Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Denver PVP

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rich256 - 20 Apr 2006 16:26 GMT
I had Targis TUMT over a year ago.  Results were marginal.
Flomax and Uroxatral doesn’t agree with me.

Yesterday I went in to see my URO, Jim Fagelson.  Since I have some
plans for the summer I thought about trying PVP this fall.  He took a
look inside and suggested PVP.  He suggested going ahead now.  So, I am
now waiting to get a schedule.  Most likely within the next two or three
weeks.

One advantage of having the TUMT first is that he has had another year
of experience with PVP.  I think now has performed maybe a couple hundred.

They gave me the option of Swedish, Sky Ridge and Englwood hospitals.
All three apparently have the laserscope machines.
Ed - 20 Apr 2006 19:50 GMT
>I had Targis TUMT over a year ago.  Results were marginal.
>Flomax and Uroxatral doesn’t agree with me.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>They gave me the option of Swedish, Sky Ridge and Englwood hospitals.
>All three apparently have the laserscope machines.

Good luck. Please let us know the outcome.

Ed
Pete - 21 Apr 2006 01:14 GMT
> I had Targis TUMT over a year ago.  Results were marginal.
> Flomax and Uroxatral doesn’t agree with me.
>
> Yesterday I went in to see my URO, Jim Fagelson.  Since I have some
> plans for the summer I thought about trying PVP this fall.  He took a
> look inside and suggested PVP.

Hi Rich...You guys must go to different doctors than I do.  Are you saying
you went to see your uro (for a discussion type visit, which could also
include some minor testing), and he ended up doing a cystoscopy on you
without prescheduling it first.  I  don't understand that, and  have never
experienced anything like that, especially since it takes a little more time
and is a "procedure" (even though no anesthesia was required obviously), and
the tech or nurse has to prep you (local anesthesia etc) and get the scope
ready, da da da da.  There is no way can I just walk into my uro's office
and get a cysto unless it was prescheduled in advance.

Please explain...Pete

He suggested going ahead now.  So, I
> am now waiting to get a schedule.  Most likely within the next two or
> three weeks.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> They gave me the option of Swedish, Sky Ridge and Englwood hospitals.
> All three apparently have the laserscope machines.
Rich256 - 21 Apr 2006 03:48 GMT
> Hi Rich...You guys must go to different doctors than I do.  Are you saying
> you went to see your uro (for a discussion type visit, which could also
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Please explain...Pete

http://www.uradenver.com/

I was in to see him a month ago.  And for every visit he has me come
with a full bladder.  His nurse has me pee in a bucket (flow test) and
does an ultrasound before I talk to him.  He suggested trying the
medication first.  That Uroxatral just didn't agree.  So yeah, his nurse
got me up in the stirrup,  She told me to take a big breath and then
squirted something that stung a bit and then he came in and did the
cystoscopy.  I don't think I even took a breath the whole time.  Pee'd
"pins and needles" for a while last night.  Before he started I asked
him if there was anything he did that didn't hurt.  His comment "not much".

Then he recommended the PVP and asked if I had any questions.  Told him
I guess not and he commented that I obviously knew a lot more about it
than most all of his patients.

Actually the first time I visited him over a year ago it was much the
same.  When he got though with the cystoscopy he recommended trying TUMT
first as PVP could always be done later.  I don't think he had performed
a lot of them at that time.  Another doctor I talked to yesterday said
that their success with TUMT is normally about 85%.  That really is not
bad.  However, that procedure is undoubtedly the most painful.  The most
painful was when he injected something into the prostate.  And then I
had to wear a catheter for five days.  I really didn't mind that.  I got
five good nights of sleep.

He sends his patients home with a catheter after PVP.  Then they remove
it themselves the next day.

I still haven't got a schedule.  At least for PVP there is very little
preparation.  No enema etc.  Just not eat after midnight.  Drink water
up to four hours before the procedure.

As I was coming into the office I overhead a patient saying something
about microwave.  I didn't get much chance to talk to him but asked if
he got on newsgroups.  He said he didn't know about them so I gave him
the name of this group.  Maybe he will show up.
Temujin - 21 Apr 2006 12:52 GMT
> I still haven't got a schedule.  At least for PVP there is very little
> preparation.  No enema etc.  Just not eat after midnight.  Drink water
> up to four hours before the procedure.

