Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostatitis / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cystoscopy

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
george - 04 Jan 2006 17:06 GMT
Hi All
My urologist recommended cystoscopy to determine what the problem is;
symptoms include prostate, bladder and urethra all burning badly when I
urinate, but no infection was found in urine samples so
antibiotics/anti-inflammatories did not help. Water flow is reduced and
ultra sound revealed that I retain some urine in the bladder after passing
water. Having studied a lot of info, it dooesn't answer my 2 main concerns:
1) Does it hurt badly when it's done in local anaesthetic?
2) Any chance of becoming impotent?
Thanks
Pete - 04 Jan 2006 19:23 GMT
> Hi All
> My urologist recommended cystoscopy to determine what the problem is;
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> my 2 main concerns: 1) Does it hurt badly when it's done in local
> anaesthetic?

Yes Yes yes...at least for me.

2) Any chance of becoming impotent?
> Thanks
Pete - 05 Jan 2006 00:42 GMT
>> Hi All
>> My urologist recommended cystoscopy to determine what the problem is;
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Yes Yes yes...at least for me.

George...My first one was done in 1995 by an old timer using a rigid scope
(he had it from WWII), and it damn near killed me (I was screaming curse
words at the top of my lungs) and had to be equivalent to childbirth or a
kidneystone.  My second one was done in 2005 with the more modern flexible
scope (which is all they use today), and that hurt like a son of a bitch
also but not as bad as the first (lol).  I may consider anesthesia next
time, but being awake helps them get feedback when they inject water into
your bladder (pertaining to pain from distending your bladder).
"Hydrodistensions" of the bladder are always done under anesthesia, since
they pressurize your bladder and hold it that way for 8 minutes (so I've
read - I've never had that done).

In my opinion the local they put in your urethra isn't worth a sh.t.  When
the scope goes through your external sphincter, I believe it will hurt (even
with the flexible scope).  And it hurts for several minutes while he is
searching around in your bladder, etc.  Ask your uro.  Just thought I would
give you a little more info.  I guess some people can tolerate pain better
than others, but I don't consider myself to be a pussy.  It hurts...Pete

> 2) Any chance of becoming impotent?
>> Thanks
myasshurts - 04 Jan 2006 23:57 GMT
george said

> Hi All
> My urologist recommended cystoscopy to determine what the problem
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> it's done in local anaesthetic? 2) Any chance of becoming
> impotent? Thanks

I had one done years ago in the doctors office.  It's wasn't that
bad.  I'd like to avoid it in the future.... but I wouldn't lose any
sleep if I had to go in for another.

PS, my stiffy's just fine!
LM - 05 Jan 2006 04:13 GMT
I've had it done a number of times. My most recent doc at Kaiser uses the
ridged scope. It wasnt the most pleasant thing, but was bearable. They
squirted some numbing stuff up my pecker first. My previous uro used the
flexible scope and it was much easier. It hurts to pee afterwards for about
a day in both cases.

> Hi All
> My urologist recommended cystoscopy to determine what the problem is;
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> 2) Any chance of becoming impotent?
> Thanks
Skuby - 06 Jan 2006 03:44 GMT
>Hi All
>My urologist recommended cystoscopy to determine what the problem is;
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>2) Any chance of becoming impotent?
>Thanks

If your doc uses the flexable scope, it's not all that bad.  You can also
ask the doc for some premedication.  My doc gave me 10mg of Valium and some
Percocet. Of course then you have to have someone to drive you home.

Good luck

Brian
Signature

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian J. Rueger       | Hampton Div. of Fire & Rescue    | "Who dares wins"
Capt/Paramedic        | Fire Station #5                  | Hampton, VA.  
B.S. Comm/I/SEL Pilot | MSgt, USAF (Ret.) 49199          | NREMT-P          
Check out my home page: http://members.cox.net/brueger
Some of my photography: http://www.usefilm.com/photographer/34185.html
"Life's too short to drink LITE beer!"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pinehollow - 06 Jan 2006 14:58 GMT
>>Hi All
>>My urologist recommended cystoscopy to determine what the problem is;
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Brian

I have had it done several times and it was always very painful until a
Doctor in Austin, Tx did it several years ago.  I expressed my concern
before the procedure and he assured me that it wouldn't hurt at all.
Naturally I didn't believe him but he was right.  It was totally painless!!
He used a thin, flexible scope and we viewed the whole thing on a CRT next
to the table.  There was never any discomfort during or after the procedure.
I went to another Uro in Fort Lauderdale a few years later and it was
extremely painful.  He used a scope that he looked through with an eyepiece
at the end of the tube.  It was flexible, but it felt like it was an inch in
diameter.  I think it was very old.

I will always ask any Uro what type of equipment he uses and how old it is.
If he has the old stuff, I will not have it done.  Life is too short to
endure pain that is unnecessary and can be avoided.

Don
losticini@hotmail.com - 06 Jan 2006 20:07 GMT
Insist it's done with the modern flexible scope. I had one for the
first time yesterday and it was OK - very little pain and over in 90
seconds in my case. The doctor and the staff were really good and
reassuring. It's not a nice thing to anticipate but it is definitely
worth having it done. Watching on the monitor helped as well as the
doctor explained what we were seeing and I actually managed to pay
attention which distracted me from the sensation. I would say that in
my case at least the pain was no worse than a dull injection. I rested
yesterday afternon and I'm fine today.

Martin
Pete - 06 Jan 2006 20:29 GMT
> Insist it's done with the modern flexible scope. I had one for the
> first time yesterday and it was OK - very little pain and over in 90
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Martin

Martin...90 seconds isn't much.  Didn't he expand your bladder a little with
some water (say 500 ml), to  have a good look at the bladder, and maybe see
how you would react to the expansion (I'm not talking about a
hydrodistension  under anesthesia).  My uro did.  The bastards won't tell
you anything unless you ask...Pete
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.