Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostatitis / February 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Single Pill Multi Herbal Supplements

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
agsconsult@cox.net - 11 Feb 2005 17:51 GMT
These should be avoided, in my opinion, for the following reasons:

1. They usually contain powdered ingredients which are inferior to
liquid caps (ex. Saw Palmetto).

2. They can cause harmful interactions (ex. Saw Palmetto & Papain as in
Prosta-Q)
http://www.drugdigest.org/DD/DVH/HerbsInteractions/0,3926,4066|Saw%2BPalmetto,00.html

3. Ingredients and dosages aren't always correct, or substandard
quality ingredients are used (ex. Nettle leaf extract instead of Nettle
root extract, or insufficient daily amounts).

Since there's an ocean of snake oil out there, eating the right foods,
or at least consuming the right individual quality supplements seems
like the better method.
Gut-buster - 11 Feb 2005 20:47 GMT
If you are saying that Saw Palmetto should be avoided, what a load of sh.t!

I used to be incapable of sitting straight due to the pain in the left side
of my arse. Now I can sit straight due to Saw Palmetto. Damned stuff made me
very sick in the stomach when I first started on it but I got used to it
eventually. Cant imagine living without it now.

> These should be avoided, in my opinion, for the following reasons:
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> or at least consuming the right individual quality supplements seems
> like the better method.
agsconsult@cox.net - 11 Feb 2005 21:42 GMT
You misunderstand what I mean. Saw Palmetto is more effective in liquid
gel caps vs. powder pills. I'm glad you had positive results with it,
since I also just started taking it.
Gut-Buster - 12 Feb 2005 03:50 GMT
> You misunderstand what I mean. Saw Palmetto is more effective in liquid
> gel caps vs. powder pills. I'm glad you had positive results with it,
> since I also just started taking it.

Oh, OK. As for it being more effective, I find it VERY effective in capsule
form.
Little John - 13 Feb 2005 01:29 GMT
> If you are saying that Saw Palmetto should be avoided, what a load of
> sh.t!
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> made me very sick in the stomach when I first started on it but I got used
> to it eventually. Cant imagine living without it now.

May I suggest to you Dr. Ronald Wheeler's PEENUTS product.  Read the success
stories at http://www.peenuts.com/testimonials.asp
Gut-Buster - 13 Feb 2005 07:06 GMT
>> If you are saying that Saw Palmetto should be avoided, what a load of
>> sh.t!
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> May I suggest to you Dr. Ronald Wheeler's PEENUTS product.  Read the
> success stories at http://www.peenuts.com/testimonials.asp

"pee nuts"???? You are joking, yes?
agsconsult@cox.net - 13 Feb 2005 16:46 GMT
This PEENUTS product examplifies my point exactly, thanks spammer. The
only real ingredient in it is Saw Palmetto, which is most likely in
powder form = ineffective. For the price of this crap, you could buy a
large quantity of quality Saw Palmetto and some good mult-vitamins from
Walgreens.
Gut-Buster - 13 Feb 2005 20:26 GMT
> This PEENUTS product examplifies my point exactly, thanks spammer. The
> only real ingredient in it is Saw Palmetto, which is most likely in
> powder form = ineffective. For the price of this crap, you could buy a
> large quantity of quality Saw Palmetto and some good mult-vitamins from
> Walgreens.

I don't agree that SP in powder is ineffective. I take capsules full of SP
powder and they are VERY effective to me. As said before, my left arse cheek
was too sore to sit on until I started on them.
Little John - 13 Feb 2005 22:24 GMT
For your information, PEENUTS was invented by one of the most respected
prostatitis specialists in the world - Dr. Ronald Wheeler.  Tell the people
who wrote the success stories at the link I posted that it is a piece of
crap and ineffective.

