Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Sinusitis / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Biofilms

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
judy.n - 14 Jul 2006 19:00 GMT
JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association, reported this
week that they did a study and directly observed biofilms in the ears
of children with chronic otitis media: and they conclude "the biofilms
persist and resist both the host immune response and antibiotic
treatment."
It's the 7/12/06 JAMA, "Direct Detection of Bacterial Biofilms on the
MIddle-Ear Mucosa of Children with Chronic Otits Media", Hall-Stoodley,
et al, vol 296, no 2 p202-211
The abstract is likely available without a subscription:
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/296/2/202

So, it's not that hard to extrapolate the theory to chronic sinusitis.
We already know that biofilms are an issue in cystic fibrosis and a
diffuse panbronchiolitis syndrome (where people get colonized with
pseudomonas.) Both cystic fibrosis and the panbronchiolitis respond to
macrolides: azithromycin pulses in cystic fibrosis and low dose
macrolides in panbronchiolitis. The macrolides are lousy pseudomonas
drugs,  but they disrupt biofilms.

I saw the article, and it seemed like it related to chronic sinusitis.
Just my opinion.
Judy
Susan - 14 Jul 2006 19:15 GMT
> JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association, reported this
> week that they did a study and directly observed biofilms in the ears
> of children with chronic otitis media: and they conclude "the biofilms
> persist and resist both the host immune response and antibiotic
> treatment."

So here's a lay question from one who hasn't read a lot about biofilms:
do they only resist host immune response, or are they in any way
possibly a result of it?  Are they created by organisms as a way to
maintain an environment more conducive to their survival?

> It's the 7/12/06 JAMA, "Direct Detection of Bacterial Biofilms on the
> MIddle-Ear Mucosa of Children with Chronic Otits Media", Hall-Stoodley,
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Just my opinion.
> Judy

It does seem highly relevent, thanks yet again.  It kind of makes me
feel unarmed and sort of hopeless in a battle with a tenacious foe,
though.  :-/

Susan
judy.n - 14 Jul 2006 20:00 GMT
Susan,
We need a scientist here, but here's the quote from the intro to the
article:
"Biofilms consist of aggregated bacteria, usually adherent to a
surface, surrounded by an extracellular matrix, and have been
implicated in several chronic bacterial infections."

They reference for this statement
1) Science 1999, Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistant
infections., Costerton et al
2) Nat Rev Microbiol 2004, Biofilms, from the natural environment to
infectious diseases. Hall-Stoodley et al

I'm guessing, but I think the answer to both your questions is yes:
definitely biofilms assist the organisms' survival, I'm less sure if if
they're created in response to the host immune/inflammatory response.
My husband is a dentist, and he gets all these articles warning him of
biofilm development in his water tubing and the need to break it up
with bleach/mechanical flushing. After the first article, I started
boiling my irrigation water. But in water tubes, there's no host
response.
Judy

> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> Susan
Susan - 14 Jul 2006 20:17 GMT
> Susan,
>  We need a scientist here, but here's the quote from the intro to the
> article:
> "Biofilms consist of aggregated bacteria, usually adherent to a
> surface, surrounded by an extracellular matrix, and have been
> implicated in several chronic bacterial infections."

> They reference for this statement
> 1) Science 1999, Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistant
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> boiling my irrigation water. But in water tubes, there's no host
> response.

Thanks, Judy.  I guess biofilm is what my teenager grew on the kitchen
sponges while we were on vacation for a week last year.  The smell!  :-D

Susan
geoffgreen@sympatico.ca - 14 Jul 2006 20:30 GMT
I believe that's why I have found the 10% xylitol solution has worked
so well for me and hopefully others if they try it.  The principle
involved is that the xylitol solution prevents adhesion of the biofilm
to the mucous membrane.  When I started my 'sinus steeping' there were
great gobs of mucous that would come out.  Eventually, the amount of
mucous was negligible which corresponded to my no longer having a sinus
infection.  For those interested here is the relevant part of the
abstract. from PubMed:
http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=...

"Furthermore, in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study,
xylitol sprayed for 4 days into each nostril of normal volunteers
significantly decreased the number of nasal coagulase-negative
Staphylococcus compared with saline control. Xylitol may be of value in

decreasing ASL salt concentration and enhancing the innate
antimicrobial defense at the airway surface".
Geoff
> Susan,
>  We need a scientist here, but here's the quote from the intro to the
> article:
> "Biofilms consist of aggregated bacteria, usually adherent to a
> surface, surrounded by an extracellular matrix, and have been
> implicated in several chronic bacterial infections."
Susan - 14 Jul 2006 20:49 GMT
> I believe that's why I have found the 10% xylitol solution has worked
> so well for me and hopefully others if they try it.  The principle
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> abstract. from PubMed:
> http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=...

This link didn't work for me.

> "Furthermore, in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study,
> xylitol sprayed for 4 days into each nostril of normal volunteers
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> decreasing ASL salt concentration and enhancing the innate
> antimicrobial defense at the airway surface".

How does this address biofilm directly?

Susan
geoffgreen@sympatico.ca - 15 Jul 2006 03:39 GMT
> How does this address biofilm directly?
>
> Susan

I believe it has to do with adhesion of the bacteria to the mucous
membrane.  The bacteria are part of the biofilm.  Here is the abstract
of the first paper I posted on xylitol:

Ultrastructure of Streptococcus pneumoniae after exposure to xylitol.

