Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Sinusitis / December 2004
Chronic Sinusitis Article
|
|
Thread rating:  |
MS - 27 Nov 2004 05:57 GMT I found the following article on
www.medscape.com
I saved it to my hard drive, but I don't still have the URL to point to. Since the article is not so long, I will post the whole article below.
------------------------
Approach to the Patient With Chronic Sinusitis
First, it is imperative to take a careful history and review past medical records, with special attention to treatment options that have been used in the past, including antibiotic and corticosteroid use, past sinus surgeries, history of nasal or facial trauma, and past subspecialty consultation (eg, allergy and otolaryngology). Next, a thorough physical examination is important, and baseline fiberoptic rhinoscopy can be very helpful to delineate the patient's anatomy. In addition, a baseline limited sinus CT scan will help document the extent of disease and clarify any other anatomic abnormalities, such as a deviated nasal septum. An allergy evaluation is also very important, since a failure to adequately address allergen triggers may cause a relapse of the disease after initial treatment. The patient should also be evaluated for associated asthma, since a significant portion of patients with chronic sinusitis may have associated asthma. Finally, a baseline absolute eosinophil count may be helpful, since persistence of eosinophilia despite medical treatment portends a less favorable response to more aggressive measures such as surgical intervention.
If there is suspicion of immune deficiency (eg, history of recurring otitis media, bronchitis, pneumonia, or recurring infections with encapsulated organisms), then humoral immunity may be evaluated with IgG (total and subclasses), IgA, IgM, or specific immune responses. If there is suspicion of allergic fungal sinusitis (by CT scan or clinical presentation), then appropriate referral to a specialist for that evaluation should be done.
Once the disease has been adequately staged, as noted above, the patient should receive "intensive medical therapy." This would consist of an antibiotic for 30 days, simultaneously started with prednisone for 8 to 10 days (see dosages below), nasal saline irrigations, intranasal steroid spray twice a day, and an (optional) oral decongestant (assuming no contraindications exist for these medications). The patient should then be re-evaluated and restaged in 1 month.
Antibiotic choices should be guided by sinus cultures whenever possible, and the use of broader single antibiotic agents should be considered with or without the addition of anaerobic coverage with clindamycin or metronidazole. Antibiotic therapy should usually be given for 7 days after sinusitis symptoms have completely resolved. This may take 4 to 8 weeks. If symptoms recur soon after treatment is stopped, or fail to resolve with the above program, then an alternative antibiotic may be needed. Treatment failures occur more commonly in chronic sinusitis, compared with acute sinusitis. In general, patients who fail a prolonged course of combined prednisone and broad-spectrum antibiotics should be referred to an otolaryngologist for surgical consultation.
There are only limited data to guide the treating physician on proper dosage of prednisone (used in conjunction with antibiotics) for the treatment of chronic sinusitis. A number of the symposium participants indicated that they had used different dosage schedules in this setting. One possible dosage regimen was suggested as follows: prednisone 20 mg orally twice a day for 4 days, followed by 20 mg orally every day for 4 days, then stop. It should be noted that the addition of oral corticosteroids to an antibiotic regimen for treatment of chronic sinusitis is a significantly different approach than those used in the past. Preliminary data suggest that it may be a very useful adjunct in this setting. However, patients and physicians alike need to be aware of the possible side effects of systemic corticosteroids. These must be weighed by the possible adverse consequences of chronic unresolved infection, risks of sinus surgery, etc. These judgments can only be made after close consultation between the treating physician and the patient, while taking all these factors into account.
Topical intranasal steroids are also recommended, especially if the patient has a history of nasal polyposis. Intranasal steroids have been shown in several double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to improve nasal congestion and reduce the size or rate of growth of nasal polyps. Postoperatively, they have also been shown to help prevent the recurrence of nasal polyps after surgical polypectomy.
