Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Sinusitis / December 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Patients save their lives by creating their own care

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
judy.n - 15 Dec 2007 18:31 GMT
From the Wall Street Journal, it's free today
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119759308934528357.html?mod=hpp_us_inside_today

A copy of today's free content
PAGE ONE

Lab Rat?
Sam Hutchison has cancer. His father
is seeking a cure beyond the edge of medicine.
By GEETA ANAND
December 15, 2007; Page A1
San Diego

Each day, Sam Hutchison swallows 44 pills, most of which weren't
prescribed by his physician. They were chosen by Sam's father, who
devised the treatment cocktail -- and tests many of the medicines on
himself -- in a desperate effort to save his seven-year-old son.

Sam Hutchison
Neil Hutchison, 45, isn't a doctor. A defense-contractor recruiter,
he's part of a growing underground pushing the edge of medicine to
find combinations of anticancer agents to save themselves or loved
ones. Many of the medicines Sam takes haven't been tested in clinical
trials for his disease. Some are meant for other illnesses; others are
still in animal testing for safety and efficacy. But the fact is that
Sam, who suffers a rare and often-deadly cancer of the nerves, is
otherwise almost certain to die. Hence Mr. Hutchinson's decision, as
he puts it, to play "lab rat" with his son.

"When your kids have run out of options, you have to think outside the
box," Mr. Hutchison says. "It's terrifying, but it's our only hope."

Mr. Hutchison's methods are highly unorthodox. Doctors warn that
untested combinations of drugs could cause terrible adverse reactions.
Science takes time, and some doctors say that trying to shortcut the
process is reckless.

But Mr. Hutchison is pursuing what many researchers believe is the
most promising approach for curing or curbing cancer, which killed
about 565,000 people in the U.S. last year. Because cancer seems to
eventually overcome most individual therapies, researchers for a
decade have advocated using combinations of new, targeted therapies on
the theory that the best hope lies in cutting off all known avenues
for the cancer to grow.

CANCER COCKTAILS

See the combinations of medicines taken by Sam Hutchison, Ben Williams
and Donlevy Fitzpatrick to fight terminal cancers.
KEY FIGURES

See some of the people1 involved in the story of Sam Hutchison and his
family.
Trials of such methods have been slow to gain traction. "Everyone
knows the future of cancer treatment lies in cancer cocktails," says
David Kessler, dean of the school of medicine at the University of
California, San Francisco. Dr. Kessler says the Food and Drug
Administration needs to undertake an effort similar to one it did when
he was commissioner in the 1990s, when it amended the drug-approval
process to speed approval of AIDS-drug combinations. "What's missing
today is leadership."

Richard Pazdur, director of the Office of Oncology Drug Products at
the FDA, says he strongly believes in the cancer-cocktail approach,
but says it's up to the "medical oncology field" to organize and
implement such trials. He says drug companies struggle over how to
collaborate on trials of therapies owned by several different firms.
Others note the convention for testing drugs has been to prove
efficacy individually in clinical trials -- and only later to evaluate
combinations of drugs.

Neil and Margot Hutchison at the beach with Sam (right) and their two
younger boys, Andrew (next from right), and Charlie.
A growing number of people won't wait any longer. Thanks to the
Internet, the sick and their families can read about scientific
discoveries as they are published, track down scientists and doctors
and share information and personal experiences. The handful of doctors
and cancer survivors willing openly to advocate the do-it-yourself
cocktail approach say they're now approached by a half-dozen to a
dozen interested patients every week.

In charting their own course, patients and families often run afoul of
their own doctors. Some physicians chafe at having patients grab
control of treatment. Some worry that medicines not yet fully tested
may harm patients and prompt malpractice lawsuits. "The patient could
suffer terribly and die as a consequence. Who is ultimately
responsible for that?," asks Marc Chamberlain, director of the neuro-
oncology program at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, which includes
the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

The practice is particularly worrisome to those running clinical
trials. While only a small minority of cancer patients are cobbling
together their own cocktails, they're often the same people -- the
desperate and the risk-takers -- who would otherwise volunteer for new
drug trials. "The end result could be that we struggle to do clinical
trials for new and improved therapies, and all of us would be alarmed
by such an outcome," Dr. Chamberlain adds.

