Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Sinusitis / January 2007
New Study: Antibiotics Mostly Useless For Acute Sinusitis
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Steven L. - 19 Dec 2006 04:46 GMT Antibiotics Mostly Useless for Sinusitis 12.18.06, 12:00 AM ET
MONDAY, Dec. 18 (HealthDay News) -- If you develop a mild sinus infection this winter -- or even a moderately severe one -- antibiotics won't necessarily speed your recovery, new research shows.
"In the vast majority of cases, rhinosinusitis is a self-limiting disease," said Dr. An De Sutter, of Ghent University Hospital in Belgium. "It can last 10 days or longer, but antibiotics do not influence the course of the disease."
So, if you don't have signs of complications or severe infection, such as a high fever or extreme pain, your best bet is to forgo antibiotics, rely on symptomatic treatments and wait for a natural recovery, De Sutter said.
De Sutter estimates that 50 percent to 70 percent of sinusitis patients are prescribed antibiotics. Although the drugs can effectively treat patients who develop bacterial sinusitis, they are ineffective against viral sinusitis, which represents the majority of cases.
In the study, De Sutter and her colleagues looked at 300 patients with mild to moderately severe sinusitis, 218 of whom received sinus X-rays. They randomly assigned patients to receive either amoxicillin or a placebo, asked them to keep a symptom diary and observed them for 15 days.
The researchers found that neither typical sinusitis signs and symptoms nor abnormal X-rays had any value in predicting the course of the disease. They also found that the disease lasted as long in patients taking amoxicillin as it did in patients taking a placebo, and that 247 of the patients recovered within 15 days.
Only two subjective complaints -- a general feeling of illness and reduced productivity -- predicted a slower recovery from sinusitis. "In patients who feel ill or who do not feel able to work, recovery will take a few days longer," De Sutter said. "But antibiotic treatment does not speed recovery in these patients."
"We don't know for sure why antibiotic treatment seemed to have no effect on the duration of the illness," De Sutter said. "But there two possible explanations: Either the illness and X-ray abnormalities were not caused by a bacterial infection, or if they were, the patients' immune systems were able to overcome the infection just as quickly without antibiotics."
The results of the study are published in the November/December issue of the Annals of Family Medicine.
"We advise antibiotic treatment only when patients have severe symptoms such as high fever and bad pain or if they have impaired immune function," De Sutter said. "This is a very small minority of patients. For all others, we advise 'watchful waiting.' "
Instead of prescribing antibiotics, doctors should focus on symptom relief: paracetamol for pain relief and intranasal decongestants in case of a blocked nose, De Sutter suggested. "Some patients experience subjective relief by inhaling hot steam," she added.
In a similar study in the same journal, researchers found the desire for pain relief was one of the main reasons why sore-throat patients demand antibiotics. They concluded that it may be preferable to treat such patients with pain medications instead of antibiotics.
In most sinusitis cases, De Sutter believes that doctors should resist patient demand for antibiotics. "Doctors should explain to patients that antibiotics do not make a difference in the speed of recovery and can cause side effects," De Sutter said. "In our trial, diarrhea was more frequent with antibiotics. Other known side effects include nausea, oral or vaginal mold or yeast infection, allergic reactions and colitis."
The over-prescription of antibiotics, especially in children, also can cause the upper respiratory tract to become colonized with antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as S. pneumoniae, De Sutter said. "These resistant bacteria may cause infections that are more difficult to treat and may be passed on to other people."
"This is an interesting study because it looked at a large population of people with acute sinusitis," said Dr. David Sherris, chairman of otolaryngology at the University at Buffalo in New York.
"Most people do not need antibiotic therapy unless symptoms persist for more than seven to 10 days," Sherris said. "Plain X-rays of the sinuses add little or nothing to the diagnosis and treatment of acute sinusitis."
But that doesn't mean that imaging is of no value in sinusitis cases, he added. With prolonged or recurrent sinusitis or complications, computed tomography (CT) is the test of choice and works well, he noted.
"Early referral to an otolaryngologist is indicated in the most severe cases or where symptoms are out of proportion with findings," Sherris said. "The specialist can perform nasal endoscopy and accurately assess the most subtle CT scan findings."
Although the new study confirms some observations that Sherris has made during years of clinical practice, it would have been stronger if it had used the symptom system from the American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sherris said. "It is more complete than the one presented in this article, and though not infallible, is better to diagnose acute sinusitis."
