Gutbuster has given you a lot of good advise.
14 days of Doxycycline may not be long enough. Typically the first line of
treatment is 6 weeks of a Hydroquinone like Cipro or Levaquin.
A prostste of 10cc is very small. This doesn't sound right. A normal
prostste measures about 30 cc. The only way to know if you have "something
else" is to do a prostate biopsy. If your PSA is normal and your doctor is
not suspicious, follow his suggestions. Keep in mine, ultrasound is not a
good screening test for prostate cancer. PSA is used for that.
This newsgroup has gone down hill and Gutbuster is right, it's full of
snake oil salesmen. If you trust and like your doctor, then tell him what
is really bothering you, physically and emotionally, and he should be your
best resource.
> 14 days of Doxycycline may not be long enough. Typically the first line of
> treatment is 6 weeks of a Hydroquinone like Cipro or Levaquin.
Uh, quinolone. But if there really is an infection 2 weeks is not
enough.
> A prostste of 10cc is very small. This doesn't sound right. A normal
> prostste measures about 30 cc.
Not correct. In a young man the prostate will be 10-20 cc. 30cc is
already slightly enlarged.
> This newsgroup has gone down hill and Gutbuster is right, it's full of
> snake oil salesmen. If you trust and like your doctor, then tell him what
> is really bothering you, physically and emotionally, and he should be your
> best resource.
Yes, the re-emergence of Polachek, who sells dangerous prolonged
courses of megadose polypharmacy antibiotics along with prostatic
massage to all patients (even though it only helps a fraction of them)
is a concern.
> > If you are taking Doxy then you have bacterial prostatitis.
Absolutely wrong. You have bacterial prostatitis if you have recurrent
urinary tract infections that localize to the prostatic fluid.
Gutbuster has made up his own definitions for everything and I am sure
that the sky on his planet is a very unique color.
The fact is that over 95% of doctors prescribe antibiotics for
prostatitis whether or not they do cultures and whether or not they
believe an infection is present. This has been documented by several
published studies in the medical literature. Since at least 2/3 of
patients get better with antibiotics reglardless of the culture
results, this is a reasonable approach for someone presenting for the
first time with symptoms.
>but the likelihood is close to 100% that it wont ever go away.
Don't be discouraged by this fantasy. If as studies show, prostatitis
develops in 2-7% of men per year and it never went away, how long
before every male on the planet had it? Newsgroups give a very skewed
impression of most conditions because people who respond to simple
treatment are not the ones who usually seek them out.
>Also, from my own experience taking Doxy constantly, month
> after
> > month for many months, the more you constantly take it, the less it is
> > effective.
Particularly when you don't have chronic bacterial prostatitis. But
don't expect any scientific debate from this poster. Just typical
toddler like responses. "I win you lose end of debate, won't post on
this subject again (repeated 5 times). In his world, it's what he
believes passes for being clever and having a rapier wit.
There are actually many types of therapy that help men with this
condition when antibiotics don't work, including alpha blockers
(Flomax, Uroxatral), phytotherapy (quercetin, bee pollen, Permixon
(type of Saw Palmetto)), dietary changes, neuroleptic drugs (Elavil,
Neurontin), physical therapy and acupuncture.
Ralph Caccese Jr - 25 Jan 2005 02:25 GMT
> Uh, quinolone. But if there really is an infection 2 weeks is not
> enough.
Gasp! I must have had a brain fart. I don't know what I was thinking
about. Quinolone is what I meant. Absolutely right.
> Not correct. In a young man the prostate will be 10-20 cc. 30cc is
> already slightly enlarged.
That's true too. I'm just not used to seeing prostates less than 30cc. I
assumed the original poster was middle aged, why, I'm not sure.
Paul, by increased echogenicity of the prostate, do you mean
calcifications? If so, that probably means nothing. Some people think
calcifications are the cause of prostatitis, but that is not the
conventional main stream thought. Although, there was a recently published
article in The Journal of Urology by Dr. Shoskes about chelation therapy
along with tetracyline for treating nanobacteria infections associated with
calcifications which was pretty interesting.
Paul - 30 Jan 2005 16:36 GMT
Hi Ralph,
I'm not sure if the doctor meant calcifications - that was just how he
worded it in his report to my GP.
I saw the urologist again last Monday, and the prostate is no longer
tender when pressure is applied to it. However, I do still have the
kidney pains and urinary problems. I'm about 2 1/2 weeks through the
antibiotic course - if my prostate has responded to the antibiotics, is
it reasonable to assume that the other symptoms will improve as well?
Many thanks,
Paul