I'm 71 and in good health except for high blood pressure (under control
with medicine) and BPH symptoms (10-15 years). I have posted a few times
to this news group in the past 3 years, mainly about my reaction to
alpha blockers (Hytrin and Flomax). They both cause my pulse to race.
I finally convinced my primary care physician in a big HMO to refer me
to an urologist. Some blood test were done before I went for the
appointment such as pH, Sp.Gr., Urine glucose, Urine blood, Nitrates,
Ketones, Esterase, U protein, Bilirubin, Urobilinogen and Urine source.
All were within normal ranges. Also the last 4 psa results were sent
(all less than 0.7)
I lucked out and got to talk to the Chief of Urology. He had me take the
ASU Questionnaire where I scored 22 mainly because of problems with
getting up at night and a weak, intermittent stream. Urgency is not much
of a problem. He reviewed the lab tests and the ASU survey.
Before he started, I told him I was only interested in PVP. At that time
he handed me the brochure "The Greenlight PVP Laser Procedure" and told
me he was using that technique. He explained that he would do the
surgery in the morning, and that I would go home with a catheter, take
it out in the shower the next morning and see him in the PM to make sure
everything was OK. He told me my condition was not a medical necessity,
but a quality of life issue. He did not buy into the irreversible
bladder stretching theory.
He said when I decided I was tired of the BPH inconveniences I could
simply ask to schedule the procedure. I was so excited to find someone
knowledgeable about the technique that I forgot to ask him some
questions. I did find out he had done 23 PVP's so far with enthusiastic
support from those operated on. He would require me to sign a form
authorizing TURP if they encountered complications. I asked him for an
example and he told me of a time when the machine malfunctioned and they
finished with a TURP.
A question I should have asked, "What about tests?" Most of you know how
big your prostate was, how fast you voided before and after, and how
much urine is retained if you do not void completely. Are these tests
used only to decide if surgery is necessary? If this is the only reason,
I don't really need to know. I'm guessing he wants to avoid the test
costs if they are not needed. This is an HMO so tests subtract instead
of add to the bottom line.
Are these tests important for other reasons?
Philip Magallanes - 18 Feb 2005 04:32 GMT
Hi Aner,
A urologist can use ultrasound, a non-invasive test to determine "how
much urine is retained if you do not void completely."
My uro did a cystoscopy before my procedure. Others do a variety of other
tests. Every procedures has its risks, so you and your uro should be
convinced that the procedure is required before you proceed.
Just my view.
Phil
> I'm 71 and in good health except for high blood pressure (under control
> with medicine) and BPH symptoms (10-15 years). I have posted a few times
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Are these tests important for other reasons?
utopia1@attglobal.net - 18 Feb 2005 06:45 GMT
The idea of having to consent in advance to a TURP if they screw up while
doing a PVP (see below) seems to me positively grotesque and unacceptable.
Is this common? Have others run into this?
Jesse
He would require me to sign a form
> authorizing TURP if they encountered complications. I asked him for an
> example and he told me of a time when the machine malfunctioned and they
> finished with a TURP.
daddyo - 18 Feb 2005 10:00 GMT
I had a small TURP procedure during my PVP in August. It was explained
to me afterwards that this was to avoid going too close to the
sphincter with the laser. The problem was caused by my prostate and
urethra being very mis-shapen. I was shown photos comparing mine with
a normal channel and they were totally different.It did cause much
bleeding but the alternative I assume would have been to risk more
permanent problems. Surgeons can pretty obviously face the unexpected
( like the laser machine failing ) What do you do ?
I had a 135g prostate which would have been considered too big for a
full TURP.
I am very happy with my outcome 6 months later
Richie
>The idea of having to consent in advance to a TURP if they screw up while
>doing a PVP (see below) seems to me positively grotesque and unacceptable.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>> example and he told me of a time when the machine malfunctioned and they
>> finished with a TURP.
hughesgr@cox.net - 19 Feb 2005 00:35 GMT
> The idea of having to consent in advance to a TURP if they screw up while
> doing a PVP (see below) seems to me positively grotesque and unacceptable.
> Is this common? Have others run into this?
>
> Jesse
Dear Jesse,
I'm a greenlight laser preceptor in eastern North Carolina. I've done
over a 100 greenlight laser procedures, and am extremely impressed with
the technology and it's results. In fact, I've successfully treated 5
or 6 men in their 90s who were in urinary retention. My greatest
success though was treating a 50 year old man who 2 months previously
had a heart transplant-- he suffered miserably from prostatism and got
instantaneous relief.
I think the words you used to describe Aner's urologist are
unfortunate. This kind of animosity towards physicians is sad. Most
doctors honestly want to do the right thing. In today's medicolegal
environment a doctor would be crazy not to view every patient as a
possible lawsuit. Aner's urologist is obviously doing a wonderful job
with informed consent, and should be commended.
During one case I had to convert to a traditional TURP to control
bleeding. I've found as I do more cases--they go more smoothly with
less bleeding.
Sincerely,
Richard M. Hughes, M.D.
utopia1@attglobal.net - 19 Feb 2005 06:15 GMT
There's an unhappy logic to what you say: you need to retreat to TURP if
there is too much bleeding; as you do more of these surgeries, you produce
less bleeding. It seems to me airtight that the retreat to TURP was related
to your inexperience. So I'd have to conclude that any doctor who sought
prior consent for a retreat to TURP is somebody whose inexperience produces
excessive bleeding: I would want to stay away from him.
Have others on this list been asked to consent to TURP before undergoing
PVP?
Jesse
> > The idea of having to consent in advance to a TURP if they screw up
> while
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Richard M. Hughes, M.D.
outlier48 - 19 Feb 2005 07:16 GMT
As a newbie I hope I can shed some light on the possible use of TURP to
stop bleeding during a PVP procedure. I am 56 and will probably have
to have some kind of surgical intervention due to problems related to
BPH this year. I have a prostate that had grown to 108 grams. I spoke
with my urologist who wanted to do a TURP and quickly left the office.
I then saw one of the urologists at UCLA who does PVP proceedures. He
told me that he has done PVPs on large prostates and once had to
perform a TURP to stop the bleeding that occurred as a result of an
improperly calibrated laser. He has done hundreds of these procedures
and actually teaches other doctors (not medical students) the
procedure. While I, too, have trouble understanding the logic of using
a TURP to stop bleeding, I do trust this doctor and if I do have a PVP
I will sign a consent form allowing him to do a TURP if he feels it is
necessary to stop any bleeding. I appreciate that he was direct with
me. Perhpas he was concerned because of the size of my prostate. To
his credit, he put me on both Avodart and Uroxatrol and my prostate is
shrinking and my symptoms have improved. I guess we each have to do
our research and make our choices. While I would like to avoid even
the PVP procedure, I will chose it over the traditional TURP, carefully
select my surgeon, and realize the risks I assume.
I hope I have been able to shed a bit of light on the subject from the
point of view of a layman facing the prospect of a PVP.
Outlier48
Jack - 18 Feb 2005 16:38 GMT
An ultrasound to determine the size of the prostate, which is done through
the rectum with little discomfort. While your PSA values are very good,
which is an indicator of a relatively small prostate and unlikely Pca, a DRE
should be done to also give an approximate size and determine if there are
any abnormalities with the prostate. The ASU value, from your symptoms,
indicates a small opening in the urethra. Good luck and hope you have a
successful PVP, most are.
Jack
> I'm 71 and in good health except for high blood pressure (under control
> with medicine) and BPH symptoms (10-15 years). I have posted a few times
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Are these tests important for other reasons?