Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Sinusitis / December 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Chronic Sinusitis Article

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
MS - 27 Nov 2004 05:57 GMT
I found the following article on

www.medscape.com

I saved it to my hard drive, but I don't still have the URL to point to.
Since the article is not so long, I will post the whole article below.

------------------------

Approach to the Patient With Chronic Sinusitis

First, it is imperative to take a careful history and review past medical
records, with special attention to treatment options that have been used in
the past, including antibiotic and corticosteroid use, past sinus surgeries,
history of nasal or facial trauma, and past subspecialty consultation (eg,
allergy and otolaryngology). Next, a thorough physical examination is
important, and baseline fiberoptic rhinoscopy can be very helpful to
delineate the patient's anatomy. In addition, a baseline limited sinus CT
scan will help document the extent of disease and clarify any other anatomic
abnormalities, such as a deviated nasal septum. An allergy evaluation is
also very important, since a failure to adequately address allergen triggers
may cause a relapse of the disease after initial treatment. The patient
should also be evaluated for associated asthma, since a significant portion
of patients with chronic sinusitis may have associated asthma. Finally, a
baseline absolute eosinophil count may be helpful, since persistence of
eosinophilia despite medical treatment portends a less favorable response to
more aggressive measures such as surgical intervention.

If there is suspicion of immune deficiency (eg, history of recurring otitis
media, bronchitis, pneumonia, or recurring infections with encapsulated
organisms), then humoral immunity may be evaluated with IgG (total and
subclasses), IgA, IgM, or specific immune responses. If there is suspicion
of allergic fungal sinusitis (by CT scan or clinical presentation), then
appropriate referral to a specialist for that evaluation should be done.

Once the disease has been adequately staged, as noted above, the patient
should receive "intensive medical therapy." This would consist of an
antibiotic for 30 days, simultaneously started with prednisone for 8 to 10
days (see dosages below), nasal saline irrigations, intranasal steroid spray
twice a day, and an (optional) oral decongestant (assuming no
contraindications exist for these medications). The patient should then be
re-evaluated and restaged in 1 month.

Antibiotic choices should be guided by sinus cultures whenever possible, and
the use of broader single antibiotic agents should be considered with or
without the addition of anaerobic coverage with clindamycin or
metronidazole. Antibiotic therapy should usually be given for 7 days after
sinusitis symptoms have completely resolved. This may take 4 to 8 weeks. If
symptoms recur soon after treatment is stopped, or fail to resolve with the
above program, then an alternative antibiotic may be needed. Treatment
failures occur more commonly in chronic sinusitis, compared with acute
sinusitis. In general, patients who fail a prolonged course of combined
prednisone and broad-spectrum antibiotics should be referred to an
otolaryngologist for surgical consultation.

There are only limited data to guide the treating physician on proper dosage
of prednisone (used in conjunction with antibiotics) for the treatment of
chronic sinusitis. A number of the symposium participants indicated that
they had used different dosage schedules in this setting. One possible
dosage regimen was suggested as follows: prednisone 20 mg orally twice a day
for 4 days, followed by 20 mg orally every day for 4 days, then stop. It
should be noted that the addition of oral corticosteroids to an antibiotic
regimen for treatment of chronic sinusitis is a significantly different
approach than those used in the past. Preliminary data suggest that it may
be a very useful adjunct in this setting. However, patients and physicians
alike need to be aware of the possible side effects of systemic
corticosteroids. These must be weighed by the possible adverse consequences
of chronic unresolved infection, risks of sinus surgery, etc. These
judgments can only be made after close consultation between the treating
physician and the patient, while taking all these factors into account.

Topical intranasal steroids are also recommended, especially if the patient
has a history of nasal polyposis. Intranasal steroids have been shown in
several double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to improve nasal congestion
and reduce the size or rate of growth of nasal polyps. Postoperatively, they
have also been shown to help prevent the recurrence of nasal polyps after
surgical polypectomy.

Summary

Management of chronic sinusitis presents a number of challenges to the
treating physician. It is now becoming clear that, in addition to infection,
inflammation may play a key role in the persistence of chronic sinusitis. If
the inflammation that leads to mucosal thickening and sinus ostial occlusion
is not addressed, it is much more difficult to successfully treat this
condition. Further studies are needed to better clarify the role and proper
dosage of both systemic and topical corticosteroids, when used alone or in
combination with antibiotic therapy, in the management of chronic sinusitis.
It is critical to identify allergen triggers to minimize the chance of
future infections through effective allergen avoidance, etc. If patients
fail to improve while on an intensive medical program, then referral to an
otolaryngologist for surgical consultation may be indicated.

