Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Just had Greenlight laser

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
CJ - 10 Jun 2004 15:52 GMT
4 days ago, I had the procedure.  I would like to report on it and maybe get
some of your comments.  Operation took about an hour, the Doc said prostrate
was larger than expected.  Stayed overnight.  They took out catheter next
day, and the first stream, I made on my own was very strong.  I might add
that was the strongest and since then (for 4 days) it returned back to slow.
Maybe this is normal.  When I got home, day 2, I found myself having to go
every 10-15 minutes. Day 3, I was going every half hour.  I suppose this is
normal progression because everything is swollen. Now it is day 4 and I am
going about every hour.  What bothers me is the stream is still weak and I
am not emptying the bladder..  Why was it so strong right after the catheter
came out?  And, why am I still urinating so often. Thank God for Ativan, it
helps me sleep at night! Might call the Doc today.  I will keep you all up
to date.  Any comments?
Terry - 11 Jun 2004 00:09 GMT
I don't want to discourage you, but you should not get your hopes up
too high.  I'm post PVP eight months and have no continued improvement
at all in flow, volume, nighttime urination, or frequency.  The only
lasting results of the procedure are retro ejaculation and reduced
control - I dribble a bit before I get to  the stool. This is new to
me. I had a short period of improvement in the first couple of months
after the PVP, but have regressed since then. Pardon my pun, but am I
pissed!

I hope you have better luck.

Terry
Marcus - 11 Jun 2004 01:22 GMT
Terry,

Frankly, Laserscope should be sued for their
misleading advertising. I don't know what your specific
issue is or who performed the surgery, but I went
through hell for over 2 months following my PVP.
It's taken 6 months for all symptoms to subside.

Laserscope sells this procedure as if it were a walk in the
park. They shouldn't get away with it. It only exacerbates
the misery of the recovery period...at least for a "significant minority"
of its patients...and that could be thousands of patients expecting,
but not experiencing, a return to "normal" in a week or two.

Hopefully you can get some answers concerning your
particularly lengthy and troublesome post-surgical issues.
There are people posting to this group who suggest that
anyone experiencing problems with PVP is either paranoid
or a troublemaker. Don't let these bloviating cheerleaders
for Laserscope discourage you from understanding that
you are one of that significant minority who are not experiencing the
trouble-free scenario that they are marketing.

Best of luck getting some good answers about your health.

Marcus

> I don't want to discourage you, but you should not get your hopes up
> too high.  I'm post PVP eight months and have no continued improvement
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Terry
Gener - 11 Jun 2004 02:16 GMT
Some doctors have good results and others don't.
Might that be a clue also?
Gene  www.photoprojects.net

> Terry,
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> >
> > Terry
Terry - 11 Jun 2004 15:52 GMT
Marcus:

Thanks for the support. I suspect that there quite a few of us who
haven't had the good fortune to benefit from the PVP. I  must admit
that I wasn't led down the garden path by my Uro, who warned me that
the procedure was new and had little track record.  Still, it's hard
for me not to whine and sulk, at least for a little while.  I'll get
over the blues pretty quick and then look for something else.

Good luck to you and any others who aren't feeling too good about
their outcomes.

Terry
Chris Bennett - 11 Jun 2004 18:26 GMT
Marcus

Same with TUMT. They show people reading during the procedure and say
that you may feel a little heat. They also say you can return to work
after a few days.

For me, the heat was OK but the bladder spasms that the heat causes
were quite uncomfortable. However, the procedure only lasted an hour
and was quite mild compared to other types of medical procedures.

The worst part of the whole process was having a catheder in for the
following 7 days. The bladder spasms got better over time but I could
hardly wait to get it out (the spasms stopped after the catheder was
removed). After the first week, there was some discomfort and I
thought that something was wrong since the literature seemed to
indicate that everything should be fine after a few days. Turns out
that some pain is normal.

Even though I am very happy with the results (I now sleep through the
night and can pee about 500 cc), It took about a month before I felt
normal. ie no discomfort, strong flow, etc. I am glad I am retired. I
would not have wanted to go to work for the first couple of weeks
after the procedure.

If the information I received had been a little more realistic, my
recovery would have been much easier.

