Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Radiation side effects?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
J W - 03 Dec 2006 19:14 GMT
Our freind has prostrate cancer, he underwent surgery earlier this year
to have his prostrate removed. He has recently begun receiving radiation
treatments for it as well. He has had about 15-20 treatments out of over
40 scheduled. Thus far has had no problems until this weekend. he has
been experiencing painful and bloody urinations. Is this a usual or
expected side effect or should he be concerned.
I.P. Freely - 03 Dec 2006 22:55 GMT
> Our freind has prostrate cancer, he underwent surgery earlier this year
> to have his prostrate removed. He has recently begun receiving radiation
> treatments for it as well. He has had about 15-20 treatments out of over
> 40 scheduled. Thus far has had no problems until this weekend. he has
> been experiencing painful and bloody urinations. Is this a usual or
> expected side effect or should he be concerned.

I am so GD sick and tired of these GD doctor who just tell patients "cut
off this leg or remove that vital organ or fry your innards with
radiation or chemicals" without first telling them a) what the odds are
it will help and b) what the side effects may be and their likelihood.
Right up there with "Get your PSA checked annually" should be "Your
doctor will treat you like an idiot and tell you about 1/3 of the story
if you're lucky. Read a couple of prostate cancer books before you
believe one word out of your doctor's mouth. Also, log into
alt.support.cancer.prostate and start reading." (Then if you get a GOOD
doctor who tells you the whole story, you're ahead of the game, hang
onto him/her, and STILL read the books and a.s.c.p. because there's no
way even the best doctors have the time to educate you to the extent the
books do.

Now, back to your question: Usual side effect. But his GD doctor should
have told him to expect it, not to be alarmed, and how to manage that
and other SEs that may crop up. Did the doc list and explain the other
SEs that may occur now or two years from now?

Why am I so PO'd about this seemingly harmless omission? Because the
same thing happens relative to all types of treatment, and some of the
SEs these GD docs aren't telling us about are very common, extremely
severe, and/or even life-threatening.

And your friend is probably just starting his life w/PC. Raid the
bookstore and pick up some Christmas gifts for him, even if he's Muslim
or Jewish or a raging atheist. Just get him some prostate cancer books
by Scardino, Walsh, Bubley, and whomever else you can find, and make
sure he reads and understands at least the chapters pertinent to his
case and to radiation treatment.

I.P.
J W - 05 Dec 2006 01:58 GMT
Thanks, Our freind is a senior (65) and a veteran, He's having to drive
175 miles to tampa every week to the VA hospital for these treatments.
They put him up in a motel and he comes home on weekends. I don't think
they are telling him much of anything. They at first told him from his
biopsy that he was pretty far advanced on some scale I think he said it
was gleason or something like that. Then when they operated to remove it
they said only a small portion was advanced and the rest was not bad.
They said they felt 99% sure that they  got everything. He has been home
in a lot of pain healing for several months now. Then they said they
wanted him to take this radiation just to be sure that everything was
knocked out. He was tolerating it fine up until last weekend his wife
told us at church he was having a lot of pain urinating and had blood in
it. He was going to ask about it this week. It didn't sound good to me.
I wonder if he really needed the radiation.


Re: Radiation side effects?  

