
Signature
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
--- U§ê FIDUCIAL_POWER@HOTMAIL.COM tø rêåch mê ---
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
> ¸,.·´¨`·., ¡ | i | ,.·´¨`·.,¸ ¡ i | i¸,.·´¨`·.,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> designed to serve the general public is rather poor, outdated, and needs
> urgent improving.
In Canada maybe, because the government got involved with trying to clamp
down the evil capitalist companies.
In the US any doctor can order any test he wants to and there are labs able
to fill that request. The real question is does the doctor want to order
such a test with meaningless results or consequences.
> We have also been discussing microorganisms that can infect epithelial
> cells, viruses that are flesh invading contributing to chronic inflammatory
> muscle disease, and virus's again, that have the ability to insert their own
> DNA into a bacteria's chromosome and live on further by replicating into
> their daughter cells.
What the bacteria does or whether it is infected or not with virus does not
impact on antimicrobials.
There are many intracelluar organisms, Rocky Mountain spotted fever and even
chlamydia are obligate intracellular and antibiotics are effective against
them. It makes no difference whether bacteria invade the epithelial cells in
terms of antibacterials. Flesh invading viruses that invade muscle are not
susceptible to antibiotics generally. Viral myocarditis means getting of
plenty of bed rest as there is very little they can do.
Bacteriophage infection of bacteria does not alter the bacteria's
susceptibility to antibiotics. A lamda infected diptheria bacteria is
susceptible to the same antbiotic as one who is not infected. The only
difference is that the infected one causes disease while one that does not
is harmless. It is one of pathogencity not one of susceptibility.
No one needs to know any of this, why? Because either antibiotics will work
or they won't.
> It's all very interesting and scores of us have our concerns with regards to
> whether or not any of this is happening in ourselves and other CPPS
> patients. We can only hope that scientists and researcher's bring more
> clarity to this subject in the very near future with unbiased investigation
> and study.
They have and antibiotics have failed and that is more important than any
B.S. theories.
> With that being said, I think all of us should keep an open mind with
> regards to other possibilties and that's why this website which has a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> adding more benefit to yourself and your quest of becoming symptom free on
> day.
Just don't mention antibiotics or I or another Moderator will can your a.s.
> I hope you do take the time to take a look there and also hope that one day
> you'll find something that works for you.
>
> God bless.
>
> ¸,.·´¨`·., ¡ | i | ,.·´¨`·.,¸ ¡ i | i¸,.·´¨`·.,
º-- Idea Man --º - 11 Apr 2004 21:58 GMT
"Robert" wrote...
> It makes no difference whether bacteria invade the epithelial cells in
> terms of antibacterials.
This is absolutely wrong. It's like speaking to a child with you.
> Flesh invading viruses that invade muscle are not
> susceptible to antibiotics generally.
This discussion isn't exclusively about antibiotics geek, so why are you
infatuated with them? Everyone here knows that antibiotics usually don't
work for CPPS patients!!! The whole message in my post is that standard labs
available to the general public are practically useless at identifying many
intracellular bacteria and viruses that are just now being recognized as
causing inflammatory disease, and these basic standards need improvement so
that one day antibiotics and other medicines might just be more effective!
You stupid little man. In one example of this there are studies which prove
e.coli do flux in and out of the human epithelial cell and avoid detection
at culture time. This infiltration protects itself against the medicine used
to kill it, the every antibiotics your telling everyone here that work every
single time. You mislead people with misinformation and ignorance. Mostly
ignorance though.
> No one needs to know any of this, why? Because either antibiotics will work
> or they won't.
You should work for Bayer or one of the other big antibiotic dug companies.
Antibiotics work every time......yep, flawless. Maybe you are already are a
shill? How much do they pay you? Your kinda sounding like a poster named Jim
who used to post here too.
> Just don't mention antibiotics or I or another Moderator will can your a.s.
Who are you threatening? Threats are meaningless to me. But, this is
interesting. You mean to tell me your a moderator at c.p.com? Wow! But,
this vague threat about discussing antibiotics sure doesn't sound like
anything the moderators over there would threaten people about? I mean from
time to time antibiotics are discussed there. How long have you been
speaking for c.p.com and been moderating there for, Robert?
p.s. Last thing I wanna say, but it won't make no difference to you. I think
your an idiot who's posting here for your own self serving purposes which
just happens to be feeding your own perverted ego by wanting to be
recognized as an internet troll. With that being said, it will be a very
long time before you ever get a response back from me to one of your posts.
So just remember this, Robert: everytime you post some utterly stupid and
inflammatory comment to the group and expect that I will answer you back,
and I don't? Well, the reason I won't participate in anymore discussion with
you is because you are a disasterous fool with the brain the size of a
peanut. That's why. But, guess what? With your hand on your dick, I bet
you'll be responding daily to my posts trying to compete for my attention
won't you? Robert, I don't like you and I'm not gay! I like women!!! There
are all kinds of internet sites that can feed your perverted nature, so go
away.

Signature
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
--- U§ê FIDUCIAL_POWER@HOTMAIL.COM tø rêåch mê ---
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