Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Sinusitis / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Sinus Polyps. To treat or not to treat?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
NEUE - 08 Apr 2005 15:23 GMT
Hi,

Last week I went to a Ear Nose and Throat doctor because I had a lump
on my cheek, which turned out to be nothing. During my visit he found
polyps on my sinuses, which give me no problems whatsoever. However,
the Dr gave me antibiotics and steroids in a spray form to treat them.
Should I even bother if I have no problems at all from this polyps?
Should I just leave them alone? I'd hate to start taking antibiotics
and steroids if it's not necessary. The doctor said it was up to me to
treat them or not, that he was just being thorough.

Thanks.

NDD
Allen L. - 08 Apr 2005 15:40 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> NDD

If they don't start growing at a rapid rate, you will be fine...at least for
awhile. When they get big enough to block your nose to an extent, you will
want to have something done.

...Allen
Susan - 08 Apr 2005 16:08 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> NDD

Why would you treat something that's so asymptomatic that you didn't
know it was there?

Susan
comptona@sbcglobal.net - 08 Apr 2005 23:31 GMT
My mother in law was diagnosed with breast cancer during a routine
mammogram...she had no symptoms....but the cancer definitely needed to
be treated!  I think it is wise to seek advice about whether certain
medical conditions need treatment, regardless of the symptoms they
present.  Granted, nasal polyps should not be compared to breast
cancer, but I think it is still wise to seek advice.
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Susan
Susan - 08 Apr 2005 23:39 GMT
> My mother in law was diagnosed with breast cancer during a routine
> mammogram...she had no symptoms....but the cancer definitely needed to
> be treated!  I think it is wise to seek advice about whether certain
> medical conditions need treatment, regardless of the symptoms they
> present.  Granted, nasal polyps should not be compared to breast
> cancer, but I think it is still wise to seek advice.

What on earth are you responding to?

The polyps are asymptomatic, not cancerous, and have already been
examined by a doctor.

The OP had already sought medical advice.

Susan
Murray Grossan - 09 Apr 2005 05:36 GMT
On 4/8/05 8:08 AM, in article 3bnl36F6ipfn0U1@individual.net, "Susan"

> Why would you treat something that's so asymptomatic that you didn't
> know it was there?

Nasal polyps can block the sinus drainage and result in changes in the
sinuses that might require sinus surgery.
The doctor is correct in prescribing antibiotic with the spray in order to
shrink the polyps - because of the blockage, there is some infection and the
polyps won't shrink if there is infection.
Susan - 09 Apr 2005 14:20 GMT
> On 4/8/05 8:08 AM, in article 3bnl36F6ipfn0U1@individual.net, "Susan"
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> shrink the polyps - because of the blockage, there is some infection and the
> polyps won't shrink if there is infection.

But in this case, the polyps were not causing a blockage.  Is the OP to
stay on antibiotics and steroid spray permanently?

Susan
ARoberts - 09 Apr 2005 16:07 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Susan
\

They weren't causing a _noticeable_ blockage; that doesn't mean that some
blocking and sequestration of fluids wasn't occurring.  Polyps aren't noted
for shrinking spontaneously.  Most of us who have had them (and in my case,
4 surgeries to remove them), know that they recur and only get worse without
attention.
Susan - 09 Apr 2005 17:07 GMT
> They weren't causing a _noticeable_ blockage; that doesn't mean that some
> blocking and sequestration of fluids wasn't occurring.  Polyps aren't noted
> for shrinking spontaneously.  Most of us who have had them (and in my case,
> 4 surgeries to remove them), know that they recur and only get worse without
> attention.

You've had symptomatic polyps, and I understand why these would require
treatment.  Is it necessarily the case that any and all polyps will
inevitabley continue to grow and to create blockages?

Susan
ARoberts - 09 Apr 2005 18:44 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Susan

In medical matters, there are few inevitabilities.  My polyps didn't
originally start out symptomatically either; their presence was noted
during a routine exam by my family doctor, but nothing was done.  About a
year later, I became continually congested and obstructed.

It has been my experience that polyps do continue to increase in size and
create blockages.  How about others here?
Susan - 09 Apr 2005 18:49 GMT
> In medical matters, there are few inevitabilities.  My polyps didn't
> originally start out symptomatically either; their presence was noted
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> It has been my experience that polyps do continue to increase in size and
> create blockages.  How about others here?

The problem with asking the question here is that we're all self
selected for having sinus symptoms.

If it were me, I would have asymptomatic polyps observed regularly for
changes/growth, rather than immediately initiating treatment, but that's
my personal bias.

Susan
comptona@sbcglobal.net - 09 Apr 2005 19:49 GMT
Susan,
Sorry I didn't explain myself better in my response.  I have had nasal
polyps removed several times and I completely understand that they
usually have nothing to do with cancer (if ever?).  I did not mean that
the individual posting the qustion had any risk of cancer what-so-ever.
I was just trying to make the point that simply b/c a condition has no
symptoms does not mean that treatment should not be considered or
looked into.  Your response indicated to me that you didn't understand
why something with no symptoms should be treated.  I was just trying to
support this individual for seeking more information about the
condition.  I also had the exact same experience that ARoberts referred
to in his/her response.  Hope that makes more sense.  Thanks!
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Susan
Susan - 09 Apr 2005 20:10 GMT
> Susan,
> Sorry I didn't explain myself better in my response.  I have had nasal
> polyps removed several times and I completely understand that they
> usually have nothing to do with cancer (if ever?).  I did not mean that
> the individual posting the qustion had any risk of cancer what-so-ever.

 I was wondering if we were both reading/responding to the same post,
thanks for clarifying.