Group: sci.med.prostate.cancer Date: Sun, Dec 3, 2006, 2:58pm (EST-3)
From: fuhgheddaboutit@noway.nohow (I.P. Freely)
J W wrote:
Our freind has prostrate cancer, he underwent surgery earlier this year
to have his prostrate removed. He has recently begun receiving radiation
treatments for it as well. He has had about 15-20 treatments out of over
40 scheduled. Thus far has had no problems until this weekend. he has
been experiencing painful and bloody urinations. Is this a usual or
expected side effect or should he be concerned.
I am so GD sick and tired of these GD doctor who just tell patients "cut
off this leg or remove that vital organ or fry your innards with
radiation or chemicals" without first telling them a) what the odds are
it will help and b) what the side effects may be and their likelihood.
Right up there with "Get your PSA checked annually" should be "Your
doctor will treat you like an idiot and tell you about 1/3 of the story
if you're lucky. Read a couple of prostate cancer books before you
believe one word out of your doctor's mouth. Also, log into
alt.support.cancer.prostate and start reading." (Then if you get a GOOD
doctor who tells you the whole story, you're ahead of the game, hang
onto him/her, and STILL read the books and a.s.c.p. because there's no
way even the best doctors have the time to educate you to the extent the
books do.
Now, back to your question: Usual side effect. But his GD doctor should
have told him to expect it, not to be alarmed, and how to manage that
and other SEs that may crop up. Did the doc list and explain the other
SEs that may occur now or two years from now?
Why am I so PO'd about this seemingly harmless omission? Because the
same thing happens relative to all types of treatment, and some of the
SEs these GD docs aren't telling us about are very common, extremely
severe, and/or even life-threatening.
And your friend is probably just starting his life w/PC. Raid the
bookstore and pick up some Christmas gifts for him, even if he's Muslim
or Jewish or a raging atheist. Just get him some prostate cancer books
by Scardino, Walsh, Bubley, and whomever else you can find, and make
sure he reads and understands at least the chapters pertinent to his
case and to radiation treatment.
I.P.
I.P. Freely - 05 Dec 2006 03:45 GMT
> Thanks, Our freind is a senior (65) and a veteran, He's having to drive
> 175 miles to tampa every week to the VA hospital for these treatments.

The VA offered to let me be treated locally at their expense so I could
avoid the 220-mile/3-hour drive to their hospital, but it's a bit late
for your friend to do that now.

> I don't think they are telling him much of anything.

I'm beginning to suspect that happens way too often with patients who
just sit back and let the docs take care of everything. I consider that
shameful, considering how personal the treatment choices are, due to
their long and complex lists of benefits and side effects. Different
patients rank the side effect menu in very different orders.

> They at first told him from his
> biopsy that he was pretty far advanced on some scale I think he said it
> was gleason or something like that. Then when they operated to remove it
> they said only a small portion was advanced and the rest was not bad.

Those are implications that recurrence is likely, but at this second
treatment level, informed personal choice become MUCH more critical,
because the benefits are much less and the potential or likely side
effects ARGUABLY much worse.

> He has been home in a lot of pain healing for several months now.

Prostate surgery shouldn't hurt much even a few days later, let alone
two weeks or months later; he should feel better in a couple of months
than he felt before the surgery, because by then the surgery is ancient
history and he should have been walking and/or exercising quite a bit to
help recovery. Some patients feel like playing football 6 weeks post-op.

> Then they said they wanted him to take this radiation just to be
> sure that everything was knocked out.
> I wonder if he really needed the radiation.

That's one approach. Or one can wait until a simple blood test for PSA
shows an increasing PSA and treat then or not, or one can wait until
scans show remote metastasis and treat THAT . . . there's no clear
solution. The only certainty is that further treatment WILL cause
further side effects. This all requires extensive patient education,
analysis, and decision-making . . . or a truly GREAT doctor VERY in tune
with the patient's innermost quality of life value system.

> He was tolerating it fine up until last weekend his wife
> told us at church he was having a lot of pain urinating and had blood in
> it. He was going to ask about it this week. It didn't sound good to me.

Darn right. But his doc should have warned him it would probably occur,
 given him some criteria for calling the doc, and been ready to
prescribe  meds and/or behaviors to mitigate the symptoms.

If your friend is willing to tolerate surgery pain for more than a day
(that's what drugs are for) or painful bloody urine for more than 5
minutes without RUNNING to the hospital, he NEEDS someone to watch out
for him in this case and with whatever else happens to him next. He must
be either very afraid of medicine or just very passive, neither of which
serves us old people well. If he has any family, please clue them in
that he needs to be closely watched for the sake of his health even if
his prostate cancer is completely cured.

I.P.
J W - 05 Dec 2006 15:47 GMT
We asked him if they couldn't farm out the treatments localy so he
wouldn't have to drive so far, he said they told him no. He was laid up
for a very long time after the surgery. there was some sort of lump down
at his taint meat (for lack of a better word) area between his yoo hoo
and hi anus. He was miserable, couldn't sit without pillows, had to lay
on his side and was real slow walking. His PSA was like .05 or something
which we all thought was good but apparently they thought differently.

