Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Why 18 cores instead of 12?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
piker - 02 Apr 2008 13:25 GMT
Why 18 cores instead of 12?

Hi all,

Im going in for a prostate biopsy in 2 weeks or so.
The Urologist says he wants to do 18 sticks. Most people
I have spoken with have never had more that 12.

So far as I know, there is nothing special about my
presentation: 55 yo male, enlarged prostate X 15 years
PSA rose from 2.4 in 2001 to 5.25 in 2008, no symptoms,
no nodules or tumors on DRE.

Why the extra cores?

The doctor sort of made a half joke that as long as he's
in there, there's no difference between 1 stick or 18.
GMAFB. I'm a paramedic and I know very well what the
difference is. I'm not happy with that kind of answer.

He also put me on Avodart for a month before the procedure.
Anybody ever heard of that?

1)  Are there any extra complications from the extra sticks?

2)  Are there any studies showing more cancer is found from
   18 sticks as opposed to 12?

TIA
Don - 04 Apr 2008 02:25 GMT
Hi piker,

I suspect that the reason for the additional "sticks" is because your
prostate is enlarged, and more samples would have a better chance of
finding cancer than 6, 8, or 12 samples.

My PSA crossed just above 4 about 10 yrs ago, has been bouncing around
between 4.5 and 6 since then, and I have resisted a biopsy because I
have no other symptoms. I have gone to 2 different specialists in the
last 5 yrs to have a color-doppler ultrasound of the prostate. Both
Doctors do not biopsy unless they see something suspicious. In my case
neither Doctor found any suspicious areas. I watched the procedure on
a color monitor, and it is sensitive enough that you can actually see
the blood pulsing through the veins.

My big hangup about the biopsy is that if nothing is found, you really
don't have a negative diagnosis, and will probably face additional
biopsies in the future.

I suppose the biggest complication from the biopsy, other than the
discomfort, is the chance of infection from puncturing the intestine.

Don
piker - 05 Apr 2008 11:52 GMT
Hi Don,

Thanks for replying.

My PSA has been slowly but steadily rising over the past 15 or 20 years.
No other signs or symptoms, though.

I wasn't real keen on a biopsy either. I'm with you in that I think
it's probably unneccessary until there is some specific reason,
+DRE, Ultrasound, etc.  I think doctors tend to biopsy almost
routinely now. Read recently that last year there were 1.6 MILLION
biopsies performed last year. Were they all really necessary??
Doubtful.But they wore me down, so I'm doing it.

My main worry about the number of sticks is post surgical complications.
All procedures carry that risk despite how the doctors downplay it.

BTW, I like the approach your doctors take to the issue, are your
doctors in the Atlanta area by any chance?

In article
<1208fba2-ea24-4ffb-9fa6-b19337b4c467@u36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
PRIJPAUDZGGS@spammotel.com says...

>Hi piker,
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>Don
Don - 06 Apr 2008 17:34 GMT
> BTW, I like the approach your doctors take to the issue, are your
> doctors in the Atlanta area by any chance?

Piker,

No, the Doctors that I went to were Dr. Fred Lee of Rochester Urology
in the Detroit area and Dr Duke Bahn of the Prostate Institute of
America in Ventura, CA (saw Dr Bahn last August).

Here is a link to other Drs. who have the color doppler equipment:
http://www.alternative-health-group.org/power-color-doppler.html

And here is a link to an article by Dr Bahn that explains the
procedure and equipment:
http://www.prostate-cancer.org/education/staging/Bahn_ColorDopplerUltrasound.html
FYI

Don
Jesse - 06 Apr 2008 21:49 GMT
> Why 18 cores instead of 12?
>
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> TIA

Yes, with a high PSA, you
are guilty til proved innocent, and they won't give you a PVP til you
are exonerated. This is fairly absurd since they don't believe PSA can
distinguish between cancer and BPH. (though free PSA will do better).
Color Doppler Ultrasound is a good idea, tho it won't detect the
smallest cancers. Dr. Fred Lee in Rochester Mich is the great expert
in this. Does anybody know of somebody who does this as a way of
testing for prostate cancer, somebody in New York City? A further
ilogic in this medical circus is that if you have an enlarged
prostate, the biopsy (now escalating to "saturation," upwards of 72
sticks), will further inflame yr prostate and shut you down, requiring
cateterization.

Jesse
Don - 24 Apr 2008 23:43 GMT
> Does anybody know of somebody who does this as a way of
> testing for prostate cancer, somebody in New York City? A further
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Jesse

Jesse,

I just noticed your question about a Dr. in the New York area. In the
link I provided: http://www.alternative-health-group.org/power-color-doppler.html
I see that Dr. Bard is located in New York, NY. His web site is:
http://www.cancerscan.com/

Hope this is what you were asking about.

Don
Don - 01 May 2008 16:55 GMT
> Why 18 cores instead of 12?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> The Urologist says he wants to do 18 sticks. Most people
> I have spoken with have never had more that 12.

Hi Piker,

Can you share with us how the biopsy went?

Don
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.