Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Tinnitus / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Prevalence of noise induced hearing loss

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Susan - 15 Feb 2006 22:30 GMT
 Med Pr. 2001;52(5):305-13.     Related Articles, Links

    [Tinnitus in noise-induced hearing impairment]

    [Article in Polish]

    Kowalska S, Sulkowski W.

    Samodzielna Pracownia Otolaryngologii i Audiologii Instytut
Medycyny Pracy, Lodz.

    The analysis of the epidemiological data indicates that exposure to
noise is widespread and it is one of the most common causes of tinnitus,
estimated at about 20.7% according to Hazell; 28% according to Axelsson;
and 42% according to Palmer. Bearing in mind the scantiness of reliable
data on the incidence and nature of tinnitus in persons exposed to
industrial noise, and especially the need for the objectivity of this
subjective symptom, the authors have decided to undertake the study
aimed at assessing the interrelation between tinnitus, the magnitude and
kind of hearing impairment, and otoacoustic emission. The study group
included 191 persons aged 42.5 +/- 7.6 years (range, 25 to 65),
occupationally exposed to noise at the levels of 88-92 dB(A) for 26.9
+/- 4.6 years (range, 9 to 30) who had reported hearing disorders and
tinnitus. The control group, matched by similar age and duration of
employment, consisted of 80 persons with perceptive hearing impairment
induced by industrial noise who had not complained of tinnitus. *The
results of the study revealed that in 59.7% of the study subjects, noise
proved to be one of the most probable factors responsible for the
development of tinnitus.* The presence of tinnitus was found in 22.5%
and in 46% of the study subjects after 10 years and 11-20 years of noise
exposure, respectively. In 95.8% of workers, tinnitus was associated
with hearing loss, and only in 4.2% of cases it occurred in ears with
normal hearing. In persons exposed to noise, tinnitus was most
frequently (59.2%) bilateral and permanent. Following the audiologic
examinations, verified by objective audiometry (tympanometry, ABR),
cochlear hearing impairment was found in 68.6%; retrochochlear in 8.37%;
mixed and other forms of impairment, e.g. presbyacousis, in 19.4% of
subjects. The audiologic assessment of tinnitus demonstrated that in
62.3% of persons, tinnitus occurred at high frequencies and correlated
with the magnitude of hearing impairment in the tonal audiogram. The
tinnitus intensity ranged between 10-15 dB and 45 dB. *In 40.3% of those
under study, noise was not the only tinnitus-risk factor. In this group
of persons, the presence of predisposing diseases was also observed,
e.g. hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis, disturbed lipid metabolism
and other etiologic factors that might have impact on the tinnitus
incidence, ototoxic drugs, for example.* The measurements of evoked
otoacoustic emission (EOAE and DPOAE) revealed in 58.63% of persons
significant differences (p < 0.01) in the amplitude and spectrum of EOAE
in the ears with tinnitus as compared to the ears without tinnitus with
a similar hearing threshold. Whereas in 27.74% of subjects, no
differences in the EOAE measurements in the ears with or without
tinnitus were observed. The results of DPOAE measurements showed in 62%
of subjects significant differences in DP-grams in the ears with
tinnitus as compared to the ears without tinnitus (p < 0.01).
Interestingly, the differences in measurements of both types of evoked
emissions (EOAE and DPOAE), expressed by the lowered amplitude, narrowed
spectrum, reduction of emission or its complete fading in a limited area
of high frequencies, were demonstrated in the ears with tinnitus only in
retrocochlear hearing impairment, as compared to those free from
tinnitus. The evaluation of the EOAE and DPOAE measurements seems to
prove that this method may be useful in assessing the contribution of
the cochlear mechanisms to the incidence of tinnitus and in
distinguishing between tinnitus generated in cochlea and tinnitus with
the source at other levels of the hearing organ or beyond it. Our study
failed to determine the interrelation between tinnitus and spontaneous
emissions as the emission was registered only in about 12% of persons
exposed to noise, including 2% of those with normal hearing.

    PMID: 11828843 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 Display  Show
Elly Byrne - 16 Feb 2006 19:30 GMT
It is an unproven generally accepted theory. There are many
dissertations on the subject, all of which prove nothing.

Elly.

>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 69 lines]
>
>  Display  Show

Elly Byrne
----------
The Ultimate Supertip
from Harvey Segal
http://tinyurl.com/bg7h2
Susan - 16 Feb 2006 19:33 GMT
> It is an unproven generally accepted theory. There are many
> dissertations on the subject, all of which prove nothing.