>  I was just trying to make the point that simply b/c a condition has no
> symptoms does not mean that treatment should not be considered or
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> condition.  I also had the exact same experience that ARoberts referred
> to in his/her response.  Hope that makes more sense.  Thanks!

I don't believe that non-fatal/asymptomatic conditions that may not ever
progress should be treated unless and until it's clear that they are
causing, or will cause,  more harm than treatment may cause.  Saying so
was my way of supporting the OP.

I adamantly believe that each of us must do due diligence, thoroughly
researching all health conditions and prescribed treatments before
taking them, barring emergency lifesaving procedures, of course.

Susan <doesn't take a doctor's word by itself, ever>
afdr9lk - 10 Apr 2005 03:32 GMT
> In medical matters, there are few inevitabilities.  My polyps didn't
> originally start out symptomatically either; their presence was noted
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> It has been my experience that polyps do continue to increase in size and
> create blockages.  How about others here?

That was my case.  Then I found something that made a big difference.
I'm not on any medication and my polpys have receeded.  I can actually
smell again from 100% loss of smell for years.   I have a theory about
it that I have pieced together from others.  I'll post it when I get
a chance.
David Combs - 03 May 2005 15:36 GMT
>> In medical matters, there are few inevitabilities.  My polyps didn't
>> originally start out symptomatically either; their presence was noted
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>it that I have pieced together from others.  I'll post it when I get
>a chance.

Please, *what* medication?

How much, how often?

Side-effects?

Thanks,

David
Shirley Thebaglady - 11 Apr 2005 11:21 GMT
One of my old Bosses got those nasal polyps when he stopped his allergy
shots.

He was in his 40's, a very hyper man, lost his temper very easy.

shirley
Don Brady - 10 Apr 2005 01:59 GMT
>You've had symptomatic polyps, and I understand why these would require
>treatment.  Is it necessarily the case that any and all polyps will
>inevitabley continue to grow and to create blockages?

I do not think so.

I agree with you that monitoring them may suffice.
Steven L. - 09 Apr 2005 16:32 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> But in this case, the polyps were not causing a blockage.  Is the OP to
> stay on antibiotics and steroid spray permanently?

The antibiotic is just to knock down the infection while the polyps are
shrunk by the steroid spray.  There's no problem with being on steroid
sprays indefinitely to keep the polyps from returning.

The cemeteries are full of people who didn't seek medical attention for
their medical problems because they were asymptomatic at the time.

Signature

Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:  sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net

Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

Susan - 09 Apr 2005 17:11 GMT
> The antibiotic is just to knock down the infection while the polyps are
> shrunk by the steroid spray.  There's no problem with being on steroid
> sprays indefinitely to keep the polyps from returning.

IME and IMO, there is definitely a problem with staying on steroid
sprays indefinitely, though I understand why someone with symptomatic
polyps would require treatment.

> The cemeteries are full of people who didn't seek medical attention for
> their medical problems because they were asymptomatic at the time.
>  

We all end up dead eventually, but I doubt many of us die due to failure
to use steroid nasal sprays daily.

Just MHO.

Susa
afdr9lk - 10 Apr 2005 03:25 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Susa

I let my polyps go for way too long without treatment.  The
physical pressure from the polyps against the bone inside my
head caused the bone to erode.  Keep in mind this was pressure
I couldn't feel.  I had to have several bone grafts around my
eye.  The bone was also eroding in my spenoid sinsus (I think
that was the one) and the doc said the bone would have
perforated in several years.  I believe his words were "serious
cranial issues" would have resulted.   They cultured staph out
of my sinuses along with other bacteria.  If that gets into
your brain...
Susan - 10 Apr 2005 17:12 GMT
> I let my polyps go for way too long without treatment.  The
> physical pressure from the polyps against the bone inside my
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> of my sinuses along with other bacteria.  If that gets into
> your brain...

I understand.  But the OP saw a doctor who offered treatment as an
option, not a necessity.

Susan
Susan - 10 Apr 2005 17:51 GMT
> I let my polyps go for way too long without treatment.  The
> physical pressure from the polyps against the bone inside my
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> of my sinuses along with other bacteria.  If that gets into
> your brain...

BTW, are you saying above, that your sinuses were asymptomatic, or just
that you were not aware that you had bone pressure?

What brought you to the diagnostic process?

Susan
Murray Grossan - 11 Apr 2005 00:20 GMT
On 4/9/05 6:20 AM, in article 3bq353F6kg537U1@individual.net, "Susan"

> But in this case, the polyps were not causing a blockage.  Is the OP to
> stay on antibiotics and steroid spray permanently?
No, generally a week of therapy suffices to shrink the polyps.
Susan - 11 Apr 2005 23:06 GMT
> On 4/9/05 6:20 AM, in article 3bq353F6kg537U1@individual.net, "Susan"
>
>>But in this case, the polyps were not causing a blockage.  Is the OP to
>>stay on antibiotics and steroid spray permanently?
>
> No, generally a week of therapy suffices to shrink the polyps.

So, polyps that aren't causing symptoms or blockage still require
treatment before they cause problems?  Or are you saying to initiate
treatment if/when they cause blockage?

What stops them from responding to whatever conditions caused them to
grow once the week of steroids is complete?

Susan <grateful not to have polyps>
ARoberts - 12 Apr 2005 13:43 GMT
> x-no-archive: yes
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> What stops them from responding to whatever conditions caused them to grow
> once the week of steroids is complete?

> Susan <grateful not to have polyps>

Ah, there's the rub.  Those of us who have the tendency to develop polyps
know that they recur--endlessly.  In my case, short-term treatment has
always meant short-term relief.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.