Summary
Management of chronic sinusitis presents a number of challenges to the treating physician. It is now becoming clear that, in addition to infection, inflammation may play a key role in the persistence of chronic sinusitis. If the inflammation that leads to mucosal thickening and sinus ostial occlusion is not addressed, it is much more difficult to successfully treat this condition. Further studies are needed to better clarify the role and proper dosage of both systemic and topical corticosteroids, when used alone or in combination with antibiotic therapy, in the management of chronic sinusitis. It is critical to identify allergen triggers to minimize the chance of future infections through effective allergen avoidance, etc. If patients fail to improve while on an intensive medical program, then referral to an otolaryngologist for surgical consultation may be indicated.
References
1.. Hamilos DL. Resistant sinusitis: what to look for when usual measures fail. Program and abstracts of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 60th Anniversary Meeting; March 7-12, 2003; Denver, Colorado. 2.. Slavin RG. Resistant sinusitis: What to look for when usual measures fail. Program and abstracts of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology 60th Anniversary Meeting; March 7-12, 2003; Denver, Colorado. 3.. Berrettini S, Carabelli A, Sellari-Franceschini S, et al. Perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic sinusitis: correlation with rhinologic risk factors. Allergy. 1999;54:242-248. Abstract 4.. Emanuel IA, Shaw SB. Chronic rhinosinusitis: allergy and sinus computed tomography relationships. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:687-691. Abstract 5.. Sinus and Allergy Health Partnership. Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:S1-S32. 6.. Kaliner MA, Osguthorpe JD, Fireman P, et al. Sinusitis: bench to bedside. Current findings, future directions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;99:S829-S848. Abstract
Copyright ? 2003 Medscape.
ENTconsult - 27 Nov 2004 18:43 GMT You can get useful information from www.sinuses.com Murray Grossan, M.D. http://www.ent-consult.com
MS - 28 Nov 2004 20:05 GMT > You can get useful information from (URLS deleted)
What does that have to do with the article I posted, which is what this thread is about?
Steven Litvintchouk - 28 Nov 2004 18:02 GMT > I found the following article on > [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > also very important, since a failure to adequately address allergen triggers > may cause a relapse of the disease after initial treatment. I'm surprised they didn't mention evaluation of irritants that aren't true allergens. Most importantly, does the patient smoke?
And does the patient live and/or work in a polluted area?
I heard that flight attendants have a high incidence of sinusitis due to the poor-quality air in airliners and the air pollution at airports.
If these are predisposing factors, then the patient must change his lifestyle--quit smoking, maybe even quit his job or move to a less polluted locale.
I think doctors are reluctant to bring up this subject because they are afraid the patients will refuse and walk out of the office.
 Signature Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
MS - 28 Nov 2004 20:10 GMT > I'm surprised they didn't mention evaluation of irritants that aren't > true allergens. Most importantly, does the patient smoke? [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Steven D. Litvintchouk > Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net I think most doctors ask the patient if he/she smokes, if I recall.
I doubt that any of us regulars here smoke, yet we all have chronic sinus problems.
And I'm sure that many sufferers have undergone the lifestyle changes you mention, yet still suffer.
Of course the factors you mention could contribute to chronic sinus problems, but I think there is a basic genetic component to it, which would take hold no matter the environment. The only chance of a "cure" someday is with the new research into genetics, stem cell research, etc. Until then, all that could be done is to try to ameliorate the symptoms as well as possible, which of course might include lifestyle changes.
MS - 28 Nov 2004 23:23 GMT > If these are predisposing factors, then the patient must change his > lifestyle--quit smoking, maybe even quit his job or move to a less > polluted locale. > > I think doctors are reluctant to bring up this subject because they are > afraid the patients will refuse and walk out of the office. Allergists especially discuss these factors, environmental modification. Are there any here whose symptoms have improved through moving to a new location?
The thing is, although certainly some environments might be better than others, there certainly is no perfect one. Pollution is everywhere. And if one moves to the country to get away from the car exhaust in the city, you then might have pesticides in the air. And of course, "natural" irritants such as mold, dust, animal dander, etc., might be more prevalent in a rural environment.
Steven Litvintchouk - 29 Nov 2004 17:28 GMT >>If these are predisposing factors, then the patient must change his >>lifestyle--quit smoking, maybe even quit his job or move to a less [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > there any here whose symptoms have improved through moving to a new > location? Mine certainly did. I used to live downwind from a factory that was pouring something into the air that really caused me trouble.