References

 1.. Hamilos DL. Resistant sinusitis: what to look for when usual measures
fail. Program and abstracts of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and
Immunology 60th Anniversary Meeting; March 7-12, 2003; Denver, Colorado.
 2.. Slavin RG. Resistant sinusitis: What to look for when usual measures
fail. Program and abstracts of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and
Immunology 60th Anniversary Meeting; March 7-12, 2003; Denver, Colorado.
 3.. Berrettini S, Carabelli A, Sellari-Franceschini S, et al. Perennial
allergic rhinitis and chronic sinusitis: correlation with rhinologic risk
factors. Allergy. 1999;54:242-248. Abstract
 4.. Emanuel IA, Shaw SB. Chronic rhinosinusitis: allergy and sinus
computed tomography relationships. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2000;123:687-691. Abstract
 5.. Sinus and Allergy Health Partnership. Antimicrobial treatment
guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2000;123:S1-S32.
 6.. Kaliner MA, Osguthorpe JD, Fireman P, et al. Sinusitis: bench to
bedside. Current findings, future directions. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
1997;99:S829-S848. Abstract

Copyright ? 2003 Medscape.
ENTconsult - 27 Nov 2004 18:43 GMT
You can get useful information from
www.sinuses.com
Murray Grossan, M.D.
http://www.ent-consult.com
MS - 28 Nov 2004 20:05 GMT
> You can get useful information from
(URLS deleted)

What does that have to do with the article I posted, which is what this
thread is about?
Steven Litvintchouk - 28 Nov 2004 18:02 GMT
> I found the following article on
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> also very important, since a failure to adequately address allergen triggers
> may cause a relapse of the disease after initial treatment.

I'm surprised they didn't mention evaluation of irritants that aren't
true allergens.  Most importantly, does the patient smoke?

And does the patient live and/or work in a polluted area?

I heard that flight attendants have a high incidence of sinusitis due to
the poor-quality air in airliners and the air pollution at airports.

If these are predisposing factors, then the patient must change his
lifestyle--quit smoking, maybe even quit his job or move to a less
polluted locale.

I think doctors are reluctant to bring up this subject because they are
afraid the patients will refuse and walk out of the office.

Signature

Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:  sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net

Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

MS - 28 Nov 2004 20:10 GMT
> I'm surprised they didn't mention evaluation of irritants that aren't
> true allergens.  Most importantly, does the patient smoke?
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Steven D. Litvintchouk
> Email:  sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net

I think most doctors ask the patient if he/she smokes, if I recall.

I doubt that any of us regulars here smoke, yet we all have chronic sinus
problems.

And I'm sure that many sufferers have undergone the lifestyle changes you
mention, yet still suffer.

Of course the factors you mention could contribute to chronic sinus
problems, but I think there is a basic genetic component to it, which would
take hold no matter the environment. The only chance of a "cure" someday is
with the new research into genetics, stem cell research, etc. Until then,
all that could be done is to try to ameliorate the symptoms as well as
possible, which of course might include lifestyle changes.
MS - 28 Nov 2004 23:23 GMT
> If these are predisposing factors, then the patient must change his
> lifestyle--quit smoking, maybe even quit his job or move to a less
> polluted locale.
>
> I think doctors are reluctant to bring up this subject because they are
> afraid the patients will refuse and walk out of the office.

Allergists especially discuss these factors, environmental modification. Are
there any here whose symptoms have improved through moving to a new
location?

The thing is, although certainly some environments might be better than
others, there certainly is no perfect one. Pollution is everywhere. And if
one moves to the country to get away from the car exhaust in the city, you
then might have pesticides in the air. And of course, "natural" irritants
such as mold, dust, animal dander, etc., might be more prevalent in a rural
environment.
Steven Litvintchouk - 29 Nov 2004 17:28 GMT
>>If these are predisposing factors, then the patient must change his
>>lifestyle--quit smoking, maybe even quit his job or move to a less
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> there any here whose symptoms have improved through moving to a new
> location?

