> > > Did I in my post suggest patients should forget about addictive drugs
> > > but go for "acupuncture or hyperbaric treatments"? You are putting your
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> for general reference to what i intend to say. It is just *you* and
> you are no authority!
Yes, that's right, but the clear implication of your messages is that
western doctors are dummies and alternative medicine and herbalists
should be tried first.
> > Here is an example:
> >
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> should be tried first". YOu are just trying to say something for the
> sake of saying it.
Medical school graduates are doctors. You're saying western doctors are
so dumb they don't even understand English.
> > College students and medical school graduates are well able to
> > understand English.
>
> Not necessarily.
Yes, they do. You can't graduate from a medical school where all the
classes are taught in English if you don't understand English.
> Last year i was in a Chinese school that employed 11
> college graduates from the US as English teachers. It turned out that
> their written English is worse than the local Chinese teachers' while
> their American language is superior to the latter's.
You'll have parse that for me. apparently, I can't understand your
English. What does it have to do with doctors?
> > Now you are recommending betahistine, but it isn't cheap and it has not
> > been shown to be effective.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I have tried it and it is in popular demand by tinnitus patients.
> Forget about the micky mouse studies you read.
That's another example. Your clear implication is that western science
is wrong.
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 24 Jul 2006 16:47 GMT
> > > > Did I in my post suggest patients should forget about addictive drugs
> > > > but go for "acupuncture or hyperbaric treatments"? You are putting your
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> western doctors are dummies and alternative medicine and herbalists
> should be tried first.
The clear "implication" is that you have a good command of
wherever-you-are language but a poor command of English.
> > > Here is an example:
> > >
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Medical school graduates are doctors. You're saying western doctors are
> so dumb they don't even understand English.
Does the intellectual inferiority of one person represent the quality
of the whole group? That you Martin is very dumb does not mean the
people in where you live are also very dumb.
> > > College students and medical school graduates are well able to
> > > understand English.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Yes, they do. You can't graduate from a medical school where all the
> classes are taught in English if you don't understand English.
They can understand English much as engineers understand the English
description related to engineering but this does not mean they are
able to do as well in subjects outside their own profession.
> > Last year i was in a Chinese school that employed 11
> > college graduates from the US as English teachers. It turned out that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> You'll have parse that for me. apparently, I can't understand your
> English. What does it have to do with doctors?
It tells you not all college graduates are good in English. The US
college graduates in general are good in American language but not
English.
> > > Now you are recommending betahistine, but it isn't cheap and it has not
> > > been shown to be effective.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> That's another example. Your clear implication is that western science
> is wrong.
This example shows not all studies are valid in light of clinical
experiences but it does not implicate "that western science is wrong"
in your sweeping generalization. Your English may be good but your
mind is not sophisticated enough.
Martin Smith - 24 Jul 2006 18:25 GMT
> > > > > Did I in my post suggest patients should forget about addictive drugs
> > > > > but go for "acupuncture or hyperbaric treatments"? You are putting
[quoted text clipped - 57 lines]
> college graduates in general are good in American language but not
> English.
I can see why you would say that, but no one else here is supporting
your position on how best to deal with tinnitus. Your defense of your
position consists mainly of claiming the people who disagree with you
don't understand English.
> > > > Now you are recommending betahistine, but it isn't cheap and it has not
> > > > been shown to be effective.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> in your sweeping generalization. Your English may be good but your
> mind is not sophisticated enough.
You wrote "Forget about the micky mouse studies you read." The clear
implication of that English statement is that western science is wrong.
One of us truly does not understand English.
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 25 Jul 2006 12:07 GMT
snipped...
> I can see why you would say that, but no one else here is supporting
> your position on how best to deal with tinnitus.
(1)Have you done a survey as to "No one here"?
(2)Is the absence of anyone here a medical authority?
(3)You are speaking like a British islander in HK who needs to pull
'others' as a way to reinforce one'e view.