Nobody knows exactly what combination is most effective, how much of
each drug to consume or how long the drugs should be taken. There are
no statistics indicating how many patients have attempted to create
their own cocktails or how successful their efforts have been.

Nick Pavlakis, a 40-year-old Australian oncologist who has helped
patients put together combination therapies, says the cocktails don't
work for everyone. Many patients give up because the side effects of
the numerous drugs can be intolerable. For some, he says the cocktail
seemed to hold the disease at bay only for a time.

But for some patients, the cancer cocktail appears to be the only
medical explanation for remarkable recoveries.

The pioneer of self-directed cancer cocktails is Ben Williams, a
behavioral psychology professor at the University of California, San
Diego. In 1995, Mr. Williams was diagnosed with a glioblastoma, the
most-deadly type of brain tumor, and was told he would likely die
within 18 months.

As he received the standard radiation treatment, Mr. Williams combed
scientific literature and became attracted to the idea of combining
therapies. His neuro-oncologist, Dr. Chamberlain, then at the
University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, initially
refused to treat him with tamoxifen, a breast-cancer drug Mr. Williams
had read could be helpful. But Mr. Williams eventually persuaded Dr.
Chamberlain to add tamoxifen to a routinely prescribed chemotherapy
drug.

Then, without telling Dr. Chamberlain, Mr. Williams added verapamil, a
blood-pressure medicine that he had read made chemotherapy more
effective, by asking another doctor to prescribe it. He bought
Accutane, an acne treatment believed to kill cancer at high doses, in
Mexico, where prescriptions weren't needed at the time.

Less than a year later, the tumor was gone. While he remains critical
of the approach, Dr. Chamberlain says the treatment cocktail "probably
contributed" to saving Mr. Williams's life.

Others followed Mr. Williams's route, with varying degrees of success.
In 2002, a 55-year-old Australian real-estate developer named Donlevy
Fitzpatrick was diagnosed with two brain tumors and given nine months
to live. He and his wife learned of drug cocktails on the Internet,
but couldn't persuade his neuro-oncologist to prescribe one. After Mr.
Fitzpatrick lost his speech, his wife, Uschi, reached out in
desperation to several experts including Mr. Williams, who helped her
find an oncologist in Sydney -- Dr. Pavlakis -- willing to try the
cocktail approach.

Treated with a cocktail including tamoxifen and Accutane, Mr.
Fitzpatrick's tumor shrank until it was not detectable on brain scans.
He regained his speech and his strength. "If Uschi had listened to
what most oncologists recommend for brain tumors, Don would be dead,"
says Henry Friedman, a brain tumor specialist at Duke University
Medical Center who also helped Mrs. Fitzpatrick.

At first, Neil and Margot Hutchison were content to follow the
established medical regimen for their son. The couple, Sam and two
younger boys share a 900-square-foot condominium in a beach community
in San Diego. Mrs. Hutchison, easygoing and even-tempered, works as a
literary agent. Her husband, a chemical-engineering major in college,
is so intense he makes right turns at traffic lights -- even when his
destination is straight ahead -- because he can't bear to stop moving.

In 2005, the red-headed, freckle-faced Sam took six rounds of high-
dose chemotherapy, underwent surgery, a stem cell transplant and six
months of treatment with Accutane. His immune system shot, his
appetite gone -- along with his hair, eyebrows and hearing -- Sam
spent 100 nights in the hospital that year.

The Hutchisons clung to hope: The cancers of about 80% of children go
into remission. In August 2005, doctors declared Sam in remission.

But in July of 2006, a bone scan showed the cancer was back, in a
small spot above his left knee. Neuro-oncologists delivered the grim
prognosis: Children with recurrent neuroblastoma rarely live for long
-- and there are virtually no survivors.

The Hutchisons were devastated. With nothing to lose, they signed up
for a clinical trial of a drug called fenretinide, hoping to buy Sam
some time. A little over a month later, a scan revealed two more
cancerous lesions on Sam's right hip. Sam was dropped from the trial.