Chris Bennett

On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:22:26 GMT, "Marcus" <orealius@comcast.net>
wrote:

>Terry,
>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>>
>> Terry
chockman - 18 Jun 2004 04:29 GMT
Chris:

I am a 60 yr old scheduled for  a TUMT in Portland, OR July 2.  My uro,
Dr McCoy uses Prostatron, TherMatrx, Green Light Laser, and Indigo
laser.  When I asked him knowing what he knows about all the procedures
and knowing what he does about me, what would he chose?  Without a
pause, he recommended TUMT.  My question...in light of your statement
that had the information you received had  been more realistic, your
recovery would have been better, what would you advise me?  What are the
do's and don'ts that you would advise?  chockman@canby.com

> Marcus
>
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
>>>
>>>Terry
Chris Bennett - 22 Jun 2004 01:09 GMT
My advise would be to go into TUMT knowing that there may be some
discomfort and mild pain.

The procedure was not that big a deal. I took some Advil for a couple
of weeks for the discomfort. Usually at night.

I only wish the catheter could have been removed much quicker. It was
the cause of most of the pain during the week I wore it. First, from
bladder spasms that occurred when I emptied the bag, and second when I
woke up with nocturnal erections (the penis gets longer but the
catheter doesn't want to!

Chris Bennett

>Chris:
>
[quoted text clipped - 78 lines]
>>>>
>>>>Terry
Maurice Batey - 12 Jun 2004 17:55 GMT
> I had a short period of improvement in the first couple of months
> after the PVP, but have regressed since then.

Although after 3 months a flow-rate test showed same amount as pre-PVP but
in half the time (I never had hosepipe flow), it has now (after 5 months)
reverted to pre-PVP rates, complete with hesitation and start/stopping.
    Difficult to understand how it can do this...

Anyone else had this?
Signature

Maurice Batey
    (Retired in Hampshire, UK)
    www.maurice.eurobell.co.uk
(Remove 'antispam.' to reply)

Lee M. - 11 Jun 2004 03:02 GMT
Just curious as to what the doctor told you to expect post-op.  If your
symptoms are significantly different from your expectations, why are you
waiting before calling him?  If he's a decent doctor, he should be as
concerned about your recovery (or lack thereof) as he was about the
procedure itself.  Good luck.

> 4 days ago, I had the procedure.  I would like to report on it and maybe get
> some of your comments.  Operation took about an hour, the Doc said prostrate
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> helps me sleep at night! Might call the Doc today.  I will keep you all up
> to date.  Any comments?
CJ - 12 Jun 2004 20:11 GMT
It has now been 6 days and things are all GRADUALLY improving.  My doc told
me, yesterday that it could take 4-6 weeks before I see strong results.
Apparently it takes quite a while for the swelling to go down.

For those who have complained about spasms and urgency, you might try
Percocet (small dose of 1/2 of a 500MG tablet).  It worked great for me. Of
course, check with your doc first.   Now I'm only taking it once a day.

I also agree that the advertising is bogus!   CB
Magna - 13 Jun 2004 12:55 GMT
Maurice,

I'm quite interested as I've just put the wheels in motion for a
possible PVP (here in the UK). What does your Doc/Uro say? Has the
bladder neck/prostate grown back?

Interesting to know how other UK guys have fared, I assume OK as Derry
& Co have been pretty quiet on this forum.

Magna
Maurice Batey - 13 Jun 2004 19:22 GMT
> What does your Doc/Uro say? Has the
> bladder neck/prostate grown back?

Waiting for uro's response to email.

I'm also queued for a cystoscpopy next month so that should be
illuminating. (Need to check that 2 mini-pre-tumours found & removed
during PVP have not recurred.)

The PVP itself was a breeze - 24 hours after PVP I walked to the train
station and caught the next train home. Bleeding had already stopped.
    And no pain felt - just vague discomfort at first. Even the overnight
catheter didn't bother me - in fact it was a treat to be able to gulp down
hot chocolate at bedtime without worrying about getting up during the
night! (It's an ill wind...)

