Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Sinusitis / July 2006
Ketek: Label To Warn Of Possible Liver Failure
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Steven L. - 30 Jun 2006 16:06 GMT Antibiotic Label to Warn of Liver Danger
By ANDREW BRIDGES The Associated Press Thursday, June 29, 2006; 8:53 PM
WASHINGTON -- The label of a novel antibiotic will be updated to reflect reports of severe liver problems, including several deaths, associated with its use, the drug's maker and health officials said Thursday.
Sanofi-Aventis' Ketek will carry a bold-type warning about the rare reports of liver failure and severe injury, some of them fatal, in patients treated with the drug. The company also is providing additional information to patients and doctors.
The Food and Drug Administration approved Ketek in 2004. The drug is used to treat respiratory tract infections, bronchitis, sinusitis and community-acquired pneumonia. Both the FDA and Sanofi-Aventis believe the drug's benefits still outweigh its risks.
Through April, the FDA has received reports of 12 cases of acute liver failure, including four deaths, among people treated with Ketek. A fifth required a liver transplant.
"In certain of these cases, it appears there are no other likely causes of liver injury, so it does appear they were linked to the use of the drug," said Dr. John Jenkins, director of the Office of New Drugs in the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
The FDA will continue to monitor the safety of Ketek and take further action if necessary, said a second agency official, Dr. Gerald Dal Pan of the Office of Epidemiology and Surveillance in the drug center.
There have been two further cases of acute liver failure reported since April, though details were not immediately available, Dal Pan said.
The FDA also knows of 23 other cases where patients had serious liver injuries after receiving the antibiotic, which also is called telithromycin.
The rate of reported liver problems associated with the drug is 23 per 10 million prescriptions filled, according to the FDA. In a previously disclosed internal memo, the FDA said the rate appeared higher in comparison with similar antibiotics.
But a study published in January that detailed several of the liver cases associated with the drug may have stimulated the reporting of further problems. That can skew perceptions of the risk of Ketek compared with older but similar antibiotics.
"At this point we cannot conclude the risk is higher than with other antibiotics used to treat these conditions," Dal Pan said.
Dr. Bruce Lavin, vice president of internal medicine for Sanofi-Aventis, said Ketek remains an option needed by doctors when they treat people who are infected with bacteria that have developed resistance to other antibiotics.
The label change comes as the Senate Finance Committee investigates allegations of fraud connected with trials of Ketek, as well as how the FDA has handled safety issues associated with the drug.
"There are questions about whether this drug should stay on the market, and there's great legitimacy to those questions. Ketek is another example where the FDA accommodated a drug maker and turned a blind eye to serious safety concerns," Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, the committee's chairman, said in a statement.
The updated label for Ketek warns doctors and patients to watch for signs of hepatitis such as fatigue, malaise, anorexia, jaundice and nausea. Patients with signs or symptoms of hepatitis should stop treatment with Ketek immediately and seek a medical evaluation, including liver functions tests, according to the label.
The label was updated to warn of cases of death and life-threatening acute respiratory failure seen in Ketek-treated patients with myasthenia gravis, an autoimmune disorder marked by muscle weakness and fatigue. The FDA knows of three such deaths. Patients with the disorder should not be given Ketek unless other options aren't available, the company said.
This month, Sanofi-Aventis stopped enrolling children in trials of the drug. The company said it had not identified any safety reason that would merit the "pause," but that it wanted to confirm the trial conformed with FDA guidelines.
U.S. sales of Ketek were an estimated $50 million in the first half of 2006, the company said.
On the Net:
Ketek information: http://www.ketek.com © 2006 The Associated Press
http://tinyurl.com/kpyl6
 Signature Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
Murray Grossan - 30 Jun 2006 19:40 GMT On 6/30/06 8:06 AM, in article m6bpg.529$PE1.480@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net, "Steven L." <sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote:
> Antibiotic Label to Warn of Liver Danger > [quoted text clipped - 89 lines] > > http://tinyurl.com/kpyl6 That's why my philosophy is not to be the first kid on the block! We like to give the new drugs time to see what heavy use might show.