I did have to have an enema before my PVP.  And it's interesting that
you got five good nights of sleep with the catheter in.  I felt like I
had to pee the whole time mine was in (just overnight).  When the nurse
did the "fill & pull" she could only get 200 ml in my bladder.  She
said I must have a really tiny bladder (and we all know that size
matters).  Then when she pulled the cath, I peed out 400 ml.  It was a
great gushing thing, a sight to behold, started instantly, over in no
time (my pre-PVP flow was 3.7 ml/sec.).  Apparently I was retaining 200
ml with the cath in.  No wonder I felt like I had to pee the whole time
it was in.

Go for the PVP, Rich.  It's worth it just to get off the meds - Hytrin,
in my case, and the Flonase I had to take because of the Hytrin.  Just
make sure he takes enough tissue out.
Rich256 - 21 Apr 2006 15:29 GMT
>> I still haven't got a schedule.  At least for PVP there is very little
>> preparation.  No enema etc.  Just not eat after midnight.  Drink water
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> in my case, and the Flonase I had to take because of the Hytrin.  Just
> make sure he takes enough tissue out.

The only discomfort of the catheter was a pulling sensation at times.
Never any sensation of having to pee for the full five days.  I just
heard a comment from someone else that had the same feeling as me.  He
said that after several years of bph problems he could get used to it
very fast.  He too only had it for one night.

I just got an email from a friend who had the radio active seed
treatment in January.  He had big time problems and has had to wear a
catheter ever since.  He hopefully gets it out next week.  Hopefully his
problem has been only that the prostate was irritated from being poked
with a needle 114 times.  Two other guys I know didn't have any problems
with that procedure.
Pete - 22 Apr 2006 01:24 GMT
>> I still haven't got a schedule.  At least for PVP there is very
>> little preparation.  No enema etc.  Just not eat after midnight.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Hytrin, in my case, and the Flonase I had to take because of the
> Hytrin.  Just make sure he takes enough tissue out.

Temujin (and Rich)...I had a 22 F (.288 inches dia) catheter put in me after
my TURP (for three days) and the discomfort of having to pee was
unbelievable (non stop), and it drove me looney.  One of the worst things I
ever experienced.  That's like having a pencil jammed up your dick for 3
days.  Never slept a minute, and the pain killers did nothing.  I had the
procedure on Friday, and didn't get the catheter out until Monday, but damn
near yanked it out myself ahead of time (I had the info about draining the
balloon).

Temujin...I don't understand how you could have been retaining with the
catheter in (that is the purpose of the cath to drain urine - unless the
little balloon held the inlet holes that much above your bladder neck, or
she shoved it in too far and didn't pull the balloon back snug with the
bladder neck, and it didn't come back out due to friction - if that was the
case that would certainly border on incompetence).  I really don't know what
you are talking about.  And your saying you peed 400 ml, but were only
retaining 200 ml (very confusing).

Rich...your uro's look like a friendly bunch of guys (does your uro have a
good bedside manner and respect your right to do research).  It sounds like
you did have the cysto without prescheduling it directly, but it sounds like
he knew he was going to do it, but I would think he would have scheduled an
extra long appointment, or some bullshit like that.  I still think it is
highly unusual.  All the better for you :-) ...Pete
Rich256 - 22 Apr 2006 03:34 GMT
>>> I still haven't got a schedule.  At least for PVP there is very
>>> little preparation.  No enema etc.  Just not eat after midnight.
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> extra long appointment, or some bullshit like that.  I still think it is
> highly unusual.  All the better for you :-) ...Pete

Well, even with the cysto he did not spend all that much time with me.
His nurse did all the preparations.  He took a look at my flow rate and
retention and it was obvious that the TUMT had not produced the hoped
for results.  A month ago he suggested trying the medication first.  It
didn't help so this time after a quick look at the data he said he
wanted to take a look inside before recommending the PVP.  It was as he
expected so recommended the PVP.  Off to the surgery schedule woman.
She gave me the option of one of three hospitals and said the surgery
would not be next week.  I have called her twice now and get her
answering machine.  The last time I told her I would like to at least
know when to expect to hear from her.

