Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate BPH / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tale of Two BPH Sufferers...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Chockman - 10 Dec 2005 17:27 GMT
By the way, I am 62 yrs old, had TUMT 7/2/04 followed by a PVP 2/23/05.
    Good results except for possible bladder neck involvement which may
require further incision at a later date.  Do have retro from PVP from
the single incision of the bladder neck that was done with the PVP.

I have a brother age 72 on the East Coast who has had BPH for 15 yrs.
Advised by a cousin MD to "put off doing anything about that area as
long as you can; you don't want anyone messing with that area."  My
brother has had 6-8 retention crises in that last 15 years, ended up in
ERs getting catheters put in to relief the bladder.  Now, he feels up
against it.  Getting up every hr, unable to go.  Had cystoscopy about 10
days ago.  Very painful, bloody process.  Gland is 103 grms.  Put on
Uroxatral and Avodart which has taken the wind out of his sails.  The
debate now is whether he should have a TUMT or Open Prostatectomy.  The
problem with the TUMT is that many years ago, he had a metal mesh placed
in his groin to repair an inguinal hernia.  Now the question is whether
a Targis procedure can be done safely.  TURP is out of the question due
to the size of the gland.  He doesn't have the $ resources to go to see
a URO who does PVP on larger glands (ie Dr Te).  Open Prostatectomy is
risky because of open heart surgery he had 9 yrs ago with a valve
implant, aortic aneurism repair and a bypass.  What to do???

My 72 friend is having some urgency and retention problems.  Cystoscopy
done yesterday by my PVP URO revealed some median lobe involvement.  My
friend did not find out the size of his gland.  My URO says TUMT or PVP
would help, but PVP is most likely to be his choice as he is a "perfect
candidate for PVP."  Likely my friend will opt for PVP after the first
of the year.

I write about these two people to illustrate how complicated options for
treating bph can become.  My brother now wishes that he had done
something 10 years earlier and could have avoided more complicated
procedures because of putting it off.  Something for those out there
facing bph to think about....
Al - 10 Dec 2005 18:20 GMT
Does that Dr still accept chickens and vegetables as payment for his
house calls?

> Advised by a cousin MD to "put off doing anything about that area as
> long as you can; you don't want anyone messing with that area."  
zigzag - 10 Dec 2005 18:34 GMT
What is more important than your health?  Sell the car, ask the family
for money, what is the use of a material asset if you can't live?  Te
on the east coast is one of the best.  Read My PVP on this site.
Jim W. - 11 Dec 2005 03:37 GMT
Dr. Te accepts Medicare - or did 18 mos. ago.  Jim W.

> What is more important than your health?  Sell the car, ask the family
> for money, what is the use of a material asset if you can't live?  Te
> on the east coast is one of the best.  Read My PVP on this site.
fgomsan@gmail.com - 22 Dec 2005 11:03 GMT
Dear Chokman,

I think PVP would be appropriate for your brother if you find an
experienced PVP surgeon. If it is impossible to opt for this due to
money aspects, he might want to consider learning self catheterisation.
If he does not empty his bladder after voiding, his real bladder
capacity is very small, and this could explain the high voiding
frequency he has. Some patients learn to do this and it helps them
manage their problem and avoid going to the ER if they feel they might
start developing a retention. The technique is relatively easy to learn
and one learns to live with it. Maybe self-catheterisation in and out
twice a day could improve his situation, but he should discuss this
with his urologist.

In the past, castration (this horrible word means to supress
testosterone production inside your body) was used for patients like
him. Today, this can be achieved reversibly with medical treatment, and
prostate size is markedly reduced in three months. He might want to
consider this prior to a TURP of a 50 gram prostate....

All the best,

Fernando Gómez Sancha
http://drgomezsancha2.blogspot.com
Magna - 23 Dec 2005 17:35 GMT
Hi Chockman,

what do you mean "Uroxatral and Avodart have taken the wind out of his
sails"? do you mean he is having side effects?

 Dr Sanchez, thank you for your input into this group, it is very
helpful, what are your experiences of patients on Uroxatral and
Avodart?

Regards, Magna
Chockman - 23 Dec 2005 18:56 GMT
In his case, I think he felt the side effects of the Uroxatral and
Avodart which included tiredness, irritability and the general feeling
of having the flu.  No strength and get up and go for about 10-14 days.
 I think that he also felt the aftereffects of having had a pretty
traumatic, painful, bloody cystoscopy due to the swelling and the amount
of retention that he was experiencing.  At age 72 both these factors
wiped him out to the degree that he did not feel like going out to do
his farm chores.

> Hi Chockman,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Regards, Magna
fgomsan@gmail.com - 24 Dec 2005 10:55 GMT
Magna,

Combination of an alpha blocker (uroxatral) and a 5 alpha reductase
inhibitor (avodart) seems to be more effective than taking either of
them alone. Tolerability is one of the problems of every drug, some
patients experience secondary effects that preclude continuing with the
treatment. Apparently after six months, he could quit the alphablocker
and continue experiencing the benefits, this is because avodart takes a
long time to work.

Patients seem to do well on combination treatment, but it is expensive
in the long run and it not always avoids the need for surgery or the
emergence of complications, as urinary retention.

Medical treatment of BPH was very successful because the surgical
alternatives where feared by patients (TURP and open prostatectomy are
relatively risky operations). Now with PVP I see more and more patients
that would rather go for an operation that will end their suffering
with minimal risk...

All the best,

Fernando
http://drgomezsancha.blogspot.com
Derek F - 27 Dec 2005 10:47 GMT
Magna, will 2006 be the year you join the PVP success club? You have been
sitting on the fence too long:-)
Derek.

> Hi Chockman,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Regards, Magna
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.