 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / May 2007A note to Pete
Your post of 5/22/07 chastising me with your vulgar and uncalled for language and attitude do not belong in a group that mainly is composed of intelligent and caring people. The use of vulgarity is used mainly because the individual has a limited vocabulary. To put the matter into its proper prospective I will tell you the whole story. I underwent baroscopic surgery for a double hernia on 3/14/07 and was discharged on 3/15/07. I had pain problems and was given oxecodine the first day home, then Demerol the next day and dilaudid the 3rd day. By that time I was floating in air and did not realize that I was not urinating. I have an enlarged prostate that has been under control for many years with the use of Pros and Hytrin. On 3/27/07 in spite of the narcotics I was aware of my inability to urinate. I told my wife to call 911 and get me to the hospital or I would die. In the ER I was diagnosed as acute renal failure and when I was catherized they removed 5 liters of urine, some of which had spilled into the kidneys. Fortunately I recovered and was discharged on 3/30/07 with the catheter still in as I could not urinate. A urodynamics test was done and again I failed to urinate. A cystoscope was done which showed that the prostate was blocking the bladder outlet and the TURP was done on 5/9/07. I was discharged on 5/11/07 with the foley as I could not urinate. The foley was removed on 5/21 and I am presently able to urinate. It is not spontaneous but has to be forced out. Pete, I hope this satisfies you. I did reply but made the mistake of not using the reply to group. > Your post of 5/22/07 chastising me with your vulgar and uncalled for > language and attitude do not belong in a group that mainly is [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > Pete, I hope this satisfies you. I did reply but made the mistake of > not using the reply to group. Norm...you do not know how to communicate in a newsgroup. I will let it go at that. I wrote you several posts in response to several of your posts (and they were all diplomatic and friendly and I was trying to help you). And you didn't respond to me or anyone else for that matter (you blurt sh.t out and people respond, and no answer, or thanks, or acknowledgment - that is rude at best). I for one, will never respond to you again, but I do sympathize with all your problems. FOR THE RECORD I DID RESPOND BUT IT WAS NOT TO THE GROUP. I DO NOT NEED YOUR SYMPATHY I NEED YOUR UNDERSTANDING. >> Your post of 5/22/07 chastising me with your vulgar and uncalled for >> language and attitude do not belong in a group that mainly is [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > I for one, will never respond to you again, but I do sympathize with all > your problems. > FOR THE RECORD I DID RESPOND BUT IT WAS NOT TO THE GROUP. I DO NOT NEED YOUR > [quoted text clipped - 35 lines] > > I for one, will never respond to you again, but I do sympathize with all > > your problems. Don't beg, Norm. Having read Pete's posts you're not missing anything. >> FOR THE RECORD I DID RESPOND BUT IT WAS NOT TO THE GROUP. I DO NOT >> NEED YOUR SYMPATHY I NEED YOUR UNDERSTANDING."Pete" [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > Don't beg, Norm. Having read Pete's posts you're not missing > anything. f.ck you a.shole. I wrote friendly and informative info to dip sh.t Norm. He still didn't tell anyone about his f.cking headaches that I told him were caused by the spinal. I constantly asked him to keep us informed and he did not because he said he sent them to "reply to sender". So the next question is why the hell didn't he resend them all "to the group" (he just sent one response back after I chastised him for not responding, and it was out of place at that- if you check the threads). I'm back out of here for good this time - unless I catch someone making a totally ignorant wrong statement. This group is now dead as sh.t, and totally redundant anyway. Dr. Sancha was the best thing that ever happened to this group and I praised him constantly. It is now a dying group. a.sholes like you and Norm are counter productive. I believe Norm is having someone write his posts now. If you are smart enough you can pick up on it (ie first he said he was sorry, and then he bounced back and started attacking me). And the stupid bastard doesn't even know it is improper ettiquette to top post in a newsgroup, and I am sure he doesn't even know what that means. Read all my posts in which I responded to him initially, and you will see I did nothing but try to help the man, in a sincere and friendly manner. He should have replied to all after he realized he replied wrong but he probably doesn't even know he could have retrieved his responses from his "sent" folder. Audios