> This PEENUTS product examplifies my point exactly, thanks spammer. The
> only real ingredient in it is Saw Palmetto, which is most likely in
> powder form = ineffective. For the price of this crap, you could buy a
> large quantity of quality Saw Palmetto and some good mult-vitamins from
> Walgreens.
Little John - 13 Feb 2005 22:26 GMT
>> May I suggest to you Dr. Ronald Wheeler's PEENUTS product.  Read the
>> success stories at http://www.peenuts.com/testimonials.asp
>
> "pee nuts"???? You are joking, yes?

Don't let the name full you.  This product was invented br Dr Ronald
Wheeler, one of the world's leading experts in prostatitis.  He discovered a
connection between prostatitis and prostate cancer.
Little John - 14 Feb 2005 02:17 GMT
>>> May I suggest to you Dr. Ronald Wheeler's PEENUTS product.  Read the
>>> success stories at http://www.peenuts.com/testimonials.asp
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Wheeler, one of the world's leading experts in prostatitis.  He discovered
> a connection between prostatitis and prostate cancer.

Correction...

Don't let the name fool you.  This product was invented br Dr Ronald
Wheeler, one of the world's leading experts in prostatitis.  He discovered a
connection between prostatitis and prostate cancer.
Little John - 15 Feb 2005 16:57 GMT
>> May I suggest to you Dr. Ronald Wheeler's PEENUTS product.  Read the
>> success stories at http://www.peenuts.com/testimonials.asp
>
> "pee nuts"???? You are joking, yes?

Don't let the name fool you.  This product was invented br Dr Ronald
Wheeler, one of the world's leading experts in prostatitis.  He discovered a
connection between prostatitis and prostate cancer.
mrpubmed@hotmail.com - 15 Feb 2005 19:17 GMT
And what makes him a "world leading expert" (ROTFL)? The fact that he
has a website and that the prostatitis foundation has a link with a
disclaimer that links are not endorsements? The fact that he does not
have a single peer reviewed publication on prostatitis? The fact that
the herbal supplement he hawks has never been tested in any clinical
trial, even though he promised years ago to do one? The fact that his
"discovery of a connection between prostatitis and prostate cancer" is
a hypothesis of his which he made without a shred of data and which
actually contradicts epidemiology studies showing no link between CPPS
and cancer (there IS a postulated link between asymptomatic
inflammation and cancer)?  Well, I think the name that he picked for
his product does show a flair for the serious investigation of clinical
science.

Or maybe you have a connection to this shining light in the academic
urological community?
Little John - 16 Feb 2005 04:53 GMT
Have you ever heard of keeping an open mind?

> And what makes him a "world leading expert" (ROTFL)? The fact that he
> has a website and that the prostatitis foundation has a link with a
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Or maybe you have a connection to this shining light in the academic
> urological community?
mrpubmed@hotmail.com - 16 Feb 2005 16:48 GMT
OK, my mind is open. Convince me.

How do you define a world leading expert in prostatitis?
How does Dr. Wheeler fulfill your criteria?
Little John - 17 Feb 2005 09:24 GMT
> OK, my mind is open. Convince me.
>
> How do you define a world leading expert in prostatitis?
> How does Dr. Wheeler fulfill your criteria?

Read the success stories at http://www.peenuts.com/testimonials.asp

Another leading doctor substantiates Wheeler's claim of the prostate cancer
connection and endorses the Peenuts product:
http://www.prostate90.com/prostatitis/index.html
mrpubmed@hotmail.com - 17 Feb 2005 11:16 GMT
So online testimonials, just like the ones you see on TV at 3 am are
your proof that Wheeler is a world leading expert in prostatitis? An
endorsement from a website run by another obvious "toxin cleansing"
quack is further proof?

Did you know that the word gullible is not in the dictionary?

