Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Tinnitus / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Which kind of controlled study should we subscribe to?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
fyfpoon@hotmail.com - 04 Apr 2005 22:32 GMT
The following is from the link:

http://www.internethealthlibrary.com/Health-problems/Tinnitus%20-%20researchAltT
herapies.htm#Acupuncture


"There are also controlled research studies which have concluded that
acupuncture is a "valuable therapeutic alternative in tinnitus"(3).

snipped...

(3)Acupuncture for tinnitus management. Nilsson S; Axelsson A; Li De G
Department of Audiology, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.Scand
Audiol (SWEDEN) 1992, 21 (4) p245-51 [Acupuncture is a valuable
therapeutic alternative in tinnitus] Akupunktur vardefullt
behandlingsalternativ vid tinnitus. Lindholm S; Berg S; Larsson B;
Hybbinette JC Avdelningslakare, lanssjukhuset i Kalmar. Lakartidningen
(SWEDEN) Mar 6 1991, 88 (10) p847-9
======================================
So is this kind of 'controlled' study about as good as the ones cited
around in ast?  Which kind should I believe?  After all, all of them
are 'scientists'!

TRUTH IS INDISPUTABLE WHILE THE 'RESULT' FROM ONE STUDY OR ONE KIND OF
STUDY COULD BE CONTRADICTED BY THE 'RESULT' FROM ANOTHER OR ANOTHER
KIND OF STUDY(FP's Law).
Bill - 04 Apr 2005 22:57 GMT
> The following is from the link:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> STUDY COULD BE CONTRADICTED BY THE 'RESULT' FROM ANOTHER OR ANOTHER
> KIND OF STUDY(FP's Law).

The author makes the statement you quote above but the footnote (which you
also quote) doesn't include anything regarding a controlled study.  I'm
ready for the truth when you are, Francis.
Susan - 04 Apr 2005 23:45 GMT
> The following is from the link:
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> around in ast?  Which kind should I believe?  After all, all of them
> are 'scientists'!

Really?  What can you tell us about the controls and other variables in
place, and about how the relief was measured, since you've read it?

Susan
fyfpoon@hotmail.com - 04 Apr 2005 23:57 GMT
http://www.acupuncture.com/Research/Tinn.htm
Bill - 05 Apr 2005 00:14 GMT
> http://www.acupuncture.com/Research/Tinn.htm

Ok, then, let's take a look at the results:

"Abstract: Fifty-six patients with continuous and severe tinnitus as their
major complaint were treated with traditional Chinese acupuncture. After a
pre-treatment period with baseline evaluation of tinnitus, 10 treatments
were given during a period of 20 days, followed by a post-treatment period
in order to obtain indications of prolonged treatment effects. Assessments
were made using visual analogue scales (VAS) and a verbal retrospective
rating scale.
Three patients reported improvement which lasted for at least 10 days after
the last treatment, indicating a possible long-term effect in some cases.
Twenty-one percent of the patients reported transient intensity reductions
lasting for hours/days. Estimated 'substantial' improvement rate by VAS,
consistent for all three parameters involved (intensity, annoyance,
awareness), was 20%, while the corresponding deterioration rate was 25.
Statistical analysis of the whole group did not show any significant general
treatment effects. Interactions between treatment evaluations by verbal
rating and VAS are discussed as well as interactions with psychological
components. "

We see that 3 patients (out of 56) reported improvement which lasted for at
least 10 days after the last treatment.  We learn that there was no control
group.  We see that this was not a double blind study.  We learn that they
looked at and talked to each patient.  We learn that the 20 percent of the
patients were, by their measure, improved and 25 percent of the patients
suffered a setback.

Absent a control group, this study is meaningless.
Murray Grossan - 05 Apr 2005 04:53 GMT
On 4/4/05 4:14 PM, in article 9Tj4e.729$q3.36794@news7.onvoy.net, "Bill"

> We see that 3 patients (out of 56) reported improvement which lasted for at
> least 10 days after the last treatment.  We learn that there was no control
> group.  We see that this was not a double blind study.  We learn that they
> looked at and talked to each patient.  We learn that the 20 percent of the
> patients were, by their measure, improved and 25 percent of the patients
> suffered a setback.

Besides, Bora Bora juice comes with a money back guarantee - it is
guaranteed to be as effective as any placebo.
fyfpoon@hotmail.com - 05 Apr 2005 18:59 GMT
Dr.  Is this study good enough for patients to try acupuncture for
tinnitus after exhausting all they have found

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9
604636&dopt=Abstract


Do you have tinnitus yourself, Dr. Grossan?

