Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / January 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

prostate cancer biopsy

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Michael Balarama - 23 Sep 2004 00:33 GMT
What is a prostate cancer biopsy..They want to do one on me because my PSA
was elevated..Dr said it is unpleasant and they go in through the but. PSA
was 3.4 up from 2.5 the last 5 years.
Michael
Philip Magallanes - 23 Sep 2004 01:43 GMT
A prostate cancer biopsy can be just slightly uncomfortable to very
uncomfortable. If your doctor knows where to put the needle that adds the
anesthetic, then you will have little discomfort. If he is not well trained
in the procedure, then your experience can be very uncomfortable.  As I
understand it, they first anesthetize the prostate with an injection, then
they proceed to take about 6 or 8 little samples of the prostate tissue
(through the rectum).
My doctor was very good.  He knew exactly where to put the needle and I felt
little discomfort.  One of my friends had prostate surgery where they
removed the entire prostate.  I asked him what he didn't like the most, and
he said it was the biopsy.
Hope you have a doctor like mine.
My PSA was above 4. But I had no cancer.

Phil

> What is a prostate cancer biopsy..They want to do one on me because my PSA
> was elevated..Dr said it is unpleasant and they go in through the but. PSA
> was 3.4 up from 2.5 the last 5 years.
> Michael
Michael Balarama - 23 Sep 2004 02:15 GMT
> A prostate cancer biopsy can be just slightly uncomfortable to very
> uncomfortable. If your doctor knows where to put the needle that adds the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Hope you have a doctor like mine.
> My PSA was above 4. But I had no cancer.

Why did they say your PSA was 4???what was it the year before???
thanks
Michael

> Phil
>
> > What is a prostate cancer biopsy..They want to do one on me because my PSA
> > was elevated..Dr said it is unpleasant and they go in through the but. PSA
> > was 3.4 up from 2.5 the last 5 years.
> > Michael
Jack - 23 Sep 2004 22:03 GMT
> What is a prostate cancer biopsy..They want to do one on me because my PSA
> was elevated..Dr said it is unpleasant and they go in through the but. PSA
> was 3.4 up from 2.5 the last 5 years.
> Michael

If you are now in your mid 60's the psa growth to 3.4 from 2.5 five years
ago isn't out of the norm, but rather just shows an expected growth of the
prostate itself.  However, if he felt something suspicious doing a DRE then
a biopsy would be in order.  I have had two, one a 7 needle, and two years
latter a 12 needle to get the tissue samples.(Prostate had grown from 55 gms
to 80 grams over the two years and that was why the 12 needle the second
time around)  Both were negative.  I felt a fair amount of discomfort with
two of the needles on the first one and with 4 of the needles on the section
one.  On a pain scale 1 to 10, I would say 6 or 7 on the ones that hurt, and
1 to 2 on all the rest.  Both times I was certain I had cancer because of
what my urologist felt doing a DRE.  That was the reason for the biopsies.
The procedure takes 15 to 20 minutes start to finish and can be done in the
Doc's office.  You'll have a little discomfort for a few hours and blood in
your ejaculate once or twice after the procedure.

Good luck

Jack
Michael Balarama - 23 Sep 2004 22:33 GMT
> > What is a prostate cancer biopsy..They want to do one on me because my PSA
> > was elevated..Dr said it is unpleasant and they go in through the but. PSA
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Good luck
thanks for you info-I am 55...a bit surprised by this deal-Dr. wants me to
take antibiotics for 2 weeks and then retest PSA and see if still high... I
will take cipro for 2 weeks...thanks for the encouragement.don't want any
needles  if possible..
Michael.

> Jack
Derek F. - 02 Oct 2004 23:55 GMT
>> > What is a prostate cancer biopsy..They want to do one on me because my
> PSA
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
>> Jack

How big is your prostate? Big prostate usually means high PSA. My PSA was
5.6 nearly ten years ago ( at age 60) and has been as high as 9.0. At the
moment it is 6.5. After three negative biopsies I have stopped having them.
I had a local for the first one but not for the next two as the Aussie lady
Uro working in the UK  thought that locals were for wimps:-)
Derek.
Michael Balarama - 03 Oct 2004 14:10 GMT
> >> > What is a prostate cancer biopsy..They want to do one on me because my
> > PSA
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> Uro working in the UK  thought that locals were for wimps:-)
> Derek.

prostate is 35 mgs..I took cipro to kill any infections for a week and get a
retest PSA tomarrow
-if high he goes in for a cancer peek..both my father and uncle had prostate
cancer in their late seventies.
Michael
drberry - 26 Jan 2005 02:39 GMT
Most biopsies are not pleasant and the morbidity rate is somewhat
high....post bleeding, prostatitis,
and pain. One practitioner told me that he had a patient with PSAs in
the 20's;
he had multiple
biopsies, and no cancer was discovered. For a while so-called
"doubling time" was considered
important, but now most researchers are warning that the PSA is not an
accurate measure to diagnose
cancer.
In any event, about 10% of prostate cancer patients die soon
regardless of any treatment (life can be
prolonged some months though...but the quality of life may be low).
Most, around 90%, who have
cancer cells in their prostates live a normal life span and die with
cancer, not from cancer. I have a
colleague/friend, who was diagnosed a decade ago with PC (with a high
Gleason score) who decided to do watchful waiting, and he
is still alive with no problems (except for a high PSA).
I, myself, have always run a PSA varying between 5 and 7, and plan to
do nothing -- other than
not measuring the PSA anymore.

