Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / December 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How many PVPs does a doc have to do before he is proficient?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
David - 09 Dec 2003 06:15 GMT
My Uro who I really like has just taken the PVP course and will be
doing PVP as soon as the hospital buys the machine early next year. Is
there anything wrong with being his first or maybe 5th or 10th case?

He tells me that the skills he needs to do the PVP are the same as the
ones he has acquired from doing millions of TURP and from doing many
prostate ops witht the old style Neo yag lasers in the past. Therefore
he says that there is no loss to me in being one of the intial cases?

Is this right?

A good point is that he said he would fully support me if I wanted to
go to another doc who had done hundreds of PVP if I felt more
comfortable with that.

So should I go with my present uro? Who is the best PVP uro in
Southern California?

David
Derry Argue - 09 Dec 2003 08:12 GMT
> My Uro who I really like has just taken the PVP course and
> will be doing PVP as soon as the hospital buys the machine
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Is this right?

As I understand it, he is correct. There was a post earlier from  
a marketing specialist who suggested that Laserscope were
promoting their product in the wrong way as it is simply a new
tool to do an old job, not a completely new procedure. There is
natural resistance to something totally new. I think he is right
from what I've heard. The techniques are similar, the tools and
results very different.

Derry
MB - 09 Dec 2003 18:01 GMT
David:

I would not want to be anyone's first or even fifth case!

Just my opinion. It stands to reason that a surgeon gets better with
practice. Even with PVP, it would seem some minimal practice/experience
would be advisable.

Mel
> My Uro who I really like has just taken the PVP course and will be
> doing PVP as soon as the hospital buys the machine early next year. Is
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> David
Lee M. - 09 Dec 2003 22:16 GMT
The fact that Laserscope requires 10 PVP procedures to have been completed
prior to a name being posted on their website suggests the manufacturers of
the equipment think that's the number required to become really proficient.

> My Uro who I really like has just taken the PVP course and will be
> doing PVP as soon as the hospital buys the machine early next year. Is
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> David
Patrick - 10 Dec 2003 01:39 GMT
Lee,
I don't know where the 10 PVPs before being put on the laserscope website
came from.  I don't think this is the case. In the past it was 5 but given
that over 11,000 PVPs were done this year, I don't think this is the case
anymore.  Given that there are now over 400 doctors doing PVP, I think it is
a simple matter to find a competent one not too far from anywhere in the US.
Patrick

> The fact that Laserscope requires 10 PVP procedures to have been completed
> prior to a name being posted on their website suggests the manufacturers of
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> >
> > David
Lee M. - 10 Dec 2003 02:32 GMT
This is the email response I received on 8/13/03 when I asked the question:

Our policy states that a urologist has to perform 10 successful GreenLight
PVP procedures before posting his contact on our "Find-a-doctor-feature"  on
our website.

Thank you for your interest.

Martina Rueter
Marketing Manager - Surgical Products
Laserscope

> Lee,
> I don't know where the 10 PVPs before being put on the laserscope website
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> > >
> > > David
Patrick - 10 Dec 2003 03:08 GMT
Okay, Martina's is the authority on this.
btw, Martina is the person I first talked with 2 years ago when I first
heard of Laserscope.  At the time Laserscope was just starting to do the
multi-center trial.  She was great.  Answered all my questions.  Led me to
Dr. Te.

If you ever get a chance to talk with her, tell her a lot of guys all over
the world thank her for her efforts in helping them solve their BPH
problems.

Patrick

> This is the email response I received on 8/13/03 when I asked the question:
>
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> > > >
> > > > David
- 11 Dec 2003 18:00 GMT
dr. laub in s barbara

> My Uro who I really like has just taken the PVP course and will be
> doing PVP as soon as the hospital buys the machine early next year. Is
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> David
Frederic E Henzi - 11 Dec 2003 23:14 GMT
David,

When it comes to doctors working on our bodies, only the very best seems to
acceptable? But how are we to measure who is the best or has the most
experience?
If you are comfortable with your euro, in my humble opinion, this is good
enough. Chances are, that the guy who does it for the first time, will try
harder than the guy doing three PVP's a day. We have had a post about a
surgeon who scheduled an operation and went out of town. Another case, the
surgeon did not proceed with the surgery because there was not enough time
to complete a big prostate. The patient was already under sedation.
I would make sure that your Dr will actually do the operation and find out
how much time he has allocated.

Good luck

Fred Henzi

> My Uro who I really like has just taken the PVP course and will be
> doing PVP as soon as the hospital buys the machine early next year. Is
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> David
David DeBar - 12 Dec 2003 03:14 GMT
*Yes that was me!  I found another doctor and I'm functioning at 100% now.

