>I would support what Jim and Mr B said in the previous posts. My 73 yr
>old brother put his intervention off until his prostate was over 100
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>about finding a surgeon experienced in PVP with large prostates is
>certainly good advice.
Couple of comments below...
>>I would support what Jim and Mr B said in the previous posts. My 73 yr
>>old brother put his intervention off until his prostate was over 100
>>grams and his URO did an open prostatectomy.
His URo refused to do a TURP on him. Since he had mess in his groin
area from a hernia repair, they were reluctant to do a TUMT on him.
The URO opened the
>>prostate to peel out the insides. The prostate was left in place. My
>>brother had a very difficult recovery from that operation.
The biggest problem he had was that they tried an epidural for pain
control, but it did not work and they had great problems for about a
week after the surgery getting the pain under control. He was miserable
during that week!!
The advice
>>about finding a surgeon experienced in PVP with large prostates is
>>certainly good advice.
I urged him to go see Dr Te, but he did not want to do that.
> How is your brother now? Is there any chance the pain was worth the
> gain?
Brother is doing great now. His surgery was Feb 9, 2006. He is very
satisfied with the outcome. The pain was worth the gain.
> Was the whole prostate removed or only part? Does he have incontinence
> or other unpleasant effects from the prostatectomy?
The capsule of the prostate was left in place. Only the bph tissue
inside the capsule was removed. He had a little leakage during the
first weeks post surgery, but has no long term incontinence. He has not
mentioned whether he has retro or not. I assume that he has not suffered
impotence from the surgery, but I can not verify that information.
> Since he no longer has a prostate, he will never need to consider TURP
> or PVP or BPH meds again. Could that be considered a plus?
Not true! His hollowed out prostate is still there. Only some of the
inside bph tissue was removed. The long term outcome remains to be
seen. Time will tell if he needs further intervention. For now, things
are great for him.
> Ed
Ed - 22 Apr 2007 03:53 GMT
>Couple of comments below...
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>seen. Time will tell if he needs further intervention. For now, things
>are great for him.
So it was a TURP without the TU. Resection of the prostate by open
operation. That surprises me... while they were there, why not remove
the whole thing (except the capsule)?
Anyway, good for your brother.
I have a big prostate (measured at 150 g, may be slightly smaller now
after 2 years on Proscar). The symptoms are sort of under control with
meds. So the uro is not pushing open or TURP but sometimes I think
about PVP. I'm in Canada and nobody here does big prostates. so it
might be Dr. Te... or I think there's a uro in Santa Barbara who does
big prostates too... or Dr. Sancha in Madrid. This would be big money
for me, because I think I would have to pay for the whole thing
myself.
So I appreciate info on alternatives such as open. Thanks.
Ed