Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / December 2006
Radiation side effects?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
J W - 03 Dec 2006 19:14 GMT Our freind has prostrate cancer, he underwent surgery earlier this year to have his prostrate removed. He has recently begun receiving radiation treatments for it as well. He has had about 15-20 treatments out of over 40 scheduled. Thus far has had no problems until this weekend. he has been experiencing painful and bloody urinations. Is this a usual or expected side effect or should he be concerned.
I.P. Freely - 03 Dec 2006 22:55 GMT > Our freind has prostrate cancer, he underwent surgery earlier this year > to have his prostrate removed. He has recently begun receiving radiation > treatments for it as well. He has had about 15-20 treatments out of over > 40 scheduled. Thus far has had no problems until this weekend. he has > been experiencing painful and bloody urinations. Is this a usual or > expected side effect or should he be concerned. I am so GD sick and tired of these GD doctor who just tell patients "cut off this leg or remove that vital organ or fry your innards with radiation or chemicals" without first telling them a) what the odds are it will help and b) what the side effects may be and their likelihood. Right up there with "Get your PSA checked annually" should be "Your doctor will treat you like an idiot and tell you about 1/3 of the story if you're lucky. Read a couple of prostate cancer books before you believe one word out of your doctor's mouth. Also, log into alt.support.cancer.prostate and start reading." (Then if you get a GOOD doctor who tells you the whole story, you're ahead of the game, hang onto him/her, and STILL read the books and a.s.c.p. because there's no way even the best doctors have the time to educate you to the extent the books do.
Now, back to your question: Usual side effect. But his GD doctor should have told him to expect it, not to be alarmed, and how to manage that and other SEs that may crop up. Did the doc list and explain the other SEs that may occur now or two years from now?
Why am I so PO'd about this seemingly harmless omission? Because the same thing happens relative to all types of treatment, and some of the SEs these GD docs aren't telling us about are very common, extremely severe, and/or even life-threatening.
And your friend is probably just starting his life w/PC. Raid the bookstore and pick up some Christmas gifts for him, even if he's Muslim or Jewish or a raging atheist. Just get him some prostate cancer books by Scardino, Walsh, Bubley, and whomever else you can find, and make sure he reads and understands at least the chapters pertinent to his case and to radiation treatment.
I.P.
J W - 05 Dec 2006 01:58 GMT Thanks, Our freind is a senior (65) and a veteran, He's having to drive 175 miles to tampa every week to the VA hospital for these treatments. They put him up in a motel and he comes home on weekends. I don't think they are telling him much of anything. They at first told him from his biopsy that he was pretty far advanced on some scale I think he said it was gleason or something like that. Then when they operated to remove it they said only a small portion was advanced and the rest was not bad. They said they felt 99% sure that they got everything. He has been home in a lot of pain healing for several months now. Then they said they wanted him to take this radiation just to be sure that everything was knocked out. He was tolerating it fine up until last weekend his wife told us at church he was having a lot of pain urinating and had blood in it. He was going to ask about it this week. It didn't sound good to me. I wonder if he really needed the radiation.
