Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

self-catheterization not working

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dave - 20 Apr 2004 16:17 GMT
I try to thread the catheter into the bladder to self-catheterize
myself, but nothing comes out. I certainly push the catheter in far
enough. Anyone know what I might be doing wrong?
Zork - 20 Apr 2004 20:47 GMT
>I try to thread the catheter into the bladder to self-catheterize
>myself, but nothing comes out. I certainly push the catheter in far
>enough. Anyone know what I might be doing wrong?

You SURE it is in far enough ?   Are you possibly already voided, but
that I doubt, should be some residual if nothing else.
Zork
Jim S. - 20 Apr 2004 22:34 GMT
> I try to thread the catheter into the bladder to self-catheterize
> myself, but nothing comes out. I certainly push the catheter in far
> enough. Anyone know what I might be doing wrong?

Hi Dave.
if you,ve been using an indwelling catheter previously there seems no reason
why you cant self catheterize
I have been using single use catheters for a few months now with no
problems.
The catheters I use are 40cm in length about 16  inches approx and when I
place one in there,s about 4--5 inches
left outside when I start to flow.Now everybodies internal plumbing is not
the same so it may be be different for you
but  16 inches is the standard size catheter so I guess there will some
people who will need more or less than me.
If you are using a reusable catheter  and require to put a lubricant on the
stem make sure that whatever you are using
is not blocking  the inlet holes,likewise with what you use to clean it.
Ive been using single use disposable catheters which are handy no cleaning
or lubricant required.
When I first used them  there was a bit of discomfort putting them in but
after a few times I think the uretha gets less sensitive
and now I can do it no problem at all.
I hope you have some success with self cath,ing, I know from previous
experience what an indwelling catheter is like

Jim S.
Dave - 21 Apr 2004 14:48 GMT
Thanks for your comments, guys. Jim, it's a possibility that the
lubricant I'm using--K-Y jelly--is indeed blocking the outlet holes.
I'll try just lubricating the catheter below the holes. Maybe I should
try it without the lubricant at all and see what happens. All very
frustrating. And as you say, I'll do anything to stay off the tube up
the penis and the bag strapped to my leg.
Dave - 21 Apr 2004 14:59 GMT
Jim: if you would be so kind as to give me the type of catheter you
use--the disposable one with no lubricant necessary--please do so. And
thank you very much. That might solve my problem by itself. Thanks
again for your help, Jim.
Jim S. - 21 Apr 2004 21:50 GMT
> Jim: if you would be so kind as to give me the type of catheter you
> use--the disposable one with no lubricant necessary--please do so. And
> thank you very much. That might solve my problem by itself. Thanks
> again for your help, Jim.

Hi Dave ,
The single use catheters I use are Lofric manufactured by Astratech and I,ve
found them to be easy to use,
they come in individual sterile packets you just partially open the packet
fill it with clean household tap water
and that activates the self lubricant on the catheter then use it after
about 30 secs and thats about it apart
from carrying out the usual basic hygiene practices I,ve had no problems
with infections which I was continually
having with the indwelling foley catheter.By the way I would not advise you
to use your existing catheter with no
lubricant as you could damage your urethra.

This is Astratech,s  USA web site   www.astratechusa.com

                                  UK web site    www.astratechuk.com
Dave - 22 Apr 2004 15:23 GMT
Jim and others: I'm still having no luck self-catheterizing myself. I
tried inserting the catheter with no lubricant, but it was no go. I've
tried only lubricating the catheter below the holes so as not to block
them, but that doesn't work, either. Tomorrow, I'm going into the
office for help. I can sqeeze out enough urine on my own to keep from
going into complete urinary retention, but over the long run, that
will not be enough to keep me from toasting my kidneys. The uro can
insert the indwelling catheter, which is much larger in circumference,
so I don't know why the self catheter doesn't slide in. What a mess.
But thanks for your comments and help, guys. Much appreciated. Dave
Jim S. - 22 Apr 2004 22:56 GMT
> Jim and others: I'm still having no luck self-catheterizing myself. I
> tried inserting the catheter with no lubricant, but it was no go. I've
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> so I don't know why the self catheter doesn't slide in. What a mess.
> But thanks for your comments and help, guys. Much appreciated. Dave

Sorry to hear your still having problems self cathing,I had a look at the
astratech UK web site
and looked up the FAQ pages regarding difficulty inserting the cath. and
this is what was stated
regarding the problem"Men with a narrow or convoluted urethral passage can
use a LoFric? Tiemann catheter, which has a slightly curved and tapered tip
to aid insertion". So possibly you need to use that type of cath.
When I started self cath,ing I was instructed how to do the procedure by a
specialist nurse and the nurse observed me first time
to make sure I could do it correctly.
That gave me the confidence to do it on my own after that.

