Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Sinusitis / March 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Some info for those of us who are newer to usenet

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Susan - 24 Mar 2006 19:51 GMT
Not to be Schoolmarmish about it, but this is really key to maintaining
coherent conversations in a virtual "room" with so many different voices
at times...

http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html

http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/quote.html

http://www.dickalba.demon.co.uk/usenet/guide/guide.html

Susan
tyshock - 24 Mar 2006 20:47 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Susan

I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that GoogleGroups' default
"Reply" option doesn't autoquote.  It's really odd that it works that
way.  You have to click 'Show Options' in the header area of the
existing post, then click Reply.  At that point it autoquotes.   Lots
of new users are probably using GoogleGroups versus a standard usenet
client.  

Tyler
lrhone11 - 24 Mar 2006 20:53 GMT
Quote: <think a lot of it has to do with the fact that GoogleGroups'
default
"Reply" option doesn't autoquote.  It's really odd that it works that
way.  You have to click 'Show Options' in the header area of the
existing post, then click Reply>

I emailed Google Groups about this last week....
Susan - 24 Mar 2006 20:59 GMT
> Quote: <think a lot of it has to do with the fact that GoogleGroups'
> default
> "Reply" option doesn't autoquote.  It's really odd that it works that
> way.  You have to click 'Show Options' in the header area of the
> existing post, then click Reply>

Yes, and when I posted through google, that's what I did.

Susan
preesi - 24 Mar 2006 21:34 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Susan

Susan?
The newsgroups are waning badly due to php forums and message boards and
bloggers...
We should all be glad people still post...

Signature

preesi
~~~~~~~~~
"If you've got a passion for fashion, and you've got a craving for
saving, take the wheel of your automobile, and swing on down to Ideal."
~~~~~~~~~ My Websites and Favorite Links: http://tinyurl.com/yvw45
Yahoo/SidekickII Name: MissPreesi
Skype: Preesi

Don Brady - 24 Mar 2006 21:40 GMT
I could look into the possibility of exposing this newsgroup as a web site
using better software than google uses.

Would people be interested in that?

If I did that, I would dedicate its ownership in trust to the current posters
of this newsgroup.  That is, I would take no personal ownership interest in
it.......
Susan - 24 Mar 2006 21:45 GMT
> I could look into the possibility of exposing this newsgroup as a web site
> using better software than google uses.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> of this newsgroup.  That is, I would take no personal ownership interest in
> it.......

What for?  Folks have any number of free news readers available to them.

Susan
Don Brady - 25 Mar 2006 00:01 GMT
>x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>What for?  Folks have any number of free news readers available to them.

For the same reasons that IBM and many other publishers have gatewayed
newsgroups to the web

- to make them more accessible to new users who have never even heard of Usenet
- to make them accessible at institutions that block the nntp port 119  
- to make them show up better in web searches

More experienced users such as you and I would continue to use newsgreaders (or
google I guess, although I do not like it for reading news).

So there would be no question of replacing the newsgroup, just making it more
accessible....

We woud lhave to be very ckear that the web site expsoing the newsgroup in an
attractive web format was *noyt* to be the commercial property of anyone.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.