Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / November 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

More $ for breast cancer than prostate cancer

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
george conklin - 14 Nov 2006 12:34 GMT
But experts and advocates say that when it comes to government financing for
the most common sex-specific reproductive cancers, breast cancer financing
exceeds prostate cancer financing by more than 40 percent, with prostate
cancer research receiving $394 million in 2005, and breast cancer receiving
$710 million. The figures, for financing by the National Cancer Institute
and Defense Department, were provided by the not-for-profit Prostate Cancer
Foundation.
soares.glaucio@gmail.com - 15 Nov 2006 11:50 GMT
The gender war is a wrong war. Congressional analysts estimate that
military and diplomatic costs of the Iraq's war will  reach $101.8
billion this fiscal year, up from $87.3 billion in 2005, $77.3 billion
in 2004 and $51 billion in 2003. Together, prostate and breast cancer
financing is circa 1% of this year's war costs. Ask yourselves what
might be accomplished with a tenfold increase in research spending in
the reproductive cancer area, let alone one hundredfold.

> But experts and advocates say that when it comes to government financing for
> the most common sex-specific reproductive cancers, breast cancer financing
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> and Defense Department, were provided by the not-for-profit Prostate Cancer
> Foundation.
George Conklin - 15 Nov 2006 20:37 GMT
> The gender war is a wrong war. Congressional analysts estimate that
> military and diplomatic costs of the Iraq's war will  reach $101.8
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> might be accomplished with a tenfold increase in research spending in
> the reproductive cancer area, let alone one hundredfold.

We always seem to have money for war.  But most of the money in the
medical/industrial complex goes for treatments, NOT research.  Medicine is
the only field of business where government is expected to pay for nearly
all research.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.