Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Tinnitus / September 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

LLLT treatment for tinnitus

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Carl - 10 Aug 2006 21:30 GMT
Hi -- I'm a newbie that's been lurking for a few months. I'm wondering if
anyone in this group has knowledge or experience with LLLT (Low Level Laser
Therapy) for tinnitus. Apparently this has been a well developed method in
Eastern Europe for a couple of decades, however I wasn't able to find any
mainstream (Lancet, etc.,) reviews of the research.  Any help with this??

Carl
Susan - 10 Aug 2006 22:36 GMT
> Hi -- I'm a newbie that's been lurking for a few months. I'm wondering if
> anyone in this group has knowledge or experience with LLLT (Low Level Laser
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Carl

You might try googling up posts from past years when it was discussed.

I can't recall anyone reporting a benefit, but that doesn't mean it
never happened.

Susan
Carl - 10 Aug 2006 23:22 GMT
Thanks, Susan ... I did some googling as suggested. This link is the best
info I could find
http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:2k_3Ut7AMYIJ:p080.ezboard.com/ftinnitussupp
ort92262frm39.showMessage%3FtopicID%3D717.topic+alt.support.tinnitus+LLLT&hl=en&
gl=ca&ct=clnk&cd=5
.
Seems that results were negative to middling, depending on who is reporting.
Carl

> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> Susan
Martin Smith - 10 Aug 2006 22:48 GMT
> Hi -- I'm a newbie that's been lurking for a few months. I'm wondering if
> anyone in this group has knowledge or experience with LLLT (Low Level Laser
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Carl

What do they do, point the laser into your ear?
Carl - 10 Aug 2006 22:59 GMT
Yes ... more or less. They irradiate the mastoid area (over the cochlea)
and also the middle ear (I think). Here are a couple of web pages describing
it ... since I'm thousands of miles from either clinic, it's only dreaming I
guess (if it works I'd be happy to travel).
http://www.tinnitus.us/treatmentoftinnitus.html
http://www.dr-wilden.de/en/index.html

>> Hi -- I'm a newbie that's been lurking for a few months. I'm wondering if
>> anyone in this group has knowledge or experience with LLLT (Low Level
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> What do they do, point the laser into your ear?
Skycloud - 12 Aug 2006 15:54 GMT
>  Yes ... more or less. They irradiate the mastoid area (over the cochlea)
> and also the middle ear (I think). Here are a couple of web pages
> describing it ... since I'm thousands of miles from either clinic, it's
> only dreaming I guess (if it works I'd be happy to travel).
> http://www.tinnitus.us/treatmentoftinnitus.html
> http://www.dr-wilden.de/en/index.html

No need to travel. Go to your local bicycle shop. Buy a cheap
battery-operated red rear lamp.  Now switch it on and shine it into your
ears!  This will have exactly the same effect as "laser therapy" and is so
much cheaper...

Steve
Murray Grossan - 12 Aug 2006 17:12 GMT
On 8/12/06 7:54 AM, in article 4k68d4FalfftU1@individual.net, "Skycloud"
<me@privacy.net> wrote:

> No need to travel. Go to your local bicycle shop. Buy a cheap
> battery-operated red rear lamp.  Now switch it on and shine it into your
> ears!  This will have exactly the same effect as "laser therapy" and is so
> much cheaper...
>
> Steve

Great idea Steve. I am going out and buying these red rear lamps. I will
then set up franchises for treating with these lamps. All you really need is
a good web site. However I think I will start small with only 1,000 of these
clinics to begin with.
Thanks for the tip.

We have used laser to put a hole through the ear drum. But  we make sure
that none of the "heat" gets to the inner ear where it could do damage.
Geo - 17 Aug 2006 02:53 GMT
> Hi -- I'm a newbie that's been lurking for a few months. I'm wondering if
> anyone in this group has knowledge or experience with LLLT (Low Level Laser
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Carl

Carl, I am in Myrtle Beach right now seeing the group at
http://curaelase.com/ for tinnitus and a separate leg ailment.  The
pain associated with the leg ailment is gone after three treatments.
That alone has been worth the time there.  The tinnitus has yet to see
any improvement, but I will continue with the treatment until I leave
in  a few days.  I guess time will tell if it ends up working and I
will report the results as I go along.

What you describe in terms of how it is treated is correct.  The
physicians point the laser towards the cochlea and surrounding areas to
assure a maximum coverage.

