Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostatitis / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Crock O' sh.t

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Sven Garlick - 09 Jun 2004 21:05 GMT
http://www.prostate-usa.com/fungustudy.html
Webmaster Chronicprostatitis.com - 09 Jun 2004 21:11 GMT
> http://www.prostate-usa.com/fungustudy.html

Your opinion of this study, Dr Garlick, seems to tally with those of the
editors of all the major medical journals. They all refused to publish
it. However, the Prostatitis Foundation continues to fund Dr Polacheck's
"studies" as their IRS forms show.
James - 10 Jun 2004 13:25 GMT
since the study is looking at the possible role of fungi - not saying it is
a cause - why does that make it bogus - I personally know very little about
the role (or lack thereof) of fungi in any disease - but why stop research?
I know people may not like the doctor / establishment doing the study  - but
that is no reason to bash research.

Is there more that you can report here (i.e. why is this research "bad" or
unfounded).  I really have no opinion on it - I am just fishing for
information.

> > http://www.prostate-usa.com/fungustudy.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> --
> Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
Rummy the Dummy - 10 Jun 2004 14:26 GMT
> since the study is looking at the possible role of fungi - not saying
> it is a cause - why does that make it bogus - I personally know very
> little about the role (or lack thereof) of fungi in any disease - but
> why stop research? I know people may not like the doctor /
> establishment doing the study  - but that is no reason to bash
> research.

Nobody is bashing research. They are bashing bad research that doesn't get
published.

> Is there more that you can report here (i.e. why is this research
> "bad" or unfounded).  I really have no opinion on it - I am just
> fishing for information.

No, you're just trolling as usual, Paul.
James - 10 Jun 2004 14:44 GMT
I am just looking for information - this was the first I heard of it - thee is
no reason to be offensing and call me a troll.

Thats why I stopped posting here - too many of the users here don't
talk/communicate - they just insult each other.

At least on the other board the users are more civil to each other.

Why are you calling me Paul - my name is Jim - and I use my real email address
- not some shill account.

If you think I am someone else you are mistaken - I post here and at cp.com on
occasion.

I think you beleive that I am "niceshymiamiguy@aol.com" - which I am not.

feel free to reply to my email address if you would like to have a real
offline disourse on the topic.

-Jim
Woody Long - 13 Jun 2004 22:01 GMT
> http://www.prostate-usa.com/fungustudy.html

http://www.doctorfungus.org/lecture/ppt/diseases/ASM_Candidiasis_04.ppt

"Our Current Tools for diagnosis [of fungal infections] are Poor.
Miserable, to be honest."

- John Rex, Professor of medicine Univ. Texas

so, yes, prostate-usa is a crock

Woody
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.