Signature

Maurice Batey
    (Retired in Hampshire, UK)
    www.maurice.eurobell.co.uk
(Remove 'antispam.' to reply)

Ron - 13 Jun 2004 20:34 GMT
Remember that chocolate contains caffine - Not the best thing to take before
going to sleep. But I'm glad - you seem to be able to handle it.
Ron

> From: Maurice Batey <maurice@eurobell.co.uk>
> Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> hot chocolate at bedtime without worrying about getting up during the
> night! (It's an ill wind...)
Maurice Batey - 14 Jun 2004 20:24 GMT
> What does your Doc/Uro say? Has the
> bladder neck/prostate grown back?

Uro 'phoned this morning. Suspects it is either scar tissue or a 'web'
tissue across the urethra. Former can be cut out (little blood supply in
scar tissue), latter can be pushed through and cleared.
    Will fit me in in the next few days. Can do bladder check at same time.
No way things could have 'grown back' in 5 months, he says.

Signature

Maurice Batey
    (Retired in Hampshire, UK)
    www.maurice.eurobell.co.uk
(Remove 'antispam.' to reply)

nambucca - 15 Jun 2004 23:52 GMT
> Maurice,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Magna

i had PVP in July 2003 ........almost textbook recovery although pulling
sensation for some 3 months but flow was hosepipe from straight after the op

Gordon Muir at Kings College did my PVP and Derrys .......he sure has lots
of experience and is a great URO
Randy - 18 Jun 2004 14:36 GMT
> For those who have complained about spasms and urgency, you might try
> Percocet (small dose of 1/2 of a 500MG tablet).  It worked great for me. Of
> course, check with your doc first.   Now I'm only taking it once a day.
>
> I also agree that the advertising is bogus!   CB

CB,

I'm 10 days post PVP and heading to see the doc for a follow-up before
a long business trip.  I wish I could say that I'm seeing a big
improvement, but that's not the case...yet (I hope).

Just a word about using Percocet (a Schedule II narcotic) to tame ones
bladder spasms:

I am a former pain management patient and have some first hand
experience with narcotics and their effects (battle damage).  You're
right that Percocet (oxycodone) will do what you say, however, it will
do a lot of other things as well, some good, many bad.  I'm not a
doctor, so anyone considering this should review these things with
their doctor.

Other than the obvious concerns about a small percentage (3% or so)
becoming dependent with chronic use, oxycodone, and other opioid
analgesics lower the pituitary's release of luetinizing hormone (LH)
and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH).  This doesn't sound bad until
you realize that both of these are the testicle's heralds for how much
testosterone to make.  Testosterone is involved in almost every aspect
of male physiology and psychology.  It's the primary anabolic hormone
(and thus accelerates healing), an antidepressant, and many other
things.  Opioids also slow down the intestines natural rythym and
users frequently need laxatives because those "spasms" are desired.
They also tell the brain to stop producing the body's natural pain
killers (endorphins and others) because the brain senses the elevated
levels of opioids as a signal to shut that system down.

Simply:  Opioids will lower testosterone and shut down natural pain
killing systems.

Opioid analgesics are excellent for their intended purpose, but should
be used with extreme caution and medical supervision.  Treating
chronic conditions (bladder spasms) other than non-responsive pain
with them may be setting up the user for a host of other issues, some
worse than the primary condition.

Good luck and thanks for the information, I just thought I'd throw in
a caveat before someone raided the medicine cabinet and started down a
long dirt road.

R
Marcus - 18 Jun 2004 16:29 GMT
I also agree that the advertising is bogus!   CB

Actually, you should have seen it a few months ago...
before they added some caveats to their rave evaluations.

I tried to talk to Laserscope on the phone about this issue
(exaggerated claims...inadequate preparation for the patients
who do not experience quick recovery) back in April. They just
hung up on me. They should be sued. Anyone interested?

Marcus

> > For those who have complained about spasms and urgency, you might try
> > Percocet (small dose of 1/2 of a 500MG tablet).  It worked great for me. Of
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
>
> R
Lee M. - 19 Jun 2004 01:28 GMT
I'd be surprised if you could get a lawyer to take the case and if you
could, I'll bet the judge would throw it out.