Honestly, you'll have to do better than that to convince anyone with
half a brain, no matter how open.
Gut-Buster - 16 Feb 2005 20:59 GMT
I have but as it turns out due to my multiple health problems, she keeps me.
:)

> Have you ever heard of keeping an open mind?
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> Or maybe you have a connection to this shining light in the academic
>> urological community?
MisterSkippy - 16 Feb 2005 19:38 GMT
>>> May I suggest to you Dr. Ronald Wheeler's PEENUTS product.  Read the
>>> success stories at http://www.peenuts.com/testimonials.asp
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>Wheeler, one of the world's leading experts in prostatitis.  He discovered a
>connection between prostatitis and prostate cancer.

Using the usual search engines, I haven't had any luck finding more
info on the link between prostatitis and PCa.
I've wondered about a possible link. I've asked a couple of GPs and my
urologist about it and they said they were not familiar with any
definitive studies documenting this. Any links or pointers in the
right direction would be most appreciated.
TIA
DFB

"When a legislature undertakes to proscribe the exercise of a citizen's
constitutional rights it acts lawlessly and the citizen can take matters into
his own hands and proceed on the basis that such a law is no law at all."
- Justice William O. Douglas
Elton Fan - 17 Feb 2005 05:49 GMT
> >Don't let the name fool you.  This product was invented br Dr Ronald
> >Wheeler, one of the world's leading experts in prostatitis.  He discovered a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> TIA
> DFB

Don't give any credence to the claim made by Dr Wheeler.  He is by and
large regarded as a quack and has never been able to back the prostate
cancer claim.  Read the following abstract which indicates that the
prostate cancer link theory is not supported:

Epidemiology. 2004 Jan;15(1):93-9.

Prostatitis as a risk factor for prostate cancer.

Roberts RO, Bergstralh EJ, Bass SE, Lieber MM, Jacobsen SJ.

Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo
Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. roberts.rose...@mayo.edu

BACKGROUND: The association of infection or inflammation of the
prostate with prostate cancer has been suggested but not established.
This study was undertaken to investigate this association. METHODS:
Cases were Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with histologically
proven prostate cancer diagnosed between January 1980 and December
1996. Cases (n = 409) were each matched to 2 control subjects (n = 803)

on age at diagnosis of prostate cancer, residency in Olmsted County,
and duration of the community medical record. The medical record of
each subject was reviewed for a history of acute or chronic bacterial
prostatitis or chronic pelvic pain syndrome (inflammatory type).
RESULTS: The relative odds of prostate cancer were elevated in men with

history of any type of prostatitis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.7; 95%
confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-2.6) or acute prostatitis (2.5;
1.3-4.7). The mean time from most recent episode of acute prostatitis
to the diagnosis of prostate cancer was 12.2 years. After exclusion of
men with acute prostatitis 2 years before the index date, the
relationship was somewhat reduced (1.9; 0.9-3.8). Chronic bacterial
prostatitis was more weakly associated with prostate cancer (1.6;
0.8-3.1), whereas chronic pelvic pain syndrome was not associated at
all (0.9; 0.4-1.8). CONCLUSIONS: Infection in the form of acute or
chronic bacterial prostatitis may be associated with prostate cancer.
However, our data do not provide compelling evidence to support this.
As a result of the limitations of current methods of assessing chronic
prostatitis, biochemical or tissue markers of infection or inflammation

of the prostate may help clarify their role in the pathogenesis of
prostate cancer.
Gut-Buster - 16 Feb 2005 20:58 GMT
>>> May I suggest to you Dr. Ronald Wheeler's PEENUTS product.  Read the
>>> success stories at http://www.peenuts.com/testimonials.asp
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> a
> connection between prostatitis and prostate cancer.

Honestly the guy may be a medical genius but he really needs to take a
course in marketing. :)
Elton Fan - 17 Feb 2005 05:50 GMT
> > Don't let the name fool you.  This product was invented br Dr Ronald
> > Wheeler, one of the world's leading experts in prostatitis.  He discovered
> > a
> > connection between prostatitis and prostate cancer.
>
> Honestly the guy may be a medical genius

Who?  Wheeler?  I don't recall seeing any peer-reviewed publications
from this guy in the area of prostatitis.

>but he really needs to take a
> course in marketing. :)
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.