Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / March 2009

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

vodart And psa Test ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Robert11 - 24 Mar 2009 12:56 GMT
Hello,

Am in my 70's now, so please bear with me a bit.

Am on Avodart, and confused over its effect on the psa test that I have
periodically.

It seems that it is either:

(a)  Avodart actually effects the prostate in such a good way in that it
also lowers the
psa.  So, the psa reading is "meaningful".

(b)  it "artificially" lowers the psa reading, and hence the reading is
essentially meaningless.
It is only meaningful in that it establishes a (new) baseline, and changes
from this new baseline, if increases, are significant.

My understanding is that it is (b) that is correct.
True ?

If so, do most Physicians just go from the new baseline, or do most tend to
switch to another (more stable) psa test ?
If so, which one ?

Any info. on all of this would be most appreciated.

Thanks,
B.
Roy Starrin - 24 Mar 2009 14:04 GMT
>Am on Avodart, and confused over its effect on the psa test that I have
>periodically.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>My understanding is that it is (b) that is correct.
>True ?
I am not a doctor, but I do have prostate cancer.
My understanding is that Avodart cuts the PSA in half, and that if
your doctor knows this, then he allows for it.  Certainly change is
the big issue, but not necessarily.  Certain more aggressive cancers
tend to generate little PSA, hence producing misleading results.
Don't know where you are coming from, but you might want to go to the
library and get (or buy from Amazon) A PRIMER ON PROSTATE CANCER (2nd
edition) by Strum and Pogliano.  It will tell you more than you
probably want to know.
There are plenty of online groups, forums, etc.  If you want more
info, email me

Age 74, Dx 12/10/08, bPSA 1.0 (on Avodart)
TRUSP:  23 grams
CS: T2b
Dx: Adenocarcinoma
GS:  Initial 8 (4+4), 2nd Opinion 9 (5+4) Bostwick lab
Bone Scan & CS 01/09 - Both negative for metastatic disease
"Too old for surgery" - Consulting surgical oncologist - 01/09
ADT3 begun 02/09 (Elegard/Casodex/Avodart)
IMRT to begin 04/09
Willie The Wimp - 24 Mar 2009 21:17 GMT
> I am not a doctor, but I do have prostate cancer.
>My understanding is that Avodart cuts the PSA in half, and that if
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>There are plenty of online groups, forums, etc.  If you want more
>info, email me

You are speaking of "total psa"?

So, if you are on Avodart long-term and get a "total psa" reading
of, say, 3, it should be crudely equivalent to a non-Avodart
patient with a reading of 6?

What about "free psa"?

 Willie
DerekF - 25 Mar 2009 00:13 GMT
>> I am not a doctor, but I do have prostate cancer.
>>My understanding is that Avodart cuts the PSA in half, and that if
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
>  Willie
Saw Palmetto also reduces PSA readings.
Derek.
Roy Starrin - 25 Mar 2009 13:17 GMT
>> I am not a doctor, but I do have prostate cancer.
>>My understanding is that Avodart cuts the PSA in half, and that if
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>of, say, 3, it should be crudely equivalent to a non-Avodart
>patient with a reading of 6?

That is my understanding.

>What about "free psa"?

I don't know.  Guess you could Google:   "free psa" Avodart
and see what turns up

  starrin

Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.