As I said the catheter really was a bit of relief for me.  Five good
nights of sleep and could schedule my going to the bathroom when ever
the bag got heavy.  Someone talked about the balloon being blown up too
much making it very uncomfortable for him.  I think he said something
about complaining and they adjusted it and no more problems.  I might
expect that if it is inflated too much it would put pressure on the
bladder giving the urge to urinate.

Maybe that was Temujin's problem.  The balloon was filling up so much of
the bladder that they could not get much in.
Temujin - 22 Apr 2006 14:05 GMT
Pete,  What I meant about the 200 ml retain was that the nurse could
only get 200 ml in when she filled it, yet I peed out 400ml, so there
must have already been 200 ml in there.  And the balloon was already
drained by then, so that shouldn't have affected it.  I guess your
theory about shoving it in too far is the most logical explanation.  I
mentioned it to the uro and he just kind of shook his head.

> Temujin...I don't understand how you could have been retaining with the
> catheter in (that is the purpose of the cath to drain urine - unless the
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> you are talking about.  And your saying you peed 400 ml, but were only
> retaining 200 ml (very confusing).
Ed - 22 Apr 2006 16:15 GMT
Your bladder is not like a gas tank with a clear liquid level. It's
more like a water balloon. So why should it make a difference how far
in it was?

... unless it was in so far that it interferred with bladder
contraction. Seems a bit of a stretch, so to speak.

Ed

>Pete,  What I meant about the 200 ml retain was that the nurse could
>only get 200 ml in when she filled it, yet I peed out 400ml, so there
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> you are talking about.  And your saying you peed 400 ml, but were only
>> retaining 200 ml (very confusing).
Pete - 22 Apr 2006 18:33 GMT
> Your bladder is not like a gas tank with a clear liquid level. It's
> more like a water balloon. So why should it make a difference how far
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Ed

I hear you Ed, but it sure makes sense to have the drain hole for the
catheter as close as possible to the bladder neck, especially if you are in
an upright standing or sitting position (ie even a balloon has a low point
and a high point to it as it changes shape).  :-) ...Pete

>> Pete,  What I meant about the 200 ml retain was that the nurse could
>> only get 200 ml in when she filled it, yet I peed out 400ml, so there
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>>> about.  And your saying you peed 400 ml, but were only retaining
>>> 200 ml (very confusing).
Ed - 23 Apr 2006 04:16 GMT
>> Your bladder is not like a gas tank with a clear liquid level. It's
>> more like a water balloon. So why should it make a difference how far
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>an upright standing or sitting position (ie even a balloon has a low point
>and a high point to it as it changes shape).  :-) ...Pete

Okay, tonight I'm going to try to pee standing on my head. I'll bet it
works fine.

Ed
Pete - 24 Apr 2006 01:42 GMT
>>> Your bladder is not like a gas tank with a clear liquid level. It's
>>> more like a water balloon. So why should it make a difference how
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Ed

Thats rediculous and silly.
Pete - 22 Apr 2006 19:43 GMT
> Pete,  What I meant about the 200 ml retain was that the nurse could
> only get 200 ml in when she filled it, yet I peed out 400ml, so there
> must have already been 200 ml in there.  And the balloon was already
> drained by then, so that shouldn't have affected it.  I guess your
> theory about shoving it in too far is the most logical explanation.  I
> mentioned it to the uro and he just kind of shook his head.

Temujin...I don't understand what the "fill and pull" thing is that the
nurse did.  Why didn't she just drain the balloon and pull the catheter out.
I'm lost :-) ...Pete

>> Temujin...I don't understand how you could have been retaining with
>> the catheter in (that is the purpose of the cath to drain urine -
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> And your saying you peed 400 ml, but were only retaining 200 ml
>> (very confusing).
Temujin - 22 Apr 2006 21:22 GMT
The "fill and pull" was what I had to go before they would let me go
home after the PVP.  The idea was to fill my bladder (by pouring water
INTO the catheter), and then pull the catheter out.  I then peed in a
cup to make sure I could urinate normally.  If not, they would put the
catheter back in for a few days and try again.  I was so miserable with
the catheter in that I was praying I would be able to pee.  The staff
used the term "fill & pull" so casually that I thought it must be some
standard uro lingo.  If nobody else has heard the term it must be some
local dialect.
Pete - 23 Apr 2006 02:46 GMT
> The "fill and pull" was what I had to go before they would let me go
> home after the PVP.  The idea was to fill my bladder (by pouring water
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> be some standard uro lingo.  If nobody else has heard the term it
> must be some local dialect.

