>Is it possible to have nodules with BPH ? Or does the presence of a
>nodule automatically mean cancer ?
Nodule and cancer (and for that matter BPH) have nothing to do with
each other. Usually one would not refer to a tumor (which could be
malignant (cancerous) or non-malignant (benign)) as being a "nodule".
Have a look up the numerous medical dictionaries on line.
Jim - 23 Jul 2009 19:27 GMT
>>Is it possible to have nodules with BPH ? Or does the presence of a
>>nodule automatically mean cancer ?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>malignant (cancerous) or non-malignant (benign)) as being a "nodule".
>Have a look up the numerous medical dictionaries on line.
Thanks, unknown. I've been checked every year for the past 6 years
and this is the first nodule detected. I suppose I can hope. For a
little while, anyway.
>Is it possible to have nodules with BPH ? Or does the presence of a
>nodule automatically mean cancer ?
I don't know about "automatically", but if I were you, I would have a
biopsy done promptly if your uro recommends that.
Ed
Jim - 23 Jul 2009 19:27 GMT
>>Is it possible to have nodules with BPH ? Or does the presence of a
>>nodule automatically mean cancer ?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Ed
Thanks Ed. I've had BPH for five years, now this. Got the good
news during my annual physical. Have appointment with uro for next
week.