Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Question about anesthetic for PVP

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
John G. - 23 May 2004 02:18 GMT
I have heard from different people who have had differing methods of
anesthetic. Some have had spinals others have had general.

The doctor who will be doing my PVP said he uses a local anesthetic
administered directly to the nerve that goes to the prostate area.

Does this make sense?

jg
Barry - 24 May 2004 04:16 GMT
> I have heard from different people who have had differing methods of
> anesthetic. Some have had spinals others have had general.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> jg

No, it doesn't.  I would suggest that you talk to the anesthesiologist
or someone from the anesthesiology group who will be doing your
procedure and obtain information about possible choice of anesthesia
that YOU could choose.  I opted for a general.
Bill Hale - 25 May 2004 18:11 GMT
> > I have heard from different people who have had differing methods of
> > anesthetic. Some have had spinals others have had general.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> procedure and obtain information about possible choice of anesthesia
> that YOU could choose.  I opted for a general.

Maybe it does.  You should check.  In my case, they did a spinal.
I watched the operation and did not require a hospital stay. Worst
part of the recovery was that I couldn't stand for about 3 hours.
There was no pain post-op.

Bill Hale
Richard - 28 May 2004 15:03 GMT
Some doctors do use a 'peri-prostatic' (local) block for PVP. (One
poster a little while ago entertainingly turned this into a
'peri-prosthetic' block, which would presumably only apply for people
who had suffered from severe erectile dysfunction!)

My urologist wasn't prepared to do local only (I did ask), mainly
because he hadn't used it up to that point, I think. I actually had an
epidural rather than a spinal, because he regards the risks as lower.
I didn't like it; though there was no pain, I could still move my
legs, and I definitely felt some trembling in them as a result of
strain from having them up in stirrups, by the end of the operation. I
also began to get some pain in my lower belly, I suspect from strain
on muscles which weren't anesthetised.

With the previous TUIP I had a spinal; with that there is absolutely
no feeling or movement during the procedure and for two or three hours
afterwards, and the lack of feeling went roughly up to my navel. As a
result, I found it more comfortable. (However, the TUIP took about
half an hour, and the PVP quite a lot longer, so I may not be
comparing like with like, I suppose.)

Both epidural and spinal allow you to watch the procedure if you want
to, providing the screen setup in the theatre allows it. I did see my
PVP 'live', though not the TUIP.

Richard Slessor
John G. - 28 May 2004 23:44 GMT
> Some doctors do use a 'peri-prostatic' (local) block for PVP. (One
> poster a little while ago entertainingly turned this into a
> 'peri-prosthetic' block, which would presumably only apply for people
> who had suffered from severe erectile dysfunction!)

Thanks for that information, Richard. As usual you seem to be the source
for really level-headed observations about our shared condition.

jg
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.