Temujin...I still don't understand.  You previously said you had the
catheter in overnight. Now you are indicating they did the "fill and pull"
before they would let you go home.  Are you saying you stayed overnight in
the hospital after the procedure.  Most people report that they go home
shortly after the procedure (ie same day).
Temujin - 23 Apr 2006 20:18 GMT
>Temujin...I still don't understand.  You previously said you had the
>catheter in overnight. Now you are indicating they did the "fill and pull"
>before they would let you go home.  Are you saying you stayed overnight in
>the hospital after the procedure.  Most people report that they go home
>shortly after the procedure (ie same day).

Boy, you can't get away with anything around here.  Sorry for the
confusion.  I live several hours away from Columbia, SC, where the
procedure was performed.  My wife and I stayed in a local hotel that
night (with the catheter), then I went in the following morning for the
fill & pull.  It wasn't so much that I couldn't go home, it was just to
see if they needed to leave the catheter in before we made the long
drive back home.  Sometimes by trying to shorten a story, you make it
incomprehensible.  Sorry about that.  If you're still confused (and I
couldn't blame you), that's the best I can do.
Pete - 24 Apr 2006 01:44 GMT
>> Temujin...I still don't understand.  You previously said you had the
>> catheter in overnight. Now you are indicating they did the "fill and
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> you make it incomprehensible.  Sorry about that.  If you're still
> confused (and I couldn't blame you), that's the best I can do.

Thanks Temujin...I now see the picture :-):-)
Pete - 24 Apr 2006 02:05 GMT
>> Hi Rich...You guys must go to different doctors than I do.  Are you
>> saying you went to see your uro (for a discussion type visit, which
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> then squirted something that stung a bit and then he came in and did
> the cystoscopy.

Rich...one more question.  Does your uro have the video assisted (ie color
monitor and taping capability) setup in his office (when he does cystos in
his office), or would he have to do them in a hospital.  My uro's do all the
cysto's the old way in the office (ie they have to look through the eye
piece), which sucks because their is no record of what they saw, and is
really becoming obsolete I believe.  As a matter of fact, I don't believe
they took any movies of my TURP either :-) .  I wouldn't thing the video
stuff would be cost prohibitive, especially for a group of uro's with six
doc's...Pete

 I don't think I even took a breath the whole time.
> Pee'd "pins and needles" for a while last night.  Before he started I
> asked him if there was anything he did that didn't hurt.  His comment "not
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> he got on newsgroups.  He said he didn't know about them so I gave him
> the name of this group.  Maybe he will show up.
Rich256 - 24 Apr 2006 02:19 GMT
>>> Hi Rich...You guys must go to different doctors than I do.  Are you
>>> saying you went to see your uro (for a discussion type visit, which
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
> stuff would be cost prohibitive, especially for a group of uro's with six
> doc's...Pete

I really don't know.  I had my eyes closed and holding my breath most of
the time!!!  However, there was a monitor sitting there and they turned
off the lights during the procedure.  No idea if it was recorded.

I was a bit surprised that the PVP will not be done at the hospital next
door to the office where I visit him.  They have three offices.  The
hospital next door has the robot machine but apparently doesn't have the
green light laser.  All four of these hospitals are in the southern part
or suburbs of Denver.  I think there must be at least three or more PVP
machines in other parts of town.  Perhaps even in a hospital that is
about a mile from me (my old URO may be doing it now but not listed on
the Laserscope site).  Maybe our hospitals are smaller here than in the
larger eastern cities.  Our population is more spread out.

I am still waiting for a schedule.  Better be before mid May or I will
have to postpone it for a couple months.
Pete - 24 Apr 2006 03:06 GMT
>>>> Hi Rich...You guys must go to different doctors than I do.  Are you
>>>> saying you went to see your uro (for a discussion type visit, which
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> I really don't know.  I had my eyes closed and holding my breath most
> of the time!!!