That night, Mr. Hutchison says he couldn't sleep. In the wee hours, he
retreated to a storage loft that he had converted into a "war room"
jammed with a desktop, three stacks of neuroblastoma books, boxes of
vitamins and supplements and plastic tubs overflowing with printouts
of his research.

Emptying the files on his desk, Mr. Hutchison began reading again. He
found a paper another father had sent him. Physicians at Brown
University had reported that a child with neuroblastoma who had
contracted a tropical illness called Chagas disease went into
remission after being treated with an antibiotic called nifurtimox. In
a later lab test, nifurtimox appeared to kill neuroblastoma cells.
Bayer AG, the German drug company, marketed the drug in other
countries, but it wasn't licensed for sale in the U.S.

Mr. Hutchison phoned one of the paper's authors. The researcher,
Giselle Sholler, had just begun experiments with mice and was several
years away from human trials. But she agreed to treat Sam on
compassionate use, a special provision for experimental treatments
when all else has failed.

Back at Rady Children's Hospital in San Diego, the Hutchisons told
Sam's oncologist Jennifer Willert of their plan. Although Dr. Sholler
would be directing treatment from Vermont, the couple hoped the
hospital would monitor Sam's progress. Initially they met with
resistance. Dr. Willert says many of her colleagues strongly opposed
treating Sam with the drug, arguing he should join another clinical
trial instead.

But the Hutchisons were adamant. Dr. Willert agreed to supervise Sam's
care, reasoning the antibiotic was unlikely to harm him.

In September 2006, Sam began nifurtimox in combination with two strong
chemotherapy drugs, the same combination treatment the patient with
Chagas disease had received when she went into remission at Brown.

By November, the cancerous spots on Sam's leg and hip were fainter.
The Hutchisons posted Sam's progress online, and soon several other
parents were clamoring to use the nifurtimox-chemotherapy combination.
Dr. Sholler began a small clinical trial, with the support of a small
foundation Mr. Hutchison helped start with another parent.

The Hutchisons were elated with Sam's progress, but feared the cancer
could eventually overcome the nifurtimox. They wanted a backup.

Late one night in his war room, Mr. Hutchison stumbled upon Mr.
Williams's story online and phoned him. Mr. Williams told Mr.
Hutchison he had no "time to get perfect information." Mr. Williams
explained his theory of attacking cancer with multiple medicines,
saying: "You're going to have to hit it every day with lots of
therapies that are relatively low toxicity."

In his loft, Mr. Hutchison re-read several papers highlighting the
potential of using high doses of omega-3, a fatty acid found in fish
oil, to stop tumor growth. In a magazine, he saw that Mark Puder,
assistant professor of surgery at Harvard Medical School, was working
with omega-3. He phoned Dr. Puder, who said he had tested the fatty
acids in mice with neuroblastoma. The drug didn't extend the mice's
lives, but "they looked much better than the other mice," Dr. Puder
said.

"If it were your son, would you give him omega-3?" Mr. Hutchison
asked. Dr. Puder immediately said yes.

Mr. Hutchison probed for the right dose for his 40-pound son. Dr.
Puder said he had no idea, but guessed four to six grams.

These days, Dr. Puder says he devotes two hours each day answering
phone calls from patients, many of whom are interested in substances
that are still in laboratory testing. Clinical trials are vital to
advancing science, he says, but they're slow. "If you have a year to
live and there's something in testing that may actually work, why not
try it?" he says.

Soon, Mr. Hutchison was gulping down large doses of omega-3. "If I'm
going to ask Sam to do this, I have to be willing to do it," he told
his wife. Mr. Hutchison swallowed eight large yellow capsules each
day.

After taking the omega-3 for two weeks, Mr. Hutchison handed Sam three
capsules one morning. Reflecting the intense stress of guesstimating a
treatment regimen for one's child, Mr. Hutchison spent that night
racing back and forth to his son's room to check on him. He told his
wife: "I don't want to be the fool who adds something to the treatment
plan that ruins everything."

