On Jul 7, 12:47 am, surfinventu...@spacemail.com wrote:
> http://www.jpgmonline.com/article.asp?issn=0022-3859;year=1983;volume...
> Any comments regarding this?
no comments on this? any more effective decongestant that could
become available that may also have less side effects then current
available ones would be a great thing.
judy.n - 18 Jul 2007 21:51 GMT
The article was from 1983--if I read it correctly. What ever happened
to this promising medication?
Judy
On Jul 16, 5:30 am, surfinventu...@spacemail.com wrote:
> On Jul 7, 12:47 am, surfinventu...@spacemail.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> become available that may also have less side effects then current
> available ones would be a great thing.