>I was jailed recently for DWI with 0.00 BAC. I think this is a case of
> false arrest or at least an opportunity to point out that the City of
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> --
> Daniel
Good questions all, HNG, but they're all answered in the details at the
link I listed at the top of the thread (http://danielnorton.com/dwi).
The officer claimed that I was going 50 in a 35 (it's possible, though
I don't generally go faster than the prevailing traffic). Then the
officer said that he smelled "the presence of alcohol" (extremely
unlikely, given a BAC of 0.00). No, no weaving or otherwise out of
control and the officers didn't mention that they saw such. I
certainly didn't need any help (and they offered none) getting in and
out of the police car while wearing handcuffs, so I really wasn't
particularly dizzy and certainly was not experiencing vertigo.
--
Daniel
Howard Gutnick - 14 Jan 2005 22:12 GMT
> Good questions all, HNG, but they're all answered in the details at the
> link I listed at the top of the thread (http://danielnorton.com/dwi).
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> --
> Daniel
Sorry but I missed the link that you cited. My concern and probably the
concern of others is that someone who is actively imbalanced/dizzy drives a
car, and so endangers him/herself or others. That person, like someone who
is experiencing seizures and isn't allowed to drive, has no business
whatsoever behind the wheel. Thanks for the clarification.
HNG
danorton@gmail.com - 14 Jan 2005 22:43 GMT
The argument that dizziness, ipso facto, makes a person unable to drive
safely is perhaps for another thread. My complaint with the APD
officers involved was for the DWI arrest, which (in Texas) would have
required a reasonable suspicion of being under the influence of drugs
(alcohol having been ruled out by breath analysis).
--
Daniel