Sherris also faulted the researchers' choice of antibiotics. "Amoxicillin, unless used in very high doses, is not a good first line antibiotic in acute sinusitis," he said. "Amoxicillin-clavulanate [augmentin] is a better choice, and is now generic in the United States. If there is an allergy to penicillin, physicians should consider azithromycin or a respiratory quinolone."
More information
For more on rhinitis, head to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/health/feeds/hscout/2006/12/18/hscout536440.html
 Signature Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
MZB - 19 Dec 2006 06:41 GMT Good article and good critique at the end. Amoxicillan has not always done the job for me.
Mel
> Antibiotics Mostly Useless for Sinusitis > 12.18.06, 12:00 AM ET [quoted text clipped - 108 lines] > > http://www.forbes.com/forbeslife/health/feeds/hscout/2006/12/18/hscout536440.html judy.n - 20 Dec 2006 17:54 GMT I saw this study when it was published, and unfortunately it shares similar flaws to a review by the Cochrance Collaborative--the evidence based medicine gurus-that concluded that antibiotis should be withheld in acute sinuitis. In many patients, acute sinusitis is self-limiting, but that number is unclear. The number usually quoted is about 60%. (Based on what??) As we who post here know, in many patients sinusitis is not self-limiting and clearly requires prompt treatment. No mention was made of brain abscesses, chronic osteomyelitis, central venous thrombosis and perio-orbital cellulits from untreated or under-treated sinusitis. I reviewed the Cochrane review several years ago for American Family Physician: they looked at 3000 studies, and discarded all but 3. They based the diagnosis of sinusitis on plain x-ray or sinus aspiration--not the clinical parameters suggested by the Society of Otolaryngologists. The three studies that they looked at used average dose amoxicillin and showed a slight trend toward effectiveness. They did not review the other 2793 studies. These type of studies are embraced as evidence that should guide clinical practice. I find that residents deny patients antibiotics all the time, following the evidence. Clearly antibiotics need to be prescribed judiciously to avoid overuse and increased resistance, but to state globally that antibiotics are not indicated in acute sinusitis is flawed and will lead to denial of antibiotic therapy in the subset of patients who require it, all based on the evidence. Medicine is trying to be more scientific and less anectodotal, but often the evidence, like in this study which utilized flawed diagnosis and treatment criteria, can lead to the wrong conclusions. Garbage in, garbage out. It's the flaw of evidence based medicine. Large HMO's--like Kaiser, and residencies--will use studies like this to create clinical practice guidelines that will state that the standard of care for acute sinusitis and acute bronchitis is symptomatic relief, and not antibiotics. Scary, because patients don't fit neatly into guidelines. Judy
> Good article and good critique at the end. Amoxicillan has not always done > the job for me. [quoted text clipped - 117 lines] > > Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net > > Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me. kathywb2001@yahoo.com - 22 Dec 2006 03:08 GMT > I reviewed the Cochrane review several years ago for American Family > Physician: they looked at 3000 studies, and discarded all but 3. They [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > dose amoxicillin and showed a slight trend toward effectiveness. They > did not review the other 2793 studies. How did they choose which 3 studies to review? Why were the others discarded? Kathyw
kathywb2001@yahoo.com - 22 Dec 2006 03:02 GMT > Antibiotics Mostly Useless for Sinusitis > 12.18.06, 12:00 AM ET When I first read this I didn't know whether to laugh or cry. I decided the latter was the most apporpriate. I'm afraid that this study has sent us back into the "dark ages." Even though I agree with the author that acute sinusitis is self limiting in most cases and doesn't need antibiotics, I'm afraid, as is the general rule, this will be the study of the "year" (or longer) and most family physcians will just read the first part of it and decide that sinsuitis does not need to be treated with antibiotics at all, and that will lead more people developing chronic problems. Maybe at least they won't prescribe amoxicillin anymore for it, because, like Mel, I've always felt like it is useless anyway. So this just makes the study more flawed in my opinion.
Hopefully, most doctors will read Dr. Sherris' review. He is the doctor who did my last surgery and he DID find subtle changes on CT scan that other doctors had missed for years that correlated with my symptoms all along. I'm afraid that it may be too late to do a lot of good now though, as I have recently gotten a bone scan (that I've asked for for years) and there is strong indication that there is still infection in the bone.
