Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Incidence of Cancer with low PSA

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Magna - 25 Jun 2004 21:43 GMT
Had this article drawn to my attention from the New England Journal of
Medicine May 27 2004.

"PREVALENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER IN MEN WITH PSA <4.0"

Background The optimal upper limit of the normal range for
prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is unknown. We investigated the
prevalence of prostate cancer among men in the Prostate Cancer
Prevention Trial who had a PSA level of 4.0 ng per milliliter or less.

Methods Of 18,882 men enrolled in the prevention trial, 9459 were
randomly assigned to receive placebo and had an annual measurement of
PSA and a digital rectal examination. Among these 9459 men, 2950 men
never had a PSA level of more than 4.0 ng per milliliter or an
abnormal digital rectal examination, had a final PSA determination,
and underwent a prostate biopsy after being in the study for seven
years.

Results Among the 2950 men (age range, 62 to 91 years), prostate
cancer was diagnosed in 449 (15.2 percent); 67 of these 449 cancers
(14.9 percent) had a Gleason score of 7 or higher. The prevalence of
prostate cancer was 6.6 percent among men with a PSA level of up to
0.5 ng per milliliter, 10.1 percent among those with values of 0.6 to
1.0 ng per milliliter, 17.0 percent among those with values of 1.1 to
2.0 ng per milliliter, 23.9 percent among those with values of 2.1 to
3.0 ng per milliliter, and 26.9 percent among those with values of 3.1
to 4.0 ng per milliliter. The prevalence of high-grade cancers
increased from 12.5 percent of cancers associated with a PSA level of
0.5 ng per milliliter or less to 25.0 percent of cancers associated
with a PSA level of 3.1 to 4.0 ng per milliliter.

Conclusions Biopsy-detected prostate cancer, including high-grade
cancers, is not rare among men with PSA levels of 4.0 ng per
milliliter or less — levels generally thought to be in the normal
range.
Magna - 26 Jun 2004 12:39 GMT
Forgot to include the website in the above post if anybody wants to
see for themselves:

http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/short/350/22/2239

This makes the PSA test look a bit redundant, doesn't it? Of course
Biopsy is a lot more costly so I can't see the NHS in the UK changing
from their current view of PSA being the "gold standard".
Liz - 26 Jun 2004 23:28 GMT
> Forgot to include the website in the above post if anybody wants to
> see for themselves:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Biopsy is a lot more costly so I can't see the NHS in the UK changing
> from their current view of PSA being the "gold standard".

No, if psa is above 4.0 then you should do biopsy. If it is quite low,
your confidence that you don't have a problem is 85 percent.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.