Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / December 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Cause of prostate enlargement

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Salinas - 30 Dec 2003 11:04 GMT
I have been told that the enlargement/pressure of the prostate which
is the trouble is due to a build up of fluid not able to escape to the
urethra as the way is blocked. Also that the blockage can be easily
undone. Is this so? My doctor knows nothing about this. It says it at
http://www.innatehealth.com/prostate.htm
Derek F - 30 Dec 2003 11:43 GMT
> I have been told that the enlargement/pressure of the prostate which
> is the trouble is due to a build up of fluid not able to escape to the
> urethra as the way is blocked. Also that the blockage can be easily
> undone. Is this so? My doctor knows nothing about this. It says it at
> http://www.innatehealth.com/prostate.htm
Derek F - 30 Dec 2003 11:46 GMT
> I have been told that the enlargement/pressure of the prostate which
> is the trouble is due to a build up of fluid not able to escape to the
> urethra as the way is blocked. Also that the blockage can be easily
> undone. Is this so? My doctor knows nothing about this. It says it at
> http://www.innatehealth.com/prostate.htm

You are a busy boy Salinas, how many other NG's are you spamming to get
people to your site?
See below from a cardiac NG.
Derek.

"Salinas" <spencer@email.com> wrote in message
news:91448639.0312300259.478e358a@posting.google.com...
> I have come across a website which claims that essential hypertension
> is caused by blockage of ducts within the skin:
> http://www.innatehealth.com/hypertension.htm
> There is no proof of this. Could it possibly be true? The only thing I
> can say from my experience is that the theory seems to fit the
> epidemiology. But no doubt many other theories do?
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.