Kathyw
judy.n - 23 Dec 2006 01:28 GMT Kathy, When I think about this article, and the the Cochrane review--(they had strict criteria, that were invalid: studies had to diagnose sinusitis with plain xrays or sinus aspiration--not clinical criteria--that's why they excluded the vast majority: a huge mistake.) Here's what I think: if you look at sinus CT's when people have a cold, they almost always show maxillary sinus abnormalities within three days of the cold starting---now, most of these people will resolve their colds on their own. Did the abnormal CT's mean that everyone with a cold has a sinusitis? I don't think so. The clinical guidelines that the ENT's write use criteria like: fever, facial pain, severe symtoms, purulent nasal drainage, tooth pain, positional facial pain, prolonged symptoms and generalized fatigue. I think that if you meet the clinical criteria for sinusitis, you quite possibly would benefit from antibiotics. I believe this was the critque that your ENT stated--they used a narrow definition of sinusitis. Cochrane said sinusitis=abnormal plain xrays and/or sinus aspirations. I didn't read this article in depth to know their criteria. I have no doubt that many people get a cold, get a mild sinusitis, and resolve it on their own. I'm afraid this article will be used to deny antibiotics to everyone with sinusitis and that would be a tremendous mistake. Judy
> > Antibiotics Mostly Useless for Sinusitis > > 12.18.06, 12:00 AM ET [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > Kathyw MZB - 23 Dec 2006 02:31 GMT Judy:
The next step for me, should my sinus problems return (and I'm sure they will) is a CT Scan.
Now, I'm sort of wondering: is it a worthwhile test??
Mel
> Kathy, > When I think about this article, and the the Cochrane review--(they [quoted text clipped - 46 lines] >> >> Kathyw judy.n - 23 Dec 2006 13:45 GMT Definitely: the key is to get it when you feel well: CT's and MRI's have both false positives and false negatives: almost every MRI I see of the head reports on some mucosal thickening of some sinus, in patients without symptoms. On the other hand, people can be chronically, constantly, actively infected, and the CT can look pretty normal. However, the CT can show perisistant abnormalities even when you feel well--and that can indiicate a sinus that is functionally not draining or aerating, and it can show anatomical abnormalities that occlude the ostea and might benefit from a surgical approach. Mucoceles--cysts filled with mucous can show up. All sorts of things. A sinus CT, without contrast, is the best way to image your sinuses--some centers had 3-D capabilities that they use in surgery as well. What I was saying is that when you have a cold, your sinuses are swollen and full of mucous on CT. Murray Grossan has posted that he doesn't allow patients to use his irrigator for 2 days before a CT because the fluid from his irrigator shows up in the sinuses on CT for a day or 2 and can be read as a persistant fluid level--which is usally consider infection. (It is a little concerning that pulsatile irrigation leaves fluid in your sinuses, at least to me. But no one has ever written about what sinuses look like on CT after neti pots or Neimed bottle irrigations. I'll bet since neti pot has low pressure, that little fluid persists, but who knows?) I'd get the CT so you know what you're dealing with. Once, I had this horrible pain over my right frontal sinus, and no amount of antibiotics made it better--it would come in severe waves--and CT showed a frontal sinus mucocele. I was immediately sent up to Boston, and at the time, they approached the surgery through your face and it was a big, scary deal, and my local ENT got a repeat scan a few weeks later, and it had gone down. So, the Boston ENT felt it waxed and waned, and wasn't likely to errode into my brain--like the last patient he operated on (he showed me her brain abscess CT just to really scare me.) Ultimately I did have surgery on that frontal sinus, and it led to a year of a bone infection, and who knows if it was the right thing to do. Two smaller surgeries later--by my local ENT--and a daily low dose of biaxin--I've done well. But I needed that CT to figure out what was going on. Judy
> Judy: > [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > >> > >> Kathyw MZB - 23 Dec 2006 19:24 GMT Judy:
Doc wants me to get the Ct Scan if (more likely when) my sinus problems return.
He seems to think they can distinguish between pus and a real abnormality.
Do you think that's a mistake (getting it when I'm sick)?
My routine physical is set for 4/28 so I can ask again at that time (who knows is my sinus problem will return before then -- it could return tomorrow or in one year!)