> The thing is, although certainly some environments might be better than > others, there certainly is no perfect one. Pollution is everywhere. For U.S. citizens, the website www.scorecard.org
gives the air quality and pollution levels for every county in the U.S., based on data from the EPA's own monitoring stations--just enter your Zip code.
 Signature Steven D. Litvintchouk Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
MS - 28 Nov 2004 23:39 GMT > Once the disease has been adequately staged, as noted above, the patient > should receive "intensive medical therapy." This would consist of an [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > contraindications exist for these medications). The patient should then be > re-evaluated and restaged in 1 month. Interesting about these recommendations, not many docs follow them. As we discussed, most docs these days, if they prescribe an antibiotic at all, it's for a short course. And not many prescribe prednisone at all.
I saw my general practitioner last Monday, for a follow-up to a physical, blood test results, etc. Of course I told him that my chronic sinusitis has been bad lately. He prescribed an antibiotic, Cefzil. (Anyone know if that is considered a first, second, or third generation cephalosporin?)
I asked him about a course of prednisone. He said he does not prescribe it, that it can have very harmful effects. I told him I know it is not good to take long term, but could there be harm in taking it for a short course? He said yes, there have been some very bad side effects people have suffered from it, even in taking it for a short time.
I should mention that this doc is professor of Internal Medicine at one of the top university medical schools in the US, so he certainly must know something! ;-) Has anyone heard of this, very negative effects of prednisone, even when taken for a short course?
(Perhaps there is a side effect listed for it that is VERY negative, life-threatening, etc., and even though that side effect might be very rare, he didn't want to take a chance with it.)
(I should mention that I'm taking every other conceivable med for rhinitis. Orally--clarinex, singular, and now even mucinex. I irrigate A LOT, and tons of very thick stuff comes out, and after irrigating use three different nasal sprays--Rhinocort Aqua (the maximum dose, two sprays in each nostril twice per day, which is twice as much as the normal dose), Atrovent nasal spray, and Astelin. I think the spray meds help (not sure at all about those oral meds), and of course irrigation helps wash out the gunk, but still my rhinitis-sinusitis is real bad. The inflammation and discharge from my nose is incredible, and super thick! Therefore, I think a course of prednisone might help me get over this, but perhaps not many docs prescribe it these days.)
Don Brady - 29 Nov 2004 02:41 GMT >I asked him about a course of prednisone. He said he does not prescribe it, >that it can have very harmful effects. I told him I know it is not good to [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >something! ;-) Has anyone heard of this, very negative effects of >prednisone, even when taken for a short course? It's certainly odd to me to hear that. Dr. Kennedy seemed to use it with no reservation whatsoever after surgery for several months.
My other doctor here Dr. Senior also told me not to worry about side-effects from it except for long-term use. He said the risks of cataracts were proportional to *cumulative* lifetime dosage,
He trained with D. Kennedy though, and publishes with him, so they have the same view on things generally.
>(Perhaps there is a side effect listed for it that is VERY negative, >life-threatening, etc., and even though that side effect might be very rare, >he didn't want to take a chance with it.) Yes I guess he might worry that a patient might be mentally destabilized by it and commit suicide or something . We know that it an affect people's mental state quite a bit in some cases.....
>(I should mention that I'm taking every other conceivable med for rhinitis. >Orally--clarinex, singular, and now even mucinex. I irrigate A LOT, and tons [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >might help me get over this, but perhaps not many docs prescribe it these >days.) Don Brady - 29 Nov 2004 02:43 GMT >>(I should mention that I'm taking every other conceivable med for rhinitis. >>Orally--clarinex, singular, and now even mucinex. I irrigate A LOT, and tons [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >>rhinitis-sinusitis is real bad. The inflammation and discharge from my nose >>is incredible, and super thick! You must either have a latent infection or be extremely sensitive to dust or mold or ......?
MS - 04 Dec 2004 21:36 GMT > You must either have a latent infection or be extremely sensitive to dust or > mold or ......? What is meant by "latent infection"?