I bleed more and suffered more pain from the inexperience doc who aborted
the operation then I did with experienced one who cured me.

Dave

> David,
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> enough. Chances are, that the guy who does it for the first time, will try
> harder than the guy doing three PVP's a day. We have had a post about a
*> surgeon who scheduled an operation and went out of town. Another case,
the
*> surgeon did not proceed with the surgery because there was not enough
time
*> to complete a big prostate. The patient was already under sedation.
> I would make sure that your Dr will actually do the operation and find out
> how much time he has allocated.
>
> Good luck
MB - 12 Dec 2003 03:23 GMT
Fred:

Sorry, pal, but I sure wouldn't want a surgeon operating on me for his first
time on the premise that he would "try harder."

Mel
> David,
>
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> >
> > David
Richard Hughes, M.D. - 12 Dec 2003 14:55 GMT
As I noted earlier, I've done about 30 PVPs. There's no question any
decent urologist can learn to do PVP well.  All of my patients have
been extremely satisfied.  I don't see any difference in the outcomes
of my last 5 versus my first 5.  There's no question, though, that the
more you do of anything the more comfortable you become.  I certainly
wouldn't have felt comfortable doing a huge prostate early on.  I do
feel confident, though, that my first few patients got an excellent
operation.  That's the great thing about PVP.  Compared to the old
TURP where visualization is often extremely difficult due to bleeding,
doing a PVP is essentially bloodless.  Though I must say when doing
larger prostates bleeding is more of a potential problem, but nothing
like the TURP.

Sincerely,

Richard Hughes, M.D.
MB - 12 Dec 2003 20:26 GMT
That's great, doc. It does appear that Laserscope makes it relatively "easy"
to do the surgery.
However, I guess I would stand by what I said. It just stands to reason that
the more experience one gets in anything, the more proficient one gets.
That's known to be true in surgery in general. All kinds of data suggest
that the doctor that does more surgeries (say heart surgery) and hospitals
that do more surgeries have better results (when normalized for the degree
of illness of the patients).

I guess what I'm interpreting here is that for laserscope the difference is
not that critical!

But, also, I have a question:  How many PVP's would a PVP surgeon be doing?
Would you say 1-2 per week or a lot more than that (or can you not
generalize)?

Mel

> As I noted earlier, I've done about 30 PVPs. There's no question any
> decent urologist can learn to do PVP well.  All of my patients have
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Richard Hughes, M.D.
Richard Hughes, M.D. - 13 Dec 2003 14:09 GMT
It all depends on a urologist's particular situation.  I've joined two
other urologists who have a busy practice.  Currently they're happy to
send PVP candidates to me; that way my practice will build up more
quickly.  In time, I'm sure they'll do PVPs.

Currently, the laser rental company comes out about 2x a month.  And
I'm doing roughly 3 a session.  I've only been in NC 4 months, and the
word of mouth is only just beginning.  I've also had a few patient's
find me on the laserscope website.  I see things for now getting
busier.  There are a lot of patients out there on flomax and proscar
who aren't happy about their symptoms, and the 200 dollar monthly
expense.

10 years ago urologists typically did 80+ TURPs a year, now the
average urologist does maybe 5.  I think I'll probably be doing 70-80
PVPS a year.  I tend to be conservative, though.  I've never been one
to talk patient's into procedures.

Sincerely,

Dr. Hughes
Frederic E Henzi - 14 Dec 2003 05:21 GMT
Dr Hughes,

Thanks for reading and posting. Getting an answer directly from a surgeon
ads real value to this NG. From the postings by the  "pioneers" I selected
PVP and had in done in May. I was number 12 and it didn't bother me. Someone
has to be the first patient. I believe that surgeons and other responsible
professionals are fully aware that people counted on them to do best they
can and when they are ready.

Fred Henzi
Derek F - 13 Dec 2003 20:21 GMT
> As I noted earlier, I've done about 30 PVPs. There's no question any
> decent urologist can learn to do PVP well.  All of my patients have
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>
> Richard Hughes, M.D.
Can you explain why a larger prostate is more inclined to bleed.
Derek.
Richard Hughes, M.D. - 17 Dec 2003 13:56 GMT
> Can you explain why a larger prostate is more inclined to bleed.
> Derek.