Your defense of your
> position consists mainly of claiming the people who disagree with you
> don't understand English.
No, if that were true, i would not have cited medical examples. When
people are reply with something totally irrelevant to what is being
posted, it draws into question their level of English and intellectual
comprehension.
> > > > > Now you are recommending betahistine, but it isn't cheap and it has not
> > > > > been shown to be effective.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> You wrote "Forget about the micky mouse studies you read." The clear
> implication of that English statement is that western science is wrong.
(1)Is "micky mouse studies" tentamount to western science being wrong?
(2)Does western science consist of all micky mouse studies?
> One of us truly does not understand English.
Both of us understand English but understanding English is not enough.
You need to be more intellectually sophisticated than just simply
throwing out some words.
Martin Smith - 25 Jul 2006 14:50 GMT
> snipped...
> >
> > I can see why you would say that, but no one else here is supporting
> > your position on how best to deal with tinnitus.
>
> (1)Have you done a survey as to "No one here"?
Yes, I have been following the board for several months. No one supports
your position.
> (2)Is the absence of anyone here a medical authority?
You'll have to parse that one for me, please, because it doesn't look
like correct English to me.
> (3)You are speaking like a British islander in HK who needs to pull
> 'others' as a way to reinforce one'e view.
Ok, but that doesn't invalidate anything I wrote. You can call me
whatever names you want.
> Your defense of your
> > position consists mainly of claiming the people who disagree with you
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> posted, it draws into question their level of English and intellectual
> comprehension.
Maybe, but I didn't do what you accuse me of doing, and the general
message that runs through your posts is clearly that you don't like
western medicine and you think western doctors are dummies.
> > > > > > Now you are recommending betahistine, but it isn't cheap and it has
> > > > > > not
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> (1)Is "micky mouse studies" tentamount to western science being wrong?
> (2)Does western science consist of all micky mouse studies?
Those are both Hobson's choices. Deceitful of you. The answer is clearly
no on both, but neither question is relevant. The general message in
your posts is that you mean the answer to both is yes.
> > One of us truly does not understand English.
>
> Both of us understand English but understanding English is not enough.
> You need to be more intellectually sophisticated than just simply
> throwing out some words.
I'm a very smart guy.
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 26 Jul 2006 02:41 GMT
snipped...
> Maybe, but I didn't do what you accuse me of doing, and the general
> message that runs through your posts is clearly that you don't like
> western medicine and you think western doctors are dummies.
I am not sure about the western doctors _in general_, as your sweeping
generation encompasses, but i do think some western doctors here in alt
are pretty dumb!
> I'm a very smart guy.
I am not sure about this too but you do appear to have a lot of time
like i have.
Martin Smith - 26 Jul 2006 05:52 GMT
> snipped...
> > Maybe, but I didn't do what you accuse me of doing, and the general
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> I am not sure about this too but you do appear to have a lot of time
> like i have.
I don't have a lot of time. I am about to become unemployed, so I am
trying to find a job. It looks like I will be moving to Australia.
fyfpoon@gmail.com - 26 Jul 2006 16:15 GMT
> > snipped...
> > > Maybe, but I didn't do what you accuse me of doing, and the general
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I don't have a lot of time. I am about to become unemployed, so I am
> trying to find a job. It looks like I will be moving to Australia.
Where are you living right now? Australia is too dry and too
socialist. Go to the US or the eastern part of Canada.
Martin Smith - 26 Jul 2006 17:04 GMT
> > > snipped...
> > > > Maybe, but I didn't do what you accuse me of doing, and the general
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Where are you living right now? Australia is too dry and too
> socialist. Go to the US or the eastern part of Canada.
I'm in Norway, and I have lived in Australia before. Neither Norway nor
Australia is any more socialist than the US, which is to say they are
all three capitalist. I think both Norway and Australia have better
health care systems. Coincidentally, both have universal public health
care.