My last allergy shots ( a few years ago) didn't show a whole lot of allergy, but the item that showed up most as an allergen were some molds. Of course, there is sensitivity that is not exactly allergy, doesn't show up on those skin tests.
Don Brady - 04 Dec 2004 21:58 GMT >What is meant by "latent infection"? Low grade persistent infection that may nto be obvious.
>My last allergy shots ( a few years ago) didn't show a whole lot of allergy, >but the item that showed up most as an allergen were some molds. Of course, >there is sensitivity that is not exactly allergy, doesn't show up on those >skin tests. Yes I very much think so. That is the case with me.
Also once your sinuses are inflamed, they are hypersensitive - a vicious circle.
MS - 05 Dec 2004 01:31 GMT > >What is meant by "latent infection"? > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > Also once your sinuses are inflamed, they are hypersensitive - a vicious > circle. Yes, that is why I thought a course of prednisone might help me get off the circle, make them less inflamed.
Of course, no matter what I do, I doubt that my sinuses, nose, etc. will ever be "normal", that I will always have that type of problem. (Probably you as well, and most of the regulars who write here.) (Unless with stem cell or other genetic research, they really find a "cure".) But it has been worse than usual for the last few months, and as a teacher, that has made things difficult. (I need to use my voice a lot, and I keep losing it while teaching. I think the very heavy PND has irritated my throat a lot.)
Perhaps I should go see an ENT and ask about prednisone. Not so easy now, being on an HMO (the only choices currently with my employer). I asked the GP at that recent visit about a referral to an ENT, and he said to wait and see if the antibiotic clears up the problem. (It might have cleared up any bacterial infection, but certainly not the heavy inflammation!) I don't think that many ENTs these days prescribe prednisone either, there seems to be a reluctance about it. Perhaps that shouldn't be the case, in reading the article I posted here, and the opinions of your ENTs. I have been to several ENTs in my life, and only one or two have prescribed prednisone, and I think only when I pushed for it.
Don Brady - 05 Dec 2004 02:53 GMT >Of course, no matter what I do, I doubt that my sinuses, nose, etc. will >ever be "normal", that I will always have that type of problem. (Probably >you as well, and most of the regulars who write here.) That is what I thought about myself too. However, I was astounded that everything is improving steadily now that I am *always* keeping a window wide open, and in summer keeping air exchange going with the outside with fans.
>(Unless with stem >cell or other genetic research, they really find a "cure".) But it has been >worse than usual for the last few months, and as a teacher, that has made >things difficult. (I need to use my voice a lot, and I keep losing it while >teaching. I think the very heavy PND has irritated my throat a lot.) It definitely does, I find.
>Perhaps I should go see an ENT and ask about prednisone. Not so easy now, >being on an HMO (the only choices currently with my employer). I asked the [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >ENTs in my life, and only one or two have prescribed prednisone, and I think >only when I pushed for it. It will definitely eliminate the inflammation short-term. The trick is to keep it away.....
MS - 04 Dec 2004 21:33 GMT > It's certainly odd to me to hear that. Dr. Kennedy seemed to use it with no > reservation whatsoever after surgery for several months. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > and commit suicide or something . We know that it an affect people's mental > state quite a bit in some cases..... I don't recall what the doc said could be the serious negative effect of even short-term Prednisone usage (he said it quickly and softly), but I'm sure it wasn't glaucoma, and not mental state either.
tollertwins - 05 Dec 2004 15:35 GMT My doc sez that 'they' are finding that there is a lifetime maximum of steroids that you can take - and then you WILL get one of the nastier side effects. Maximum varies by individual..
He saves them for anaphylaxis cases.
> > Once the disease has been adequately staged, as noted above, the patient > > should receive "intensive medical therapy." This would consist of an [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > might help me get over this, but perhaps not many docs prescribe it these > days.) Don Brady - 05 Dec 2004 18:56 GMT >My doc sez that 'they' are finding that there is a lifetime maximum of >steroids that you can take - and then you WILL get one of the nastier >side effects. Maximum varies by individual.. You are correct that it is the cumulative lifetime dosage or oral steroids that counts.
But just a short course of a month or two is normally inconsequential in that picture.
People with severe asthma take them continuously for decades......
|
|
|