Mine certainly did.
I used to live downwind from a factory that was pouring something into
the air that really caused me trouble.

> The thing is, although certainly some environments might be better than
> others, there certainly is no perfect one. Pollution is everywhere.

For U.S. citizens, the website
www.scorecard.org

gives the air quality and pollution levels for every county in the U.S.,
based on data from the EPA's own monitoring stations--just enter your
Zip code.

Signature

Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email:  sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net

Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.

MS - 28 Nov 2004 23:39 GMT
> Once the disease has been adequately staged, as noted above, the patient
> should receive "intensive medical therapy." This would consist of an
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> contraindications exist for these medications). The patient should then be
> re-evaluated and restaged in 1 month.

Interesting about these recommendations, not many docs follow them. As we
discussed, most docs these days, if they prescribe an antibiotic at all,
it's for a short course. And not many prescribe prednisone at all.

I saw my general practitioner last Monday, for a follow-up to a physical,
blood test results, etc. Of course I told him that my chronic sinusitis has
been bad lately. He prescribed an antibiotic, Cefzil. (Anyone know if that
is considered a first, second, or third generation cephalosporin?)

I asked him about a course of prednisone. He said he does not prescribe it,
that it can have very harmful effects. I told him I know it is not good to
take long term, but could there be harm in taking it for a short course? He
said yes, there have been some very bad side effects people have suffered
from it, even in taking it for a short time.

I should mention that this doc is professor of Internal Medicine at one of
the top university medical schools in the US, so he certainly must know
something! ;-) Has anyone heard of this, very negative effects of
prednisone, even when taken for a short course?

(Perhaps there is a side effect listed for it that is VERY negative,
life-threatening, etc., and even though that side effect might be very rare,
he didn't want to take a chance with it.)

(I should mention that I'm taking every other conceivable med for rhinitis.
Orally--clarinex, singular, and now even mucinex. I irrigate A LOT, and tons
of very thick stuff comes out, and after irrigating use three different
nasal sprays--Rhinocort Aqua (the maximum dose, two sprays in each nostril
twice per day, which is twice as much as the normal dose), Atrovent nasal
spray, and Astelin. I think the spray meds help (not sure at all about those
oral meds), and of course irrigation helps wash out the gunk, but still my
rhinitis-sinusitis is real bad. The inflammation and discharge from my nose
is incredible, and super thick! Therefore, I think a course of prednisone
might help me get over this, but perhaps not many docs prescribe it these
days.)
Don Brady - 29 Nov 2004 02:41 GMT
>I asked him about a course of prednisone. He said he does not prescribe it,
>that it can have very harmful effects. I told him I know it is not good to
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>something! ;-) Has anyone heard of this, very negative effects of
>prednisone, even when taken for a short course?

It's certainly odd to me to hear that.   Dr. Kennedy seemed to use it with no
reservation whatsoever after surgery for several months.  

My other doctor here Dr. Senior also told me not to worry about side-effects
from it except for long-term use.  He said the risks of cataracts were
proportional to *cumulative*  lifetime dosage,

He trained  with D. Kennedy though, and publishes with him, so they have the
same view on things generally.

>(Perhaps there is a side effect listed for it that is VERY negative,
>life-threatening, etc., and even though that side effect might be very rare,
>he didn't want to take a chance with it.)

Yes I guess he might worry that a patient might be mentally destabilized by it
and commit suicide or something .  We know that it an affect people's mental
state quite a bit in some cases.....

>(I should mention that I'm taking every other conceivable med for rhinitis.
>Orally--clarinex, singular, and now even mucinex. I irrigate A LOT, and tons
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>might help me get over this, but perhaps not many docs prescribe it these
>days.)
Don Brady - 29 Nov 2004 02:43 GMT
>>(I should mention that I'm taking every other conceivable med for rhinitis.
>>Orally--clarinex, singular, and now even mucinex. I irrigate A LOT, and tons
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>rhinitis-sinusitis is real bad. The inflammation and discharge from my nose
>>is incredible, and super thick!

You must either have a latent infection or be extremely sensitive to dust or
mold or ......?
MS - 04 Dec 2004 21:36 GMT
> You must either have a latent infection or be extremely sensitive to dust or
> mold or ......?

What is meant by "latent infection"?

