There has been discussion here about dilatation (not "dilation"), but
no suggestion that this might be tried for bph as a step short of
surgery. I understand that dilatation may have to be repeated. Is
dilatation, balloon or otherwise, worth trying before moving to pvp?
What do people think? Has anybody had any experience with this?
Jesse
Salmon Egg - 20 Feb 2006 23:18 GMT
On 2/20/06 7:36 AM, in article
1140449815.117879.263690@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com, "Jesse"
<utopia1@attglobal.net> wrote:
> There has been discussion here about dilatation (not "dilation"), but
> no suggestion that this might be tried for bph as a step short of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Jesse
If you like being tortured.
Bill
-- Ferme le Bush
fgomsan@gmail.com - 20 Feb 2006 23:51 GMT
Balloon dilatation was tried as a treatment for BPH, but it failed. It
has been abandoned. It can be used for certain urethral strictures, or
in ureteric strictures, with a high failure rate.
Fernando Gómez Sancha
http://drgomezsancha2.blogspot.com
Jesse - 21 Feb 2006 15:29 GMT
I don't mean to beat a dead horse -- and dilatation might well be a
dead horse -- but these comments leave some room for further inquiry.
Dr. Sancha counts out balloon dilatation. But this is only one method
of dilatation. What of others?
The other posting indicates that dilatation might be painful, but then
anesthesia comes into play.
My questions are influenced by discussion on the prostate cancer list,
where dilatation is discussed as a useful procedure that must be
repeated from time to time. An overall evaluation of dilatation vs PVP
would involve assessing this need for repetition with the former
against the possible damage done by any kind of surgery.
Jesse
Buford R - 22 Feb 2006 03:36 GMT
I cannot answer your question but all I can tell you is if you do this
procedure to make sure you are sedated. I know some people handle pain better
than others but for me, it was one of the most painful things I have ever had
and if I were to have it again, I would either be sedated or I would not have
it. That simple. I had to sit down in the doctor's lobby for about 30 minutes
after the procedure before I could even walk to my car. My wife had to drive
me home. I just felt like I was on fire. Fortunately, it only lasted a few
hours for those few hours were miserable.
Buford R
>I don't mean to beat a dead horse -- and dilatation might well be a
>dead horse -- but these comments leave some room for further inquiry.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
>Jesse
c palmer - 22 Feb 2006 08:37 GMT
From: utopia1@attglobal.net (Jesse)
There has been discussion here about dilatation (not "dilation"), but no
suggestion that this might be tried for bph as a step short of surgery.
I understand that dilatation may have to be repeated. Is dilatation,
balloon or otherwise, worth trying before moving to pvp? What do people
think? Has anybody had any experience with this?
Jesse
=======
hi jesse - been there - done that.....
but i might be able to explain why it usually will not work on men with
prostates.
picture in your mind, a ball (prostate) and it being held in place by
rubber bands (muscle groups) the ball has a opening all the way through
it and due to age, the ball is getting more dense in the middle and
closing off the passageway. so, they stick a balloon in it to open it
up. while the balloon is in there, it goes back to its original size,
but as soon as the balloon is removed, the pressure of the muscle groups
keeps applying pressure on the ball and closes down the passageway
again.
if you can relax the muscle groups, then you can get relief, hence, all
the difference meds for that.
in my case, it was different. i had the prostate removed. i scarred up
from the surgery and had a restriction at the bladder neck and had to
hop upon the table again for the dilatation procedure. before i went
into the OR, they had me hooked up to an IV and said if it got too bad,
he would knock me out so i wouldn't be in pain. i thanked him for being
considerate. when i went into the OR, got on the table and the next
thing i remember was them wiping me down and cleaning me up. i already
had the catheter inside and was ready to go to the recovery room.
and yes, the pain from this procedure afterwards was worse than the
entire removal of the prostate.
hope this information helps....
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
Jesse - 22 Feb 2006 18:31 GMT
Buford, thanks for the response. My sympathies for the pain you
experienced with dilatation. So, clearly, one would have to seek
sedation or some kind of anesthesia. But the question that remains is
this: what was the result of dilatation? Did it improve flow? Did it
have to be done again? If you could do it painlessly, would you
recomend it as a temporary substitute for surgery?
Jesse
Buford R - 23 Feb 2006 02:56 GMT
I don't think from what I have read that I would recommend dilatation as a
temporary substitute for the surgery. The PVP is a fairly simple procedure
although as others have said it is not a walk in the park. Unfortunately, so
far I am one of the 10% that PVP's have not helped but there are 90% out
there that have had remarkable results. From what I read on the dilatation,
it seems to onlyh be a temporary fix and can actually create other false
channels. Go to www.laserurology.com. Dr. Lin has a set of questions and
answers on the PVP. If I can help any further, let me know.
Buford
>Buford, thanks for the response. My sympathies for the pain you
>experienced with dilatation. So, clearly, one would have to seek
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>Jesse