Rather than continuing to intellectualize, you should go to China and
ask to be referred to a couple of top-gun acupuncturists and try it out
yourself.  Then come back and report to all of us.  Jim and Dr. Nagler
should do the same time also.

I once read the website of Dr. Nagler in which he described his
experience with acupuncture as one in which his feet were 'full of
holes'.  Well, he must have gone to visit a chinatown graduate from San
Francisco!

FP
Bill - 05 Apr 2005 20:30 GMT
> Dr.  Is this study good enough for patients to try acupuncture for
> tinnitus after exhausting all they have found
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> FP

The best way to insure your acupuncturist is doing a good job is to first go
to China with Francis and have a "top gun" insert needles in those places
that provide tinnitus relief.  Carefully mark these punctures with a
permanent tattoo mark.  Then, when you get back, just make certain whoever
treats you drives his spikes at those points.
Murray Grossan - 06 Apr 2005 05:00 GMT
On 4/5/05 10:59 AM, in article
1112723966.180253.122800@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com, "fyfpoon@hotmail.com"

> Dr.  Is this study good enough for patients to try acupuncture for
> tinnitus after exhausting all they have found
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> FP

No I don't have tinnitus myself. You can be a good obstetrician even if you
are male.

Before I can recommend something to my patients I have to be as certain as I
can be that this is the best I can recommend.  That's the only reason why
people spend their hard earned money and valuable time to visit me. If they
didn't want that they could read the internet themselves.
Remember, I am in Los Angeles and more than 1/2 my new patients have had
most of the "new age " therapies before I see them .

I think the "controlled studies " topic has been beaten to death but I do
want to point out that few of the studies measured hearing or measured
tinnitus.
I am well aware that if I tell the patients with a firm voice, "this
medicine will make you well!" that this will add considerably to the
theraputic effect. But in order to find out if the therapy is actually
working, I usually don't do this. But that way I can distinguish the placebo
from the physiological effect which certainly helps my patients.

Actually I missed my chance. I should have purchased a chinese throne,
dressed up a chinese friend in the authentic costume, put the room into soft
light and chinese music, then brought the patient in and have the chinese
expert point to the theraputic areas. Too late now.

You CAN get tinnitus relief with a rabbit's foot. Anything that lowers the
anxiety reinforcement cycle can be theraputic.
Elly Byrne - 06 Apr 2005 21:19 GMT
>I think the "controlled studies " topic has been beaten to death but I do
>want to point out that few of the studies measured hearing or measured
>tinnitus.

And not one paid any attention to the state of the neck and/or
shoulder muscles.

Elly's Tinnitus Resources
http://eebee.net/
Jim Chinnis - 05 Apr 2005 01:42 GMT
"fyfpoon@hotmail.com" <fyfpoon@hotmail.com> wrote in part:

>http://www.acupuncture.com/Research/Tinn.htm

Again, not a controlled study.
Signature

Jim Chinnis / Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Want to discuss Meniere's? See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MenieresDG

Bill - 05 Apr 2005 02:31 GMT
> "fyfpoon@hotmail.com" <fyfpoon@hotmail.com> wrote in part:
>
>>http://www.acupuncture.com/Research/Tinn.htm
>
> Again, not a controlled study.

Unless I missed something, this study suggests acupuncture does more harm
than good.
Jim Chinnis - 05 Apr 2005 02:54 GMT
"Bill" <Bill@myplace.now> wrote in part:

>> "fyfpoon@hotmail.com" <fyfpoon@hotmail.com> wrote in part:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Unless I missed something, this study suggests acupuncture does more harm
>than good.

Can't tell without a control group.
Signature

Jim Chinnis / Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Want to discuss Meniere's? See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MenieresDG

Bill - 05 Apr 2005 03:20 GMT
> "Bill" <Bill@myplace.now> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Can't tell without a control group.

Right, but didn't it say 20% got better, 25% got worse?  Not that those
numbers mean squat, but they make me wonder why anyone would point to that
study and say acupuncture works on tinnitus.
Jim Chinnis - 05 Apr 2005 03:37 GMT
"Bill" <Bill@myplace.now> wrote in part:

>> "Bill" <Bill@myplace.now> wrote in part:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>numbers mean squat, but they make me wonder why anyone would point to that
>study and say acupuncture works on tinnitus.

Yeah...and overall they say, "Statistical analysis of the whole
group did not show any significant general treatment effects."