My last allergy shots ( a few years ago) didn't show a whole lot of allergy,
but the item that showed up most as an allergen were some molds. Of course,
there is sensitivity that is not exactly allergy, doesn't show up on those
skin tests.
Don Brady - 04 Dec 2004 21:58 GMT
>What is meant by "latent infection"?

Low grade persistent infection that may nto be obvious.

>My last allergy shots ( a few years ago) didn't show a whole lot of allergy,
>but the item that showed up most as an allergen were some molds. Of course,
>there is sensitivity that is not exactly allergy, doesn't show up on those
>skin tests.

Yes I very much think so.   That is the case with me.

Also once your sinuses are inflamed,  they are hypersensitive - a vicious
circle.
MS - 05 Dec 2004 01:31 GMT
> >What is meant by "latent infection"?
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Also once your sinuses are inflamed,  they are hypersensitive - a vicious
> circle.

Yes, that is why I thought a course of prednisone might help me get off the
circle, make them less inflamed.

Of course, no matter what I do, I doubt that my sinuses, nose, etc. will
ever be "normal", that I will always have that type of problem. (Probably
you as well, and most of the regulars who write here.) (Unless with stem
cell or other genetic research, they really find a "cure".) But it has been
worse than usual for the last few months, and as a teacher, that has made
things difficult. (I need to use my voice a lot, and I keep losing it while
teaching. I think the very heavy PND has irritated my throat a lot.)

Perhaps I should go see an ENT and ask about prednisone. Not so easy now,
being on an HMO (the only choices currently with my employer). I asked the
GP at that recent visit about a referral to an ENT, and he said to wait and
see if the antibiotic clears up the problem. (It might have cleared up any
bacterial infection, but certainly not the heavy inflammation!) I don't
think that many ENTs these days prescribe prednisone either, there seems to
be a reluctance about it. Perhaps that shouldn't be the case, in reading the
article I posted here, and the opinions of your ENTs. I have been to several
ENTs in my life, and only one or two have prescribed prednisone, and I think
only when I pushed for it.
Don Brady - 05 Dec 2004 02:53 GMT
>Of course, no matter what I do, I doubt that my sinuses, nose, etc. will
>ever be "normal", that I will always have that type of problem. (Probably
>you as well, and most of the regulars who write here.)

That is what I thought about myself too.  However, I was astounded that
everything is improving steadily now  that I am *always* keeping a window wide
open, and in summer keeping air exchange going with the outside with fans.

>(Unless with stem
>cell or other genetic research, they really find a "cure".) But it has been
>worse than usual for the last few months, and as a teacher, that has made
>things difficult. (I need to use my voice a lot, and I keep losing it while
>teaching. I think the very heavy PND has irritated my throat a lot.)

It definitely does, I find.

>Perhaps I should go see an ENT and ask about prednisone. Not so easy now,
>being on an HMO (the only choices currently with my employer). I asked the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>ENTs in my life, and only one or two have prescribed prednisone, and I think
>only when I pushed for it.

It will definitely eliminate the inflammation short-term.  The trick is to keep
it away.....
MS - 04 Dec 2004 21:33 GMT
> It's certainly odd to me to hear that.   Dr. Kennedy seemed to use it with no
> reservation whatsoever after surgery for several months.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> and commit suicide or something .  We know that it an affect people's mental
> state quite a bit in some cases.....

I don't recall what the doc said could be the serious negative effect of
even short-term Prednisone usage (he said it quickly and softly), but I'm
sure it wasn't glaucoma, and not mental state either.
tollertwins - 05 Dec 2004 15:35 GMT
My doc sez that 'they' are finding that there is a lifetime maximum of
steroids that you can take - and then you WILL get one of the nastier
side effects. Maximum varies by individual..

He saves them for anaphylaxis cases.

> > Once the disease has been adequately staged, as noted above, the patient
> > should receive "intensive medical therapy." This would consist of an
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> might help me get over this, but perhaps not many docs prescribe it these
> days.)
Don Brady - 05 Dec 2004 18:56 GMT
>My doc sez that 'they' are finding that there is a lifetime maximum of
>steroids that you can take - and then you WILL get one of the nastier
>side effects. Maximum varies by individual..

You are correct that it is the cumulative lifetime dosage or oral steroids that
counts.

But just a short course of a month or two is normally inconsequential in that
picture.  

People with severe asthma take them continuously for decades......
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.