Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Tinnitus / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

combatting T with phase inverted sounds

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mantorok - 09 Oct 2004 13:56 GMT
Hello,

Well here is a litle experiment that I am trying at the moment.

I determined 1 of my T sounds to be at some 7000 hz. Now in theory, when you
invert the phase of a sound and you place an exact normal sound on top of
that you would get a reaction that makes the noise quieter.

The big problem is that the exact T frequency never stays the same, and that
you have to almost exactly match the amplitude of your T with the synthetic
sound you are creating (in programs like sound forge or so)..

I had half satisfying results in wich I caused the T in my right ear to be
more quiet .

I'd like to see if there could be a noise generator that could generate
inverted noise around a specific given frequency, so you can fine tune it to
actually have a sound that is tuned to your needs and could not only mask
your t but at the same time because of all the inversions on the specific
frequency regions, reduce it..

You'd swat 2 flies with one blow if that could be possible
Skycloud - 09 Oct 2004 15:59 GMT
--
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> You'd swat 2 flies with one blow if that could be possible

Even if it were practicable to produce a sound (or sounds) that could
maintain an accurate antiphase to the high tinnitus frequencies over a
reasonable period, and even assuming that the tinnitus signal(s) itself were
stable enough to be amenable to this treatment, IMO this would still not
work.

This is because the tinnitus is a signal in the nervous system - it's not a
'wave'.   By the time the sound signal is processed by the cochlear it's
probably not an AC signal (like that within an audio lead) but a complex
pattern of stimulation in the auditory nerve fibres.

But the tinnitus has to be a _wave_ if it is to be cancellable by another
wave.   The deadening effect you're finding from feeding in a tone is more
likely due to something else - residual inhibition. I too have been playing
with tones and have obtained useful results (at least for my own tinnitus);
see www.detinnitiser.com  if you're interested.

Cheers

Steve O
Charge it to the kids - 09 Oct 2004 17:00 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> You'd swat 2 flies with one blow if that could be possible

Most signal generators permit frequency, amplitude and phase adjustments.
The problem lies in having a sample of the T when adjusting the generator to
produce the canceling signal.  It is impossible to accurately cancel a
signal without knowing these parameters, and the T signal has never been
sampled.  I suppose you could listen to the output of such a generator,
trying to adjust it so you didn't hear either it or your tinnitus.  If it
worked at all, I suspect it would work for fleeting moments.  It is more
likely that even if you could sample the T sound in order to cancel it
variably and in real time, that sound would have been perceived well before
the cancellation took place.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.