Creating Sam's treatment regimen consumes much of his father's waking
life. Mr. Hutchison sends emails either late at night or early in the
morning, arriving at work at 7 a.m. Anxious about his son's illness,
Mr. Hutchison phones and emails Sam's doctors so frequently they often
joke about it. "I don't think he ever sleeps," Dr. Sholler says.

But the omega-3 seemed to pay off. Within weeks, the Hutchisons say
Sam's hair and eyebrows began to grow back and they noticed he had
more energy.

Meanwhile, Mr. Hutchison, in frequent touch with other parents online,
learned of an extract of a Chinese herb used world-wide to fight
malaria that also appears to fight cancer. He discovered that the
herb, artemesinin, had been used safely for years. He ordered the
medicine on the Internet and began taking five of the pills daily. In
January, he added three of the pills to Sam's regimen, upping Sam's
daily intake to 20 pills.

Even as Sam's scans were coming back showing the cancerous spots so
faint they were barely detectable, Mr. Hutchison continued his hunt,
extending his reach to increasingly experimental treatments. James
Belanger, a naturopath in Lexington, Mass., and a specialist in
finding alternative cancer treatments, cited data from a small
clinical trial. He suggested treating Sam with a chemical compound
that reduces copper, which tumor cells seem to need to grow. Mr.
Hutchison added tetrathiomolybdate, the copper-reducing compound, to
Sam's daily treatment.

In October, after the Hutchisons had been shopping for Halloween
costumes -- Sam chose the "Incredible Hulk" -- they learned a
radiologist's report of his latest scan suggested the cancer might
have returned in his right leg. The Hutchisons drove home in silence.

Mr. Hutchison berated himself for not adding more cancer-fighting
pills to Sam's daily regimen. He had been digging into research
suggesting a mixture of vitamin C and vitamin K3, known as vitamin
C:K3, killed cancer cells in a similar way as nifurtimox. He even had
ordered boxes of the vitamin mixture and taken it himself, but he had
held off giving it to Sam, afraid of adding something new to a drug
cocktail that appeared to be effective.

Now, terrified that Sam's cancer was back, Mr. Hutchison added one
vitamin C:K3 capsule a day to Sam's treatment regimen.

On a recent afternoon, as Sam sat in front of the television in his
living room playing a football game on the computer, Mr. Hutchison
interrupted with a box of pills. Pausing the game, Sam downed the
pills without hesitation in two gulps of water and resumed play. Soon
Sam was exultant.

"I won, I won," he shouted, flashing a big smile and running up the
stairs, arms raised.

"That's great," Mr. Hutchison replied, beaming down from his loft.

Then, turning to a visitor, Mr. Hutchison added, softly: "I wish it
were that easy in cancer."

Days later, they got good news. The radiologist, re-reading the scan
with the Hutchisons, concluded Sam's cancer hadn't returned.

An elated Mr. Hutchison then began questioning his decision to add
vitamin C:K3. "I don't want to over-think this thing," he said. But if
Sam's cancer wasn't back, he didn't want to risk the vitamin mixture.
He decided to stop it until he gets the results of a mouse experiment
gauging the effects of vitamin C:K3 with nifurtimox, a test funded by
a small foundation Mr. Hutchison and three other parents have
launched.

"Playing lab rat with your kid isn't easy," Mr. Hutchison said, tears
welling up in his eyes. "This brings me to my knees."

Write to Geeta Anand at geeta.anand@wsj.com2

Cancer Cocktails

Below are the combinations of medicines taken by Sam Hutchison, Ben
Williams and Donlevy Fitzpatrick to fight terminal cancers. Many
doctors oppose this approach of combining anti-cancer agents not yet
proven safe and effective, but patients with fatal illnesses argue
they have nothing to lose.

* * *

Sam Hutchison's Daily Cocktail

To fight neuroblastoma, Sam's dad put together a cocktail of anti-
cancer medicines including these.

Nifurtimox, 360 mg -- Antibiotic used to fight tropical illness, in
early clinical trial for cancer
Cytoxan*, 25 mg -- Conventional chemotherapy drug
Tetrathiomolybdate, 80 mg -- Used to treat Wilson's disease, in early
testing for cancer
Artemesinin, 150 mg -- Anti-malaria medicine, in early testing for
cancer
Omega-3, 4 g -- Used to treat cardiovascular disease, in early testing
for cancer
Celebrex, 400 mg -- Anti-inflammatory drug, in testing for cancer

*Cytoxan used two weeks on, one week off

* * *

Ben Williams's Cancer Cocktail

Mr. Williams combined these drugs and other supplements in 1995 to
successfully beat his brain tumor.