Re: Radiation side effects? Group: sci.med.prostate.cancer Date: Sun, Dec 3, 2006, 2:58pm (EST-3) From: fuhgheddaboutit@noway.nohow (I.P. Freely) J W wrote: Our freind has prostrate cancer, he underwent surgery earlier this year to have his prostrate removed. He has recently begun receiving radiation treatments for it as well. He has had about 15-20 treatments out of over 40 scheduled. Thus far has had no problems until this weekend. he has been experiencing painful and bloody urinations. Is this a usual or expected side effect or should he be concerned. I am so GD sick and tired of these GD doctor who just tell patients "cut off this leg or remove that vital organ or fry your innards with radiation or chemicals" without first telling them a) what the odds are it will help and b) what the side effects may be and their likelihood. Right up there with "Get your PSA checked annually" should be "Your doctor will treat you like an idiot and tell you about 1/3 of the story if you're lucky. Read a couple of prostate cancer books before you believe one word out of your doctor's mouth. Also, log into alt.support.cancer.prostate and start reading." (Then if you get a GOOD doctor who tells you the whole story, you're ahead of the game, hang onto him/her, and STILL read the books and a.s.c.p. because there's no way even the best doctors have the time to educate you to the extent the books do. Now, back to your question: Usual side effect. But his GD doctor should have told him to expect it, not to be alarmed, and how to manage that and other SEs that may crop up. Did the doc list and explain the other SEs that may occur now or two years from now? Why am I so PO'd about this seemingly harmless omission? Because the same thing happens relative to all types of treatment, and some of the SEs these GD docs aren't telling us about are very common, extremely severe, and/or even life-threatening. And your friend is probably just starting his life w/PC. Raid the bookstore and pick up some Christmas gifts for him, even if he's Muslim or Jewish or a raging atheist. Just get him some prostate cancer books by Scardino, Walsh, Bubley, and whomever else you can find, and make sure he reads and understands at least the chapters pertinent to his case and to radiation treatment. I.P.
I.P. Freely - 05 Dec 2006 03:45 GMT > Thanks, Our freind is a senior (65) and a veteran, He's having to drive > 175 miles to tampa every week to the VA hospital for these treatments. The VA offered to let me be treated locally at their expense so I could avoid the 220-mile/3-hour drive to their hospital, but it's a bit late for your friend to do that now.
> I don't think they are telling him much of anything. I'm beginning to suspect that happens way too often with patients who just sit back and let the docs take care of everything. I consider that shameful, considering how personal the treatment choices are, due to their long and complex lists of benefits and side effects. Different patients rank the side effect menu in very different orders.
> They at first told him from his > biopsy that he was pretty far advanced on some scale I think he said it > was gleason or something like that. Then when they operated to remove it > they said only a small portion was advanced and the rest was not bad. Those are implications that recurrence is likely, but at this second treatment level, informed personal choice become MUCH more critical, because the benefits are much less and the potential or likely side effects ARGUABLY much worse.
> He has been home in a lot of pain healing for several months now. Prostate surgery shouldn't hurt much even a few days later, let alone two weeks or months later; he should feel better in a couple of months than he felt before the surgery, because by then the surgery is ancient history and he should have been walking and/or exercising quite a bit to help recovery. Some patients feel like playing football 6 weeks post-op.
> Then they said they wanted him to take this radiation just to be > sure that everything was knocked out. > I wonder if he really needed the radiation. That's one approach. Or one can wait until a simple blood test for PSA shows an increasing PSA and treat then or not, or one can wait until scans show remote metastasis and treat THAT . . . there's no clear solution. The only certainty is that further treatment WILL cause further side effects. This all requires extensive patient education, analysis, and decision-making . . . or a truly GREAT doctor VERY in tune with the patient's innermost quality of life value system.
> He was tolerating it fine up until last weekend his wife > told us at church he was having a lot of pain urinating and had blood in > it. He was going to ask about it this week. It didn't sound good to me. Darn right. But his doc should have warned him it would probably occur, given him some criteria for calling the doc, and been ready to prescribe meds and/or behaviors to mitigate the symptoms.
If your friend is willing to tolerate surgery pain for more than a day (that's what drugs are for) or painful bloody urine for more than 5 minutes without RUNNING to the hospital, he NEEDS someone to watch out for him in this case and with whatever else happens to him next. He must be either very afraid of medicine or just very passive, neither of which serves us old people well. If he has any family, please clue them in that he needs to be closely watched for the sake of his health even if his prostate cancer is completely cured.
I.P.
