Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Tinnitus / February 2006
Prevalence of noise induced hearing loss
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Susan - 15 Feb 2006 22:30 GMT Med Pr. 2001;52(5):305-13. Related Articles, Links
[Tinnitus in noise-induced hearing impairment]
[Article in Polish]
Kowalska S, Sulkowski W.
Samodzielna Pracownia Otolaryngologii i Audiologii Instytut Medycyny Pracy, Lodz.
The analysis of the epidemiological data indicates that exposure to noise is widespread and it is one of the most common causes of tinnitus, estimated at about 20.7% according to Hazell; 28% according to Axelsson; and 42% according to Palmer. Bearing in mind the scantiness of reliable data on the incidence and nature of tinnitus in persons exposed to industrial noise, and especially the need for the objectivity of this subjective symptom, the authors have decided to undertake the study aimed at assessing the interrelation between tinnitus, the magnitude and kind of hearing impairment, and otoacoustic emission. The study group included 191 persons aged 42.5 +/- 7.6 years (range, 25 to 65), occupationally exposed to noise at the levels of 88-92 dB(A) for 26.9 +/- 4.6 years (range, 9 to 30) who had reported hearing disorders and tinnitus. The control group, matched by similar age and duration of employment, consisted of 80 persons with perceptive hearing impairment induced by industrial noise who had not complained of tinnitus. *The results of the study revealed that in 59.7% of the study subjects, noise proved to be one of the most probable factors responsible for the development of tinnitus.* The presence of tinnitus was found in 22.5% and in 46% of the study subjects after 10 years and 11-20 years of noise exposure, respectively. In 95.8% of workers, tinnitus was associated with hearing loss, and only in 4.2% of cases it occurred in ears with normal hearing. In persons exposed to noise, tinnitus was most frequently (59.2%) bilateral and permanent. Following the audiologic examinations, verified by objective audiometry (tympanometry, ABR), cochlear hearing impairment was found in 68.6%; retrochochlear in 8.37%; mixed and other forms of impairment, e.g. presbyacousis, in 19.4% of subjects. The audiologic assessment of tinnitus demonstrated that in 62.3% of persons, tinnitus occurred at high frequencies and correlated with the magnitude of hearing impairment in the tonal audiogram. The tinnitus intensity ranged between 10-15 dB and 45 dB. *In 40.3% of those under study, noise was not the only tinnitus-risk factor. In this group of persons, the presence of predisposing diseases was also observed, e.g. hypertension, diabetes, atherosclerosis, disturbed lipid metabolism and other etiologic factors that might have impact on the tinnitus incidence, ototoxic drugs, for example.* The measurements of evoked otoacoustic emission (EOAE and DPOAE) revealed in 58.63% of persons significant differences (p < 0.01) in the amplitude and spectrum of EOAE in the ears with tinnitus as compared to the ears without tinnitus with a similar hearing threshold. Whereas in 27.74% of subjects, no differences in the EOAE measurements in the ears with or without tinnitus were observed. The results of DPOAE measurements showed in 62% of subjects significant differences in DP-grams in the ears with tinnitus as compared to the ears without tinnitus (p < 0.01). Interestingly, the differences in measurements of both types of evoked emissions (EOAE and DPOAE), expressed by the lowered amplitude, narrowed spectrum, reduction of emission or its complete fading in a limited area of high frequencies, were demonstrated in the ears with tinnitus only in retrocochlear hearing impairment, as compared to those free from tinnitus. The evaluation of the EOAE and DPOAE measurements seems to prove that this method may be useful in assessing the contribution of the cochlear mechanisms to the incidence of tinnitus and in distinguishing between tinnitus generated in cochlea and tinnitus with the source at other levels of the hearing organ or beyond it. Our study failed to determine the interrelation between tinnitus and spontaneous emissions as the emission was registered only in about 12% of persons exposed to noise, including 2% of those with normal hearing.
PMID: 11828843 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Display Show
Elly Byrne - 16 Feb 2006 19:30 GMT It is an unproven generally accepted theory. There are many dissertations on the subject, all of which prove nothing.
Elly.
>x-no-archive: yes > [quoted text clipped - 69 lines] > > Display Show Elly Byrne ---------- The Ultimate Supertip from Harvey Segal http://tinyurl.com/bg7h2
Susan - 16 Feb 2006 19:33 GMT > It is an unproven generally accepted theory. There are many > dissertations on the subject, all of which prove nothing. But muscle tension as a cause, not an effect is proven?
