Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Sinusitis / November 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

nasal irrigation as cause of infection?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
judy - 16 Nov 2009 21:00 GMT
I recently read a summary about a recently published article (and a
detractor) who claim that repeated irrigations may destroy mucus
protection against infection...Has anyone else read/heard of this
article?  Thoughts?
Susan - 16 Nov 2009 21:42 GMT
> I recently read a summary about a recently published article (and a
> detractor) who claim that repeated irrigations may destroy mucus
> protection against infection...Has anyone else read/heard of this
> article?  Thoughts?

Someone posted about it recently.  I suspect there's a balance where
irrigating when one needs it, but not all the time is probably best.

The sprays routinely rx'ed for sinusitis and nasal allergies cause far
more damage, both due to their active ingredients and the cilia killing
benzalkonium chloride they're preserved with, though.

Susan
Oakfed - 16 Nov 2009 23:50 GMT
judy wrote:
> I recently read a summary about a recently published article (and a
> detractor) who claim that repeated irrigations may destroy mucus
> protection against infection...Has anyone else read/heard of this
> article?  Thoughts?

The summary said that stopping routine irrigation and irrigating only
when infected dropped infections from an average of 6 a year to 3 a
year.

It could be that people who are already getting frequent infections (3
a year, anyhow) are affected differently? I have chronic sinusitis and
irrigate once daily, and it seems to help a little, but I don't get
many infections (no infections and just a couple colds in the 2 years
since a sinus surgery).

It's also possible that poor technique and/or improper cleaning of
irrigation gear are causing or spreading infections, rather than the
hypothesized mechanism of removal of protective mucus.
Susan - 17 Nov 2009 01:21 GMT
> The summary said that stopping routine irrigation and irrigating only
> when infected dropped infections from an average of 6 a year to 3 a
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> irrigation gear are causing or spreading infections, rather than the
> hypothesized mechanism of removal of protective mucus.

Folks who've been treated with steroids sprays have a problem with
tissue barrier function, BTDT.

And the irrigator hygiene issue is huge for growing pseudomonus.

I store my bottle with a bleach solution in it at all times.

Susan
Steven L. - 17 Nov 2009 17:30 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> And the irrigator hygiene issue is huge for growing pseudomonus.

This is a particular problem for the mechanical irrigators like
HydroPulse or WaterPik.  You can't keep bleach inside their mechanisms
for more than 10 minutes at a time without damaging their seals.  And
they stay wet inside all the time, a great breeding ground for microbes.

So yes, when I read the article, it seemed like they didn't control for
these factors.

Signature

Steven L.
Email:  sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

Susan - 17 Nov 2009 17:34 GMT
> This is a particular problem for the mechanical irrigators like
> HydroPulse or WaterPik.  You can't keep bleach inside their mechanisms
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> So yes, when I read the article, it seemed like they didn't control for
> these factors.

Those were my first thoughts, too.  I threw my HydroPulse in the garbage
and bought the 16oz NeilMed bottle.

Susan
Steven L. - 18 Nov 2009 01:45 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Those were my first thoughts, too.  I threw my HydroPulse in the garbage

It's a good thing you didn't have second thoughts.  :-)

Signature

Steven L.
Email:  sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

Susan - 18 Nov 2009 02:05 GMT
> It's a good thing you didn't have second thoughts.  :-)

It was such a relief!  The outsides and the insides are impossible to
clean well, it was a cheaply built, badly designed dust catcher.  It's
so nice to have an easy to use, easy to clean and air dry squeeze bottle.

At first I'd thought I'd keep the Hydropulse til it died, but I couldn't
wait to get rid of it.

Susan
sbnjhfty - 18 Nov 2009 02:13 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Susan

With my hydropulse I caused a super nasty double ear infection from that
thing forcing fluid where it shouldn't be.  The Neilmed bottle is much
safer and easier to control.  I'm also a firm believer that the
pulsating action does not wake up immobile cilia.  I believe that the
cilia just simply cannot do their job because of swelling.  Dr Grossan
believes the opposite.  He believes that the cilia stop working for
various reasons, then the swelling starts.
Neil Brooks - 18 Nov 2009 21:16 GMT
> > x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> safer and easier to control.  I'm also a firm believer that the
> pulsating action does not wake up immobile cilia.  

Sure it does.  It's inventor told us that many times ;-)

> I believe that the
> cilia just simply cannot do their job because of swelling.  Dr Grossan
> believes the opposite.  He believes that the cilia stop working for
> various reasons, then the swelling starts.
Susan - 18 Nov 2009 21:39 GMT
> Sure it does.  It's inventor told us that many times ;-)

Were you the one who reviewed the studies he cited and found that not
one of them supported his assertions?

In my house, we call that MSU.

Susan
Neil Brooks - 19 Nov 2009 00:05 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> > Sure it does.  It's inventor told us that many times ;-)
>
> Were you the one who reviewed the studies he cited and found that not
> one of them supported his assertions?

Nah.  I was in the camp of those who always just assumed that :-)

> In my house, we call that MSU.

Hm.  Having gone to that particular school, I still can't quite parse
that one.  "My Study .... something" ??

If not ... then ... must ... know .... :-)

OMG: did I REALLY use the wrong "its," above?  SHAME on MSU!!
Susan - 19 Nov 2009 01:23 GMT
> Nah.  I was in the camp of those who always just assumed that :-)

I wish I could remember who did it; reviewed all 30 studies that Grossan
kept citing, found no truth to his assertions.

>> In my house, we call that MSU.
>
> Hm.  Having gone to that particular school, I still can't quite parse
> that one.  "My Study .... something" ??

Makes $hit up.

> If not ... then ... must ... know .... :-)
>
> OMG: did I REALLY use the wrong "its," above?  SHAME on MSU!!

I keep using it's for its, their for there... I'm not getting any more
coherent as I age, that's for sure.

Susan
sbnjhfty - 18 Nov 2009 02:13 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Susan

With my hydropulse I caused a super nasty double ear infection from that
thing forcing fluid where it shouldn't be.  The Neilmed bottle is much
safer and easier to control.  I'm also a firm believer that the
pulsating action does not wake up immobile cilia.  I believe that the
cilia just simply cannot do their job because of swelling.  Dr Grossan
believes the opposite.  He believes that the cilia stop working for
various reasons, then the swelling starts.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.