> I also agree that the advertising is bogus!   CB
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Marcus
Liz - 19 Jun 2004 05:44 GMT
> I'd be surprised if you could get a lawyer to take the case and if you
> could, I'll bet the judge would throw it out.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> >
> > Marcus

Isn't it like the 100 or more restaurants that claim to have the
"worlds best hamburger?"
MB - 19 Jun 2004 20:22 GMT
Liz:

I agree to a degree. We know that "puffery" occurs when advertising
products. It is considered legal.

With medical devices, I'm sure more caution is in order. HOWEVER, that being
said, it would be interesting to see what the data shows, assuming there is
some reliable data.

Marcus: you have posted many times with this same theme. However, while YOU
claim the site is just not telling the whole story, YOU also are not telling
the whole story. As I recall, you have a variety of serious medical problems
(transplant along with associated medications) that could well be a
contributing factor in your situation. Please correct if I am mistaken about
your medical situation.

All that being said, having read the posts over quite a few years (and
suffering with BPH), I would go the PVP route if surgery was called for.
But, having read the posts, I am not going to jump into this until my
symptoms warrant it (others who have had great success keep urging everyone
to go PVP --- I'm of the opinion that this is not a guaranteed success and
so one should weigh matters carefully before proceeding). What I have done
is connected with a PVP uro who will monitor my progress and so if things
suddenly go south, I will at least be in line for this procedure. We have no
local PVP experts at this time and my big fear was going into major
retention and being pressured (while in misery) to have some other procedure
locally.

Mel

> > I'd be surprised if you could get a lawyer to take the case and if you
> > could, I'll bet the judge would throw it out.
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Isn't it like the 100 or more restaurants that claim to have the
> "worlds best hamburger?"
Richard - 20 Jun 2004 14:06 GMT
I've continued to monitor PVP postings over the past few months, and
haven't seen anything to change the suggestion I posted back in
February: "Perhaps we can all agree that most people seem to do very
well very quickly after PVP; that a fairly small minority don't (and
we can usefully explore why here); that it's nevertheless probably the
best current bet; and that Laserscope will increase their credibility
if they keep *all* their marketing honest and attuned to a reasonably
sophisticated and knowledgeable market, which will either get annoyed
by puffery, exaggeration and oversimplification or (possibly even
worse) just laugh at it."

In other words, I agree with two or three people who have said in
various threads over the last few days that PVP certainly isn't a
miracle solution for BPH, but that for those otherwise facing a TURP
it shows great promise currently of offering similar results for less
trauma. That's not to say it's the only solution; for some people
drugs and even herbal supplements may do an acceptable job (at least
for a long time, though maybe not indefinitely), and the various forms
of radio frequency treatment are worth considering. My own feeling,
based mainly on postings here - and my own sample of one! - is that
the positive effects of the latter may not last very long; but as I've
said here before, for all I know we may not be hearing about a host of
longterm successes with Targis, Prostatron, TUNA etc. If anyone
currently has a bit more time than I do, they could do us all a useful
service by doing an Internet search for recent reports in the medical
literature on the durability of radio frequency therapies for BPH, and
reporting back to us; PubMed would be a good place to start.

About six months after PVP, my own flow is currently good and I no
longer (thank goodness) have the urgency I experienced for several
weeks after the procedure; that was a very nasty shock, as I'd never
had any pre-PVP. It looks as though I'm going to be one of those
(about a third, it seems?) who have lasting retro, but I can't say I
find that a major problem. (If I had any plans to father children, I
might take a different view, though it only makes the process rather
more complicated.)

I'm sorry to hear Maurice is having problems, which do sound as if
they may be caused by some kind of stricture; that's always a
possibility after any instrument has been used for work through the
urethra. It will be interesting to hear what his doctor finds.

Richard Slessor
Marcus - 20 Jun 2004 17:01 GMT
I would amend your description of the "very small minority" who experience
problems with PVP to:
"a significant minority." These are the words of my surgeon, Dr. Collins
coming to grips with the reality of PVP. He, unlike Laserscope, at least has
the decency to be honest.

Marcus

> I've continued to monitor PVP postings over the past few months, and
> haven't seen anything to change the suggestion I posted back in
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Richard Slessor
Liz - 21 Jun 2004 23:34 GMT
> I would amend your description of the "very small minority" who experience
> problems with PVP to:
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> > might take a different view, though it only makes the process rather
> > more complicated.)

