Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / January 2006
beta-sitosterol is helpful, not hurtful for pca
|
|
Thread rating:  |
DRLARRYVON - 10 Jan 2006 14:59 GMT My reference studies indicate beta-sitosterol is adjunctive for the remission of prostate cancer, not accentuating. Actually, the ginsengs, as well, are helpful for all cancer.
Pete - 10 Jan 2006 21:40 GMT Dr. Larry Von...would you please identify yourself (ie are you a real M.D.), and provide your references studies. Thank you...Pete
> My reference studies indicate beta-sitosterol is adjunctive for the > remission of prostate cancer, not > accentuating. Actually, the ginsengs, as well, are helpful for all > cancer. c palmer - 10 Jan 2006 22:10 GMT From: pete@nospam.net (Pete)
Dr. Larry Von...would you please identify yourself (ie are you a real M.D.), and provide your references studies. Thank you...Pete
DRLARRYVON wrote: My reference studies indicate beta-sitosterol is adjunctive for the remission of prostate cancer, not accentuating. Actually, the ginsengs, as well, are helpful for all cancer.
======= i agree with pete 100% - if you ARE a doctor, where do you practice? what is your office phone number? in what state do you practice?
i would like to have some references on your studies, the type of study that was used. was it a blind sided study or a double blind sided?
what age group? and what stages of prostate cancer are we talking about?
was there any study of recurrence of pca vs initial occurrence?
and i've just gotten started on the long list of questions for you if you are truly a doctor.
now, if you want to come over to the prostate cancer support newsgroups, we will do into a lot deeper discussion with this topic.
be aware that your comments that you made were in a BPH newsgroup.
your statement about beta-sitosterol is adjunctive for the remission of prostate cancer is about as bland as stating that lycopene will not cause prostate cancer........
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so." http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
Pete - 10 Jan 2006 22:45 GMT > From: pete@nospam.net (Pete) > [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > > ~ curtis Curtis...I believe this questionable person wrote this in regard to my other thread that referenced that beta sitosterol can encourage the growth of prostate cancer cells (per some herbalist who was a doctor of nutrition - I queried her on this and she never answered me - which pissed me off). Just wanted to make sure you understood the background.
I think the person who wrote this may not be correct since I have read (by an identifiable doctor of pharmacology) that proscar may aggravate (but not cause) prostate cancer, and I would think there could be a relationship, since both proscar and beta sitosterol supposedly block the production of DHT...Pete
> knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is > optional "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing > old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so." > http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc c palmer - 11 Jan 2006 01:00 GMT hi pete - sorry, i miss the original post and only got in on the end of this one.
i did some different search engines research and couldn't find anything on a dr. larry von. the only thing close was a person who was a mechanical engineer and there was nothing in any research studies with his name on it that he claimed.
as to the proscar discussion. it was really kicked around fairly well with all kinds of documentation, but the bottom line really is this. it seems that the drug does a great job for the most part. but when it comes to prostate cancer and proscar, it they don't know if it mask the cancer or what - but it's only the really aggressive gleason scores that appear when a person gets pca. so, if a person is taking proscar, and if they were to be dx'ed with pca later in life while still on the drug, the chances are it will be a more aggressive prostate cancer. but the studies don't have any explanation for that.
here is a really big study - 19,000 men - on proscar that will help explain what's happening.
~ curtis
============
Proscar May Help Prevent Prostate Cancer, But There Are Side Effects
By Daniel DeNoon By Charlotte Grayson, MD
June 24, 2003 -- A huge clinical trial shows that a drug called Proscar can also prevent or delay prostate cancer. It also shows that the drug may increase the risk of aggressive, high-grade prostate tumors. And while men taking Proscar have fewer urinary problems, they also have more sexual problems.
Confused? Here are the answers to some FAQs.
Why Would a Healthy Man Worry About Prostate Cancer?
After skin cancer, prostate cancer is the most common cancer in U.S. men. A man's lifetime risk of getting prostate cancer is 16.7%. But prostate cancer grows very slowly. In fact, many men who have prostate cancer never know about it and usually die from something other than the cancer. That's why a man's lifetime risk of dying from prostate cancer is much lower: 3.6%.
Currently, the best way to prevent prostate cancer is early detection. That's why most doctors advise men older than 50 to have annual digital rectal exams and PSA tests, which are blood tests that look at a substance released by the prostate. Doctors advise men who are at high risk for the cancer -- particularly black men -- to begin screening at age 40.
What is Proscar?
Proscar is a drug approved by the FDA to treat symptoms of enlarged prostate -- a condition known as benign prostatic hyperplasia or BPH. The drug shrinks the prostate, improves urine flow, and cuts the risk of BPH surgery. Proscar works by keeping a man's body from turning the male hormone testosterone into its most potent form, dihydrotestosterone or DHT.
Why Might Proscar Reduce Prostate Cancer Risk?
Male sex hormones speed the growth of prostate tumors. Proscar inhibits the most potent form of testosterone.
What Was the Study?
It's called the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial or PCPT. The study looked at whether giving Proscar to normal, healthy men age 55 and older could cut their risk of prostate cancer. The study enrolled nearly 19,000 men. Nearly a third were age 55-60, nearly a third were 61-65, and a little more than a third were older than 65. All had normal PSA levels and normal findings from digital rectal exams. Half the men received daily 5 mg doses of Proscar. The other half got an identical-looking placebo pill. The study was supposed to last until all of the men had been treated for seven years. It was stopped early -- although most of the men had finished seven years of treatment -- because men getting Proscar had fewer prostate cancers. All men with abnormal digital rectal exams or elevated PSA levels had a prostate biopsy. At the end of the study, all men were asked to undergo prostate biopsy.