Tapiainen T, Sormunen R, Kaijalainen T, Kontiokari T, Ikaheimo I, Uhari

M.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Oulu, PO Box 5000, FIN-90014,
Oulu.

OBJECTIVES: Xylitol is a sugar alcohol which reduces the growth of
Streptococcus pneumoniae and the adherence of pneumococci and
Haemophilus influenzae to nasopharyngeal cells. Xylitol prevents acute
otitis media but does not decrease nasopharyngeal carriage of
pneumococci. We hypothesized that xylitol could affect the surface
structures of viable pneumococci, which would further explain the
mechanism of action of xylitol in preventing acute otitis media.
METHODS: We exposed five strains of pneumococci to 0.5%-5% xylitol, 5%
glucose, 5% fructose and 5% sorbitol or control medium (brain heart
infusion) for 0.5-2 h and examined the ultrastructure of bacteria by
electron microscopy. RESULTS: The cell wall of pneumococci became more
diffuse, the polysaccharide capsule became ragged and the proportion of

damaged pneumococci increased after exposure to xylitol for 2 h, but
not after exposure to other sugars or control medium. The phenotype of
all pneumococcal strains was opaque before xylitol exposure and became
almost transparent both in xylitol and in control medium during the
experiment. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates further that xylitol
has a harmful effect on pneumococci. The observed changes in the
polysaccharide capsule and the cell wall of pneumococci could affect
the adherence and virulence of pneumococci, explaining the good
clinical efficacy of xylitol in the prevention of acute otitis media.

PMID: 15190027 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

and here is the proper link to the other xylitol paper, Geoff

http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=11027360
Susan - 15 Jul 2006 14:54 GMT
>>How does this address biofilm directly?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> membrane.  The bacteria are part of the biofilm.  Here is the abstract
> of the first paper I posted on xylitol:

Can you remind us again of the xylitol % and preparation you're using,
and how often?

Thanks.

Susan
judy.n - 15 Jul 2006 15:31 GMT
No solution here: but a decent wikepedia site explaining biofilms:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biofilm

I think the key is to break up the film with it's matrix, and solvents,
or agents like xylitol, or even irrigation may all be helpful.
I do think they are part of the reason why the sinuses, those remote
areas, are so tough to clear up, and why in the face of a persisting
biofilm, the infections come back.
Judy
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Susan
geoffgreen@sympatico.ca - 15 Jul 2006 19:00 GMT
> Can you remind us again of the xylitol % and preparation you're using,
> and how often?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Susan

Hi Susan.  Here's the xylitol solution I use:

I mix 3 tablespoons or 45 ml of 100% pure xylitol in 250 ml of water.
I used to mix salt but after reading how salt can reduce the
anti-bacterial substances in the mucous I stopped. (See the link above
to the complete paper at PubMed).  I used to use this 100% solution
about every 2 hours when I had my severe sinus infection back in the
middle of June.  But now the xylitol seems to have cured it.  I can say
unequivocally that the xylitol did cure it as the different antibiotics
I tried had no effect.  I steep my sinuses, by that I mean I put  the
solution in my sinuses and let this solution stay in there for several
minutes.  I get the mixture in my sinuses by tilting my head and gently
squirting the mixture in through my nostril and then lying down for
several minutes on my back being careful to try to prevent the solution
from dribbling out of my nose.  After several minutes, I drain the
solution from my nostrils and gently blow my nose and then lean forward
and shake my head back and forth to really get all the mucous that
would come out of my nose  but now there's almost nothing so I'm just
doing this procedure once in the morning and once at night as a
preventitive.  I hope it helps you as it has helped me Good luck, Geoff
Susan - 15 Jul 2006 19:07 GMT
>>Can you remind us again of the xylitol % and preparation you're using,
>>and how often?
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> doing this procedure once in the morning and once at night as a
> preventitive.  I hope it helps you as it has helped me Good luck, Geoff

Thanks, I'll try it starting today.  As it happens, my bad sinus, the
right ethmoid always steeps, It can take forever to get stuff to drain
out of it, unless I lie down on my left side or til forward and to the left.

Susan
geoffgreen@sympatico.ca - 15 Jul 2006 19:03 GMT
> Can you remind us again of the xylitol % and preparation you're using,
> and how often?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Susan

Hi Susan.  Here's the xylitol solution I use:

I mix 3 tablespoons or 45 ml of 100% pure xylitol in 250 ml of water.
I used to mix salt but after reading how salt can reduce the
anti-bacterial substances in the mucous I stopped. (See the link above
to the complete paper at PubMed).  I used to use this 100% solution
about every 2 hours when I had my severe sinus infection back in the
middle of June.  But now the xylitol seems to have cured it.  I can say
unequivocally that the xylitol did cure it as the different antibiotics
I tried had no effect.  I steep my sinuses, by that I mean I put  the
solution in my sinuses and let this solution stay in there for several
minutes.  I get the mixture in my sinuses by tilting my head and gently
squirting the mixture in through my nostril and then lying down for
several minutes on my back being careful to try to prevent the solution
from dribbling out of my nose.  After several minutes, I drain the
solution from my nostrils and gently blow my nose and then lean forward
and shake my head back and forth to really get all the mucous that
would come out of my nose  but now there's almost nothing so I'm just
doing this procedure once in the morning and once at night as a
preventitive.  I hope it helps you as it has helped me Good luck, Geoff
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.