Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Sinusitis / January 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is It Safe To Use Tap Water For Nasal/Sinus Irrigations?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dreamharp - 28 Dec 2006 16:44 GMT
I have tap water that is treated with ozone instead of chlorine.  Is it
alright to use tap water as part of
my nasal saline? Or should I purchase distilled water?  There was a
consumer study that showed
there was more bacteria in bottled water than regular tap water.  Any
comments?

Thanks!

Dreamharp
dlzc - 28 Dec 2006 17:44 GMT
Dear dreamharp:

> I have tap water that is treated with ozone instead of
> chlorine.  Is it alright to use tap water as part of my
> nasal saline?

How did you validate that your ozone treatment produced at least a
three log reduction in viable organisms in your "chlorine free tap
water"?  Did you assay this ozonated tap water for disinfection
byproducts?

> Or should I purchase distilled water?

I would.  A gallon doesn't cost much.

> There was a consumer study that showed there was
> more bacteria in bottled water than regular tap water.

Depends on the water source.  Some bottled water is passed through a
reverse osmosis process and ozonated, and some is only grossly
filtered, prior to bottling.

> Any comments?

There is more life harbored in your nose than could be found in a few
ounces of clear tap water, even without ozone.  But no point in adding
"strangers" to the mix.

Use distilled.  Chill afer opening.  Add "a little" heated (for
sterilization) table salt to the water, to keep from irritating your
nasal passages more.  Dispose of unused contents within 1 week of
opening.

David A. Smith
Murray Grossan - 29 Dec 2006 05:30 GMT
On 12/28/06 9:44 AM, in article
1167327880.339077.128850@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com, "dlzc" <dlzc1@cox.net>
wrote:

> Use distilled.  Chill afer opening.  Add "a little" heated (for
> sterilization) table salt to the water, to keep from irritating your
> nasal passages more.  Dispose of unused contents within 1 week of
> opening.
Are you saying irrigate with distilled water plain?
That can be uncomfortable and damaging to the nose. Best to use saline -
1 tsp to 500 cc . Can add 1/2 tsp of baking soda to this.
Neil Brooks - 29 Dec 2006 06:06 GMT
dlzc wrote:

>> Use distilled.  Chill afer opening.  Add "a little" heated (for
>> sterilization) table salt to the water, to keep from irritating your
>> nasal passages more.  Dispose of unused contents within 1 week of
>> opening.

Murray Grossan responded:

> Are you saying irrigate with distilled water plain?
> That can be uncomfortable and damaging to the nose. Best to use saline -
> 1 tsp to 500 cc . Can add 1/2 tsp of baking soda to this.

I think you misread dlzc's response on this one....
dlzc - 29 Dec 2006 15:27 GMT
Dear Murray Grossan:

> On 12/28/06 9:44 AM, in article
> 1167327880.339077.128850@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com, "dlzc" <dlzc1@cox.net>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> > irritating your nasal passages more.  Dispose of
> > unused contents within 1 week of opening.

> Are you saying irrigate with distilled water plain?

I could have been more clear had I said "Start with distilled water."

> That can be uncomfortable and damaging to the nose.
> Best to use saline - 1 tsp to 500 cc . Can add 1/2 tsp
> of baking soda to this.

I'd heat both on the stove, before adding them, to maintain
"sterility".  It is good to have a recipe, however.  In a "gallon",
this is 7.5 teaspoons of salt, and perhaps 3.5 teaspoons of baking
soda.  The baking soda is to act as a solution buffer, to control the
pH, right?

David A. Smith
MZB - 28 Dec 2006 17:54 GMT
Well, I always boil the water and then let it cool off.

mel
>I have tap water that is treated with ozone instead of chlorine.  Is it
> alright to use tap water as part of
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Dreamharp
Johnny1000@webtv.net - 29 Dec 2006 01:19 GMT
>I have tap water that is treated with ozone
> instead of chlorine. Is it alright to use tap
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>there was more bacteria in bottled water than
> regular tap water. Any comments?