Rich...Did holding your breath help with the pain.  My recent one last year
hurt like a son of a bitch, but not as bad as the one I had years before
that with the old rigid scope (damn near killed me).  I am thinking about
having general anesthesia for the next one, but it's inconvenient getting a
ride...Pete

However, there was a monitor sitting there and they
> turned off the lights during the procedure.  No idea if it was
> recorded.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I am still waiting for a schedule.  Better be before mid May or I will
> have to postpone it for a couple months.
Rich256 - 24 Apr 2006 03:39 GMT
>>>>> Hi Rich...You guys must go to different doctors than I do.  Are you
>>>>> saying you went to see your uro (for a discussion type visit, which
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> having general anesthesia for the next one, but it's inconvenient getting a
> ride...Pete

Yeah, I think so.  The nurse told me to take a deep breath before she
stuck some stuff in first.  That I think was supposed to kill the pain a
bit but it didn't do much.  Just a stinging sensation but nothing only
for a minute or so.

 But I would not even think of a general anesthesia.  Can't have that
in a doctors office anyway.

Reminds me of when I was a teen and got a couple plantar warts on the
bottom of my feet.  My old country doctor, who was a "you won't even
feel this" type, says "better get a hold on the table because this might
hurt a bit.  Then injects Novocaine into the bottom of my foot.   Then
gets ready to do the other foot.   I often  wonder what it cost to
straighten out the stainless steel bars on the table and file out my
finger prints.  Good old guy though.  I figure he saved my life a couple
times.  We didn't have all the protection from pneumonia and the like in
those days.

He did sort of lose his composure once when doing a hernia check on a
buddy of mine.  The doc says "cough" and my buddy says "How can I when
you got me by the throat".
Pete - 24 Apr 2006 19:50 GMT
>>>>>> Hi Rich...You guys must go to different doctors than I do.  Are
>>>>>> you saying you went to see your uro (for a discussion type
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
> pain a bit but it didn't do much.  Just a stinging sensation but
> nothing only for a minute or so.

The lidocaine for the local they put in your penis is a joke.  Does nothing
for me at all.

>  But I would not even think of a general anesthesia.  Can't have that
> in a doctors office anyway.

I got one on you Rich.  That surprises me for a big city like Denver
(probably because you have so many hospitals nearby - but I'm sure you also
have a shitload of endoscopy centers for EGD's and colonoscopies - boy do
the gastro's get rich off those).

I live in western Maryland (out in the country so to speak - city of approx.
35,000).  All the uro's are in one huge office, as you have heard me say
before, and they have a complete surgical suite and the whole ball of wax
(for more serious stuff they go to the county hospital).  They have an
anesthesiologist visit them whenever they do a procedure requiring GA.  But
remember, these guys didn't even know what a PVP was when I asked them if
they did it :-) .

The uro even did my TURP in his surgical suite (whereas they normally do
them in the hospital - at least that's what his PA told me), but I thought
he was only supposed to remove some scar tissue from my previous TUIP, but I
had signed the form, and he did the TURP when I was under.  Told you all
about that before.  Take care...Pete

> Reminds me of when I was a teen and got a couple plantar warts on the
> bottom of my feet.  My old country doctor, who was a "you won't even
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> buddy of mine.  The doc says "cough" and my buddy says "How can I when
> you got me by the throat".
Rich256 - 24 Apr 2006 20:51 GMT
>>>>>>> Hi Rich...You guys must go to different doctors than I do.  Are
>>>>>>> you saying you went to see your uro (for a discussion type
[quoted text clipped - 64 lines]
> had signed the form, and he did the TURP when I was under.  Told you all
> about that before.  Take care...Pete

Still, Denver is considered a cow town by many in the east.  Total state
population is less than many eastern cities.  And Denver's metro
population is probably about a million but spread out over at least a 30
mile diameter area.  When I visit in the east, even though having lived
there for a while, I have to get used to how densely populated the
cities are.  Especially after living in Los Angeles for many years,
where you can drive for 100 miles and still be in town.

Schedule set for May 2.  Switched to Littleton Hospital so I have to
drive an additional 5 miles (15 miles total).  Arrive 8:30, Surgery 10:30.

I just got an email from Laserscope.  Probably won't be able to make it:

Free PVP Patient Education Seminar

Learn more about BPH and treatment options including the
PVP procedure using the GreenLight™ laser.
PVP delivers rapid symptom relief and dramatic urine flow.