> What is a prostate cancer biopsy..They want to do one on me because my PSA
> was elevated..Dr said it is unpleasant and they go in through the but. PSA
> was 3.4 up from 2.5 the last 5 years.
> Michael
nambucca - 27 Jan 2005 14:19 GMT
> Most biopsies are not pleasant and the morbidity rate is somewhat
> high....post bleeding, prostatitis,
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> > was 3.4 up from 2.5 the last 5 years.
> > Michael

The morbidity for prostate cancer is like all other cancers it depends what
particular form /aggresive nature the cancer is

I know a guy age 65 had a PSA oct 2003 of 4.3
he went to sign up for a research project in March 2004 for a drug that
prevents prostate cancer only to be tested and have a PSA of 8.5 ......a
biopsy revealed stage 4 cancer throughout the prostate

Seemingly CT and MRI scans were OK but have they told the truth or have they
not been read correctly

Surgury was done in Oct 2004 and the cancer had gone outside of the capsule
,,,,,,he is now extremely distressed because he is impotent and about to
undergo 6 weeks of pin point Radiotherapy every single day ( from a new
machine of which there is only 3 in the UK )

Now to my mind this means that things are much much worse than the medics
are telling him

I am trying to help his wife cope with the shock etc
but dont know how positive to be .......ideas anyone
Anyone any ideas
c palmer - 28 Jan 2005 05:22 GMT
I know a guy age 65 had a PSA oct 2003 of 4.3 he went to sign up for a
research project in March 2004 for a drug that prevents prostate cancer
only to be tested and have a PSA of 8.5 ......a biopsy revealed stage 4
cancer throughout the prostate
Seemingly CT and MRI scans were OK but have they told the truth or have
they not been read correctly
Surgery was done in Oct 2004 and the cancer had gone outside of the
capsule ,,,,,,he is now extremely distressed because he is impotent and
about to undergo 6 weeks of pin point Radiotherapy every single day (
from a new machine of which there is only 3 in the UK )
Now to my mind this means that things are much much worse than the
medics are telling him
I am trying to help his wife cope with the shock etc but don't know how
positive to be .......ideas anyone Anyone any ideas
===========
whoa!!!  something's not right here.......

ok, i'll buy the trial research and assuming that the psa was 4.3 and
8.5 velocity rise within 6 months, the gleason score would have to be
close to a 9 or 10 to achieve a rise like that.  

ok, i'll even buy in on the fact that if it was an aggressive prostate
cancer and that is why the psa score wasn't that high.  the reason is
because the most aggressive prostate cancers all but destroy the
prostate cell's psa make ability and therefore doesn't make the patient
nor doctor aware of such a highly aggressive cancer till it is too late.

now, if i give credit for those two points.  here is a known fact.
prostate cancer may start in the back two lobes and can sometimes be
detected in the median lobe when they do surgery to enlarge the urethra
due to BPH, but the pca foci has spread throughout the entire gland much
like a loaf of old stale bread gets mold in it.  you may have one slice
that actually shows evidence of mold spots, but if you go to the
opposite end of the loaf, there may not be anything showing, but you can
smell the mold spores present.  ok, what does all this mean?

summing it all up,  he had a quick psa rise, the prostate gland has
prostate cancer cell throughout it, but the stage 4 cancer and to have
surgery.  it would be like shuting the door after the horses have left
the barn.  the cancer has spread to remote areas of the body - that is
what stage 4 means.  it is no longer gland contained, nor it is even
close to the prostate gland.  in stage 4 - evidence shows that the
patient has "hot spots" on his bones and/or organs in his body.  so, why
would they operate and remove the prostate gland?

since the prostate cancer was outside the capsule, they may have removed
the erectile nerves.  but even if they don't, there is still a risk of
damaging them as they handle the prostate in removing it, along with
prostate cancer may be attached to the nerve itself.  in that case, the
surgeon has to physically strip the cancer off the nerve by hand,
because the cancer is "sticky"  

also it is common than rare - that erections do come back but it may
take up to 18 to 24 months for this to happen.

there are wives who use pca surgery as a get out of sex free card and
welcome it.  there are others who feel the hurt and want to help their
partner as much as they can.

i would recommend a book called, "making love again" by the lakens.  it
is a book written by a husband and wife who went through prostate cancer
and surgery and their fight to get their lives back again.  they share
their thoughts and feelings at various stages in treatment.

btw - fwiw dept - normal average age of being dx'ed with pca is 65 and
they don't know why, but men who are dx'ed later in life - the pca is
more developed at the time of discovery than if it is dx'ed when the men
is younger.

~ curtis

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
nambucca - 29 Jan 2005 14:32 GMT
> summing it all up,  he had a quick psa rise, the prostate gland has
> prostate cancer cell throughout it, but the stage 4 cancer and to have
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> patient has "hot spots" on his bones and/or organs in his body.  so, why
> would they operate and remove the prostate gland?

............................................................................
............

Gleason score was 8
and yes i must admit i thought Stage 4 cancer means its already spread

Hence why i dont believe the claim that Ct and MRI scans are clear

Either his GP has ballsed up the PSA report in Oct 2003 or as you say he has
a very aggresive cancer
He is a heavy smoker which i think is highly contributory

However had no symptoms whatever till the biopsy after which he bled
continuously
he did apparently become impotent just before the surgury and its he who is
upset by the impotance
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.