Tamoxifen, 220 mg daily -- Breast cancer drug, in early testing at the
time for brain cancer
Verapamil*, 600 mg daily -- Hypertension drug, believed to make
chemotherapy more effective
Accutane**, 160 mg daily -- Severe acne medicine, in early testing at
the time for brain cancer
Mushroom extract PSK, 3 g daily -- Used against cancer in Japan
Melatonin, 15 mg/night -- Hormone in trials against cancer in Italy
Conventional chemotherapy

*Verapamil used in the week surrounding chemotherapy
**Accutane used in the weeks between chemotherapy

* * *

Donlevy Fitzpatrick's Cocktail

Mr. Fitzpatrick is currently using this combination to drugs to fight
his brain cancer

Avastin+ -- Colorectal cancer drug, effective against brain cancer in
combination with Irinotecan in early trials
Irinotecan* -- Conventional chemotherapy drug
Temodar**, 100 mg daily -- Oral chemotherapy drug marketed for brain
cancer
Thalidomide, 100 mg daily -- FDA approved for treating multiple
myeloma, in early testing for brain tumors
Tarceva, 300 mg daily -- FDA approved for advanced non-small cell lung
cancer and as a combination therapy to treat advanced pancreatic
cancer, in early trials as a combination therapy for brain cancer

*Avastin and Irinotecan infused every other week
**Temodar given 14 days on, 14 days off treatment

Source: Mr. Hutchison, Mr. Williams and Mrs. Fitzpatrick

    URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119759308934528357.html

    Hyperlinks in this Article:
(1) javascript:OpenWin(' http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/info-enlargePic07.html?
project=imageShell07&bigImage=Undergrnd_121407.gif&h=1729&w=246&title=WSJ.COM&thePubDate=20070202','imageShell07','toolbar=yes,scrollbars=yes,location=no,width=266,height=1785,left=300,top=300')
(2) mailto:geeta.anand@wsj.com
neil0502@yahoo.com - 15 Dec 2007 19:56 GMT
Uh, wow.

Thanks for posting that, Doc.  I'd call it heart-warming, but my
pericardium is well lined with asbestos from ..... ;-)

My primary ophthalmologist -- the one who Rx'd the drops that
initially proved so helpful, but ... over time, so devastating -- is
at UCSD.  I'm fortunate to live in a city with such high-quality care
available.

At least I /think/ I'm fortunate ;-)

Next Thursday, I meet with a Neuro guy at UCSD to discuss the brachial
neuritis/Parsonage-Turner Syndrome stuff.  I'm hopeful that he will
evaluate my research, and the notion that -- particularly in somebody
with a Dx of an immune disorder -- perhaps a 3-5 day trial of IVIG
makes MUCH more sense than IV Methylprednisolone.

"My body, my science experiment."

Indeed.
Johnny1000@webtv.net - 16 Dec 2007 19:18 GMT
>"When your kids have run out of options, you
> have to think outside the box," Mr. Hutchison
> says. "It's terrifying, but it's our only hope."

My life has been put on hold this last year, over some kidney stones.
..Because I'm dealing with a brick walled medical bureaucracy that
insists on putting the dollar first. ...Not to mention I'm dealing with
one of the most powerful unions around that refuses to allow any
competition -- or extra shifts..

I saw my Dr. last January....I had three stones that needed lithotripsy
(blasting). . ...Finally, I got in to see the urologist in August.  (I
had to close my business early; drive 21/2 hours to the hospital (there
and back); wait an hour + in the reception area....   All this for a 10
minute appointment, so the Dr. could say: "What's your age? Do you drink
or smoke? ...OK...I'll set you up for the lithotripsy, but you'll have
to drive to Vancouver for it --  300+ miles away."  ...So 3 months later
I went in for the lithotripsy.  "...Can you get all 3 stones", I asked,
as I was lying on the table (as they were all in the one kidney)...
"No, we're just doing the 2 small ones".