BTW, I understand you are a physician. How do you even practice when the sinus problems get bad?
Mel
Mel
> Definitely: the key is to get it when you feel well: CT's and MRI's > have both false positives and false negatives: almost every MRI I see [quoted text clipped - 94 lines] >> >> >> >> Kathyw judy.n - 23 Dec 2006 22:15 GMT Mel, You'd be amazed at how many physicians have sinus issues. Just like people in all other profession,-- sinusitis is very common. When I think back, I can't imagine how I made it through my internship pregnant--22+ years ago. (And I did have some sinus infections during internship too--although I only took antibiotics if my ob okayed them.) Actually my older daughter is engaged to an intern: and despite all the attempts to reduce the residents' work hours--his internship is grueling. Off the top of my head, I can think of a number of colleagues who've had sinus surgery. I work with a great pediatric allergist who has had some major sinus problems, and we'll discuss work, and then we "talk sinuses". My ENT has had a history of sinus problems, which is part of the reason he's so wonderful to work with--he really understands what patients feel. For me, low dose biaxin has been extremely helpful--I came across the work of Anders Cervin at a faculty development conference in 2002, when they were teaching us how to do internet searches, and it has made a huge impact on my sinus problems. So has continued allergy shots. I work with a dean at the medical school, and she once commented that I was lucky that I could get access to medications and physicians, and she's right. Not that I haven't had my share of unfortunate outcomes, and worthless consults, but I can search the literature and have access to to databases at a medical school library, and that gives me access to some more information. Although, I wouldn't be posting on this group, or reading if I had all the answers. No one does. I'm very reluctant to "play the doctor card"--it makes my husband nuts--but sometimes it does open some doors. One of the many reasons I really appreciate my ENT is that he is able to both treat me as a colleague and let me be a patient--a very tough thing to do. Judy
> Judy: > [quoted text clipped - 113 lines] > >> >> > >> >> Kathyw judy.n - 23 Dec 2006 22:18 GMT Mel, I didn't answer the question of when to get the sinus CT: I'm going by what my ENT and the other ENT consultants I use tell me--they want to see the scan when the patient is over the acute infection. They want to see what it looks like when the patient is at their best. It sounds like your primary care MD is timing the scan--maybe they should consult with an ENT about when they'd prefer it be done. Judy
> Judy: > [quoted text clipped - 113 lines] > >> >> > >> >> Kathyw Murray Grossan - 23 Dec 2006 21:42 GMT On 12/23/06 5:45 AM, in article 1166881541.101433.98040@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com, "judy.n"
> On the other hand, people can be > chronically, constantly, actively infected, and the CT can look pretty > normal. This doesn't happen with the CT scans. You can have a nasal infection and not show sinus disease, but CT scans are quite accurate. You can have a neuralgia or referred pain and call it sinusitis and the CT will be negative. MRI for sinuses are very misleading as they show positive with the slightest mucus.
Susan - 24 Dec 2006 00:05 GMT > This doesn't happen with the CT scans. > You can have a nasal infection and not show sinus disease, but CT scans are > quite accurate. You can have a neuralgia or referred pain and call it > sinusitis and the CT will be negative. > MRI for sinuses are very misleading as they show positive with the slightest > mucus. Totally false, Murray, from my experience. My infections, though fully symptomatic with signs and symptoms, have never shown up on CT scans. I've read that this is very common with ethmoid sinus disease.
Susan
Murray Grossan - 24 Dec 2006 22:00 GMT On 12/23/06 4:05 PM, in article 4v5uh8F1anp9oU1@mid.individual.net, "Susan" <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Susan Susan, there are caveats. In other words, you can have a biofilm nasal disease/infection that is not sinusitis. You can have referred pain, neuralgia, many things that are not actually sinusitis. Perhaps you are referring to the flat plate type CT. Also, a vacuum sinusitis won't show but that is not acute sinus infection. I see a patient daily that says he had a sinus x ray that didn't show a sinus infection but is being treated, etc and the diagnosis is something else, including referred cervicogenic pain. I believe your infections were something else or the films were not able to "layer". Our CT are so finely layered it is not possible to miss a fluid level or bony erosion or thickened mucosa.
Susan - 25 Dec 2006 04:19 GMT > Susan, there are caveats. In other words, you can have a biofilm nasal > disease/infection that is not sinusitis. You can have referred pain, [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > layered it is not possible to miss a fluid level or bony erosion or > thickened mucosa. We have heard of many reports in which bone was found to be infected in ethmoid sinus disease in surgery that was not apparent on CT scan.
