Thank you for your comment.
I do not claim I have a cancer I simply worry if I do. The
reasons for my worry apart from the obvious are:
1. At the prostate clinic I received a few prostate massages which
improved nothing but caused pain and possibly damaged
something as I now have a new problem with ejaculation.
For people with cancer or calculi in their prostate the massage
is contra-indicated.
Cancer could break and spread elsewhere and calculi could
damage something.
2. I underwent a heavy antibiotic, and other drugs, treatment for a
couple of months. My condition and symptoms worsened.
If the condition were prostate cancer than I don't think antibiotics
would help.
The decion makers assumed I had a chronic prostatitis, many years
old, and that it was on bacterial basis - although no such bacteria were
ever found.
I know that some people may have a prostate cancer and have no
symptoms. However, some of the symptoms of prostate cancer are:
(see WebMD site):
- presence of blood in the urine
- difficulty with urination
- problems with sexual functions
- pains and pressures in the pelvic area
- pus in the prostate liquid
(all of those I have)
in other words similar to prostatitis.
I thought they would first find out for sure, to the extent that it is
possible, what the problem is instead of going into treatments.
Now it has all been changed. It turned out I am very sensitive to
the Quinolone based drugs (Levaquin - Levofloxacin) which did me
no good and I have all kinds of side effects. I may have had a reaction
to Flomax as well. I was taking Vioxx too which has now been taken
off the shelves.
Right now the same doctor is waiting for the results of some tests
including a transrectal ultra sound. He asked me to take only herbal
remedies such as Prosta-Ease and Prostaphil-2 as well as Uva Ursi
tea, Kefir (Russian style yougurt), some pure cranberry juice but no
drugs, no massage.
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> I do not claim I have a cancer I simply worry if I do.
Most men don't ever develop a clinical case of prostate cancer. In
fact, over a life time, in the US, only about one in six will. So there
is no point in worrying about something that most likely won't happen.
You will have time enough to worry if it does happen.
The
> reasons for my worry apart from the obvious are:
>
> 1. At the prostate clinic I received a few prostate massages which
> improved nothing but caused pain and possibly damaged
> something as I now have a new problem with ejaculation.
If the massage didn't help, then don't do it. I've never heard of
prostate massage being used to treat prostatitis or other such
conditions, but I'm not a urologist.
> For people with cancer or calculi in their prostate the massage
> is contra-indicated.
>
> Cancer could break and spread elsewhere and calculi could
> damage something.
I'm not sure massage would cause a cancer, particularly a small one, to
spread. Doctors believe that cancer can escape from the prostate at any
time and does so, but unless the cancer cells have developed the ability
to live outside their home turf, it doesn't matter. It is a change in
the characteristics of the cancer cells, not their migration from the
prostate that is important. But since massage hasn't helped with your
problems, there would be no point in doing it.
Are you sure you are getting advice from a qualified urologist?
> 2. I underwent a heavy antibiotic, and other drugs, treatment for a
> couple of months. My condition and symptoms worsened.
You probably have prostatitis, but not every form of prostatitis
responds to antibiotics.
> If the condition were prostate cancer than I don't think antibiotics
> would help.
As I just noted, antibiotics in many cases won't help if you have
prostatitis. So the failure of the antibiotics does not mean that you
have cancer.
> The decion makers assumed I had a chronic prostatitis, many years
> old, and that it was on bacterial basis - although no such bacteria were
> ever found.
Again, that is apparently not unusual. But let me remind you again
that I'm not a urologist nore even a physician.
> I know that some people may have a prostate cancer and have no
> symptoms. However, some of the symptoms of prostate cancer are:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> - pains and pressures in the pelvic area
> - pus in the prostate liquid
I know that they list those symptoms, but they are very misleading.
Those are the symptoms of advanced prostate cancer. It is very unlikely
that if you have advanced prostate cancer, and you have even vaguely
competent doctors, that they have missed it. You really have to trust
your doctors on this rather than looking up symptoms on websites and
trying to interpret them by yourself. If you have doubts about your
doctors, get second or even third opinions.
> (all of those I have)
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> to Flomax as well. I was taking Vioxx too which has now been taken
> off the shelves.
There are many alternatives to Vioxx. The older drugs like naproxen
work well to control inflammation. I've taken it to control disc
disorders in my back for many years.
> Right now the same doctor is waiting for the results of some tests
> including a transrectal ultra sound. He asked me to take only herbal
> remedies such as Prosta-Ease and Prostaphil-2 as well as Uva Ursi
> tea, Kefir (Russian style yougurt), some pure cranberry juice but no
> drugs, no massage.
Sounds good to me. You might ask him why he doesn't think a biopsy is
in order at this time. I presume he will have a good answer.
>>I also agree that early prostate cancer does not cause any of the
>>symptoms you seem to have. First symptons of prostate cancer are
>>difficult urination due to a tumor impacting the urethea or joint pain
>>from a metatasized cancer. A biopsly is the only sure diagnosis.