...So now I'm still left with a 5 mm stone (the big one) -- just
itching to come down.   And after not hearing anything from the Dr. for
a month,  I phoned him to see when I could get this other guy blasted.
His receptionist said... "Well, you'll have to come in for another visit
with him...  I'll make an appointment for you: Jan 14th 2008."
a.sholes!!  All this BS, for another 10 minute appointment, just so the
Dr. can bleed off another 100 bucks or more from our health care system.
..And the aggravating thing is.. He has nothing to do with my condition
or procedure, other than recomending me for a lithotripsy, under the
care of another urologist, whom I didn't even see.  

In British Columbia here, you're looking at up to a 3 or 4 month wait
for an ultra sound, or cat scan.  Plus, even the simplest operations
require a 2 or 3 year waiting period -- if you're lucky.  

...I was just talking to a friend the other day about my sinus
problems.  He told me that the wait in B.C. to get in for an operation
can be up to 5 years, because the hospital will only allot so much time
for sinus operations....   However, if you pay (as he did... 7 grand up
front), the Dr. will do the operation in his own clinic with only a
month or so waiting period.  ...Sort of reminds me of the old back room
coat hanger abortion procedure.

My advice for anyone using the medical system -- especially in B.C.
here: Hope to hell you stay healthy, and whatever you do: never grow
old.  (Guess where the deepest cutbacks are made)    ....Jon
Oakfed - 17 Dec 2007 02:33 GMT
>In British Columbia here, you're looking at up to a 3 or 4 month wait
>for an ultra sound, or cat scan.  Plus, even the simplest operations
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>here: Hope to hell you stay healthy, and whatever you do: never grow
>old.  (Guess where the deepest cutbacks are made)    ....Jon

I'm in Victoria, BC. Things weren't that bad for me. I had a CT scan
in April; there was a one month wait for that. The ENT scheduled
surgery shortly thereafter, and I had my surgery in August. (Still no
significant improvement for me, though there's been hints of it the
last month or so, and at least there weren't any obvious
complications).

So I call BS on 5 year wait times for sinus surgeries - at least in
Victoria. IU was never approached for money to do early surgery. THere
is a big for-pay facility in Vancouver that does advertise sinus
surgeries among their services, though - but they've been having legal
challenges which I'm not sure are resolved yet.
Johnny1000@webtv.net - 18 Dec 2007 18:38 GMT
>I'm in Victoria, BC. Things weren't that bad for
> me. I had a CT scan in April; there was a one
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>So I call BS on 5 year wait times for sinus
> surgeries - at least in Victoria.

It all depends where you are, and the Dr.(s) you're dealing with.  ...If
you live in Kamloops, you'll wait a few months for a catscan, and up to
4 for an ultrasound.   In Williams Lake, because the catscan machine is
fairly new, the wait is only a few days, up to a week, and the
ultrasound 2 months.    

Unfortunately, the hospitals won't share availability, even though "you"
as a patient can go where you want.  ...In fact there are "finally" a
no. of private facilities opening up for ultra sound etc, that bypass
those unnecessary waits.  (It's a wonder the union doesn't picket them
-- you know these  over-worked and under paid gov. employees have to
have their breaks and chat times, so they can only do a few people a
day)  

--Hell... Those machines should be running 24 hours a day.  They would
be if I owned them.

This friend (I was talking about) had to have the sinus surgery 2 years
ago.  I'm sure he wouldn't have paid out the 7 grand, if he was made
knowledgable of a way around it.  ...Perhaps if his Dr. would have
contacted an Ent in Victoria, the wait would have been considerably
less.  ...Unfortunately, most Drs these days are more concerned about
what goes into their pocket, and will go to extremes to distant
themselves emotionally from the needs of the patients.   ...Jon
rpautrey2 - 18 Dec 2007 16:11 GMT
I had to invent my own chronic sinusitis & MCS treatment/cure
technology. See my "Sinus Drainage Methods" posts in this group. Paul
Autrey
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.