Susan
judy.n - 26 Dec 2006 13:32 GMT No test is perfect, and I doubt that you base surgical treatment solely on the CT. I posted on the other thread as well: a vacuum sinusitis implies blockage, a biofilm infection is still an infection--although you've indicated that you believe it is confined to the nasal mucosa. I'm sure you have a state of the art CT scanner, but I would imagine that the imagining is only one piece of the clinical picture, and even a very high tech, finely sliced 3-D scanner is not 100% sensitive and specific. I still belive that we treat the patient, not the test. Judy
> On 12/23/06 4:05 PM, in article 4v5uh8F1anp9oU1@mid.individual.net, "Susan" > <nevermind@nomail.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > layered it is not possible to miss a fluid level or bony erosion or > thickened mucosa. kathywb2001@yahoo.com - 26 Dec 2006 17:15 GMT > I still belive that we treat the patient, not the test. > Judy Well said, Judy. Thanks.
Kathyw
judy.n - 26 Dec 2006 23:15 GMT Thanks Kathy, Technology is helpful, but never the final answer. I get upset when tests are used to invalidate what patients are experiencing. Yes, the CT can clarify if the pain is "acute sinusitis"--fluid and/or thickened mucosa and osteal obstruction, but they are just one piece of the clinical puzzle, and are literally a snap shot in time. If I know my body, and I know I am infected--and a rigid endoscopy or a CT doesn't validate my perception, we still need to weigh my perception as meaningful--not discount it and tell me the pain is referred or psycosomatic. When I had surgery in Boston in 2000, and the Boston ENT refused to see me in follow up, because all of his patients always have good outcomes, my local ENT had to endoscope me a number of times before we found the pseudomonas osteomyelitis. He couldn't find the infection right away, but he believed me when I told him that fever, localized pain, fatigue, bits of dead bone when I irrigated-- just weren't right. My CT just showed massive surgical changes and scars and adhesions from the surgery. I'd love if it chronic sinusitis was simple, but it's not. Judy
> > I still belive that we treat the patient, not the test. > > Judy > > Well said, Judy. Thanks. > > Kathyw rick@spamgmail.com - 24 Dec 2006 03:26 GMT >On 12/23/06 5:45 AM, in article >1166881541.101433.98040@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com, "judy.n" [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >MRI for sinuses are very misleading as they show positive with the slightest >mucus. As a patient, I agree. My first CT scan, in which the infection apparently wasn't all gone, showed blockage (if that's the correct term) in my right ethmoid. Several months later, after aggressive antibiotic therapy, and re CT-scan, using the same facility, and same scanner, showed clear.
Doctors need to make sure their patients are as infection-free as they can be before doing the tests, so as to prevent unnecessary surgery.
Rick
kathywb2001@yahoo.com - 24 Dec 2006 06:04 GMT > This doesn't happen with the CT scans. > You can have a nasal infection and not show sinus disease, but CT scans are > quite accurate. Dr. Grossan, I'm just wondering how many patients have come to you complaining of symptoms of sinusitis, and you've told them that they didn't have it because it didn't show up on the CT scan? I know myself as well as many other here have had significant ethmoid disease that did not show up on CT scans, but at surgery there was disease. I just recently had a bone scan, and it now shows I have infection in the remaining ethmoid bones. Even the ENT who did my last surgery in July to open up my sphonoids which had been blocked (and is very well respected) had not thought the ethmoids were involved. I had also sent CT scans to another well respected ENT who also did not detect ethmoid disease. So what am I supposed to do now? My current ENT has said it is too close to my brain to do surgery, but I am miserable, and don't know how much more of this I can stand.
