Sounds like sometimes one gets the rosy picture and sometimes one gets
up to 12 months recovery or even a redo. I guess my main question is
whether the potential problems of PVP a
Right now..my Dad has been on a catheter for 1.5 yrs but has bladder
function. He is weak from recurring bouts and hospital stays regarding
uriniary tract infection and complications that ensue. Infection from
this arrangement is his biggest threat right now. The nursing home is
talking "hospice". His normal uro suggests TURP over microwave. He does
not do PVP or microwave..just TURP.
But it seems like PVP has the best chance of getting him off the
catheter quickly and more safely.
We have an appointment/consult scheduled with another Uro who has done
around 150 PVPs in the last 2-3 years. I would hope he would have some
sense as to how things go. No pun intended.
Insights..keep 'em coming.
Derek F - 15 Jun 2006 17:28 GMT
My UK uro told me that they did a PVP on a man in poor health who was in his
90's with a 100 gr+ prostate.
He said that PVP is such a "gentle procedure" that it was quite suitable for
him when he would not have been able endure a TURP procedure.
Derek.
> Sounds like sometimes one gets the rosy picture and sometimes one gets
> up to 12 months recovery or even a redo. I guess my main question is
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> sense as to how things go. No pun intended.
> Insights..keep 'em coming.
redbeard419@msn.com - 15 Jun 2006 18:31 GMT
Be aware that contrary to what you sometimes hear that TURP and
Greenlight/PVP are essentially the same operation with a different
tool. The TURP cuts with a hot wire which does not coagulate as well as
the laser used in the PVP. The TURP recovery is longer and more bloody
than the PVP. I don't think that it makes any difference if the tissue
is vaporized or cut away. These are just the properties of the tool
that is used.
I do not totally believe the story of the 90 year old since anesthesia
is probably more dangerous than either surgery. I may be a little
biased. I had holmium laser surgery about 5 years ago with a remarkably
uneventful recovery.
A uro one told me that you should pick the surgeon rather than the
tool. I think that laser surgery is easier and I picked the tool rather
than the surgeon.
Fred
Rich256 - 15 Jun 2006 18:32 GMT
> Sounds like sometimes one gets the rosy picture and sometimes one gets
> up to 12 months recovery or even a redo. I guess my main question is
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> sense as to how things go. No pun intended.
> Insights..keep 'em coming.
Keep us informed of the results!!
Pete - 15 Jun 2006 18:44 GMT
> Sounds like sometimes one gets the rosy picture and sometimes one gets
> up to 12 months recovery or even a redo. I guess my main question is
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> sense as to how things go. No pun intended.
> Insights..keep 'em coming.
Dad's kid...I have not had PVP, but have TUIP and TURP. I would definitely
vote PVP if I were to have another procedure, but the problem is they don't
do it where I live, and traveling is a problem (getting someone to take me,
etc).
If you like the new uro that has done a 150 PVP's (which is a plus), I would
go for it.
Good luck and best wishes and keep us informed if you can :-) ...Pete
Temujin - 15 Jun 2006 20:11 GMT
If your Dad's regular uro does TURP but doesn't do PVP, then of course
he is going to recommend the procedure that he does. I wouldn't trust
his word on this without a second opinion. The guy who has done lots
of PVPs probably also does TURP and is more likely to give an unbiased
opinion. Scan some old posts on this group, and you won't find much
good to say about the "gold standard" TURP. It may be effective but
it's yesterday's technique.