You are right about doctors just wanting patients to be docile and do
what they are told, that's for sure. I'm a stage 4 colon cancer patient.
My oncologist would go balistic if anyone questioned anything she said
or did , she did not like to be challenged. She was quick to tell me
however that there was no cure and no hope of beating it, that she was
just keepng me alive as long as possible with chemo whch I found to be
extremely depressing and not much help or comfort. Her patients would
all just climb in the chemo chairs, wrap up in blankets, take whatever
they were given without qestion and sleep. I on the other hand asked
questions, wanted to knw what I was given and  what it may or may not do
to me. She didn't like that and after 8 months of chemo when my bone
marrow (platlets, white & red blood cells) was crashing and my liver
numbers were of the scale from chemo toxicity and CT scans showed a
possible recourance happening, she decided to fire me for asking too
many questions. The new Onc my HMO gave me didn't even want to see me.
he said I had to go on chemo break for 3-4 months and hasn't even
monitored my blood. I have sigent ring cell cancer along with the colon
cancer which they tell me is extreely aggressive and therefore I should
not be off chemo for any extended period of time, so who do you beleive?
All I know is this onc hasn't even give me the time of day for 3 months.
My primary doc ageed to at least test my CEA every month and that is
rising  by 50% every month. So yesterday out of sheer panick I lost my
cool and fired this onc, so now we are one for one. One fired me and I
fired one. Made me feel good at the time but then it sank in that now I
have no onc. no one to even flush the port and nearly 12 of the 18
months they said I'd most likely live are gone. Both the oncs agreed
that I needed to get on a clinical trial since I apparently failed 1st
line chemo but they both refused to help me find one, said they were too
busy. I suspect it was because there was o money in it for them. Oh well
enough ranting about me this was supposed to be for my freind with
prostate cancer. You struck a nerve with me when you said  

"I'm beginning to suspect that happens way too often with patients who
just sit back and let the docs take care of everything. I consider that
shameful, "

And I guess it just had to come off my chest. I'm very angry with the
medical system right now. It was my regular doctor's mistake in
overlooking anemia low iron in my blood tests that allowed my colo
cancer to go undetected until I was in pain and decided to go to the ER.
I will advise him about the books you said to get and thank you for the
advice. ou are right, he is very passive, hates to make waves or rock
the boat and is subject to take things far to seriously. When they at
first told him the biopsy results showed him to be high on the scale he
was ready to arange his funeral and very depressed so his wife has to
take care in what she even tells him and how she tells it.
.



Re: Radiation side effects?  