Susan
Martin Smith - 16 Feb 2006 19:45 GMT > x-no-archive: yes > >> It is an unproven generally accepted theory. There are many >> dissertations on the subject, all of which prove nothing. > > But muscle tension as a cause, not an effect is proven? No, although it isn't likely an effect. But muscle tension might also be a symptom of the real problem, which might be muscle imbalance, degradation of the surfaces of bones in the neck, bad posture, just plain stress, etc.
The point is one can do something about these things. One can fix them. One can't fix permanently damaged hairs in his inner ear, so it really does make sense to try fixing the things you can fix before you just accept living with the thing you can't fix just because the standard view says the problem is that one thing.
Susan - 16 Feb 2006 19:50 GMT > The point is one can do something about these things. One can fix them. > One can't fix permanently damaged hairs in his inner ear, so it really > does make sense to try fixing the things you can fix before you just > accept living with the thing you can't fix just because the standard > view says the problem is that one thing. There are other correctable causes, many of which I've listed. Further, in those where no cause is found, often a benzodiazapene will help, or self hypnosis, etc.
Muscle tension is very likely a cause of any stressful condition/ailment.
Susan
Martin Smith - 16 Feb 2006 20:00 GMT > x-no-archive: yes > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > in those where no cause is found, often a benzodiazapene will help, or > self hypnosis, etc. Yes, and Elly doesn't claim those causes aren't real.
Benzodiazapene have side effects, and they don't actually fix the problem. Nor does hypnosis.
> Muscle tension is very likely a cause of any stressful condition/ailment. I think it is the other way around.
Susan - 16 Feb 2006 20:20 GMT > Yes, and Elly doesn't claim those causes aren't real. She denies the prevalence, despite knowing nothing about it.
> Benzodiazapene have side effects, and they don't actually fix the > problem. Nor does hypnosis. If the problem is defined as the suffering, they fix it for many folks.
>> Muscle tension is very likely a cause of any stressful condition/ailment. > > I think it is the other way around. Belief isn't the same as established fact.
Susan
Martin Smith - 16 Feb 2006 20:28 GMT > x-no-archive: yes > >> Yes, and Elly doesn't claim those causes aren't real. > > She denies the prevalence, despite knowing nothing about it. The prevalence of what? Tick born dieases are not prevalent, let alone the tinnitus caused by them.
>> Benzodiazapene have side effects, and they don't actually fix the >> problem. Nor does hypnosis. > > If the problem is defined as the suffering, they fix it for many folks. But you know benzodiazapenes are tranquilizers, right? Exactly the medication a doctor might prescribe for... wait for it -- Muscle Tension!
>>> Muscle tension is very likely a cause of any stressful >>> condition/ailment. >> >> I think it is the other way around. > > Belief isn't the same as established fact. You aren't making much sense here. Muscle tension is a symptom of a problem. You can treat the symptom, which is what benzodiazapenes do, or you can find the underlying cause of the problem and fix that. Benzodiazapenes and hypnosis don't do that.
Susan - 16 Feb 2006 20:59 GMT > The prevalence of what? Tick born dieases are not prevalent, let alone > the tinnitus caused by them. Nevermind.
>>> Benzodiazapene have side effects, and they don't actually fix the >>> problem. Nor does hypnosis. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > But you know benzodiazapenes are tranquilizers, right? Exactly the > medication a doctor might prescribe for... wait for it -- Muscle Tension! Or for quieting the CNS.
>>>> Muscle tension is very likely a cause of any stressful >>>> condition/ailment. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > you can find the underlying cause of the problem and fix that. > Benzodiazapenes and hypnosis don't do that. Hammer meet nail.
Susan <done talking to the wall>
Elly Byrne - 17 Feb 2006 20:04 GMT It has not been proven by the ATA and medical fraternity becuase they don't look there.
But Assar Bjorne successfully treats his patients. http://www.yts.se/english/index.htm
Elly.
>x-no-archive: yes > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Susan Elly Byrne ---------- The Ultimate Supertip from Harvey Segal http://tinyurl.com/bg7h2
Susan - 17 Feb 2006 21:08 GMT > It has not been proven by the ATA and medical fraternity becuase they > don't look there. At least we agree it's not proven.
Neuroborreliosis is a well proven cause of tinnitus. So is hormone dysregulation.
Susan
|
|
|