About a year ago when I first came to this support group, the most
frequently recommended was:"there is no cure for tinnitus and the only
way (to cope with it) is habituation...".
I tried to habituate and I tried and tried.... There was NO way to
habituate a t which came with all sorts of nerve discomfort in the
head. Then I told the group. The response from the participants,
including those who are doctors themselves, was the same:"habituate
and habituate...". And there seems to be a peer group pressure in alt
that anyone who explores beyond the sheer domain of habituation was
instantly laughed at and discriminated against.
I have finally habituated my t, but _only after_ I had my the nerve
discomfort in my head taken care of first. The method used to take
care of *my* nerve discomfort was acupuncture operation or
'pseudoscience'.
Thus I am suggesting to this group to avoid the tendency of
generalization. If something worked or did not work for you, it might
or might not work for others. The person that perceives 'truth' is
the patient himself.
Against the background, I suggest that the 'single-dimensional'
question, which frequently appears on this group, such as "Does this
or that work?" should be modified into one that runs like this:"Does
this or that work for this or that person under this or that
circumstance?". The latter is more scientific and less
pseudo-scientific.
FP
Bill - 22 Nov 2004 23:33 GMT
> About a year ago when I first came to this support group, the most
> frequently recommended was:"there is no cure for tinnitus and the only
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> FP
This from someone who has recommended intravenous injections of herbs,
consumption of black beans, aspirin with ginkgo, hyperbaric chamber
treatments, sleeping without a pillow, drugs to deal with hallucinations and
acupuncture.
jganders - 23 Nov 2004 02:37 GMT
Reminder: this group is alt.support.tinnitus. the 'alt' stands for
'alternative'. Is there a sci.support.tinnitus somewhere to be found?
No. Why? I think we all know the answer to that. Harping on people
posing 'alternative' remedies for tinnitus here is like telling a
priest to stop saying prayers in the Sunday services. As an aside, I
would hope the doctors who habituate this group are here to pick up
ideas and pointers from all this random chatter. But I sometimes
wonder if some of them are here to snag a patient or two. Too bad if
true. In my opinion ng posts here by western medical doctors are no
more credible than people like Francis who have a wealth of personal
experience behind their words. (I know I've said this before but here
goes again... I'd still like to figure out how to structure all this
random ng chatter into something easier to search and analyze).
I incourage passionate ones like Mr. Poon to spill his guts here. His
thoughts might be laughable to some but to me they are much
appreciated. To me his experiences give him the right to post his
ideas here. Ok, I'm done. Let the sniping continue... :-)
Jim
Susan - 23 Nov 2004 15:16 GMT
>Reminder: this group is alt.support.tinnitus. the 'alt' stands for
>'alternative'. Is there a sci.support.tinnitus somewhere to be found?
>No. Why? I think we all know the answer to that. Harping on people
>posing 'alternative' remedies for tinnitus here is like telling a
>priest to stop saying prayers in the Sunday services.
You're right, actually. It's his ng as much as anyone's. And others are free
to disagree, if they're so inclined. I think that's fine, as long as everyone
remains respectful.
Susan
Oregon7 - 27 Nov 2004 05:52 GMT
When there is no 'cure' for some condition, who can blame people for being
brave and willing to turn over every stone in the world to see if something
helps them?
I tell people who call me, that maybe some treatment only works for 1 percent
of the people who try it, but for that one person out of 100, it is a 100
percent effect!
MJ
Susan - 27 Nov 2004 18:00 GMT
>I tell people who call me, that maybe some treatment only works for 1 percent
>of the people who try it, but for that one person out of 100, it is a 100
>percent effect!
Well, yeah, but it's a mightly expensive experiment for the other 99.
Susan