Group: sci.med.prostate.cancer Date: Mon, Dec 4, 2006, 7:47pm (EST-3)
From: fuhgheddaboutit@noway.nohow (I.P. Freely)
J W wrote:
Thanks, Our freind is a senior (65) and a veteran, He's having to drive
175 miles to tampa every week to the VA hospital for these treatments.
The VA offered to let me be treated locally at their expense so I could
avoid the 220-mile/3-hour drive to their hospital, but it's a bit late
for your friend to do that now.
I don't think they are telling him much of anything.
I'm beginning to suspect that happens way too often with patients who
just sit back and let the docs take care of everything. I consider that
shameful, considering how personal the treatment choices are, due to
their long and complex lists of benefits and side effects. Different
patients rank the side effect menu in very different orders.
They at first told him from his
biopsy that he was pretty far advanced on some scale I think he said it
was gleason or something like that. Then when they operated to remove it
they said only a small portion was advanced and the rest was not bad.
Those are implications that recurrence is likely, but at this second
treatment level, informed personal choice become MUCH more critical,
because the benefits are much less and the potential or likely side
effects ARGUABLY much worse.
He has been home in a lot of pain healing for several months now.
Prostate surgery shouldn't hurt much even a few days later, let alone
two weeks or months later; he should feel better in a couple of months
than he felt before the surgery, because by then the surgery is ancient
history and he should have been walking and/or exercising quite a bit to
help recovery. Some patients feel like playing football 6 weeks post-op.
Then they said they wanted him to take this radiation just to be
sure that everything was knocked out.
I wonder if he really needed the radiation.
That's one approach. Or one can wait until a simple blood test for PSA
shows an increasing PSA and treat then or not, or one can wait until
scans show remote metastasis and treat THAT . . . there's no clear
solution. The only certainty is that further treatment WILL cause
further side effects. This all requires extensive patient education,
analysis, and decision-making . . . or a truly GREAT doctor VERY in tune
with the patient's innermost quality of life value system.
He was tolerating it fine up until last weekend his wife told us at
church he was having a lot of pain urinating and had blood in it. He was
going to ask about it this week. It didn't sound good to me.
Darn right. But his doc should have warned him it would probably occur,
given him some criteria for calling the doc, and been ready to
prescribe meds and/or behaviors to mitigate the symptoms.
If your friend is willing to tolerate surgery pain for more than a day
(that's what drugs are for) or painful bloody urine for more than 5
minutes without RUNNING to the hospital, he NEEDS someone to watch out
for him in this case and with whatever else happens to him next. He must
be either very afraid of medicine or just very passive, neither of which
serves us old people well. If he has any family, please clue them in
that he needs to be closely watched for the sake of his health even if
his prostate cancer is completely cured.
I.P.
I.P. Freely - 05 Dec 2006 19:00 GMT
> I'm a stage 4 colon cancer patient.
> My oncologist would go balistic if anyone questioned anything she said
> or did , she did not like to be challenged.

Grounds for instant, on-the-spot firing, IMO.

> She was quick to tell me
> however that there was no cure and no hope of beating it, that she was
> just keepng me alive as long as possible

That part's true. At least she's being honest rather than lying to you.

> with chemo whch I found to be
> extremely depressing and not much help or comfort.

Then why bother?
> she decided to fire me
> The new Onc my HMO gave me didn't even want to see me.
> out of sheer panick I lost my cool and fired this onc
> so now we are one for one.
> both refused to help me find one, said they were too busy.
> I suspect it was because there was no money in it for them.

That . . . or word gets around about difficult patients. But then what
the heck do terminal cancer docs expect, a ward full of pie-eyed,
valley-girl CHEERLEADERS?

> When they at
> first told him the biopsy results showed him to be high on the scale he
> was ready to arange his funeral and very depressed so his wife has to
> take care in what she even tells him and how she tells it.

Unless he takes the bull by the horns and gets some psych counseling,
he's in for a loooooooooong decade of misery before his cancer kills him
or is pronounced cured.

I.P.
George Conklin - 06 Dec 2006 20:48 GMT
> Unless he takes the bull by the horns and gets some psych counseling,
> he's in for a loooooooooong decade of misery before his cancer kills him
> or is pronounced cured.
>
> I.P.

My father suffered from the after-effects of radiation for prostate cancer
for 25 years.  Yes, he was 'cured,' but the pain from the after effects was
always there...wall-to-wall constrictions for a lifetime.  After every trip
to the urologist his voice shook for a week.  And a colleague has also told
me that his doctors will not even discuss the after effects of radiation
from his prostate cancer...they also do not even want to discuss it.  It is
a forbidden topic.
I.P. Freely - 07 Dec 2006 00:49 GMT
> a colleague has also told
> me that his doctors will not even discuss the after effects of radiation
> from his prostate cancer...they also do not even want to discuss it.  It is
> a forbidden topic.

I'd fire them, report them to the state medical board, name them in the
cancer forums, and spread the word locally . . . maybe beginning with a
flyer to this effect:

"My father suffered from the after-effects of radiation for prostate
cancer for 25 years.  Yes, he was 'cured,' but the pain from the after
effects was always there...wall-to-wall constrictions [explain] for a
lifetime.  After every trip to the urologist his voice shook for a week.
How open is YOUR urologist about the prospects of this extreme or lesser
but more common side effects -- or the x% incidence of subsequent colon
cancer attributed to this treatment?"