J W - 05 Dec 2006 15:47 GMT We asked him if they couldn't farm out the treatments localy so he wouldn't have to drive so far, he said they told him no. He was laid up for a very long time after the surgery. there was some sort of lump down at his taint meat (for lack of a better word) area between his yoo hoo and hi anus. He was miserable, couldn't sit without pillows, had to lay on his side and was real slow walking. His PSA was like .05 or something which we all thought was good but apparently they thought differently.
You are right about doctors just wanting patients to be docile and do what they are told, that's for sure. I'm a stage 4 colon cancer patient. My oncologist would go balistic if anyone questioned anything she said or did , she did not like to be challenged. She was quick to tell me however that there was no cure and no hope of beating it, that she was just keepng me alive as long as possible with chemo whch I found to be extremely depressing and not much help or comfort. Her patients would all just climb in the chemo chairs, wrap up in blankets, take whatever they were given without qestion and sleep. I on the other hand asked questions, wanted to knw what I was given and what it may or may not do to me. She didn't like that and after 8 months of chemo when my bone marrow (platlets, white & red blood cells) was crashing and my liver numbers were of the scale from chemo toxicity and CT scans showed a possible recourance happening, she decided to fire me for asking too many questions. The new Onc my HMO gave me didn't even want to see me. he said I had to go on chemo break for 3-4 months and hasn't even monitored my blood. I have sigent ring cell cancer along with the colon cancer which they tell me is extreely aggressive and therefore I should not be off chemo for any extended period of time, so who do you beleive? All I know is this onc hasn't even give me the time of day for 3 months. My primary doc ageed to at least test my CEA every month and that is rising by 50% every month. So yesterday out of sheer panick I lost my cool and fired this onc, so now we are one for one. One fired me and I fired one. Made me feel good at the time but then it sank in that now I have no onc. no one to even flush the port and nearly 12 of the 18 months they said I'd most likely live are gone. Both the oncs agreed that I needed to get on a clinical trial since I apparently failed 1st line chemo but they both refused to help me find one, said they were too busy. I suspect it was because there was o money in it for them. Oh well enough ranting about me this was supposed to be for my freind with prostate cancer. You struck a nerve with me when you said
"I'm beginning to suspect that happens way too often with patients who just sit back and let the docs take care of everything. I consider that shameful, "
And I guess it just had to come off my chest. I'm very angry with the medical system right now. It was my regular doctor's mistake in overlooking anemia low iron in my blood tests that allowed my colo cancer to go undetected until I was in pain and decided to go to the ER. I will advise him about the books you said to get and thank you for the advice. ou are right, he is very passive, hates to make waves or rock the boat and is subject to take things far to seriously. When they at first told him the biopsy results showed him to be high on the scale he was ready to arange his funeral and very depressed so his wife has to take care in what she even tells him and how she tells it. .
Re: Radiation side effects? Group: sci.med.prostate.cancer Date: Mon, Dec 4, 2006, 7:47pm (EST-3) From: fuhgheddaboutit@noway.nohow (I.P. Freely) J W wrote: Thanks, Our freind is a senior (65) and a veteran, He's having to drive 175 miles to tampa every week to the VA hospital for these treatments. The VA offered to let me be treated locally at their expense so I could avoid the 220-mile/3-hour drive to their hospital, but it's a bit late for your friend to do that now. I don't think they are telling him much of anything. I'm beginning to suspect that happens way too often with patients who just sit back and let the docs take care of everything. I consider that shameful, considering how personal the treatment choices are, due to their long and complex lists of benefits and side effects. Different patients rank the side effect menu in very different orders. They at first told him from his biopsy that he was pretty far advanced on some scale I think he said it was gleason or something like that. Then when they operated to remove it they said only a small portion was advanced and the rest was not bad. Those are implications that recurrence is likely, but at this second treatment level, informed personal choice become MUCH more critical, because the benefits are much less and the potential or likely side effects ARGUABLY much worse. He has been home in a lot