Larger prostates are much more vascular--meaning a greater number of
more prominent blood vessels. Also larger prostates tend to be more
friable--meaning if you touch the prostate with the scope it's more
likely to bleed. Your typical BPH patient's prostate will be 4 cm in
length--roughly a 50 gram prostate. Prostates larger than 100 grams
will be over 6cm in length. When a larger prostate bleeds during a
case it's more difficult to control the bleeding because it's harder
to find the bleeding vessel.

Dr. Hughes
David DeBar - 12 Dec 2003 03:01 GMT
There is not a black and white answer to your question.  If you have
relatively small prostate and there are no complications a Uro with minimum
experience will probably not have any problems.  That said, I must tell you
that the first Uro I went to had been doing the procedure for two years and
wrote a book on the PVP procedure.  He aborted the operation because my
prostate was bigger then he expected and was bleeding too much.  I traveled
from Virginia to Florida where a much more experienced doctor (Dr. Lyn) did
the procedure with 100% success.

I am reminded of a conversation where I overheard a salesman recommending
which motorcycle helmet a customer should buy. He asked do you have a $20
head or do you have $250 head?
To me it was well worth the expense and trouble to find the most experienced
doctor I could.

Dave

P.S.  I was very tempted to lean over to that salesman a say "He obviously
has a $20 head or he would not be riding a motorcycle."  No flames please, I
have enjoyed riding a motorcycle with and without a helmet.
David DeBar - 13 Dec 2003 17:29 GMT
Dr. Nseyo who teaches urology and the PVP procedure at the Veterans hospital
in Richmond Virginia was the first doctor who attempted the operation.  This
guy sells a book on the Internet for student doctors to learn how to perform
PVP.  I thought that made him a world class expert and maybe he is.  I was
conscious during the all of the first operation.  I became concerned when a
troubled sounding voice from the small crowd of people between my legs said.
"It's not long enough." I wondered what they were talking about, my penis or
the fiber cable!?!?
Dr. Nseyo appeared near my head and explained that my prostate is much
bigger then they expected and I bleed profusely every time it's touched.
This means that the operation would take more time then they have scheduled
for me and they have others waiting to have the operation done this same
day.  He went on to suggest that I consider having an open prostectomy
where the would cut me open from navel to pelvis, reach in and peal it open
like the skin of an orange.  He would then remove the tissue from within the
prostate, sew the outer skin back together. I would be fitted with a tap
under my navel to from which to urinate until the prostate skin healed and
then come back to have it reattached.

Even under the influence of the happy drugs I was on, this seemed like a bad
idea to me.  I told him to let me off the table, I will continue to treat it
with drugs rather then have such an invasive operation.  He then suggested
that I take Proscar for a period of time to shrink the gland, come back and
he will "stage" the operation doing a little at a time and sending me home
with a catheter still in me.

When I got home I contacted Dr. Lin in Florida who I learned about from this
news group.  I had Dr. Lin and Dr. Nsyeo talk to each other on the phone so
Dr. Lin could understand the problem.

Dr Lin had me have a CAT scan done of the area and the results sent to him.
He then called me back and told me that he thinks he can do the surgery.  We
scheduled it for the end of July 2003.

When I first visited Dr. Lin he did a digital examination and when I turned
around I saw that he was all smiles.  He was now confident that the
operation would be a success and he would not need to stage me.   The next
day I went in for the surgery.  I was conscious for the early parts of the
operation.  I could see clouds of blood bellowing out when the prostate was
hit by the laser.  I watched as Lin slowed and attempted to stop the flow of
blood.  It seemed that the operation speeded up, I could see large chunks of
tissue being removed and blood was obscuring the view most of the time.  I
could see that the LASER probe was being pumped back and forth.  Most of
the time it was obscured from view by blood but some times it would poke
thru and be visible. I lost consciousness.

When I recovered consciousness Dr. Lin came to me and told me that the
operation was a complete success he cleaned almost all of the tissue in the
gland.  He was beaming with pride.  He explained to me that he now
understands why Nseyo had a problem with me. He explained that inexperienced
doctors depend on being able to see what they are doing.  In my case,
because I bleed so much, it would have taken forever because he would need
to cut a little, stop cutting and stop the bleeding, clear the view and
start cutting again.  Because he has so much experience and has done so many
of these operations, he can do it by "feel" and does not need to see what is
going on at all times.

I'm grateful that Dr. Nseyo was man enough to recognize that the operation
was beyond his skill and also grateful that I found Dr. Lin.  Dr. Lin and I
now consider each other as friends.

I had retro-ejaculation for about four months.  That has recently cured it's
self and I'm now operating at 100%.

I'm sorry if I went on for too long but I think that there a lesson to learn
from my story.

Dave
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.