So, the jury is still out on the tinnitus.  However, I can assure the
doubters elsewhere in this thread that it works for other ailments.
Martin Smith - 17 Aug 2006 06:15 GMT
> > Hi -- I'm a newbie that's been lurking for a few months. I'm wondering if
> > anyone in this group has knowledge or experience with LLLT (Low Level Laser
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> So, the jury is still out on the tinnitus.  However, I can assure the
> doubters elsewhere in this thread that it works for other ailments.

How does it work?
Geo - 17 Aug 2006 15:16 GMT
I am not exactly sure about the science behind it.  Apparently, the
laser penetrates the tissue and somehow promotes the healing or growth
of cells thereby helping to reduce pain.  What ever.  The group that I
am seeing is having some success with this.
Martin Smith - 17 Aug 2006 15:39 GMT
> I am not exactly sure about the science behind it.  Apparently, the
> laser penetrates the tissue and somehow promotes the healing or growth
> of cells thereby helping to reduce pain.  What ever.  The group that I
> am seeing is having some success with this.

I can imagine it causes calcium deposits to break down, but that
requires penetration of the skin, as you say, and that means burning. I
think the only difference between laser light and regular light of the
same frequency is that the photons of the laser light are emitted in
nearly perfectly parallel rays, so the total energy striking the surface
they hit is much higher.
Skycloud - 17 Aug 2006 09:49 GMT
> So, the jury is still out on the tinnitus.  However, I can assure the
> doubters elsewhere in this thread that it works for other ailments.

Okay I believe you.  Then why not save some money and do the whole thing
yourself at home with a bicycle lamp ?

Are there any studies which have definitely established coherent (laser)
light does something that incoherent (lamp) light does not?

Steve
Geo - 17 Aug 2006 15:25 GMT
> Okay I believe you.  Then why not save some money and do the whole thing
> yourself at home with a bicycle lamp ?
>
> Are there any studies which have definitely established coherent (laser)
> light does somethin

I don't know.  I presume there are studies on this.  I doubt a doctor
would spend 100,000 dollars plus on medical lasers when they could use
a regular lamps, as you suggest.
Martin Smith - 17 Aug 2006 15:35 GMT
> > Okay I believe you.  Then why not save some money and do the whole thing
> > yourself at home with a bicycle lamp ?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> would spend 100,000 dollars plus on medical lasers when they could use
> a regular lamps, as you suggest.

I think medical lasers actually burn stuff or act as a catalyst for
cohesive chemistry. I know my eye surgeon actually burned off parts of
my corneas. Now I can see the Apollo moon landing site. And my dentist
uses a laser to cause fillings to harden.

So I would expect pointing a laser into your ear would have to destroy
something to make a change, or it would do nothing at all.
Skycloud - 17 Aug 2006 17:55 GMT
> I don't know.  I presume there are studies on this.  I doubt a doctor
> would spend 100,000 dollars plus on medical lasers when they could use
> a regular lamps, as you suggest.

I shall await to see these studies - I have a feeling I'll be waiting for
quite a while...

I would think that the use of regular lamps wouldn't command such a market
premium; after all they don't sound as exotic as 'lasers' - even if they did
exactly the same thing.

Fancy technology, fancy web sites, fancy consulting rooms, fancy bedside
manner, and a fancy price... these all build up the credibility of the
'treatment' in the mind of the patient/victim. And anyway, once I've paid
say $1000 for something, I have a vested interest in believing it works.

However I admit all this fancy stuff also increases the placebo effect - and
placebo can indeed work wonders in cases of tinnitus.

Steve
Carl - 19 Aug 2006 18:58 GMT
Thanks for jumping in GEO -- I knew someone HAD to be using this technique
to justify all the write-ups.

To partially respond to questions about how it works -- I believe the answer
is still out, just as for ultrasound and physiotherapy, although the
proposed theory is one of deep heating, but at non-destructive
temperatures -- the same way as your body kills off rhino-viruses by
plugging your nose and elevating the localized temperature. With the laser
treatment (and moderate warming) of the cochlea, it's thought that some
'hair' rejuvenation is triggered.

Please keep us up to date GEO ... I understand that benefits continue
accruing for 3 - 6 months after treatment??

Carl

>> Hi -- I'm a newbie that's been lurking for a few months. I'm wondering if
>> anyone in this group has knowledge or experience with LLLT (Low Level
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> So, the jury is still out on the tinnitus.  However, I can assure the
> doubters elsewhere in this thread that it works for other ailments.
Skycloud - 19 Aug 2006 19:48 GMT
> Thanks for jumping in GEO -- I knew someone HAD to be using this technique
> to justify all the write-ups.
>
> To partially respond to questions about how it works --

But *does* it work?  Where's the hard evidence?