Kathw
judy.n - 24 Dec 2006 14:53 GMT Kathy, maybe a second/third opinion? Some surgeons--like Peter Catalano at Lahey, will take on really tough cases. I have to search for the reference: but I have definitely seen an article where "clear" CT's showed disease on subsequent surgery. There was a JAMA article by Kennedy several years ago that referenced the false negatives of sinus CT's. There is no perfect test. If Dr. Grossan feels that CT is completely sensitive and specific, why does he tell patients not to irrigate for 2 days before a CT? Bottom line: you shouldn't be miserable. I did have lot of ethmoid pain after a big surgery and bone infection, and my ENT went in to clean up some thick adhesions near my ethmoids, and he found some "posterior spurring" and an overly narrow area which he felt caused a lot of the pain--he also found some infected ethmoids he hadn't expected. After that last surgery, my chronic right frontal/ethmoid pain got so much better. We did it in a surgicenter under local sedation--I asked to avoid general anesthesia. Judy
> > This doesn't happen with the CT scans. > > You can have a nasal infection and not show sinus disease, but CT scans are [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Kathw kathywb2001@yahoo.com - 24 Dec 2006 17:46 GMT > Kathy, maybe a second/third opinion? Some surgeons--like Peter Catalano > at Lahey, will take on really tough cases. Thanks Judy. I was having a really bad day yesterday; today I'm feeling a lot better. I never know from one day to the next whether I will be able to function that day or not. I do have a good ID doctor I am seeing again at the first of January and a new ENT that is affilitated with him and Emory University (6 hour drive). I would prefer to go back to Dr. Sherris, but I don't see going to Buffalo from Tennesse an option this time of year unless I absolutely have to (12 hour drive); flying isn't an option at this point. He has already told me that he would put me on IV antitiotics if I have evidence of infection on a bone scan and a postitive culture. The only problem is that I've been on and off of both antifungals and antibitiotics since my last surgery in July, and it's hard to get a positive culture, but I can't function at all when I go off of either of them. I have had both mold (including Blastomyces) and several different bacteria cultured out over the last 2 years. Ireally need to know exactly what I am getting treated first. I do have a couple of cultures pending from some nasty looking drainage that came out when I first went back on the VFend and doxycycline together. That combination seems to be working the best for now and I need to stay on it at least until after Christmas. I'm just a little leary that if I'm not having symptoms or the new ENT doesn't see anything when I go, it will ruin the relationship with my ID doctor; then I don't know what I will do because it took me a long time to find him.
My current ENT is trying to say that the postivie uptake on the bone scan in the exact same areas where I have had the excruciating pain (ethmoids and mid maxillaries) behind my nose, is from surgery that I had 7 years ago, even though I continue to have ths awful tasting gritty, nasty looking drainage from time to time, and I've shown it to him. And he actually told me at one time that bacteria are probably trapped in the bone. It couldn't be from this last surgery becaue all Dr. Sherris did was open up my sphenoids and frontals and the bone scan didn't show anything there.
Dr. Kennedy is the ENT that I sent a CT scan to that I had done at National Jewish Medical Center that showed mild ethmoid and maxillary disease with reactive bone formation that could be old osteomyelitis. All I ever heard back was that I wasn't a candidate for surgery at this time.
So, this is getting very frustrating. I even won a disabiltiy claim becasue the judge reviewed all my records and listened to my symtpoms and determined that I was not able to work. Too bad he can't treat me for this.
Anyway, I will keep Dr. Catalano in mind also. I have to keep trying to find help.
I hope you and everyone else have a wonderful sinusitis free (or at least managable) Holiday.
Kathyw
Murray Grossan - 24 Dec 2006 22:05 GMT On 12/23/06 10:04 PM, in article 1166940276.292733.314670@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com,
>> This doesn't happen with the CT scans. >> You can have a nasal infection and not show sinus disease, but CT scans are [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Kathw To repeat, I see patient's daily whose sinus X rays didn't show disease. But they had "sinus symptoms". The goal is to find why they have the symptoms. Sometimes its migraine, or cervicogenic or neuralgic or vacuum. And sometimes a different CT is needed. When you are in doing surgery you see areas that are better removed or opened, but that is not the same as sinusitis.
Helge Rebhan - 12 Jan 2007 17:17 GMT > This doesn't happen with the CT scans. > You can have a nasal infection and not show sinus disease, but CT scans are > quite accurate. You can have a neuralgia or referred pain and call it > sinusitis and the CT will be negative. > MRI for sinuses are very misleading as they show positive with the slightest > mucus. So is MRI hardly ever used for sinusitis diagonsis? I have a reoccuring weak sinusitis everz 2-3 weeks and I wonder what is the best approach to a.ses the real causes in my case? I believe that one or two teeths could be well responsible but simple exams and x-rays did not reveal anything sofar.
|
|
|