I've used water, straight out of the tap (untreated well water), for the
last 5 years.   No problem.       I would be more concerned over how
clean the irrigation equipment is, and how careful you are with handling
your salt. ...IE: to avoid contamination, via splashing, mucky hands
etc.    ...Jon.
Murray Grossan - 29 Dec 2006 05:27 GMT
On 12/28/06 8:44 AM, in article
1167324296.341977.4030@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com, "dreamharp"
<janishuether@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I have tap water that is treated with ozone instead of chlorine.  Is it
> alright to use tap water as part of
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Dreamharp

Don't need to use distilled water. Any bottled water is OK . If you don't
mind the EXPENSE smart water is probably best, but whether there is a
benefit or not I don't know.
judy.n - 29 Dec 2006 16:51 GMT
What is "smart" water?
Most people use boiled water or distilled water as a BASE for their
solution, as bottled water has no standards for sterilitiy, and
biofilms can exist in pipes and municipal or well water can contain
some low levels of contaminants.
Judy
> On 12/28/06 8:44 AM, in article
> 1167324296.341977.4030@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com, "dreamharp"
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> mind the EXPENSE smart water is probably best, but whether there is a
> benefit or not I don't know.
Neil Brooks - 29 Dec 2006 18:27 GMT
> What is "smart" water?

It's a brand name.  Google turns up....

http://www.glaceau.com/

Click on smartwater along the top edge of the page
MZB - 29 Dec 2006 23:11 GMT
If you boil the water first, doesn't that take care of the problem??

Mel
> What is "smart" water?
> Most people use boiled water or distilled water as a BASE for their
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>> mind the EXPENSE smart water is probably best, but whether there is a
>> benefit or not I don't know.
Murray Grossan - 30 Dec 2006 00:44 GMT
On 12/29/06 3:11 PM, in article Mghlh.117$Q4.58@newsfe02.lga, "MZB"
<moo@noway.prudigy.net> wrote:

> If you boil the water first, doesn't that take care of the problem??
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>>> mind the EXPENSE smart water is probably best, but whether there is a
>>> benefit or not I don't know.

Smart water contains some of the electrolytes used in Breathe.ease and
Ringer's solution, so it is "better" than distilled. But whether it is worth
the price or you will feel a difference, I don't really know.
judy.n - 30 Dec 2006 15:44 GMT
That's what I do: after reading the list of contaminants from my local
water board. My younger daughter lives in a dorm at college, and
boiling water is tough for her, so she uses distilled water. I actually
make up a quart of solution as needed.
 Everyone uses different ingredients in their irrigation: I boil water
and use kosher salt and some white vinegar (to discourage pseudomonas).
Judy
> If you boil the water first, doesn't that take care of the problem??
>
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> >> mind the EXPENSE smart water is probably best, but whether there is a
> >> benefit or not I don't know.
iowehqnf.da;n - 30 Dec 2006 23:17 GMT
you guys go on and on about irrigation solutions like it is rocket
science....it's not...

here's what to do:

1) if you can, boil the water in advance, this is not to "kill any
germs" but to make it feel better (a lot better) when you irrigate. if
you have been irrigating with water that hasn't been boiled first, just
try it and see if you don't feel the difference.

2) one teaspoon of salt per liter is plenty, if you boil the water
first. Another advantage of boiling the water in advance is that you
need for less salt to make the irrigation feel ok...if you use too much
salt it's bad for the cilia, no sense damaging them when you can use
boiled water and use less salt...

3) buy yourself a waterpik or a similar pump and one of grossan's tips
(or someone else's if you prefer) and irrigate at least once per day...

now does that sound like rocket science to you...???
iowehqnf.da;n - 31 Dec 2006 00:18 GMT
oh, and in addition to the teaspoon of non iodized salt, a pinch of
baking soda...

still not rocket science...
Murray Grossan - 31 Dec 2006 20:06 GMT
On 12/30/06 3:17 PM, in article FMCdnax42qM7bgvYnZ2dnUVZ_ompnZ2d@rcn.net,

> you guys go on and on about irrigation solutions like it is rocket
> science....it's not...
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> now does that sound like rocket science to you...???

One teaspoon salt to litre will make a hypotonic solution. I recommend one
tsp to 500 cc  and you can add 1/4 to 1/2 tsp of baking soda.

Please, no offence meant but your statement that boiled water needs less
salt and works better reminds me of a recent trip to the Alternative
Medicine Exhibit.
For sale. "Energized water, like the Russion Astronauts use
For Sale. Water blessed by Rajah the great healer.

What was interesting was that NO One attending offered to sample these
products.

Yes, boiling the water does remove the chlorine, but it also cancentrates
chemicals in the water.