I.P.
George Conklin - 07 Dec 2006 17:14 GMT
> > a colleague has also told
> > me that his doctors will not even discuss the after effects of radiation
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> I.P.

  My urologist right now is treating me for kidney stones and I
participated in a clincial trial.  So, I got to rate HIM.
Leonard Evens - 08 Dec 2006 15:34 GMT
>> Unless he takes the bull by the horns and gets some psych counseling,
>> he's in for a loooooooooong decade of misery before his cancer kills him
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> from his prostate cancer...they also do not even want to discuss it.  It is
> a forbidden topic.

Radiation for prostate cancer 25 or more years ago was very different
from what it is now.  First, it was much less effective because doses
had to be kept down in order to avoid damage to surrounding tissues.
Even so, there often was such damage with long term effects, as in your
father's case.

Radiation therapy today is very different.   It is much better focused.
 This allows the use of higher doses with less danger of affecting
surrounding tissues.  I don't want to try to minimize your father's
suffering, but it is not clear it is relevant for a man today
considering radiation therapy.  Such a man needs to know the likelihoods
for men like him when treated by a speific practitioner.   Although such
information is not always going to be perfectly reliable, it should give
some reasonabel idea of what is likely to occur.  Of course, one should
avoid practitioners who refuse to give such estimates.
George Conklin - 09 Dec 2006 03:14 GMT
> >> Unless he takes the bull by the horns and gets some psych counseling,
> >> he's in for a loooooooooong decade of misery before his cancer kills him
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Radiation for prostate cancer 25 or more years ago was very different
> from what it is now.

  The side effects people brought up were the same, and are the same, and
always will be the same.  And what was then 6,000 rads is, given different
measurements, still a huge dose.

 First, it was much less effective because doses
> had to be kept down in order to avoid damage to surrounding tissues.
> Even so, there often was such damage with long term effects, as in your
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> considering radiation therapy.  Such a man needs to know the likelihoods
> for men like him when treated by a speific practitioner.

  Give me a break.  A specific doctor does not know or even discuss his
problems.  They are in the grave.
Leonard Evens - 09 Dec 2006 15:07 GMT
>>>> Unless he takes the bull by the horns and gets some psych counseling,
>>>> he's in for a loooooooooong decade of misery before his cancer kills
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>    The side effects people brought up were the same, and are the same, and
> always will be the same.

The typical side effects resulting from radiation are certainly more or
less the same now as they were 25 years ago.  What is different is the
frequency with which those side effects occur and their severity.  There
is lots of evidence from published studies that modern methods such as
3D conformal radiation with IMRT produces less severe side effects than
methods used 25 years ago.  The most serious long term effect is
radiation proctitis.  According to Scardino, 3D wtih IMRT has reduced
this side effect to 2 to 3 percent.  (He also gives a reference to the
scientific literature.)

The most common side effect from radiation is impotence, common for any
form of treatment.   But in the great majority of cases, such impotence
can be treated.

Of course there will still be some men who will experience side effects
such as radiation proctitis which will make them miserable.  That would
be a consideration in deciding on whether treatment is advisable and if
so which treatment is a good choice.

And what was then 6,000 rads is, given different
> measurements, still a huge dose.

I think that in current terms that is 60 Grays, which would have been a
quite large dose with the methods used 25 years ago.   Today, they can
use over 80 grays while still obtaining a significant reduction in side
effects compared to 60 grays 25 years ago.

>   First, it was much less effective because doses
>> had to be kept down in order to avoid damage to surrounding tissues.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>    Give me a break.  A specific doctor does not know or even discuss his
> problems.  They are in the grave.

My urologist gave me figures on how likely it was that I would
experience long term incontinence or impotence.  I don't think we
discussed the likelihood of either death during or shortly after
surgery, but I'm sure he would have had I asked.   Such events do occur,
even with the best surgeons, but they are pretty rare in treating
prostate cancer.  Typically one or two men per thousand die during
radical prostatectomy, and those are usually men who have pre-existing
serious medical conditions.  I am sure there are cases of men who die
during radiation treatment, but it must be very rare and not
attributable to the treatment.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.