Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / July 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Flomax long term effects?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
smicker - 06 Jul 2004 23:51 GMT
Is there an long term effect from taking Flomax? I get none of the
problems others have so far.
smicker
CJ - 07 Jul 2004 00:06 GMT
Insomnia is one of the side effects for some.
smicker - 07 Jul 2004 03:18 GMT
>Insomnia is one of the side effects for some.

I hadn't realised that was the cause of my lack of real sleep. That
bears thinking about now as it adds up thanks.
smicker
Spread deMocracy - 07 Jul 2004 01:21 GMT
You are fortunate.  All medications have different effects on people.
FLOMAX is "supposed to have" fewer acute side affects such as dizziness and
orthostatic hypotension.  But, I experienced intensive dizziness--nearly
feinted each time-- after I run up several long flights of stairs, which I
do at my office.  Other alpha blockers were the same.  So, I just pulled
myself off, for now and am managing until I get all my blood work back.   I
had to force my doctor to do all the Estradiol, DHT, SBGH, etc., blood
tests.  He insisted it was not normal protocol, but he finally relented.
Did your doc do all the blood tests beyond just PSA, cholesterol, and
insulin?

> Is there an long term effect from taking Flomax? I get none of the
> problems others have so far.
> smicker
smicker - 07 Jul 2004 03:24 GMT
>You are fortunate.  All medications have different effects on people.
>FLOMAX is "supposed to have" fewer acute side affects such as dizziness and
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>Did your doc do all the blood tests beyond just PSA, cholesterol, and
>insulin?

I only had the PSA test, cholesterol is low because I am on stattins
after having a couple of heart attacks and a series of strokes after a
colostomy. I am already in a wheel chair so running anywhere is out of
the question. I was just begining to accept my lot in life at 61 when
I had to start using Flomax because of BPH. What else happens now?
Thanks for your post.
smicker
Spread deMocracy - 07 Jul 2004 23:21 GMT
PSA testing is very common and is necessary.  My gripe is with traditional
practice that has given me the impression that a few pills will be all I
need.   Since alpha blockers merely relax the passageway, I keep wondering
when the prostate will catch up to whatever little space is left in there.
It is logical to me that if the doctor is treating the symptoms only, which
I'm convinced alpha blockers are, ("FLOMAX"), then it is logical that the
Prostate will keep on growing and that it is only a matter of a short period
of time, maybe a few uncomfortable years at the outside,  before the
prostate catches up to and closes off the passageway.  Then comes DHT
inhibitors and THEIR side effects.  Recent studies indicate that a
combination therapy is quite successful in helping to head off surgery.  So,
why hasn't my doctor gone there right away?  That is, relax the passageway
while allowing DHT inhibitors to work since the work very slowly, (9 months
to 2 years).  Why wait until things go critical?  But, hey!  Who am I to
question the medical "experts".  That thinking got me alarmed enough to
insist my doctor start testing for the CAUSE of my BPH and not to merely
acknowledge that I have BPH.  If my DHT is too high, let's know NOW and get
right to it with DHT inhibitors, ("PROSCAR"), while there is still room in
there.  On the other hand, if my estrogens are out of whack, which happens
in a large number of BPH instances, then let's go there and beat the crap
out of the Estradiols.   By my urologist never talked about ANY of this.
Hence my insistence on all the other blood work ups.  From what I am
learning,  I am starting to convince myself that an
endocrinologist--(hormone specialist)-- is what our GPs ought to be
referring us BPH-ers to and not urologists.  That will be my next
"discussion" with my urologist once I get my blood work back, (some of the
results will be ready next week).  Meanwhile, all the best to you!

> >You are fortunate.  All medications have different effects on people.
> >FLOMAX is "supposed to have" fewer acute side affects such as dizziness and
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Thanks for your post.
> smicker
nambucca - 07 Jul 2004 22:27 GMT
> Is there an long term effect from taking Flomax? I get none of the
> problems others have so far.
> smicker

IMHE retro was a pretty instant effect
Hiatus Hernia was the next to appear
Wish I had gone straight for PVP
Spread deMocracy - 07 Jul 2004 23:46 GMT
Yeah, retro was indeed a side effect of "FLOMAX" for me, too.   When I
complained about the dizzy spells when walking up stairs or riding my
bicycle, my urologist had me try "XATROL".  2 weeks later when I reported
that I still had all the dizzy side effects and still couldn't exercise
worth crap, etc., but that I no longer had retros, he seemed surprised and
almost disappointed that retros vanished.  I may have read his expression of
amazement as disappointment, but he questioned the hell out of me as though
implying, "Impossible!".  So, I thought he was more disappointed than
amazed.  I'm NOT a doctor, but you might want to ask yours about letting you
try one of the other 3 remaining approved alpha blockers.  As for your
Hiatus Hernia.  I have never read of anything statistically significant
tying that to the medication.  If you have had an active lifestyle, or ever
binged on food, or ever drank too much, or ever got punched or kicked in the
stomach, or ever lifted something heavy, or ever vomited too hard, or if you
are a heavy meat eater before bed time and tossed and turned violently while
asleep, or horsed around at a football party after stuffing yourself on beer
and pizza, or, or....ANY of those could have started the weakening and tear
and any of those could have worsened the condition...Regardless, ANY
medication will have all kinds of side effects, some of which are unique to
certain individuals, and so rare that they never make it to the radar of the
controlled tests the FDA requires. Question is never, is the medication so
specific and so effective as to not have any side effects?  Rather, is the
relief and possible side effects worth it compared to the condition itself.
Hiatus Hernias are relatively easy operations--as far as operations go.
Meanwhile, let us know if you discover others who can make a direct
correlation to the medication.   We all want to know about potential side
effects.   Here's wishing the very best.

> > Is there an long term effect from taking Flomax? I get none of the
> > problems others have so far.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Hiatus Hernia was the next to appear
> Wish I had gone straight for PVP
Beach Runner - 16 Jul 2004 15:58 GMT
The
\

>>IMHE retro was a pretty instant effect
>>Hiatus Hernia was the next to appear
>>Wish I had gone straight for PVP
>>    

The Hernia makes no sense. I do have a recommendation....
The Hernia Institute of Florida is incredible, can't be beat.

Bob
smicker - 08 Jul 2004 01:10 GMT
>> Is there an long term effect from taking Flomax? I get none of the
>> problems others have so far.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Hiatus Hernia was the next to appear
>Wish I had gone straight for PVP
Yes I had noticed you were keen on PVP;-)
Thanks.
smicker
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.