> >I just had 2 more urine analysis/culture, which showed nothing. No
> >WBC/RBC, no organisms found.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Urine cultures are a waste of time. Totally worthless.
> I've had 8 or 9 over the past year and all come back clean.
> ejaculate, extreme fatigue etc...
> And it all recedes with a course of ABX's.
> Makes one wonder who's the brightest in this contest.
>> >I just had 2 more urine analysis/culture, which showed nothing. No
>> >WBC/RBC, no organisms found.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>How is that worthless as that tells you a lot about what you have or don't
>have.
Because Robert the retard, If a test can't find the bacteria infection
that's obviously there it's USELESS.
>> Yet I have every physical symptom of a bacteria infection, dark green
>> phlegm in large amounts, Bronchial inflammation,
>And you expect them to find bronchial inflammation from a urine culture?
Yeah I do. If a bacteria is systemic then it should show up in the
urine, unless the test is so antiquated it sucks and the bacteria has
mutated in such a way as to evade the test.
God you are so stupid.
> Fever, dark yellow
>> ejaculate, extreme fatigue etc...
>> And it all recedes with a course of ABX's.
>
>Meaning the doctors give you ABX's anyway with all cutures being negative?
NO. It means the doctor is using something called empirical evidence.
It's as much an acknowledgement on their parts that they don't know
everything, an admission on their part if you will that their test is
inadequate.
>> Yet the fck'in worthless yaps that call themselves doctors tell me in
>> spite of all the physical evidence I can't have a bacterial infection,
>
>These doctors that give you ABX even though you are culture negative are
>"fck'in worthless yaps"?
YES. Most refuse to go further and and order newer and more accurate
tests that identify the particular strain of bacteria SO that the
correct ABX could be prescribed to get rid of this infection once and
for all. Instead I have to take a general antibiotic that is only
partially effective in controlling the growth of the bacteria.
This is half-assed to say the least. Any reputable doctor knows this
will only make the problem worse in the long run, allowing the
bacterial strain to develop resistance to the current meds.
Never mind the harmful side effects the antibiotic is doing to my
system while I take it.
>> all on an antiquated, out of date test that the simplest microbial
>> organisms have learned to evade.
>Out of date meaning what is in date?
Out of date meaning that the test is OLD! Bacteria like any
microrganism uses mutagenic defense as a means of survival.
i.e. it's adapted to evade detection with the test means that were
developed over 60 years ago.
>Simplest microbial organisms have learned to evade what?
>Bacteria grow when they can eat enough food. Give them food and they will
>grow. If they don't grow then you don't have the right food or they are not
>there.
>> Makes one wonder who's the brightest in this contest.
Well... with such a moronic reply as the one above that you've penned
we all now know that when it comes to working glia cells you are
definitely a one legged man in an a.s kicking contest, Robert.
>There will be a lot here who will agree with you about doctors being
>worthless and that tests are inadequate and then you hear that not all
>doctors are worthless and then the next step is to go to the ones that are
>not. So go to the ones that are not.
More half-witted replies. If you had even a jot of intelligence and
any power of recall at all you'd have remembered my earlier posts
about NOT being able to go elsewhere.
That is unless you're volunteering to provide the means of seeking
other medical care? Are you Robert?
If you are feel free to post info on how you'll send the funds to
"allow" me to take your sage advice.
I'll need about 1,500 bucks for starters.
Robert - 22 Apr 2004 06:07 GMT
> >> >I just had 2 more urine analysis/culture, which showed nothing. No
> >> >WBC/RBC, no organisms found.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Because Robert the retard, If a test can't find the bacteria infection
> that's obviously there it's USELESS.
Then why have cultures then if they are useless?
> >> Yet I have every physical symptom of a bacteria infection, dark green
> >> phlegm in large amounts, Bronchial inflammation,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> urine, unless the test is so antiquated it sucks and the bacteria has
> mutated in such a way as to evade the test.
Mutated to evade the test? They either grow or don't grow.
> God you are so stupid.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> everything, an admission on their part if you will that their test is
> inadequate.
And you call them worthless for treating you empirically even though nothing
has grown?
So it's an admission that they don't know everything and that the test are
inadequate and for that you call them worthless. Yet you still go back to
them. I think you are in a circle and need to get out of the circle. I am
not the idiot here dude.
> >> Yet the fck'in worthless yaps that call themselves doctors tell me in
> >> spite of all the physical evidence I can't have a bacterial infection,
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Never mind the harmful side effects the antibiotic is doing to my
> system while I take it.
You sound like somebody who knows what he wants so why go to doctors that
won't do what you say? Why not go to one of the doctors who use the latest
tests so they can rid you of this infection?
> >> all on an antiquated, out of date test that the simplest microbial
> >> organisms have learned to evade.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> i.e. it's adapted to evade detection with the test means that were
> developed over 60 years ago.
Are you saying it's a defense mechanism not to grow in nutrient broth so the
bacteria can hide and not be detected? Do you think they have a brain?
> >Simplest microbial organisms have learned to evade what?
> >Bacteria grow when they can eat enough food. Give them food and they will
> >grow. If they don't grow then you don't have the right food or they are not
> >there.
> >> Makes one wonder who's the brightest in this contest.
> Well... with such a moronic reply as the one above that you've penned
A culture means you try and grow the bacteria. Bacteria are characterized by
what they will grow on and it is one of the things that identifies them.
This hasn't changed for centuries but what has changed is the defense the
bacteria have adopted to be able to grow in resistance to antibiotics.
> we all now know that when it comes to working glia cells you are
> definitely a one legged man in an a.s kicking contest, Robert.
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> "allow" me to take your sage advice.
> I'll need about 1,500 bucks for starters.
So the VA sucks then? Would you rather be in Canada or would you rather be
seen by a VA doc? I don't see any difference in posts between you and Idea
Man. YOu might even be the same guy.
OK Canada sucks and the VA sucks, and Australia sucks and the UK sucks. Now
we are really getting somewhere. Lets hear from those in the US that say
that all the doctors suck. Then let's hear from those people who know real
good doctors. Let's hear from the really good doctors who know how to treat
this condition. Let's see the studies and or papers showing good treatment
results. Once all the doctors see and read about the good results even VA
doctors will be able to treat you. I don't know of a better motivation by
them to get you off their back. They don't want to see somebody like you
every week. If giving you a one year presciption for antibiotics would work
they would have done it long ago. The problem is it doesn't and there isn't
anything out there that is good. Try butt relaxation exercises.
º-- Idea Man --º - 24 Apr 2004 04:18 GMT
> don't see any difference in posts between you and Idea
> Man. YOu might even be the same guy!!!!!!!
Hi everyone. Hope your doing well.
Yep, I'm Gothika and Gothika is me. Gee, this is fun.
> OK Canada sucks
Canada rocks! Oh no. My crayons all melted together.
Bye.