>I believe the answer is still out, just as for ultrasound and
>physiotherapy, although the proposed theory is one of deep heating, but at
>non-destructive temperatures --

Okay, let's say it works. But if its a penetrating heating effect you're
after, red light from a bicycle lamp bulb would actually work better because
most of its radiation is already in infra-red (heat) form anyway, unlike
that from a laser...

Steve
Geo - 20 Aug 2006 15:11 GMT
> > Thanks for jumping in GEO -- I knew someone HAD to be using this technique
> > to justify all the write-ups.
> >
> > To partially respond to questions about how it works --
>
> But *does* it work?  Where's the hard evidence?

Skycloud, I've been looking around a bit and found this site
(laserworld.org) for some information out there.  As I've said before,
I have not noticed an immediate improvement in my tinnitus.  Time will
tell I guess because the treatments can apparently have a prolonged
healing effect that goes beyond the last treatment.  What I have
noticed is that it definitely helped on my (formerly) broken/dislocated
foot/ankle.  The discomfort I had is gone.  I don't need to do that any
longer.  I also know several people that have been treated for ailments
such as shoulder, hand, back and facial nerve pain.  They have seen
significant improvements.  My word may not constitute hard evidence for
you, but that's what I have seen, and experienced, so far.

So, my immediate impression is this: the treatment works more for
immediate actual pain, as opposed to lingering non-painful conditions
like tinnitus, which doesn't really involve pain, but annoyance.  If my
tinnitus condition improves I will certainly notify the forum.

> >I believe the answer is still out, just as for ultrasound and
> >physiotherapy, although the proposed theory is one of deep heating, but at
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Steve
Skycloud - 20 Aug 2006 19:33 GMT
> So, my immediate impression is this: the treatment works more for
> immediate actual pain, as opposed to lingering non-painful conditions
> like tinnitus, which doesn't really involve pain, but annoyance.  If my
> tinnitus condition improves I will certainly notify the forum.

Well this is good news, even if it doesn't work for tinnitus.  Had you
thought of trying a simple heat lamp though?  This might have been more
effective than a laser for your pain conditions.   I had heat treatment
years ago, to help a prolapsed disc in my back.

I'm a relative newbie to tinnitus (three years) but in that time it's
certainly educated me as to the sheer level of quackery and wishful thinking
out there.

Steve
Geo - 21 Aug 2006 03:39 GMT
> > So, my immediate impression is this: the treatment works more for
> > immediate actual pain, as opposed to lingering non-painful conditions
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> certainly educated me as to the sheer level of quackery and wishful thinking
> out there.

When it comes to the treatment of tinnitus there's no doubt as to the
quackery out there.  Like you, I have researched it, and through this
forum have discovered that there are plenty of snake oil schemes out
there.  I've been living with tinnitus for over 18 years so I've pretty
much seen it all.  Why I tried laser is that it is used by MD's.  They
have much more at stake and more to lose than, say, some Joe Blow
selling some "natural" remedy.  Not to say that there aren't quack
doctors out there.  That said, I went in to this not expecting as much
for the ringing in the ears as I did alleviating pain in my foot mainly
because I was familiar with the success on actual pain as opposed to
tinnitus.

I never considered a heat lamp because the laser isn't just the use of
a penetrating heat, but also a particular wave of light entering the
affected area and having some kind of healing effect at the cellular
level.  I wish I understood the science about this more.  Hopefully,
research and studies will become more widespread and some
determinations can be made.  LLLT is fairly new in practice.  Although
it's approved by the FDA I am not aware of insurance companies paying
for it yet.  I guess we just have to take a wait and see approach.

If you find any more information about lasers please post it for the
forum.

> Steve
IMO - 15 Sep 2006 12:04 GMT
> > > So, my immediate impression is this: the treatment works more for
> > > immediate actual pain, as opposed to lingering non-painful conditions
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> > Steve

SOunds to me like you are talking about the "Tinnitool" soft laser
device developed by this swiss company.  You can buy it at
www.audiorelief.com.. It costs £195 but there is money back guarantee
on that.  It doesnt work for everyone but about 70% of people do see
some or alot of improvement on their T.  I been to other forums where
some people say it did work, but some said it didnt, so its really hit
and miss.

Good luck.

IMO

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.