Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / April 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PVP vs Turp

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Norm - 20 Apr 2007 22:42 GMT
I had  double laproscopic hernia surgery and was on strong meds for pain. I
was out of it and did not realize that I was unable to urinate for a few
days and was taken to the emergency room where they catherized me and took
out 5 liters of urine in a few hours. The diagnosis was acute renal failure.

My Uro did a cystoscope today and said that my prostate is enlarged(5.9 x
5.0 cm) He recommended Turp rather than PVP due to the size of the prostate
and also because he says it may take 4 weeks to determine if the PVP has
worked.

Any comments would be appreciated.
fwh1@westchestergov.com - 20 Apr 2007 23:07 GMT
He may or may not be right. He is probably recommending the TURP
because that is what most uros do. He is familiar with it. Get a
second opinion from a uro that does offer PVP. He is apt to offer a
more informed opinion. I can't believe the line about having to wait 4
weeks to see if PVP has worked.

If you brought your car into a mechanic who needed a certain piece of
equipment to treat the problem, he might tell you that that equipment
is unreliable and offer another solution. Dr's aren't any different.

Also- Dr's sometimes sometimes have a financial incentive to offer one
treatment rather than another. If the Dr. owns or leases the equipment
for PVP, he has monthly payments and he wants to use the equipment.
The equipment for a TURP is in every hospital.

A doctor once told me that you should select the doctor and not the
tool.

Fred
Jim W. - 21 Apr 2007 22:07 GMT
I have a friend whose prostate was so large his uro wanted to do an open
prostate removal and he got a similar second opinion.  I begged him to see
Dr. Te in NYC who had done my PVP and is known to be able to deal with very
large prostates.  Bottom line -  Dr. Te did a PVP on my friend to his
delight and relief.  Get a second opinion from a PVP uro as the previous
poster recommended. Jim W.

>I had  double laproscopic hernia surgery and was on strong meds for pain. I
>was out of it and did not realize that I was unable to urinate for a few
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
Mr. B - 21 Apr 2007 22:30 GMT
Absolutely.  Please, please follow Jim's advice.  My PVP was the BEST thing
I've ever done for myself.

In situations with very large prostates (over 100 gms), some doctors will do
the PVP 'outright', while others may choose to try Proscar or Avodart to
shrink the prostate to a more 'manageable' size prior to surgery.  In any
event do not let the size of your prostate deter you from exploring PVP with
a top flight surgeion like Dr. Te.

Mr. B
>I have a friend whose prostate was so large his uro wanted to do an open
>prostate removal and he got a similar second opinion.  I begged him to see
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>>
>> Any comments would be appreciated.
Traveling Man - 30 Apr 2007 15:24 GMT
> I have a friend whose prostate was so large his uro wanted to do an open
> prostate removal and he got a similar second opinion.  I begged him to see
> Dr. Te in NYC who had done my PVP and is known to be able to deal with very
> large prostates.  Bottom line -  Dr. Te did a PVP on my friend to his
> delight and relief.  Get a second opinion from a PVP uro as the previous
> poster recommended. Jim W.

Can you post Dr. Te's phone number?  I'm concerned with the ability of my
local PVP urologist as I have a large (100g+) prostate.

TIA
Chockman - 30 Apr 2007 15:30 GMT
Dr Alexis E Te at 212-746-4811    http:www.cornellurology.com

>>I have a friend whose prostate was so large his uro wanted to do an open
>>prostate removal and he got a similar second opinion.  I begged him to see
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> TIA
Chockman - 30 Apr 2007 15:31 GMT
Dr Alexis E Te at 212-746-4811    http:www.cornellurology.com

>>I have a friend whose prostate was so large his uro wanted to do an open
>>prostate removal and he got a similar second opinion.  I begged him to see
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> TIA
Traveling Man - 30 Apr 2007 15:51 GMT
> Dr Alexis E Te at 212-746-4811    http:www.cornellurology.com
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>> TIA

Thanks!   I appreciate it!
Chockman - 22 Apr 2007 00:07 GMT
I would support what Jim and Mr B said in the previous posts.  My 73 yr
old brother put his intervention off until his prostate was over 100
grams and his URO did an open prostatectomy.  The URO opened the
prostate to peel out the insides.  The prostate was left in place.  My
brother had a very difficult recovery from that operation.  The advice
about finding a surgeon experienced in PVP with large prostates is
certainly good advice.

> I had  double laproscopic hernia surgery and was on strong meds for pain. I
> was out of it and did not realize that I was unable to urinate for a few
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Any comments would be appreciated.
Ed - 22 Apr 2007 00:35 GMT
>I would support what Jim and Mr B said in the previous posts.  My 73 yr
>old brother put his intervention off until his prostate was over 100
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>about finding a surgeon experienced in PVP with large prostates is
>certainly good advice.

How is your brother now? Is there any chance the pain was worth the
gain?

Was the whole prostate removed or only part? Does he have incontinence
or other unpleasant effects from the prostatectomy?

Since he no longer has a prostate, he will never need to consider TURP
or PVP or BPH meds again. Could that be considered a plus?

Ed
Chockman - 22 Apr 2007 00:56 GMT
Couple of comments below...

>>I would support what Jim and Mr B said in the previous posts.  My 73 yr
>>old brother put his intervention off until his prostate was over 100
>>grams and his URO did an open prostatectomy.
His URo refused to do a TURP on him.  Since he had mess in his groin
area from a hernia repair, they were reluctant to do a TUMT on him.
 The URO opened the
>>prostate to peel out the insides.  The prostate was left in place.  My
>>brother had a very difficult recovery from that operation.

The biggest problem he had was that they tried an epidural for pain
control, but it did not work and they had great problems for about a
week after the surgery getting the pain under control.  He was miserable
during that week!!
  The advice
>>about finding a surgeon experienced in PVP with large prostates is
>>certainly good advice.
 I urged him to go see Dr Te, but he did not want to do that.

> How is your brother now? Is there any chance the pain was worth the
> gain?

Brother is doing great now.  His surgery was Feb 9, 2006.  He is very
satisfied with the outcome.  The pain was worth the gain.

> Was the whole prostate removed or only part? Does he have incontinence
> or other unpleasant effects from the prostatectomy?
The capsule of the prostate was left in place.  Only the bph tissue
inside the capsule was removed.  He had a little leakage during the
first weeks post surgery, but has no long term incontinence.  He has not
mentioned whether he has retro or not. I assume that he has not suffered
impotence from the surgery, but I can not verify that information.

> Since he no longer has a prostate, he will never need to consider TURP
> or PVP or BPH meds again. Could that be considered a plus?
Not true!  His hollowed out prostate is still there.  Only some of the
inside bph tissue was removed.    The long term outcome remains to be
seen.  Time will tell if he needs further intervention. For now, things
are great for him.

> Ed
Ed - 22 Apr 2007 03:53 GMT
>Couple of comments below...
>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>seen.  Time will tell if he needs further intervention. For now, things
>are great for him.

So it was a TURP without the TU. Resection of the prostate by open
operation. That surprises me... while they were there, why not remove
the whole thing (except the capsule)?

Anyway, good for your brother.

I have a big prostate (measured at 150 g, may be slightly smaller now
after 2 years on Proscar). The symptoms are sort of under control with
meds. So the uro is not pushing open or TURP but sometimes I think
about PVP. I'm in Canada and nobody here does big prostates. so it
might be Dr. Te... or I think there's a uro in Santa Barbara who does
big prostates too... or Dr. Sancha in Madrid. This would be big money
for me, because I think I would have to pay for the whole thing
myself.

So I appreciate info on alternatives such as open. Thanks.

Ed
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.