I just got back from seeing my urologist and the way he put it was
(for the green light laser procedure that is similar to TURP)
"you will have retrograde ejaculation" -- note he used the word WILL.
He also said that it is "ok as long as I don't want to have more children."

> > I'm sorry to hear Maurice is having problems, which do sound as if
> > they may be caused by some kind of stricture; that's always a
> > possibility after any instrument has been used for work through the
> > urethra. It will be interesting to hear what his doctor finds.
> >
> > Richard Slessor
XS11E - 30 Jun 2004 06:29 GMT
> I agree to a degree. We know that "puffery" occurs when
> advertising products. It is considered legal.

Puffing is completely legal, mis-representation is not.  It sometimes
requires a court to determine the line between the two.

One nice thing in the real estate business, the line is VERY clearly
defined, new agents are carefully taught what may be said and what may
not be said.  I believe in the medical profession the line is not
clearly defined?
CJ - 18 Jun 2004 18:43 GMT
All that you say makes sense.  That's why I suggested a very small dose and
use only when absolutely needed. CB
nambucca - 14 Jun 2004 00:51 GMT
> 4 days ago, I had the procedure.  I would like to report on it and maybe get
> some of your comments.  Operation took about an hour, the Doc said prostrate
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> helps me sleep at night! Might call the Doc today.  I will keep you all up
> to date.  Any comments?

probably just the tissue reaction to the laser
Take Homeopathic Arnica that will soon heal things ...........it will soon
improve
Richard F. Somer - 14 Jun 2004 22:35 GMT
>4 days ago, I had the procedure.  I would like to report on it and maybe get
>some of your comments.  Operation took about an hour, the Doc said prostrate
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>helps me sleep at night! Might call the Doc today.  I will keep you all up
>to date.  Any comments?

From the responses you are getting, it is clear that there are a number
of variations in outcomes to this procedure, the most obvious being with
the patient and the doctor. We do not all have the same prostate or
problems; we do not all respond the same to surgery; and of course all
doctors are not equally proficient in this procedure.

I had an enormous gland that required five hours on the slab, but I had
no pain or even discomfort afterwards. Flow was strong from beginning
and became better over time. It took about a month for the superficial
healing to complete--that is, no blood in urine. Since then, all has
been quite satisfactory--I can go at least five hours between voiding in
the daytime, and my bladder is gradually increasing its capacity. And my
general sense of well-being is much improved over pre-PVP days.

Dick

Signature

Richard F. Somer

I have always made it a rule never to smoke more than one pipe at the same time.
(adapted from Mark Twain)

CJ - 18 Jun 2004 18:49 GMT
It is now 10 days since procedure.  Off all medications and I am not to full
"stream" yet.  Doc says that will take a couple of weeks at least.  Only
negative experience I'm having is a tinge of blood at the end of urination.
Will be seeing Doc next Monday.
CJ - 22 Jun 2004 23:05 GMT
Update...It's been 2 weeks and just got back from Doc.  Only problem I'm
having is blood in urine at the beginning and ending of peeing.  He said
this happens many times and not to be concerned.  The stream is not at full
strength, but he said that will also take a while.  Some minor urgency
feeling some days, but I find that Tylenol relieves that.  Everything else
seems fine.
David DeBar - 15 Jun 2004 20:37 GMT
I had my PVP 10 months ago.  For a while I could pee like a power washer!
this subsided over several months.  I still have a good stream but not like
the day after the surgery.  It takes a while for the bladder to get the idea
that it's OK to hold off for while when there is some pee in it.  Now I
sleep through the night and I'm not in a panic when I go to the bathroom.
If I'm out some where and public bath room is occupied,  I can put it off
until I get home a couple hours later.  It was not that way prior to PVP.
It takes a while to get everything under control but it happens.  Good Luck.

Dave
> 4 days ago, I had the procedure.  I would like to report on it and maybe get
> some of your comments.  Operation took about an hour, the Doc said prostrate
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> helps me sleep at night! Might call the Doc today.  I will keep you all up
> to date.  Any comments?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.