WHEN: Thursday, April 27, 2006
            6:30pm - 8:00pm

WHERE:   Recreation Center - East Ridge Facility
                9568 South University Boulevard
                Highlands Ranch, CO 80126
Pete - 24 Apr 2006 22:41 GMT
>>>>>>>> Hi Rich...You guys must go to different doctors than I do.  Are
>>>>>>>> you saying you went to see your uro (for a discussion type
[quoted text clipped - 81 lines]
> it:
> Free PVP Patient Education Seminar

Rich...since you are one of the staunch regulars in the group here, I doubt
that there is much that Laserscope can tell you, that you don't already
know.  Hell, maybe you can help them teach the class :-) .  Good luck on May
second, and looking forward to hearing a good result.  I meant to ask you
before.  You mentioned your low flow rate and retention, but I don't
remember you saying how much you were retaining (I assume you are retaining
somewhat).

Pete

> Learn more about BPH and treatment options including the
> PVP procedure using the GreenLight™ laser.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>                 9568 South University Boulevard
>                 Highlands Ranch, CO 80126
Rich256 - 24 Apr 2006 23:18 GMT
>>>>>>>>> Hi Rich...You guys must go to different doctors than I do.  Are
>>>>>>>>> you saying you went to see your uro (for a discussion type
[quoted text clipped - 87 lines]
>
> Pete

Sorry, I don't remember.  Not a lot of retention but flow rate is pretty
slow.  Really, I have thought that I could live this way but would be
nice to get back to somewhere near normal.  Been following this group
for more than a year now.  Probably here more than many because I sort
of enjoy looking around the web - and not much anything better to do :-).

I don't look forward to the cross town trip during rush hour but it is
all suburban driving.  Nothing like trying to get to the downtown hospitals.
Bill - 25 Apr 2006 22:56 GMT
There are some in Denver now.  I used Brownrigg in Pueblo
when I did mine 2 years ago cuz he was the only one who had
done > 100 in Colorado at that time.

Now it's all over.  I have moved to Brutscher in Ft. Collins for
followup.  He has a nice style & is good.

Don't fear the PVP.  

Bill Hale Loveland CO
Rich256 - 26 Apr 2006 00:10 GMT
> There are some in Denver now.  I used Brownrigg in Pueblo
> when I did mine 2 years ago cuz he was the only one who had
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Bill Hale Loveland CO

Doctors?  Yes, there have been 9 listed on Laserscope for quite some
time.  I think there are even more that are not listed on the site.

Of them 3 are with Denver Urology Clinic, 2 Urology Associates and 2
with Colorado Urology Associates.

What we were discussing is that Urology Associates uses one of three
hospitals, Swedish, Littleton or Sky Ridge.

And the option of whether they do PVP or not is obviously determined by
which hospital they use and as to if the hospital has purchased the
equipment.  Or perhaps the equipment is purchased by the doctors but
resides at the hospital.  For example both Urology Associates and
Colorado Urology Associates both use Swedish at a minimum.  I expect
both of them use Sky Ridge as well as it has all the latest equipment.

Urology Associates also uses Porter Hospital which has the Robot machine:

http://www.porterhospital.org/index.php?s=optional_2

Aurora Urologists also use that machine at the Aurora Hospitals.  I
think they may have the greenlight laser too but not listed on
Laserscope site.

There must be other hospitals that have the equipment for the doctors
for the northern part of town.
Temujin - 24 Apr 2006 21:08 GMT
<The lidocaine for the local they put in your penis is a joke.  Does
nothing
<for me at all.

I agree.  It just doesn't get up in there far enough.  It helps some
when the scope is first inserted, but just when you're thinking "that
wasn't too bad," it goes through the sphincter into your prostate, and
whoah Mama!
Pete - 24 Apr 2006 22:24 GMT
> <The lidocaine for the local they put in your penis is a joke.  Does
> nothing
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> wasn't too bad," it goes through the sphincter into your prostate, and
> whoah Mama!

You got that right Temjujin.  I believe the key for the pain is the
sphincter, and depending how long the uro looks around inside the bladder,
it can be a son of a bitch.  Some people in here have reported it doesn't
bother them too much.  I don't like it, and consider it extreme pain, but
nowhere near as bad as when I had the rigid scope by the horse doctor in
1995. :-) ...Pete
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.