of pain healing for several months now. Prostate surgery shouldn't hurt much even a few days later, let alone two weeks or months later; he should feel better in a couple of months than he felt before the surgery, because by then the surgery is ancient history and he should have been walking and/or exercising quite a bit to help recovery. Some patients feel like playing football 6 weeks post-op. Then they said they wanted him to take this radiation just to be sure that everything was knocked out. I wonder if he really needed the radiation. That's one approach. Or one can wait until a simple blood test for PSA shows an increasing PSA and treat then or not, or one can wait until scans show remote metastasis and treat THAT . . . there's no clear solution. The only certainty is that further treatment WILL cause further side effects. This all requires extensive patient education, analysis, and decision-making . . . or a truly GREAT doctor VERY in tune with the patient's innermost quality of life value system. He was tolerating it fine up until last weekend his wife told us at church he was having a lot of pain urinating and had blood in it. He was going to ask about it this week. It didn't sound good to me. Darn right. But his doc should have warned him it would probably occur, given him some criteria for calling the doc, and been ready to prescribe meds and/or behaviors to mitigate the symptoms. If your friend is willing to tolerate surgery pain for more than a day (that's what drugs are for) or painful bloody urine for more than 5 minutes without RUNNING to the hospital, he NEEDS someone to watch out for him in this case and with whatever else happens to him next. He must be either very afraid of medicine or just very passive, neither of which serves us old people well. If he has any family, please clue them in that he needs to be closely watched for the sake of his health even if his prostate cancer is completely cured. I.P.
I.P. Freely - 05 Dec 2006 19:00 GMT > I'm a stage 4 colon cancer patient. > My oncologist would go balistic if anyone questioned anything she said > or did , she did not like to be challenged. Grounds for instant, on-the-spot firing, IMO.
> She was quick to tell me > however that there was no cure and no hope of beating it, that she was > just keepng me alive as long as possible That part's true. At least she's being honest rather than lying to you.
> with chemo whch I found to be > extremely depressing and not much help or comfort. Then why bother?
> she decided to fire me > The new Onc my HMO gave me didn't even want to see me. > out of sheer panick I lost my cool and fired this onc > so now we are one for one. > both refused to help me find one, said they were too busy. > I suspect it was because there was no money in it for them. That . . . or word gets around about difficult patients. But then what the heck do terminal cancer docs expect, a ward full of pie-eyed, valley-girl CHEERLEADERS?
> When they at > first told him the biopsy results showed him to be high on the scale he > was ready to arange his funeral and very depressed so his wife has to > take care in what she even tells him and how she tells it. Unless he takes the bull by the horns and gets some psych counseling, he's in for a loooooooooong decade of misery before his cancer kills him or is pronounced cured.
I.P.
George Conklin - 06 Dec 2006 20:48 GMT > Unless he takes the bull by the horns and gets some psych counseling, > he's in for a loooooooooong decade of misery before his cancer kills him > or is pronounced cured. > > I.P. My father suffered from the after-effects of radiation for prostate cancer for 25 years. Yes, he was 'cured,' but the pain from the after effects was always there...wall-to-wall constrictions for a lifetime. After every trip to the urologist his voice shook for a week. And a colleague has also told me that his doctors will not even discuss the after effects of radiation from his prostate cancer...they also do not even want to discuss it. It is a forbidden topic.
I.P. Freely - 07 Dec 2006 00:49 GMT > a colleague has also told > me that his doctors will not even discuss the after effects of radiation > from his prostate cancer...they also do not even want to discuss it. It is > a forbidden topic. I'd fire them, report them to the state medical board, name them in the cancer forums, and spread the word locally . . . maybe beginning with a flyer to this effect:
"My father suffered from the after-effects of radiation for prostate cancer for 25 years. Yes, he was 'cured,' but the pain from the after effects was always there...wall-to-wall constrictions [explain] for a lifetime. After every trip to the urologist his voice shook for a week. How open is YOUR urologist about the prospects of this extreme or lesser but more common side effects -- or the x% incidence of subsequent colon cancer attributed to this treatment?"
