It is true.  I have been off antibiotics for four years, if you excuse
my ear-nose-throat guy for having put me on them for three days late
last year, and that was all that I allowed.

For as long as I was going to be on antibiotics, I was going to have
chronic prostatitis, with if not imminent, eventually the clear threat
of having acute episodes, and if you are still on them, so are you.  I
hope there isn't anyone out there who has not been able to respond
favorably to therapy either from elavil, allopurinol, and/or
neurontin, not to mention the quercetin, saw palmetto, green tea that
on their own were not good enough for me over a few years ago.

Instead of stating it or beating anyone over the head with it, I have
a question instead.
What defines your urologist as a quack?  Is it enough, even if he or
she has not published it on the web, that if he guarantees you that
the antibiotic he will give you will cure you, that that indeed is
enough?  Keep the public health a little in mind, as you respond.
Could have I made it more simple than this?

Six years ago to this day, I was in nitrofurantoin, to which the
supposed pathogens were sensitive, but that does not penetrate the
prostate at all, and gave me quasi-epileptic symptoms for four days
(translate: four consecutive nights of lost sleep) and perhaps even
some minor permanent neurological damage.  Fortunately, if it did, it
is minor enough that it would be hard to trace the cause of any
current problems to it. As much as my uro specialist was a true
believer in the public health, as he would tell me, he had me enslaved
to the idea that antibiotics were my only way out, since I was not
buying it and neither should you, that all the symptoms could only
otherwise be in my head, if I could not be cured otherwise.