judy.n - 01 Jul 2006 01:56 GMT Ketek was held up by the FDA for a couple of years re: safety concerns--they kept requiring additional clinical trials. The drug reps were pushing it at conferences for two years before it became available. Personally, I've always worried about the visual disturbances: patients can get "fixed accomodation" where they can't adjust the focus of their eyes. Especially young women, especially in the first day or so of use. I've always wondered if patients who took it should be counseled not to drive. I've never written a script for it, but I've been to several lectures where it was promoted as a crucial step in preventing resistance. (In some defense of it, I've seen several patients get liver problems with either bactrim or amoxicillin--but they were always reversible.) Judy
> On 6/30/06 8:06 AM, in article > m6bpg.529$PE1.480@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net, "Steven L." [quoted text clipped - 96 lines] > That's why my philosophy is not to be the first kid on the block! We like to > give the new drugs time to see what heavy use might show. rick@spamgmail.com - 01 Jul 2006 16:37 GMT >On 6/30/06 8:06 AM, in article >m6bpg.529$PE1.480@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net, "Steven L." [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] >> patients treated with the drug. The company also is providing additional >> information to patients and doctors. <snip>
>That's why my philosophy is not to be the first kid on the block! We like to >give the new drugs time to see what heavy use might show. I used a course of Ketek once. It didn't help me more than any others, but most antibiotics are that way with me anyway.
Rick
Murray Grossan - 01 Jul 2006 17:57 GMT On 7/1/06 8:37 AM, in article pg5da2h8shsne5gcscgugne1o37bd00frf@4ax.com,
> It didn't help me more than any > others, but most antibiotics are that way with me anyway. > > Rick Rick, go back to the listings here re macrolides being effective because they are anti-inlammatory. Combining an antibiotic with an anti-inflammatory for sinusitis can make a huge difference.
Steven L. - 02 Jul 2006 06:03 GMT > On 6/30/06 8:06 AM, in article > m6bpg.529$PE1.480@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net, "Steven L." [quoted text clipped - 96 lines] > That's why my philosophy is not to be the first kid on the block! We like to > give the new drugs time to see what heavy use might show. Yep, even doctors get screwed that way occasionally. My ENT told me he has stopped prescribing Zyrtec for his patients, because he used it himself for his own allergies and he got a rare but nasty side effect from it (back pain).
 Signature Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
judy.n - 02 Jul 2006 21:45 GMT I used to work with a brilliant physician, an advocate of evidence based medicine, who felt that personal experience was much more powerful than evidence. I agree. Judy
> > On 6/30/06 8:06 AM, in article > > m6bpg.529$PE1.480@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net, "Steven L." [quoted text clipped - 106 lines] > Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net > Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me. Susan - 03 Jul 2006 01:06 GMT > I used to work with a brilliant physician, an advocate of evidence > based medicine, who felt that personal experience was much more > powerful than evidence. I agree. As do I. Nothing gets me gone faster than a new doc who comments after my report of my experiences, "oh, well, that's subjective." Yeah, right. It's information.
Susan
judy.n - 03 Jul 2006 14:31 GMT And as we wrote on an earlier post about sinus CT's: there is no perfect technology. Patient history is still the crucial component of the evaluation. History is more important than physical findings in the vast majority of situations. The current trend in medicine is to make it less anectodal and subjective, but to rely on the "evidence" when it's flawed, or nonexistent, is a problem. As you know, most studies are drug company sponsored, and they suppress bad outcomes and hide the studies. So much for the data base of evidence. I trust doctors who are open to listening and believing me, and working with me--and admitting when they find the situation confusing or frustrating, but are committed to hanging in there with me to work it out. I completely agree with you: "subjective" is actually an objective reporting of your symptoms. I've had many occasions where my endoscopy is "clear" and I come home, and due to the decongestant, it's obvious I've been brewing a sinus infection. Judy
> x-no-archive: yes > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Susan judy.n - 03 Jul 2006 21:35 GMT Back to ketek: there have been allegations of fraud in the clinical trials: here's a link to an article about it. http://hcrenewal.blogspot.com/2006/06/senator-smells-coverup-about-how-fda.html Judy
> And as we wrote on an earlier post about sinus CT's: there is no > perfect technology. Patient history is still the crucial component of [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > > > Susan Steven L. - 04 Jul 2006 01:26 GMT > x-no-archive: yes > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > my report of my experiences, "oh, well, that's subjective." Yeah, > right. It's information. The most annoying thing is when you are prescribed psychotherapeutic meds for a mental health disorder. If you report side effects, the doctor tells you in so many words that "You're a nutcase and hypochondriac anyway, so you're probably imagining the side effects."
Been there, done that. Twice.
 Signature Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
Susan - 04 Jul 2006 03:48 GMT > The most annoying thing is when you are prescribed psychotherapeutic > meds for a mental health disorder. If you report side effects, the > doctor tells you in so many words that "You're a nutcase and > hypochondriac anyway, so you're probably imagining the side effects." It's so they don't have to think any harder about how to help you. Doctor's get paid the same rate and stay just as busy whether they do a lousy job or not.
Susan
|
|
|