Incidentally someone once recommended iced water for irrigation. That would
certainly shrink the swollen membranes, but I think it would be painful.
Anyone try this? I am not recommending this, just curious.
Johnny1000@webtv.net - 31 Dec 2006 20:37 GMT
hydromed@adelphia.net (Murray Grossan) wrote:

>Incidentally someone once recommended iced
> water for irrigation. That would certainly
> shrink the swollen membranes, but I think it
> would be painful. Anyone try this? I am not
> recommending this, just curious.

I've recommended cold water irrigation, for years on this group.   ...I
tend to get sinus induced headaches, centred  beneath an eyebrow, or
between the eyes. ...The cold water works wonders towards clearing this
up. ...It's not really painful, but you find your eye muscles are a
little slow to react, for a few minutes afterwards.

It was the cold water irrigation that helped clear a major sinus
infection I had about 6 years ago. ...I went for 3 days feeling lousy,
like I had a cold or flu. ...My head was pounding, and I felt nauseated.
I irrigated with cold water, and lay face down on an ice-pack. ...10
minutes later, I irrigated again with the cold/salty water, and flushed
out masses of green and yellow crap.  ...Within seconds, my headache,
nausea, and cold-like symptoms were completely gone.  ...It was amazing.  

..I assume the cold water was able to settle the inflammation just
enough, to permit the infected material a drainage route.

Whenever I irrigate now, I use either lukewarm (room temp.) water, or,
if I feel a flare-up coming on: water as cold as I can get it.  

..The only thing you can't do with the cold water, is suck it in
through the nostrils (as you can with warm water, while irrigating).
..It immediately zips right through your nasal passages, and down your
throat.       ...Jon
judy.n - 01 Jan 2007 19:41 GMT
> Yes, boiling the water does remove the chlorine, but it also cancentrates
> chemicals in the water
What chemicals? I would imagine it matters whether your tap water is
well water or municipal--treated water. I boil the water to kill any
water loving bacteria, and don't boil it down to the point I woud be
concentrating any chemicals.
 You've said any bottle water is fine, but municipal water actually
has sterility standards while bottled water has none.
Here is a copy of the comments of an ENT from Pittsburgh, in response
to an article in Annals of Family Medicine about irrigation: I found it
extremely informative:

Berrylin J Ferguson,
Pittsburgh, USA
M.D., University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Send response to journal:
Re: Commentary on: "Qualitative Aspects of Nasal Irrigation Use by
Patients With Chronic Sinus Disease in a Multimethod Study"

Email Berrylin J Ferguson

The authors report on the quality of life improvements and reflections
of over two dozen individuals utilizing hypertonic saline nasal
irrigation on an as needed basis. The findings provide validation of
the anecdotal experience of many rhinologists. Unique to this study was
an apparent added benefit of group training and discussions, which gave
these sufferers an additional benefit conferred from "group
support", a benefit acknowledged in many disease states from cancer
support groups to chronic debilitating diseases. I had not previously
considered that this kind of group support might be helpful for chronic
rhinosinusitis, but from the interviews it appears that it is indeed
appreciated by the participants.

I can think of no way to perform a blinded controlled study of nasal
irrigations, but that doesn't mean they are not effective. In fact,
the efficacy of the irrigation frequently overshadows the efficacy of
any number of added ingredients including antifungals, antibacterials,
and topical steroids.1 The irrigation serves to remove nasal debris in
noses that are not self-cleaning, which is particularly a problem in
patients with nasal polyps or who have undergone extensive sinus/nasal
surgery.

Nasal irrigation can also be helpful as a rinse to remove mucus before
the application of a topical steroid or antibiotic. I commonly
recommend a commercial nasal lavage kit, of which there are a half
dozen or so available to assist with compliance. There are many
commercially available nasal irrigators.2 I also provide our patients
with a "recipe" so that they can make their own saline irrigation.
Patients should be warned to use filtered or boiled water, and to make
sure the device used for irrigation is cleaned frequently to prevent
iatrogenic inoculation with water loving microbes such as Pseudomonas
and Serratia.