I.P.
George Conklin - 07 Dec 2006 17:14 GMT > > a colleague has also told > > me that his doctors will not even discuss the after effects of radiation [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > I.P. My urologist right now is treating me for kidney stones and I participated in a clincial trial. So, I got to rate HIM.
Leonard Evens - 08 Dec 2006 15:34 GMT >> Unless he takes the bull by the horns and gets some psych counseling, >> he's in for a loooooooooong decade of misery before his cancer kills him [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > from his prostate cancer...they also do not even want to discuss it. It is > a forbidden topic. Radiation for prostate cancer 25 or more years ago was very different from what it is now. First, it was much less effective because doses had to be kept down in order to avoid damage to surrounding tissues. Even so, there often was such damage with long term effects, as in your father's case.
Radiation therapy today is very different. It is much better focused. This allows the use of higher doses with less danger of affecting surrounding tissues. I don't want to try to minimize your father's suffering, but it is not clear it is relevant for a man today considering radiation therapy. Such a man needs to know the likelihoods for men like him when treated by a speific practitioner. Although such information is not always going to be perfectly reliable, it should give some reasonabel idea of what is likely to occur. Of course, one should avoid practitioners who refuse to give such estimates.
George Conklin - 09 Dec 2006 03:14 GMT > >> Unless he takes the bull by the horns and gets some psych counseling, > >> he's in for a loooooooooong decade of misery before his cancer kills him [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Radiation for prostate cancer 25 or more years ago was very different > from what it is now. The side effects people brought up were the same, and are the same, and always will be the same. And what was then 6,000 rads is, given different measurements, still a huge dose.
First, it was much less effective because doses
> had to be kept down in order to avoid damage to surrounding tissues. > Even so, there often was such damage with long term effects, as in your [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > considering radiation therapy. Such a man needs to know the likelihoods > for men like him when treated by a speific practitioner. Give me a break. A specific doctor does not know or even discuss his problems. They are in the grave.
Leonard Evens - 09 Dec 2006 15:07 GMT >>>> Unless he takes the bull by the horns and gets some psych counseling, >>>> he's in for a loooooooooong decade of misery before his cancer kills [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > The side effects people brought up were the same, and are the same, and > always will be the same. The typical side effects resulting from radiation are certainly more or less the same now as they were 25 years ago. What is different is the frequency with which those side effects occur and their severity. There is lots of evidence from published studies that modern methods such as 3D conformal radiation with IMRT produces less severe side effects than methods used 25 years ago. The most serious long term effect is radiation proctitis. According to Scardino, 3D wtih IMRT has reduced this side effect to 2 to 3 percent. (He also gives a reference to the scientific literature.)
The most common side effect from radiation is impotence, common for any form of treatment. But in the great majority of cases, such impotence can be treated.
Of course there will still be some men who will experience side effects such as radiation proctitis which will make them miserable. That would be a consideration in deciding on whether treatment is advisable and if so which treatment is a good choice.
And what was then 6,000 rads is, given different
> measurements, still a huge dose. I think that in current terms that is 60 Grays, which would have been a quite large dose with the methods used 25 years ago. Today, they can use over 80 grays while still obtaining a significant reduction in side effects compared to 60 grays 25 years ago.
> First, it was much less effective because doses >> had to be kept down in order to avoid damage to surrounding tissues. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Give me a break. A specific doctor does not know or even discuss his > problems. They are in the grave. My urologist gave me figures on how likely it was that I would experience long term incontinence or impotence. I don't think we discussed the likelihood of either death during or shortly after surgery, but I'm sure he would have had I asked. Such events do occur, even with the best surgeons, but they are pretty rare in treating prostate cancer. Typically one or two men per thousand die during radical prostatectomy, and those are usually men who have pre-existing serious medical conditions. I am sure there are cases of men who die during radiation treatment, but it must be very rare and not attributable to the treatment.
|
|
|