> To quote the site:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> stimulus. Once again we see posh presentation and smooth words trying to
> pull the wool over the eyes of desperate people.
I agree, but the two waves don't really cancel each other out in the
sense of stopping the wave. They are actually both there; both hit the
ear, but because one is phase shifted, the two waves have opposite
affects in the brain.
In the case of tinnitus, there is only one wave from the noise
generating device. The tinnitus noise is just the effect in the brain.
So, the wearer of the device could manipulate the tuning dial until he
finds a wave whose effect in his brain cancels the tinnitus noise.
> As for the results cited.... certainly, exposure to tones can reduce or
> cancel tinnitus for a while. But this is due to the well known effect of
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> pitch difference in the two ears (in cases of binaural tinnitus) ? I hope
> they check all this...
I assume the patient just puts the device on and fiddles with the
control until he finds the right setting.
> Oh yes, and what about a ballpark figure for costs?
>
> Steve
Skycloud - 25 Jul 2006 22:52 GMT
Hi Martin,
> I agree, but the two waves don't really cancel each other out in the
> sense of stopping the wave. They are actually both there; both hit the
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> So, the wearer of the device could manipulate the tuning dial until he
> finds a wave whose effect in his brain cancels the tinnitus noise.
Right. The question is "which effect is achieving this... is it residual
inhibition ... or phase cancellation ?"
With residual inhibition, the tuning for such a device is not critical (I've
tried it). When the interfering tone is in the general vicinity of the
tinnitus frequency it has the greatest effect.
(a) But if phase cancellation is at work, we would expect to hear a
'warbling' (beat) effect as we approached the tinnitus frequency. This
'warble' would become slower and slower and eventually stop when we exactly
matched the tinnitus frequency.
I did look for, and found no evidence for this warble/beat effect when
trying a sound generator with my own tinnitus. And this should not be
surprising; see (b) below...
It's worth remembering too that many peoples' tinnitus is not a single tone
but a compound tone (further complicated by the interaural pitch difference,
when present). Effective phase cancellation would then become a very complex
matter.
(b) It's true our ear/brain system can indeed distinguish between incoming
_stereo_ sounds which are in phase or in antiphase. However sounds entering
the ear/brain system in antiphase do _not_ cancel out to silence, they just
sound 'different' (hard to describe unless you've heard it but useful to
know when you're phasing up loudspeakers!). This would indicate that the
effect of trying to cancel tinnitus with another antiphased tone might not
be so straightforward either.
Of course actual sound waves out in the outside world _can_ cancel out to
silence when in they meet in antiphase. But we are considering here what the
ear/brain system makes of antiphased signals, not what happens according to
physics in the outside world.
So, my view:
1) At least for stereo sounds, antiphasing just doesn't produce silence in
the ear/brain. Instead things sound 'strange'.
2) I know of no evidence of any 'beat' effect against tinnitus produced
internally by the ear/brain. Such an effect would be observed first if true
phase cancellation to silence were possible. Even if it were, it would
then be incredibly hard to maintain this phase relationship with the high
(and often multiple) tinnitus frequencies.
Steve
Enno Borgsteede - 26 Jul 2006 00:26 GMT
Hi Martin,
> In the case of tinnitus, there is only one wave from the noise
> generating device. The tinnitus noise is just the effect in the brain.
> So, the wearer of the device could manipulate the tuning dial until he
> finds a wave whose effect in his brain cancels the tinnitus noise.
This would be true if the brain had a sense of phase, but I sincerely
doubt if such a sense is there. There is a sense of frequency and time,
but that's not enough to do any canceling. The brain's not fast enough
for that, IMO.
cheers,
Enno
Jim Chinnis - 26 Jul 2006 01:26 GMT
Enno Borgsteede <ennoborg@gmail.com> wrote in part:
>Hi Martin,
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Enno
The brain does encode phase information on lower frequencies. Unfortunately,
unlike sound pressures, all nerve impulses are of the same polarity. Adding
a stimulation may create more nerve impulses or time-shift impulses, but it
cannot cancel them.

Signature
Jim Chinnis / Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Want to discuss Meniere's? See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MenieresDG
Martin Smith - 26 Jul 2006 05:51 GMT
> Enno Borgsteede <ennoborg@gmail.com> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> a stimulation may create more nerve impulses or time-shift impulses, but it
> cannot cancel them.
I suspect the best that a noise canceling device could do would be to
disintegrate the tinnitus "sound" into white noise. But that would
probably be an improvement.
> To quote the site:
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Oh yes, and what about a ballpark figure for costs?
The cost is about 4,000 dollars. I went for a check up in an ENT
office in the city of Vancouver. That lady doctor did not even bother
to check out if there was anything wrong with my ear but if there was
anything that could have caused it. She just went ahead to sell me the
sound cancelling device. I suppose one of these days ENT doctor
service would be available in e-Bay.
> Steve