The debate of hypertonic versus normal saline irrigation is sure to
continue.3 I usually provide the patient with the recipe for hypertonic
saline and suggest that they reduce the amount of salt they add, if
they find that the hypertonic mixture is irritating. Interestingly,
hypertonic inhaled saline has been shown to be beneficial in cystic
fibrosis.4 Seven percent of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis carry
a mutation for cystic fibrosis compared to 2% of normal controls. Thus
there may be a variance in response to hypertonic versus isotonic
saline irrigations, depending on the cause of the patient's
rhinosinusitis.5

Finally, the authors capture in a qualitative manner the relief that
patients feel with this technique. I still recall the words of a
patient on her return visit, "I can't believe I've been suffering for
30 years with the sinus condition when relief was as easy and
inexpensive as this salt water wash." A trial of hypertonic or isotonic
saline nasal rinse is inexpensive, does not promote bacterial
resistance, and safe. Saline irrigations should be a therapeutic
alternative offered to any patients suffering from chronic
rhinosinusitis.

References

1. Ferguson BJ. Antifungal Nasal Washes for Chronic Rhinosinusitis:
What's Therapeutic -- The Watch or the Antifungal? J Allergy Clin
Immunology 2003;111(11)37-8.

2. Tomooka LT, Murphy C, Davidson TM. Clinical Study Literature Review
of Nasal Irrigation. Laryngoscope 2000;110(11)89-93.

3. Garavello W, Romagnoli M, Gaini RM. Hypertonic or Ice Tonic Saline
for Allergic Rhinitis in Children. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
2005;16:91.

4. Elkins MR, Robinson M, Rose BR, Harbour C, Moriarty CP, Marks GB,
Belousova EG, Xuan W, Bye PT. National Hypertonic Saline in Cystic
Fibrosis (NHSCF) Study Group. A Controlled Trial of Long-term Inhaled
Hypertonic Saline in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. N Engl J Med
2006;354:229-240.

5. Wang X, Moylan B, Leopold DA, Kim J, Rubenstein RC, Togias A, Proud
D, Zeitlin PL, Cutting GR. Mutation in the Gene Responsible for Cystic
Fibrosis and Predisposition to Chronic Rhinosinusitis in the General
Population. JAMA 2000;284:1814-1819.

Competing interests:   None declared

Please note her rationale for hypertonic saline, and the advice to use
boiled or filtered water.

Judy
Here's the URL
http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/4/4/295

Pulsatile vs. Non-pulsatile nasal irr
> On 12/30/06 3:17 PM, in article FMCdnax42qM7bgvYnZ2dnUVZ_ompnZ2d@rcn.net,
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> certainly shrink the swollen membranes, but I think it would be painful.
> Anyone try this? I am not recommending this, just curious.
judy.n - 01 Jan 2007 19:46 GMT
> Yes, boiling the water does remove the chlorine, but it also cancentrates
> chemicals in the water.
That can't be a universal finding, as tap water varies considerably if
it is from well or municipal water. Municipal water has standards,
bottled water has no standards for sterility.

I personally found this article, and the subsequent letter from Dr.
Ferguson to be very informative re: boiled or filtered water, and the
rationale for hypertonic saline. From the Annals of Family Medicine.
http://www.annfammed.org/cgi/eletters/4/4/295
Berrylin J Ferguson,
Pittsburgh, USA
M.D., University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
Send response to journal:
Re: Commentary on: "Qualitative Aspects of Nasal Irrigation Use by
Patients With Chronic Sinus Disease in a Multimethod Study"

Email Berrylin J Ferguson

The authors report on the quality of life improvements and reflections
of over two dozen individuals utilizing hypertonic saline nasal
irrigation on an as needed basis. The findings provide validation of
the anecdotal experience of many rhinologists. Unique to this study was
an apparent added benefit of group training and discussions, which gave
these sufferers an additional benefit conferred from "group
support", a benefit acknowledged in many disease states from cancer
support groups to chronic debilitating diseases. I had not previously
considered that this kind of group support might be helpful for chronic
rhinosinusitis, but from the interviews it appears that it is indeed
appreciated by the participants.

I can think of no way to perform a blinded controlled study of nasal
irrigations, but that doesn't mean they are not effective. In fact,
the efficacy of the irrigation frequently overshadows the efficacy of
any number of added ingredients including antifungals, antibacterials,
and topical steroids.1 The irrigation serves to remove nasal debris in
noses that are not self-cleaning, which is particularly a problem in
patients with nasal polyps or who have undergone extensive sinus/nasal
surgery.

Nasal irrigation can also be helpful as a rinse to remove mucus before
the application of a topical steroid or antibiotic. I commonly
recommend a commercial nasal lavage kit, of which there are a half
dozen or so available to assist with compliance. There are many
commercially available nasal irrigators.2 I also provide our patients
with a "recipe" so that they can make their own saline irrigation.
Patients should be warned to use filtered or boiled water, and to make
sure the device used for irrigation is cleaned frequently to prevent
iatrogenic inoculation with water loving microbes such as Pseudomonas
and Serratia.