But muscle tension as a cause, not an effect is proven?

Susan
Martin Smith - 16 Feb 2006 19:45 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
>> It is an unproven generally accepted theory. There are many
>> dissertations on the subject, all of which prove nothing.
>
> But muscle tension as a cause, not an effect is proven?

No, although it isn't likely an effect. But muscle tension might also be
a symptom of the real problem, which might be muscle imbalance,
degradation of the surfaces of bones in the neck, bad posture, just
plain stress, etc.

The point is one can do something about these things. One can fix them.
One can't fix permanently damaged hairs in his inner ear, so it really
does make sense to try fixing the things you can fix before you just
accept living with the thing you can't fix just because the standard
view says the problem is that one thing.
Susan - 16 Feb 2006 19:50 GMT
> The point is one can do something about these things. One can fix them.
> One can't fix permanently damaged hairs in his inner ear, so it really
> does make sense to try fixing the things you can fix before you just
> accept living with the thing you can't fix just because the standard
> view says the problem is that one thing.

There are other correctable causes, many of which I've listed.  Further,
in those where no cause is found, often a benzodiazapene will help, or
self hypnosis, etc.

Muscle tension is very likely a cause of any stressful condition/ailment.

Susan
Martin Smith - 16 Feb 2006 20:00 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> in those where no cause is found, often a benzodiazapene will help, or
> self hypnosis, etc.

Yes, and Elly doesn't claim those causes aren't real.

Benzodiazapene have side effects, and they don't actually fix the
problem. Nor does hypnosis.

> Muscle tension is very likely a cause of any stressful condition/ailment.

I think it is the other way around.
Susan - 16 Feb 2006 20:20 GMT
> Yes, and Elly doesn't claim those causes aren't real.

She denies the prevalence, despite knowing nothing about it.

> Benzodiazapene have side effects, and they don't actually fix the
> problem. Nor does hypnosis.

If the problem is defined as the suffering, they fix it for many folks.

>> Muscle tension is very likely a cause of any stressful condition/ailment.
>
> I think it is the other way around.

Belief isn't the same as established fact.

Susan
Martin Smith - 16 Feb 2006 20:28 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
>> Yes, and Elly doesn't claim those causes aren't real.
>
> She denies the prevalence, despite knowing nothing about it.

The prevalence of what? Tick born dieases are not prevalent, let alone
the tinnitus caused by them.

>> Benzodiazapene have side effects, and they don't actually fix the
>> problem. Nor does hypnosis.
>
> If the problem is defined as the suffering, they fix it for many folks.

But you know benzodiazapenes are tranquilizers, right? Exactly the
medication a doctor might prescribe for... wait for it -- Muscle Tension!

>>> Muscle tension is very likely a cause of any stressful
>>> condition/ailment.
>>
>> I think it is the other way around.
>
> Belief isn't the same as established fact.

You aren't making much sense here. Muscle tension is a symptom of a
problem. You can treat the symptom, which is what benzodiazapenes do, or
you can find the underlying cause of the problem and fix that.
Benzodiazapenes and hypnosis don't do that.
Susan - 16 Feb 2006 20:59 GMT
> The prevalence of what? Tick born dieases are not prevalent, let alone
> the tinnitus caused by them.

Nevermind.

>>> Benzodiazapene have side effects, and they don't actually fix the
>>> problem. Nor does hypnosis.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> But you know benzodiazapenes are tranquilizers, right? Exactly the
> medication a doctor might prescribe for... wait for it -- Muscle Tension!

Or for quieting the CNS.

>>>> Muscle tension is very likely a cause of any stressful
>>>> condition/ailment.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> you can find the underlying cause of the problem and fix that.
> Benzodiazapenes and hypnosis don't do that.

Hammer meet nail.

Susan <done talking to the wall>
Elly Byrne - 17 Feb 2006 20:04 GMT
It has not been proven by the ATA and medical fraternity becuase they
don't look there.

But Assar Bjorne successfully treats his patients.
http://www.yts.se/english/index.htm

Elly.

>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Susan

Elly Byrne
----------
The Ultimate Supertip
from Harvey Segal
http://tinyurl.com/bg7h2
Susan - 17 Feb 2006 21:08 GMT
> It has not been proven by the ATA and medical fraternity becuase they
> don't look there.

At least we agree it's not proven.

Neuroborreliosis is a well proven cause of tinnitus.  So is hormone
dysregulation.

Susan

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.