> I see from your posting history that you've never had a positive
> urinalysis. You say that despite this, you are "convinced" you have/had
> a bacterial infection. Now, tell us, why should we subscribe to this
> unproven, quasi-religious faith you have in a bacterial infection? Or
> could it be that it is /you/ who is the "craphead"?
You can urinanalyze bacterial prostatitis sufferers all day long and
come up with negative results every time. To check for bacteria in
the prostate it is necessary to expel prostatic fluid and check for
bacteria in that. Unless, of course, you are really not interested in
finding any bacteria.
gothika - 30 Aug 2004 04:42 GMT
>> I see from your posting history that you've never had a positive
>> urinalysis. You say that despite this, you are "convinced" you have/had
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>bacteria in that. Unless, of course, you are really not interested in
>finding any bacteria.
Correct. Urinalysis is about as useful as a tit on a bull for finding
bacterial infections.
You can have a colonized infection in any organ or even in your spinal
column or bone marrow and a urinalysis can miss it completely.
All they check is to see if you have an elevated WBC, if not you can't
have an infection.
I was deathly ill with Tuberculosis for nearly 2 months and had
repeated urinalysis which all came up negative.
They only started taking me serious after I started coughing up blood
and aveoili.
Only after one doctor had the sense to run a scratch test did they get
a clue.
Even then sputum and tissue cultures came up negative.(The bacilli
were only identified after they extracted fluid from my lower lungs
and spine.)
I'd been diagnosed with chronic prostate infections no less than 5
times in the last decade, all based on elevated WBC and inflamed
prostate and bladder.
Like most here I had intial success with ABX's but would always have a
relapse after a period of time.
Whatever recurring infection I have has gone systemic though.
All the classic symptoms. Low grade fever with elevated blood
pressure, inflamed lymph glands as well as urinary tract burning and
prostate pains as well as fluid in the lungs with dark green or brown
phlegm mixed with blood.
I'm lucky if one in five of my urinalysis show anything amiss.
I always get relief with antibiotics though.(And NO I don't want to
take the antibiotics, actually hate having to deal with the side
effects.)
Like many here am sick of hearing the all knowing few pontificate on
on what ails some of us. HOW could they know having not even met us to
make any sort of diagnosis?
My condition has a hospital full of specialists stumped, very unlikey
some wit in a news group could possibly have any more of a clue.
Webmaster Chronicprostatitis.com - 30 Aug 2004 07:59 GMT
> > I see from your posting history that you've never had a positive
> > urinalysis. You say that despite this, you are "convinced" you have/had
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> bacteria in that. Unless, of course, you are really not interested in
> finding any bacteria.
I guess you must be a genius, because you know more than the Medline
Medical Encyclopedia, which states:
"Chronic Bacterial Prostatitis
Signs and tests
A urinalysis reveals increased white blood cells (WBCs) and bacterial
growth upon culture of urine #3. Culture of prostatic secretions shows
in increased levels of WBCs and more concentrated bacterial growth."
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000523.htm
More likely, you are one of the silly people still clinging to the
disproved idea of bacterial infection as the cause of the majority (95%)
instead of the minority (5%) of male chronic pelvic pain cases.
Get educated:
http://www.chronicprostatitis.com/
wrkg_onit - 30 Aug 2004 19:02 GMT
Bacterial prostatitis confirmed by
1. cytology of EPS
2. culture of EPS
3. prostate biopsy
But first was negative per urinalysis by 2 different UROs, before I
got smart and realized they, and apparently, you, didn't know what
they were doing.
I have since found similar stories from other bacterial prostatitis
sufferers.
> > > I see from your posting history that you've never had a positive
> > > urinalysis. You say that despite this, you are "convinced" you have/had
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Get educated:
> http://www.chronicprostatitis.com/
Webmaster Chronicprostatitis.com - 30 Aug 2004 23:31 GMT
> Bacterial prostatitis confirmed by
> 1. cytology of EPS
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I have since found similar stories from other bacterial prostatitis
> sufferers.
The very last place I'd place any trust or confidence is in "stories by
other bacteria prostatitis sufferers".
The sad fact for people like you, whom I like to call "obsessive
personality" types who fix on one idea and cannot be shaken from it, is
that if you do the sort of exhaustive investigations you describe,
culturing biopsies etc, to NORMAL men, you will find bacteria. That's
proved in recent studies:
http://www.chronicpelvicpain.us/viewtopic.php?t=971
They say the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and so it is in
cases like yours. Proudly armed with your hard-won "diagnosis" of
"bacterial prostatitis", you then pound this "infection" with the
appropriate antibiotics. Typically, this brings no (or passing) relief.
What can be wrong, you ask? Denial steps in, and these are the usual
nonsense excuses:
1) bacteria are hiding in calcium deposits
2) bacteria or resistant to antibiotics
3) bacteria are locked in acini and cannot be got at
4) <insert your lastest excuse here>
Instead, I suggest you look at other etiologies that are far more
likely.
It's interesting that your main symptom, burning at the tip of the
penis, is associated with trigger points in the levator ani.
wrkg_onit - 30 Aug 2004 19:03 GMT
Bacterial prostatitis confirmed by
1. cytology of EPS
2. culture of EPS
3. prostate biopsy
But first was negative per urinalysis by 2 different UROs, before I
got smart and realized they, and apparently, you, didn't know what
they were doing.
I have since found similar stories from other bacterial prostatitis
sufferers.
> > > I see from your posting history that you've never had a positive
> > > urinalysis. You say that despite this, you are "convinced" you have/had
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Get educated:
> http://www.chronicprostatitis.com/