a.sholes. >>> FOR THE RECORD I DID RESPOND BUT IT WAS NOT TO THE GROUP. I DO NOT >>> NEED YOUR SYMPATHY I NEED YOUR UNDERSTANDING."Pete" [quoted text clipped - 70 lines] > >Audios a.sholes. I didn't know about the top post/bottom post ettiquette thing...Thanks!! I hope this note goes to the right spot....Corky > I didn't know about the top post/bottom post ettiquette > thing...Thanks!! > > I hope this note goes to the right spot....Corky Corky...That was correct. It makes good sense to bottom post since you are usually responding to the person who last wrote, and therefore his message is right above you and the thread is easier to track (if you top post, you have to scroll all the way to the bottom to see what the last person wrote, and keep scrolling back and forth, and it is unwieldy. Many newsgroups will blast the hell out of you for top posting. Then there is middle posting, where you comment on various parts of a long message (and you can get blasted for that also, but it is more acceptable since it lends itself to answering a persons comments piece by piece). Middle posting is used quite often, but bottom posting is the most prevalent, I would say. You will also note that I "snipped" all the previous conversations off since there was no reason to keep making the thread longer (more bytes, unnecessary scrolling, etc). Many newsgroups will get on you for not snipping also. The Mozilla newsgroups (Firefox, Thunderbird, etc) are very strict about these kinds of things, especially the top posting (they will jump on you in a heartbeat - lol). Hope this helps. Take care...Pete >> I didn't know about the top post/bottom post ettiquette >> thing...Thanks!! [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > >Hope this helps. Take care...Pete Thanks Pete...Learn something every day. I use Free Agent Newsreader, and I thought that there would have been an option so one could automatically set the reply to the bottom. No such luck, at least not on the free version. I just have to remmeber now to scroll all the way down before typing in my responce. Corky >>> I didn't know about the top post/bottom post ettiquette >>> thing...Thanks!! [quoted text clipped - 29 lines] > on the free version. I just have to remmeber now to scroll all the way > down before typing in my responce. Corky There you go. I have been doing it for years. And don't forget Corky, middle posting can be very useful also, where appropriate :-):-) . Pete, I suspect the reason this group is dead is largely down to you being a small minded anally retentive twat. Having read your posts and noticed your predilection towards grammar nazism, your pickiness over posting and your generally shoddy attitude I can only say "good riddance" to a particularly small minded and thoroughly unpleasant individual. It would have been more useful to perhaps educate Norm by private e- mail on how to post correctly instead of publicly berating him but then that would deny you your public grandstanding, wouldn't it? This board isn't your personal fiefdom and the sooner you realise that the better it will be. In the meantime I will hold you to your word over vacating this NG although somehow I doubt you actually will. > Pete, I suspect the reason this group is dead is largely down to you > being a small minded anally retentive twat. Having read your posts [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > the better it will be. In the meantime I will hold you to your word > over vacating this NG although somehow I doubt you actually will. Like I said...f.ck you a.shole. Or did you miss it the first time. So you're not leaving then? LOL! > So you're not leaving then? > > LOL! f.cking a.shole. > > So you're not leaving then? > > > LOL! > > f.cking a.shole. Well done! You've mastered swearing on the internet. Have a cookie! What next? Are you going to go CAPS on my a.s? Seriously, do us all a favour and just crawl back under your rock. > Well done! You've mastered swearing on the internet. Have a cookie! > > What next? Are you going to go CAPS on my a.s? > > Seriously, do us all a favour and just crawl back under your rock. f.cking a.shole. >Your post of 5/22/07 chastising me with your vulgar and uncalled for >language and attitude do not belong in a group that mainly is composed of [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] >removed on 5/21 and I am presently able to urinate. It is not spontaneous >but has to be forced out. As often, this thread has warped into a hi-jacked sh.t-fight! Kegel exercises are to strengthen the pelvic floor muscles to assist regain continence. Women use them post childbirth. However, Tantric Sex uses them to prolong orgasms. Research on Google. Take your pick LOL -Please reply to group as my email addr is fake! -Regards CC |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.