Good luck   Jim S
Ron - 23 Apr 2004 20:53 GMT
A year after my first PVP, when my surgeon attempted Urodynamic testing,
though he tried a bunch of different catheters, couldn't get it into the
bladder. Even when he tried to guide it in with a cystoscope & failed.
Ron

> From: "Jim S." <lochland@clara.co.uk>
> Newsgroups: sci.med.prostate.bph
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Good luck   Jim S
Dave - 24 Apr 2004 02:36 GMT
Jim: thanks for your latest post and the info re the Tiemann catheter.
I visited my uro's office today, and though my uro wasn't in, the
nurse tried to catheterize me and couldn't do it, either. I visit my
uro again Monday, but I'm afraid he's just going to slap the permanent
catheter on me again and tell me there's nothing more he can do. I'll
ask him about the Tiemann catheter. This HMO setup isn't conducive to
encouraging the doctor to go the extra mile for you. But, I'll keep
trying. There's gotta be a way to self-catheterize myself. Anything
but the dang tube up my penis and bag on my leg. I'll check back with
everyone on Tuesday and let you know what my uro told me. Thanks again
for your support.
Dave - 28 Apr 2004 15:51 GMT
I visited my uro on Monday, and as I feared, he said I would have to
wear the urethral catheter the rest of my life, since I am unable to
self-catheterize myself. He was very vague about why he can slip the
permanent catheter in okay but why I can't slip the self-catheter in.
I see him again in a couple of weeks, at which time we're going to
have one last try at self-catheterization. Meanwhile, I'm already
lining up second opinions. It's still very hard to believe that I
might actually have to go through life with a tube up my penis and a
bag strapped to my leg. No more sex and "increased morbidity." Not
good. Your comments and suggestions are welcome, guys. Any advice
greatly appreciated.
Davis - 28 Apr 2004 16:19 GMT
Davis wrote:

>I visited my uro on Monday, and as I feared, he said I would have to
>wear the urethral catheter the rest of my life, since I am unable to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>good. Your comments and suggestions are welcome, guys. Any advice
>greatly appreciated.

You are not in a good position, and you're there because you have not
gotten a second opinion as yet, in my humble opinion. I've noticed
that many have suggested this also.

I know how money situations can be, being retired, but a situation
like that would prompt me to do what it takes to get an opinion from a
respected urologist, and preferably one who does, and is experienced
with the PVP procedure.

A urologist who is "vague", and keeps you in the dark as to your
situation begs to be discharged. I believe that there is help for your
condition. Just not with the urologist you are currently visiting.
Zork - 28 Apr 2004 17:24 GMT
Like has been said by many before, can't be stressed enough.
Get a 2nd and possibly a 3rd opinion ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
I can't belive the information you have gotten to this point
is adequete or complete.
Please do it...
Zork
-------

>Davis wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>situation begs to be discharged. I believe that there is help for your
>condition. Just not with the urologist you are currently visiting.
MB - 28 Apr 2004 19:34 GMT
Dave:

People get second opinions for far less morbid situations. You should, too.
Is there a teaching hospital nearby?

Mel

> I visited my uro on Monday, and as I feared, he said I would have to
> wear the urethral catheter the rest of my life, since I am unable to
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> good. Your comments and suggestions are welcome, guys. Any advice
> greatly appreciated.
c palmer - 29 Apr 2004 02:24 GMT

Is there a teaching hospital nearby?
Mel
------------------

boy mel, that sounds like that best advice i've heard.  teaching
hospitals would be on the cutting edge of technology.

================

No more sex and "increased morbidity." Not good. Your comments and
suggestions are welcome, guys. Any advice greatly appreciated.
-----------
dave - it's not the end of the world - believe me.  i know.  but we have
guys who can still get it up after the RP surgery and still have the
catheter in.  some doctors don't want any sexual activity until the
catheter comes out and other doctors who will tell how to do it in such
a way the catheter doesn't interfere.  

if you want to have any sex, just wear a condom and place the catheter
where is will lay inside the condom.  from the feedback i've heard is
that it works with minimum problems.  

i can't believe the doctor would say no sex.  the seminal fluid is going
to come out.  people don't talk about it, but in older men who don't
have much sex drive will "leak" from just having a bowel movement, or
they will "drip" if there hasn't been any ejaculation in the past few
weeks.    sorry to be so graphic, but that's life.

hope this info helps.

~ curtis

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer that of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
Dave - 29 Apr 2004 15:10 GMT
I'm in the process of getting a second opinion now from my HMO re my
situation with the permanent catheter. If necessary, I'll get second
opinions from other urologists and pay for them myself. I still don't
understand how sex can work with a tube sticking out of my cock and
urine dripping out of the tube. But right now, that's the least of my
problems. Thanks again, guys, for your support and advice.
Zork - 22 May 2004 15:15 GMT
>I try to thread the catheter into the bladder to self-catheterize
>myself, but nothing comes out. I certainly push the catheter in far
>enough. Anyone know what I might be doing wrong?
----------------------
It's been a while since anything has been posted in the group with your
dilemma. Last I recall you were going to visit a different uro to
get another opinion....the ultimate goal of course was to not have to
have a permanent catheter.
Has any progress been made and/or have you found out why self
catherization will not work for you.
Been thinking of you !
Zork
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.