What Did the Study Show?
There was good news for men in the PCPT who took Proscar:
Proscar cut the risk of prostate cancer by 25%. Proscar cut the risk of urinary problems. Proscar reduced the risk of having an enlarged prostate (BPH).
But there was also bad news for men in the PCPT who took Proscar: They had more problems with sexual function -- including erectile dysfunction and loss of libido.
While their overall risk of prostate cancer was lower, they had an increased risk of high-grade, aggressive prostate cancer.
Were There Any Problems with the Study?
Overall, nearly 25% of the men receiving placebo in the PCPT were found to have prostate cancer. That's four times as much cancer as most experts would expect in the general population. Thus it's possible that many of the cancers prevented by Proscar are low-grade cancer that wouldn't be a problem for many years, if ever. It's going to be important to see what happens to the men in the PCPT. Follow-up studies are underway. Should I Take Proscar To Prevent Prostate Cancer? There's no easy answer. If you're worried about prostate cancer, you should talk about it with your doctor. Peter T. Scardino, MD, chief of urology at New York's Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, spoke with WebMD reporter Salynn Boyles about the PCPT study. "It certainly does not seem prudent at this point to tell tens of thousands of men that they should take this drug," Scardino tells WebMD. Other doctors may have other opinions. Some men with risk factors for prostate cancer may wish to ask their doctors about taking Proscar to prevent prostate cancer.
Should I Stop Taking Proscar for Relief of Urinary Symptoms?
"Probably not," Scardino writes in the New England Journal of Medicine. Just be sure to get regular digital rectal exams and PSA tests.
What About Propecia?
Propecia is another brand name for finasteride, the main ingredient in Proscar. It's used to prevent male pattern baldness. The PCPT study looked at a 5 mg dose of finasteride. Propecia is a 1 mg dose. It's not known whether the lower dose has the same effects.
SOURCES: WebMD Health, "Drug Prevents Prostate Cancer." The New England Journal of Medicine, July 17, 2003. National Institutes of Health, news release and fact sheet on PCPT, June 24, 2003.
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so." http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
El Castor - 11 Jan 2006 01:15 GMT >> From: pete@nospam.net (Pete) >> [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] >> old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so." >> http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc Pete, as you requested, I followed up your e-mail to Karen concerning Beta Sitosterol. I just posed it as a new question, rather than mention you, and get her all pissed off. (-8
My Question: "I note that you recommend against the use of Beta Sitosterol in connection with prostate health as it is known to "encourage the growth of prostate cancer cells". This concerns me since I take Saw Palmetto. It is my understanding that the active ingredient in Saw Palmetto is Beta Sitosterol. Do you also recommend against the use of Saw Palmetto? Can you cite any studies which show a connection between Beta Sitosterol and the growth of prostate cancer cells?"
Her Reply: "This is the second question I've had on this. The component in Cinnamon is in a different chemical make up than that in Saw Palmetto. Remember, we're not extracting one chemical. You must look at the herb as a whole. Cinnamon is not recommended for people with Prostate cancer. Saw Palmetto is often recommended for prostate problems, so evidently the chemical, though it is present in both herbs, does not present an issue with Saw Palmetto."
You will note that nowhere in my question did I refer to "cinnamon". I guess you can draw your own conclusions about the value that I would place on her advice. (-8
BTW, I visited a urologist today. I haven't seen one since I had a biopsy about four years ago, so it was about time. He had no problem with me taking Beta Sitosterol and Saw Palmetto, so I'll probably continue. I explained the relief I'd experienced with Ibuprofen, and he wasn't surprised. The mechanism, in my case, is not so much an enlarged prostate (89cc), but rather an age related hormone imbalance that causes younger men to produce less urine while asleep, or in my case, more urine. NSAIDs counteract this effect. He recommended two aspirin at bed time, and if that didn't work, either go to three, or switch back to Ibuprofen, and taper off the dose until I get to the minimum dose that's effective.
Jeff
Pete - 11 Jan 2006 02:27 GMT >>> From: pete@nospam.net (Pete) >>> [quoted text clipped - 78 lines] > guess you can draw your own conclusions about the value that I would > place on her advice. (-8 Jeff...she is full of sh.t. If you re-read what I sent her I was very specific and had her hands down on a contradiction. She said why would you want to take anything that encourages the growth of cancer cells (if you recall) - now she is saying there are different kinds of beta sitosterol - Huh!!! BTW I doubt your urologist knows anymore about this than you or I do. Do you think he sits home at night and studies herbs and beta sitosterol and saw palmetto - think about it. Take care...Pete
> BTW, I visited a urologist today. I haven't seen one since I had a > biopsy about four years ago, so it was about time. He had no problem [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Jeff El Castor - 12 Jan 2006 04:49 GMT >>>> From: pete@nospam.net (Pete) >>>> [quoted text clipped - 80 lines] > >Jeff...she is full of sh.t. Hey Pete, in all honesty, the woman is a herbologist. What did you expect? (-8
>If you re-read what I sent her I was very >specific and had her hands down on a contradiction. She said why would you [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >you think he sits home at night and studies herbs and beta sitosterol and >saw palmetto - think about it. Take care...Pete Oh sure, but I think they work, so that's all he has to hear. Please don't think I put a lot of faith in doctors, but in this guy's favor, he sees a lot more prostates than you and I.
I did learn something of which I wasn't aware. Size isn't everything -- some tend to grow outwards, and some inwards, closing off the hole in the donut. Thankfully, I seem to have an outie.
>> BTW, I visited a urologist today. I haven't seen one since I had a >> biopsy about four years ago, so it was about time. He had no problem [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >> >> Jeff
|
|
|