Hello Everyone-
I was writing in the hope someone in the group had experience with
this.
My story as briefly as possible; I'm a 50 y.o. whose dealt with what I
thought was BPH for 25 years. The onset occurred in my early twenties,
I was referred to a urologist who diagnosed "prostatitis" after x-rays
of my bladder showed no restriction passing urine. He described my
prostate as usually swollen, but with never any sign of infection.
After beginning saw palmetto in the late 1980's I had some relief and
have since kept it manageable until the last six months, where my
symptoms have become awful, up 7-8 x a night, and a new sensation like
a "swollen fist" in my abdomen. Main symtoms are difficulty starting,
hesistency, interuption, weak stream (avg. 30cc over 5 seconds) and
sensation of uncomplete bladder voiding.
My doc prescribed Hytrin, which hasn't really helped. After being
examined by a Urologist, I was told my prostate is normal for a man my
age (slightly swollen). Ultrasound showed no urinary retention.
Cytoscopy revealed what my uro described as a "tight bladder neck",
simply put, more muscle than normal reducing the opening to a much
smaller size. He says he's sees this several times a year.
His recommendation is a modified TUIP, using electricity to cut two
"flaps" in the ring of muscle of the bladder neck (not the whole
length of the prostate) to increase the size. He says roughly 3/4 of
patients who do this procedure describe substantial improvement,
though there is a slight risk of retro.
Has anyone else here heard of this or dealt with it? I'd greatly
appreciate any help you could give me.
Thanks so much-
Mark
James Mullins - 21 Nov 2004 22:53 GMT
I don't know if my situation is identical to yours or not, but I did
have a TUIP as well as a TUNA and a PVP. None of the procedures were
successful, but if I had it to do over, I would have opted for the PVP
first. It was no more painful or uncomfortable than the TUNA and was
probobly less painful and uncomfortable than the TUIP. The TUIP is a
bloody operation, although I'm sure it's not as bad as a TURP. I had
the TUNA in 2000, the TUIP in 2002 and the PVP in Oct. 2003. I had (and
have) all the symptoms of BPH. My prostate is small, about 25 grams,
and there is a blockage at the bladder neck, which the TUIP is supposed
to relieve. I got retro from the TUIP, but Dr. Laub said that the PVP
wpuld have given me retro anyway, because of the location of the tissue
he had to lase. I'm not qualified to give you medical advice, but I
would suggest that you at least investigate the PVP. Even if it is not
suitable for you, which it may not be, you will have at least have
looked at all your options. When I first started looking, PVP was not
available, but that's where I wish I had started. I live in Las Vegas
and a uro here finally showed up on Laserscope's list of docs who
have performed the required number of PVP operations. I suspect that in
the not too distant future, I will have to make a decision whether to
get a second PVP or get a TURP. Good luck in your search!
bnd777 - 21 Nov 2004 23:36 GMT
> Hello Everyone-
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>
> Mark
Firstly i guess you are in the USA because they dont normally do a TUIP in
the UK from what i have heard
2nd ........most USA libraries have stacks of books on the subject and i
sure did not see any recomendations for TUIP in any of the good ones when i
ploughed thru them
Spread deMocracy - 24 Nov 2004 00:49 GMT
Doesn't sound like you have much choice. But I agree with the other posters
to your question: try to carefully weigh pros and cons of the various
prostate zappers they use these days...though PVP is becoming the zapper of
choice for trimming enlarged prostates, it may not be suitable for your
specific and unique problem?? I dunno. Check all options of zappers, if
you can. In the end, you'll likely have to do whatever you have access to
or whatever your urologist/surgeon insists upon. Here's wishing you the
best of outcomes...(no pun intended)!!
"Mark" <mlandman@sonic.net> [SNIP] Cytoscopy revealed what my uro described
as a "tight bladder neck", simply put, more muscle than normal reducing the
opening to a much smaller size. [SNIP] His recommendation is a modified
TUIP, using electricity to cut two "flaps" in the ring of muscle of the
bladder neck