The debate of hypertonic versus normal saline irrigation is sure to
continue.3 I usually provide the patient with the recipe for hypertonic
saline and suggest that they reduce the amount of salt they add, if
they find that the hypertonic mixture is irritating. Interestingly,
hypertonic inhaled saline has been shown to be beneficial in cystic
fibrosis.4 Seven percent of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis carry
a mutation for cystic fibrosis compared to 2% of normal controls. Thus
there may be a variance in response to hypertonic versus isotonic
saline irrigations, depending on the cause of the patient's
rhinosinusitis.5

Finally, the authors capture in a qualitative manner the relief that
patients feel with this technique. I still recall the words of a
patient on her return visit, "I can't believe I've been suffering for
30 years with the sinus condition when relief was as easy and
inexpensive as this salt water wash." A trial of hypertonic or isotonic
saline nasal rinse is inexpensive, does not promote bacterial
resistance, and safe. Saline irrigations should be a therapeutic
alternative offered to any patients suffering from chronic
rhinosinusitis.

References

1. Ferguson BJ. Antifungal Nasal Washes for Chronic Rhinosinusitis:
What's Therapeutic -- The Watch or the Antifungal? J Allergy Clin
Immunology 2003;111(11)37-8.

2. Tomooka LT, Murphy C, Davidson TM. Clinical Study Literature Review
of Nasal Irrigation. Laryngoscope 2000;110(11)89-93.

3. Garavello W, Romagnoli M, Gaini RM. Hypertonic or Ice Tonic Saline
for Allergic Rhinitis in Children. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
2005;16:91.

4. Elkins MR, Robinson M, Rose BR, Harbour C, Moriarty CP, Marks GB,
Belousova EG, Xuan W, Bye PT. National Hypertonic Saline in Cystic
Fibrosis (NHSCF) Study Group. A Controlled Trial of Long-term Inhaled
Hypertonic Saline in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. N Engl J Med
2006;354:229-240.

5. Wang X, Moylan B, Leopold DA, Kim J, Rubenstein RC, Togias A, Proud
D, Zeitlin PL, Cutting GR. Mutation in the Gene Responsible for Cystic
Fibrosis and Predisposition to Chronic Rhinosinusitis in the General
Population. JAMA 2000;284:1814-1819.

Competing interests:   None declared

Judy
> On 12/30/06 3:17 PM, in article FMCdnax42qM7bgvYnZ2dnUVZ_ompnZ2d@rcn.net,
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> certainly shrink the swollen membranes, but I think it would be painful.
> Anyone try this? I am not recommending this, just curious.
judy.n - 02 Jan 2007 13:32 GMT
Sorry for  the two posts: it didn't seem to take the first one.
> > Yes, boiling the water does remove the chlorine, but it also cancentrates
> > chemicals in the water.
[quoted text clipped - 136 lines]
> > certainly shrink the swollen membranes, but I think it would be painful.
> > Anyone try this? I am not recommending this, just curious.
dlzc - 02 Jan 2007 15:25 GMT
Dear Murray Grossan:

> On 12/30/06 3:17 PM, in article FMCdnax42qM7bgvYnZ2dnUVZ_ompnZ2d@rcn.net,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> > salt it's bad for the cilia, no sense damaging them
> > when you can use boiled water and use less salt...

> One teaspoon salt to litre will make a hypotonic
> solution. I recommend one tsp to 500 cc  and you
> can add 1/4 to 1/2 tsp of baking soda.

This poster was starting with (presumably) tap water, which already
contains a locally variable (and sometimes seasonally variable) amount
of salt and hardness.  I agree with your presecription... for distilled
water.

> Please, no offence meant but your statement that
> boiled water needs less salt and works better reminds
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> membranes, but I think it would be painful.
> Anyone try this? I am not recommending this, just curious.

!Brain Freeze!  ;>)

David A. Smith
judy.n - 02 Jan 2007 17:56 GMT
Dr. Grossan actually didn't recommend distilled water: here's his
recommendation:

Don't need to use distilled water. Any bottled water is OK . If you
don't
mind the EXPENSE smart water is probably best, but whether there is a
benefit or not I don't know.

Judy
> Dear Murray Grossan:
>
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>
> David A. Smith
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.