Of course, it was also offered up here as a controlled study, I
guess, which it isn't.
Signature

Jim Chinnis / Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Want to discuss Meniere's? See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MenieresDG

Murray Grossan - 05 Apr 2005 05:02 GMT
On 4/4/05 7:37 PM, in article eau351hfq1dhatf13leikd22eriu50nek6@4ax.com,

> "Bill" <Bill@myplace.now> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> Of course, it was also offered up here as a controlled study, I
> guess, which it isn't.

Care and concern by the caregiver is always helpful to whatever ails the
patient.

In the early days of biofeedback, each researcher took pains NOT to give
personal support , encouragement, in order to determine if this therapy
really worked or was it the attention and concern of the researcher.

One of my friend did a study of a type of therapy. His results were useless
because of his real concern for his patients. Patients just felt better no
matter which therapy he applied.
Jim Chinnis - 05 Apr 2005 01:42 GMT
"fyfpoon@hotmail.com" <fyfpoon@hotmail.com> wrote in part:

>The following is from the link:
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>STUDY COULD BE CONTRADICTED BY THE 'RESULT' FROM ANOTHER OR ANOTHER
>KIND OF STUDY(FP's Law).

Truth my be indisputable, but authors can lie. There was no
control group in the "controlled study" you cite:

Scand Audiol. 1992;21(4):245-51. Related Articles, Links  

Acupuncture for tinnitus management.

Nilsson S, Axelsson A, Li De G.

Department of Audiology, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Fifty-six patients with continuous and severe tinnitus as their
major complaint were treated with traditional Chinese acupuncture.
After a pre-treatment period with baseline evaluation of tinnitus,
10 treatments were given during a period of 20 days, followed by a
post-treatment period in order to obtain indications of prolonged
treatment effects. Assessments were made using visual analogue
scales (VAS) and a verbal retrospective rating scale. Three
patients reported improvement which lasted for at least 10 days
after the last treatment, indicating a possible long-term effect
in some cases. Twenty-one percent of the patients reported
transient intensity reductions lasting for hours/days. Estimated
'substantial' improvement rate by VAS, consistent for all three
parameters involved (intensity, annoyance, awareness), was 20%,
while the corresponding deterioration rate was 25%. Statistical
analysis of the whole group did not show any significant general
treatment effects. Interactions between treatment evaluations by
verbal rating and VAS are discussed as well as interactions with
psychological components.

PMID: 1488611 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Signature

Jim Chinnis / Warrenton, Virginia, USA
Want to discuss Meniere's? See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MenieresDG

fyfpoon@hotmail.com - 05 Apr 2005 18:39 GMT
> "fyfpoon@hotmail.com" <fyfpoon@hotmail.com> wrote in part:
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Truth my be indisputable, but authors can lie. There was no
> control group in the "controlled study" you cite:

OK, Jim, I have just enough time to take you on this one.
(1)Has the author lied?  This is a dangerous assumption to make,
especially when it is done by pretigious schools.
(2)Regardless whether or not the study is 'controlled' or not
controlled by your standard, it is
nevertheless a study or a kind of study in which the reaction of the
patients is measured 'scientifically'.  Right?  And the reaction is
that some patients do have their t sound cut down! This may be a small
percentage but nevertheless there is a cause and effect relationship
there amongst these patients between acu treatment and t sound
reduction.
(3)The study uses 10 treatments in 20 days as opposed to my own
experience in which I used only ONE in a week for 6 months with 2
acupuncturists.  So the frequency of the use of this treatment is also
a point for a debate.  Perhaps the other patients that initially
reacted to acutreatment poorly might have gained more improvement if
more time had been given or might react more positively if they had
been treated with wider time intervals.  My 2 experts told me that it
is destructive to be treated day after day.

Then the question comes.  Should we take this result as a reference
benchmark to recommend patients to
try acupuncture for their tinnitus or should we tell the patients not
to try because this kind of study
is not good enough?  If I had taken the cited 'controlled' study in
ast, I would not have gone for acutreatment, and life for me would
still have been a living hell.

I would recommend other audience in ast to try acu-treatment if they
had already tried every scientific methods under the sun and had not
found them helpful at all!

FP
=============================================

> Scand Audiol. 1992;21(4):245-51. Related Articles, Links
>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Jim Chinnis / Warrenton, Virginia, USA
> Want to discuss Meniere's? See http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MenieresDG
William Nunn - 11 Apr 2005 20:40 GMT
A sham, fake treatment and the authentic treatment which are double blinded.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.