Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

PVP or HOLAP and TURP in same procedure

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
bph.question - 08 Jan 2006 12:05 GMT
I am 50 with fairly severe BPH symptoms that I have been treating
primarily with Flomax for the past 3 or so years.  I've been seeing my
urologist every six months at which time we have an ultrasound and a
flow meter test.  My prostate is a bit under 50 cc according to the
ultrasound measurements.  The prostate protrudes into my bladder right
at the urethra so when my bladder is full it is especially difficult to
urinate.  Up to recently, I have been OK with the situation and waiting
until it worsened before taking another step in treatment.

My symptoms have been getting more severe with more frequent urgency
problems and very slow flow with straining at times.  So the urologist
performed a cystoscopy recently to see if there were any obstructions
(strictures) in the urethra.  There were none.  He confirmed that the
prostate is poking out right at the bottom of the bladder and said it
was "longer" than he had felt it was based on the ultrasound.

So we are now discussing what type of procedure I should have to reduce
the size of my prostate.  He hasn't given me his final recommendation
on treatment, but during our most recent conversation he said that for
someone as young as I am he would prefer to use a combination of a TURP
and PVP or HOLAP.  I think the reason he mentioned TURP is that he
wouldn't want me to have to have another procedure too soon after this
one.  I have told him about the favorable things I've reado about PVP
and my preference for this type of procedure.  But I don't remember
reading anything about the use of both procedures at the same time.  He
also provided me with a reprint of an article from Urology Today that
compared PVP and HOLAP and concluded that HOLAP was preferable to PVP -
although my reading of the article was that the two were similar.  I
had asked him earlier about his experience with PVP and he said he has
used it but not too frequently.  So I think he might be steering me
away from PVP.  I haven't asked him this directly but I plan to when we
next meet.

He will be giving me his recommendation later in the month, and I may
try to get a second opinion before making a decision on what to do.

I'd be curious to hear from others, especially the Dr. from Madrid!

Warm regards to all
fgomsan@gmail.com - 09 Jan 2006 20:01 GMT
Regarding obtaining tissue for analysis. this was analyzed in a study.
If you have a normal PSA and Digital rectal examination, the risk of
missing a cancer with PVP is very low, and it can be catched up in
follow up examinations. e.g. if your PSA is 3 ng/mL before surgery, it
might go down to 2 ng/mL after PVP, and then you have to follow it up
at regular intervals. If it went up in three successive measurements,
then you should have a biopsy. If it remains stable, then you are OK
and just have to keep doing regular checkups.

All the best,

Fernando Gómez Sancha
http://drgomezsancha2.blogspot.com
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.